Can the Fixed-Term Parliaments Act be bypassed by a simple bill?Was there a precedent of circumventing Commons supermajority requirement?Can the UK government propose a motion of no confidence in itself?Why did Labour support the snap election?Is there a minimum time frame that a Prime Minister may set an early election for?Is the Fixed-term Parliaments Act binding upon the UK parliament?If, on 12 December, the House of Commons passes, by a simple majority, a vote of “no confidence” in Theresa May's government, what happens next?Were three-line whips more (or less) common before the Fixed-term Parliaments Act?By what mechanism was the 2017 UK General Election called?Is there any timeframe restriction for scheduling an early election under the Fixed-term Parliaments Act?What are the procedural differences in calling a general election “notwithstanding the FTPA”?Could a simple-majority bill for a general election, passing through both houses be amended by the SNP to provide for a further Scottish referendum?What happens if the UK government refuses to function or carry out its duties?
Configuring iPad's to not require passwords routinely
Does saddle height needs to be changed when crank length changes?
Why aren't there attempts to evolve classical musical instruments so that they're easier to play?
Harmonic sums and elementary number theory
How to solve system equations with sum and vectors
Where is the Windows license key on win 10?
Huygens Lander: Why The Short Battery Life?
Is sometimes "how I shall" = "how shall I"?
Find integer solution in equation
Character Development - Robert Baratheon
Is there a difference between downloading / installing a list of packages and downloading each packge by its own?
Why combining some command of xstring package cause error?
What does T mean in ATP rankings
Can one get into trouble if one doesn't show up at the gate 30 minutes before departure (or whatever time window the boarding pass is indicating)?
One of my friends deposited £42 into my account that he had borrowed previously. Will it affect my UK visa application?
Find the length of a number's "base-jumping" path
Two congruent triangles
Learn university maths or train for high school competitions: which is better?
How does Overleaf render LaTeX online?
Was refused in UK, should I replace my passport?
progress indicator without dynamic
Why only sine waves?
Am I being exploited by my supervisor?
Rite of Winter: How to Stop Crescian Couples from Mutual Assassination
Can the Fixed-Term Parliaments Act be bypassed by a simple bill?
Was there a precedent of circumventing Commons supermajority requirement?Can the UK government propose a motion of no confidence in itself?Why did Labour support the snap election?Is there a minimum time frame that a Prime Minister may set an early election for?Is the Fixed-term Parliaments Act binding upon the UK parliament?If, on 12 December, the House of Commons passes, by a simple majority, a vote of “no confidence” in Theresa May's government, what happens next?Were three-line whips more (or less) common before the Fixed-term Parliaments Act?By what mechanism was the 2017 UK General Election called?Is there any timeframe restriction for scheduling an early election under the Fixed-term Parliaments Act?What are the procedural differences in calling a general election “notwithstanding the FTPA”?Could a simple-majority bill for a general election, passing through both houses be amended by the SNP to provide for a further Scottish referendum?What happens if the UK government refuses to function or carry out its duties?
.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty
margin-bottom:0;
.everyonelovesstackoverflowposition:absolute;height:1px;width:1px;opacity:0;top:0;left:0;pointer-events:none;
The Fixed-Term Parliaments Act sets out the conditions for calling a general election, including a two-thirds majority vote in the House for an early general election.
But could a bill be presented to the House calling for a general election that could pass on a simple majority?
united-kingdom house-of-commons
add a comment
|
The Fixed-Term Parliaments Act sets out the conditions for calling a general election, including a two-thirds majority vote in the House for an early general election.
But could a bill be presented to the House calling for a general election that could pass on a simple majority?
united-kingdom house-of-commons
2
Passage in the commons by a simple majority is not sufficient for a bill to become law. The house of lords must also be involved.
– phoog
Sep 25 at 17:14
add a comment
|
The Fixed-Term Parliaments Act sets out the conditions for calling a general election, including a two-thirds majority vote in the House for an early general election.
But could a bill be presented to the House calling for a general election that could pass on a simple majority?
united-kingdom house-of-commons
The Fixed-Term Parliaments Act sets out the conditions for calling a general election, including a two-thirds majority vote in the House for an early general election.
But could a bill be presented to the House calling for a general election that could pass on a simple majority?
united-kingdom house-of-commons
united-kingdom house-of-commons
edited Sep 25 at 19:58
Reinstate Monica - M. Schröder
2,1962 gold badges14 silver badges36 bronze badges
2,1962 gold badges14 silver badges36 bronze badges
asked Sep 25 at 16:40
BenBen
10.1k2 gold badges24 silver badges69 bronze badges
10.1k2 gold badges24 silver badges69 bronze badges
2
Passage in the commons by a simple majority is not sufficient for a bill to become law. The house of lords must also be involved.
– phoog
Sep 25 at 17:14
add a comment
|
2
Passage in the commons by a simple majority is not sufficient for a bill to become law. The house of lords must also be involved.
– phoog
Sep 25 at 17:14
2
2
Passage in the commons by a simple majority is not sufficient for a bill to become law. The house of lords must also be involved.
– phoog
Sep 25 at 17:14
Passage in the commons by a simple majority is not sufficient for a bill to become law. The house of lords must also be involved.
– phoog
Sep 25 at 17:14
add a comment
|
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
Yes, but such a bill would have to be approved by both the Commons and the Lords (by a simple majority). Or if the Lords didn't approve it, the commons could force it through under the Parliament Act, but there would still be possibly a substantial delay.
