changing number of arguments to a function in secondary evaluationusing a Mathematica function to define a new functionConstruct a function whose definition depends on the values of its arguments and evaluates a SectionHow to get the parameter number of inbuilt functionHow to hold evaluation of a value that is passed to a functionFormatting Display PrecisionFunctions that remember some arguments while not remembering other arguments

How does Facebook track your browsing without third party cookies?

Minimum age of קידושין for a female?

Can the jeopardy of being judged be fought against in court?

Where do I put nobles/royalty in a science fiction military?

Can a Tiefling be born from two human parents?

Two super-button calculator

Produce the random variable for an asset from a uniformly distributed random varible

How do gelatinous cubes reproduce?

Minipage misalign horizontally 2 long side-by-side tables and cause them to overlap, even though plenty of space free

Plot the Pascalian triangle

Weird Power Outage in Certain Rooms- Condominium

Responding to social invitations with autism

Why does "Endgame​" have a different time travel theory?

In Flanders Fields

What is the last point where one can throw away fruits if one has indicated "not bringing any fruit" on the US customs form when flying to the US?

How to react to unfair reviewer comments?

Why don't we shield existing CPUs from radiation instead of designing new ones?

What's the difference between words "tongue" and "lingua"?

A feasible and efficient method of fast global travel?

Stop autocorrect from autocorrecting a word even if I re-type it after it has been autocorrected

What color is a wolf's coat?

Intersection of four circles

A major investor asked me (the software lead) whether the board should fire my boss (the Co-Founder and CTO). What should I do?

How to translate "cocotte en papier" in English?



changing number of arguments to a function in secondary evaluation


using a Mathematica function to define a new functionConstruct a function whose definition depends on the values of its arguments and evaluates a SectionHow to get the parameter number of inbuilt functionHow to hold evaluation of a value that is passed to a functionFormatting Display PrecisionFunctions that remember some arguments while not remembering other arguments






.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty
margin-bottom:0;

.everyonelovesstackoverflowposition:absolute;height:1px;width:1px;opacity:0;top:0;left:0;pointer-events:none;








7














$begingroup$


So I have a function that produces answers involving uninstantiated(?) function names, e.g.



 Out[1]= f[a,b,c,d].


I then want to evalute this leftover result by, say, replacing this f[a,b,c,d] with a defined function g[a,b,c,d,e].



I think something maybe to do with slots, but my poor attempts have still failed, eg.



 Out[1] /. f[##] &@g[##,e]

Out[1] /. f[___] -> g

Out[1] /. f[#1, #2, #3, #4] -> g[#1, #2, #3, #4, e]









share|improve this question










$endgroup$










  • 2




    $begingroup$
    You're mixing the concepts of pure functions (# and &) with replacement (/., ->, :>). Use slots with the first one, use patterns (Pattern in the documentation, x_ or x__ for example in usage) with the second. E.g. f[a, b, c, d] /. f[x__] :> g[x, e].
    $endgroup$
    – eyorble
    Aug 10 at 18:02











  • $begingroup$
    Aargh. This comment is an answer! I'll accept it if you want
    $endgroup$
    – nate
    Aug 10 at 18:06

















7














$begingroup$


So I have a function that produces answers involving uninstantiated(?) function names, e.g.



 Out[1]= f[a,b,c,d].


I then want to evalute this leftover result by, say, replacing this f[a,b,c,d] with a defined function g[a,b,c,d,e].



I think something maybe to do with slots, but my poor attempts have still failed, eg.



 Out[1] /. f[##] &@g[##,e]

Out[1] /. f[___] -> g

Out[1] /. f[#1, #2, #3, #4] -> g[#1, #2, #3, #4, e]









share|improve this question










$endgroup$










  • 2




    $begingroup$
    You're mixing the concepts of pure functions (# and &) with replacement (/., ->, :>). Use slots with the first one, use patterns (Pattern in the documentation, x_ or x__ for example in usage) with the second. E.g. f[a, b, c, d] /. f[x__] :> g[x, e].
    $endgroup$
    – eyorble
    Aug 10 at 18:02











  • $begingroup$
    Aargh. This comment is an answer! I'll accept it if you want
    $endgroup$
    – nate
    Aug 10 at 18:06













7












7








7


1



$begingroup$


So I have a function that produces answers involving uninstantiated(?) function names, e.g.



 Out[1]= f[a,b,c,d].


I then want to evalute this leftover result by, say, replacing this f[a,b,c,d] with a defined function g[a,b,c,d,e].



I think something maybe to do with slots, but my poor attempts have still failed, eg.



 Out[1] /. f[##] &@g[##,e]

Out[1] /. f[___] -> g

Out[1] /. f[#1, #2, #3, #4] -> g[#1, #2, #3, #4, e]









share|improve this question










$endgroup$




So I have a function that produces answers involving uninstantiated(?) function names, e.g.



 Out[1]= f[a,b,c,d].


I then want to evalute this leftover result by, say, replacing this f[a,b,c,d] with a defined function g[a,b,c,d,e].



I think something maybe to do with slots, but my poor attempts have still failed, eg.



 Out[1] /. f[##] &@g[##,e]

Out[1] /. f[___] -> g

Out[1] /. f[#1, #2, #3, #4] -> g[#1, #2, #3, #4, e]






functions argument-patterns






share|improve this question














share|improve this question











share|improve this question




share|improve this question










asked Aug 10 at 17:59









natenate

2851 silver badge7 bronze badges




2851 silver badge7 bronze badges










  • 2




    $begingroup$
    You're mixing the concepts of pure functions (# and &) with replacement (/., ->, :>). Use slots with the first one, use patterns (Pattern in the documentation, x_ or x__ for example in usage) with the second. E.g. f[a, b, c, d] /. f[x__] :> g[x, e].
    $endgroup$
    – eyorble
    Aug 10 at 18:02











  • $begingroup$
    Aargh. This comment is an answer! I'll accept it if you want
    $endgroup$
    – nate
    Aug 10 at 18:06












  • 2




    $begingroup$
    You're mixing the concepts of pure functions (# and &) with replacement (/., ->, :>). Use slots with the first one, use patterns (Pattern in the documentation, x_ or x__ for example in usage) with the second. E.g. f[a, b, c, d] /. f[x__] :> g[x, e].
    $endgroup$
    – eyorble
    Aug 10 at 18:02











  • $begingroup$
    Aargh. This comment is an answer! I'll accept it if you want
    $endgroup$
    – nate
    Aug 10 at 18:06







2




2




$begingroup$
You're mixing the concepts of pure functions (# and &) with replacement (/., ->, :>). Use slots with the first one, use patterns (Pattern in the documentation, x_ or x__ for example in usage) with the second. E.g. f[a, b, c, d] /. f[x__] :> g[x, e].
$endgroup$
– eyorble
Aug 10 at 18:02





$begingroup$
You're mixing the concepts of pure functions (# and &) with replacement (/., ->, :>). Use slots with the first one, use patterns (Pattern in the documentation, x_ or x__ for example in usage) with the second. E.g. f[a, b, c, d] /. f[x__] :> g[x, e].
$endgroup$
– eyorble
Aug 10 at 18:02













$begingroup$
Aargh. This comment is an answer! I'll accept it if you want
$endgroup$
– nate
Aug 10 at 18:06




$begingroup$
Aargh. This comment is an answer! I'll accept it if you want
$endgroup$
– nate
Aug 10 at 18:06










3 Answers
3






active

oldest

votes


















9
















$begingroup$

From my own comment:



You're mixing the concepts of pure functions (# and &) with replacement (/., ->, :>). Use slots with the first one, use patterns (Pattern in the documentation, x_ or x__ for example in usage) with the second.



For this problem:



f[a, b, c, d] /. f[x__] :> g[x, e]



g[a, b, c, d, e]




Note the use of __, which is two underscores: This is a pattern which grabs 1 or more elements (see also ___ which grabs 0 or more elements), and inserts them as a Sequence when used in replacement. Thus, it doesn't get inserted as a List.



If you wanted to do this with pure functions, it becomes a bit more complicated:



g[Sequence @@ #, e] &[f[a, b, c, d]]



g[a, b, c, d, e]




But note that this isn't dependent on its argument being in the form of f[...], it will replace any functional head. To avoid that requires conditionals of some variety, e.g:



If[Head[#] === f, g[Sequence @@ #, e], Undefined] &[f[a, b, c, d]]





share|improve this answer












$endgroup$






















    7
















    $begingroup$

    You can also use Apply:



    g[##, e] & @@ f[a, b, c, d]



    g[a, b, c, d, e]




    or ReplaceAll with replacement rule f -> (g[##, e] &):



    f[a, b, c, d] /. f -> (g[##, e] &)



    g[a, b, c, d, e]







    share|improve this answer










    $endgroup$






















      2
















      $begingroup$

      There is yet another solution, using Flatten with Head f, namely



      Flatten[g[f[a, b, c, d], e], 1, f]



      g[a, b, c, d, e]




      This assumes that g is not defined for two arguments, otherwise it will evaluate before Flatten has a chance so flatten the f. If that's not the case one can use Inactive on g, act with Flatten and then Activate again.



      Activate[Flatten[Inactive[g][f[a, b, c, d], e], 1, f]]





      share|improve this answer










      $endgroup$










      • 1




        $begingroup$
        you can also use FlattenAt: FlattenAt[g[f[a, b, c, d], e], 1] (+1)
        $endgroup$
        – kglr
        Aug 11 at 16:05













      Your Answer








      StackExchange.ready(function()
      var channelOptions =
      tags: "".split(" "),
      id: "387"
      ;
      initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

      StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
      // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
      if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
      StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
      createEditor();
      );

      else
      createEditor();

      );

      function createEditor()
      StackExchange.prepareEditor(
      heartbeatType: 'answer',
      autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
      convertImagesToLinks: false,
      noModals: true,
      showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
      reputationToPostImages: null,
      bindNavPrevention: true,
      postfix: "",
      imageUploader:
      brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
      contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/"u003ecc by-sa 4.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
      allowUrls: true
      ,
      onDemand: true,
      discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
      ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
      );



      );














      draft saved

      draft discarded
















      StackExchange.ready(
      function ()
      StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmathematica.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f203569%2fchanging-number-of-arguments-to-a-function-in-secondary-evaluation%23new-answer', 'question_page');

      );

      Post as a guest















      Required, but never shown


























      3 Answers
      3






      active

      oldest

      votes








      3 Answers
      3






      active

      oldest

      votes









      active

      oldest

      votes






      active

      oldest

      votes









      9
















      $begingroup$

      From my own comment:



      You're mixing the concepts of pure functions (# and &) with replacement (/., ->, :>). Use slots with the first one, use patterns (Pattern in the documentation, x_ or x__ for example in usage) with the second.



      For this problem:



      f[a, b, c, d] /. f[x__] :> g[x, e]



      g[a, b, c, d, e]




      Note the use of __, which is two underscores: This is a pattern which grabs 1 or more elements (see also ___ which grabs 0 or more elements), and inserts them as a Sequence when used in replacement. Thus, it doesn't get inserted as a List.



      If you wanted to do this with pure functions, it becomes a bit more complicated:



      g[Sequence @@ #, e] &[f[a, b, c, d]]



      g[a, b, c, d, e]




      But note that this isn't dependent on its argument being in the form of f[...], it will replace any functional head. To avoid that requires conditionals of some variety, e.g:



      If[Head[#] === f, g[Sequence @@ #, e], Undefined] &[f[a, b, c, d]]





      share|improve this answer












      $endgroup$



















        9
















        $begingroup$

        From my own comment:



        You're mixing the concepts of pure functions (# and &) with replacement (/., ->, :>). Use slots with the first one, use patterns (Pattern in the documentation, x_ or x__ for example in usage) with the second.



        For this problem:



        f[a, b, c, d] /. f[x__] :> g[x, e]



        g[a, b, c, d, e]




        Note the use of __, which is two underscores: This is a pattern which grabs 1 or more elements (see also ___ which grabs 0 or more elements), and inserts them as a Sequence when used in replacement. Thus, it doesn't get inserted as a List.



        If you wanted to do this with pure functions, it becomes a bit more complicated:



        g[Sequence @@ #, e] &[f[a, b, c, d]]



        g[a, b, c, d, e]




        But note that this isn't dependent on its argument being in the form of f[...], it will replace any functional head. To avoid that requires conditionals of some variety, e.g:



        If[Head[#] === f, g[Sequence @@ #, e], Undefined] &[f[a, b, c, d]]





        share|improve this answer












        $endgroup$

















          9














          9










          9







          $begingroup$

          From my own comment:



          You're mixing the concepts of pure functions (# and &) with replacement (/., ->, :>). Use slots with the first one, use patterns (Pattern in the documentation, x_ or x__ for example in usage) with the second.



          For this problem:



          f[a, b, c, d] /. f[x__] :> g[x, e]



          g[a, b, c, d, e]




          Note the use of __, which is two underscores: This is a pattern which grabs 1 or more elements (see also ___ which grabs 0 or more elements), and inserts them as a Sequence when used in replacement. Thus, it doesn't get inserted as a List.



          If you wanted to do this with pure functions, it becomes a bit more complicated:



          g[Sequence @@ #, e] &[f[a, b, c, d]]



          g[a, b, c, d, e]




          But note that this isn't dependent on its argument being in the form of f[...], it will replace any functional head. To avoid that requires conditionals of some variety, e.g:



          If[Head[#] === f, g[Sequence @@ #, e], Undefined] &[f[a, b, c, d]]





          share|improve this answer












          $endgroup$



          From my own comment:



          You're mixing the concepts of pure functions (# and &) with replacement (/., ->, :>). Use slots with the first one, use patterns (Pattern in the documentation, x_ or x__ for example in usage) with the second.



          For this problem:



          f[a, b, c, d] /. f[x__] :> g[x, e]



          g[a, b, c, d, e]




          Note the use of __, which is two underscores: This is a pattern which grabs 1 or more elements (see also ___ which grabs 0 or more elements), and inserts them as a Sequence when used in replacement. Thus, it doesn't get inserted as a List.



          If you wanted to do this with pure functions, it becomes a bit more complicated:



          g[Sequence @@ #, e] &[f[a, b, c, d]]



          g[a, b, c, d, e]




          But note that this isn't dependent on its argument being in the form of f[...], it will replace any functional head. To avoid that requires conditionals of some variety, e.g:



          If[Head[#] === f, g[Sequence @@ #, e], Undefined] &[f[a, b, c, d]]






          share|improve this answer















          share|improve this answer




          share|improve this answer








          edited Aug 10 at 18:23

























          answered Aug 10 at 18:12









          eyorbleeyorble

          6,7031 gold badge13 silver badges30 bronze badges




          6,7031 gold badge13 silver badges30 bronze badges


























              7
















              $begingroup$

              You can also use Apply:



              g[##, e] & @@ f[a, b, c, d]



              g[a, b, c, d, e]




              or ReplaceAll with replacement rule f -> (g[##, e] &):



              f[a, b, c, d] /. f -> (g[##, e] &)



              g[a, b, c, d, e]







              share|improve this answer










              $endgroup$



















                7
















                $begingroup$

                You can also use Apply:



                g[##, e] & @@ f[a, b, c, d]



                g[a, b, c, d, e]




                or ReplaceAll with replacement rule f -> (g[##, e] &):



                f[a, b, c, d] /. f -> (g[##, e] &)



                g[a, b, c, d, e]







                share|improve this answer










                $endgroup$

















                  7














                  7










                  7







                  $begingroup$

                  You can also use Apply:



                  g[##, e] & @@ f[a, b, c, d]



                  g[a, b, c, d, e]




                  or ReplaceAll with replacement rule f -> (g[##, e] &):



                  f[a, b, c, d] /. f -> (g[##, e] &)



                  g[a, b, c, d, e]







                  share|improve this answer










                  $endgroup$



                  You can also use Apply:



                  g[##, e] & @@ f[a, b, c, d]



                  g[a, b, c, d, e]




                  or ReplaceAll with replacement rule f -> (g[##, e] &):



                  f[a, b, c, d] /. f -> (g[##, e] &)



                  g[a, b, c, d, e]








                  share|improve this answer













                  share|improve this answer




                  share|improve this answer










                  answered Aug 10 at 19:24









                  kglrkglr

                  226k10 gold badges256 silver badges514 bronze badges




                  226k10 gold badges256 silver badges514 bronze badges
























                      2
















                      $begingroup$

                      There is yet another solution, using Flatten with Head f, namely



                      Flatten[g[f[a, b, c, d], e], 1, f]



                      g[a, b, c, d, e]




                      This assumes that g is not defined for two arguments, otherwise it will evaluate before Flatten has a chance so flatten the f. If that's not the case one can use Inactive on g, act with Flatten and then Activate again.



                      Activate[Flatten[Inactive[g][f[a, b, c, d], e], 1, f]]





                      share|improve this answer










                      $endgroup$










                      • 1




                        $begingroup$
                        you can also use FlattenAt: FlattenAt[g[f[a, b, c, d], e], 1] (+1)
                        $endgroup$
                        – kglr
                        Aug 11 at 16:05
















                      2
















                      $begingroup$

                      There is yet another solution, using Flatten with Head f, namely



                      Flatten[g[f[a, b, c, d], e], 1, f]



                      g[a, b, c, d, e]




                      This assumes that g is not defined for two arguments, otherwise it will evaluate before Flatten has a chance so flatten the f. If that's not the case one can use Inactive on g, act with Flatten and then Activate again.



                      Activate[Flatten[Inactive[g][f[a, b, c, d], e], 1, f]]





                      share|improve this answer










                      $endgroup$










                      • 1




                        $begingroup$
                        you can also use FlattenAt: FlattenAt[g[f[a, b, c, d], e], 1] (+1)
                        $endgroup$
                        – kglr
                        Aug 11 at 16:05














                      2














                      2










                      2







                      $begingroup$

                      There is yet another solution, using Flatten with Head f, namely



                      Flatten[g[f[a, b, c, d], e], 1, f]



                      g[a, b, c, d, e]




                      This assumes that g is not defined for two arguments, otherwise it will evaluate before Flatten has a chance so flatten the f. If that's not the case one can use Inactive on g, act with Flatten and then Activate again.



                      Activate[Flatten[Inactive[g][f[a, b, c, d], e], 1, f]]





                      share|improve this answer










                      $endgroup$



                      There is yet another solution, using Flatten with Head f, namely



                      Flatten[g[f[a, b, c, d], e], 1, f]



                      g[a, b, c, d, e]




                      This assumes that g is not defined for two arguments, otherwise it will evaluate before Flatten has a chance so flatten the f. If that's not the case one can use Inactive on g, act with Flatten and then Activate again.



                      Activate[Flatten[Inactive[g][f[a, b, c, d], e], 1, f]]






                      share|improve this answer













                      share|improve this answer




                      share|improve this answer










                      answered Aug 11 at 15:57









                      MannyCMannyC

                      3181 silver badge7 bronze badges




                      3181 silver badge7 bronze badges










                      • 1




                        $begingroup$
                        you can also use FlattenAt: FlattenAt[g[f[a, b, c, d], e], 1] (+1)
                        $endgroup$
                        – kglr
                        Aug 11 at 16:05













                      • 1




                        $begingroup$
                        you can also use FlattenAt: FlattenAt[g[f[a, b, c, d], e], 1] (+1)
                        $endgroup$
                        – kglr
                        Aug 11 at 16:05








                      1




                      1




                      $begingroup$
                      you can also use FlattenAt: FlattenAt[g[f[a, b, c, d], e], 1] (+1)
                      $endgroup$
                      – kglr
                      Aug 11 at 16:05





                      $begingroup$
                      you can also use FlattenAt: FlattenAt[g[f[a, b, c, d], e], 1] (+1)
                      $endgroup$
                      – kglr
                      Aug 11 at 16:05



















                      draft saved

                      draft discarded















































                      Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematica Stack Exchange!


                      • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                      But avoid


                      • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                      • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

                      Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


                      To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




                      draft saved


                      draft discarded














                      StackExchange.ready(
                      function ()
                      StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmathematica.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f203569%2fchanging-number-of-arguments-to-a-function-in-secondary-evaluation%23new-answer', 'question_page');

                      );

                      Post as a guest















                      Required, but never shown





















































                      Required, but never shown














                      Required, but never shown












                      Required, but never shown







                      Required, but never shown

































                      Required, but never shown














                      Required, but never shown












                      Required, but never shown







                      Required, but never shown









                      Popular posts from this blog

                      Tamil (spriik) Luke uk diar | Nawigatjuun

                      Align equal signs while including text over equalitiesAMS align: left aligned text/math plus multicolumn alignmentMultiple alignmentsAligning equations in multiple placesNumbering and aligning an equation with multiple columnsHow to align one equation with another multline equationUsing \ in environments inside the begintabularxNumber equations and preserving alignment of equal signsHow can I align equations to the left and to the right?Double equation alignment problem within align enviromentAligned within align: Why are they right-aligned?

                      Where does the image of a data connector as a sharp metal spike originate from?Where does the concept of infected people turning into zombies only after death originate from?Where does the motif of a reanimated human head originate?Where did the notion that Dragons could speak originate?Where does the archetypal image of the 'Grey' alien come from?Where did the suffix '-Man' originate?Where does the notion of being injured or killed by an illusion originate?Where did the term “sophont” originate?Where does the trope of magic spells being driven by advanced technology originate from?Where did the term “the living impaired” originate?