The FTPA allows the PM to call a general election without consulting the Lords providing he or she has the votes of 2/3 of Parliament.
Notwithstanding the implicit ability of any Parliament to repeal part or all of any previous act of parliament, the FTPA sets out intentions. It is intended that a 2/3 majority should be required before a government calls an election so that the government would normally need the support of opposition parties. The FTPA describes how the process should go in the normal procedure, not how the procedure should be changed in exceptional situations.
add a comment
|
Yes. Any Act of Parliament can be amended or repealed by a later Act of Parliament.
To quote Wikipedia:
No Parliament can bind a future parliament (that is, it cannot pass a law that cannot be changed or reversed by a future Parliament).
4
@Ben: the idea is that an early general election should only occur if there is cross-party support. If there is, then all it takes is a single motion in the Commons (with the 2/3 majority). Passing a new Act of Parliament takes longer, requires the agreement of the Lords - and can be amended. The danger of opposition amendments makes this unattractive to the current government.
– Steve Melnikoff
Sep 25 at 16:59
1
With a majority vote, yes - but the current government doesn't have one.
– Steve Melnikoff
Sep 25 at 17:03
1
@Ben: a government with a majority certainly can, as it can simply decline to put it on the schedule. However, if the opposition are able to gain control of the schedule, then the govt may not be able to do that - in the Commons. In the Lords, the procedures are different, and no party has a majority, so I'm not sure; but it seems unlikely, as the Lords were content to pass the Benn bill.
– Steve Melnikoff
Sep 25 at 17:08
1
@Ben at the moment the government wants a general election and the opposition does not. So if anyone would try to bypass the FTPA with a new act of parliament it would be the government rather than the opposition.
– phoog
Sep 25 at 17:16
3
@Ben A somewhat simplified way of thinking about the situation is to believe there are three groups: hard leavers (like e.g. Gove), soft leavers (e.g. May) and remainers (e.g. Clarke). None of the groups can get their way in Parliament because the two other groups will unite to stop them. Unless it's something like the Benn Bill which aims to prevent a hard Brexit. Collectively Parliament doesn't know what it wants but knows what it doesn't want.
– richardb
Sep 26 at 8:09
|
show 5 more comments
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
Yes, but such a bill would have to be approved by both the Commons and the Lords (by a simple majority). Or if the Lords didn't approve it, the commons could force it through under the Parliament Act, but there would still be possibly a substantial delay.
The FTPA allows the PM to call a general election without consulting the Lords providing he or she has the votes of 2/3 of Parliament.
Notwithstanding the implicit ability of any Parliament to repeal part or all of any previous act of parliament, the FTPA sets out intentions. It is intended that a 2/3 majority should be required before a government calls an election so that the government would normally need the support of opposition parties. The FTPA describes how the process should go in the normal procedure, not how the procedure should be changed in exceptional situations.
add a comment
|
Yes, but such a bill would have to be approved by both the Commons and the Lords (by a simple majority). Or if the Lords didn't approve it, the commons could force it through under the Parliament Act, but there would still be possibly a substantial delay.
The FTPA allows the PM to call a general election without consulting the Lords providing he or she has the votes of 2/3 of Parliament.
Notwithstanding the implicit ability of any Parliament to repeal part or all of any previous act of parliament, the FTPA sets out intentions. It is intended that a 2/3 majority should be required before a government calls an election so that the government would normally need the support of opposition parties. The FTPA describes how the process should go in the normal procedure, not how the procedure should be changed in exceptional situations.
add a comment
|
Yes, but such a bill would have to be approved by both the Commons and the Lords (by a simple majority). Or if the Lords didn't approve it, the commons could force it through under the Parliament Act, but there would still be possibly a substantial delay.
The FTPA allows the PM to call a general election without consulting the Lords providing he or she has the votes of 2/3 of Parliament.
Notwithstanding the implicit ability of any Parliament to repeal part or all of any previous act of parliament, the FTPA sets out intentions. It is intended that a 2/3 majority should be required before a government calls an election so that the government would normally need the support of opposition parties. The FTPA describes how the process should go in the normal procedure, not how the procedure should be changed in exceptional situations.
Yes, but such a bill would have to be approved by both the Commons and the Lords (by a simple majority). Or if the Lords didn't approve it, the commons could force it through under the Parliament Act, but there would still be possibly a substantial delay.
The FTPA allows the PM to call a general election without consulting the Lords providing he or she has the votes of 2/3 of Parliament.
Notwithstanding the implicit ability of any Parliament to repeal part or all of any previous act of parliament, the FTPA sets out intentions. It is intended that a 2/3 majority should be required before a government calls an election so that the government would normally need the support of opposition parties. The FTPA describes how the process should go in the normal procedure, not how the procedure should be changed in exceptional situations.
edited Sep 25 at 17:03
answered Sep 25 at 16:48
James KJames K
46.1k8 gold badges128 silver badges191 bronze badges
46.1k8 gold badges128 silver badges191 bronze badges
add a comment
|
add a comment
|
Yes. Any Act of Parliament can be amended or repealed by a later Act of Parliament.
To quote Wikipedia:
No Parliament can bind a future parliament (that is, it cannot pass a law that cannot be changed or reversed by a future Parliament).
4
@Ben: the idea is that an early general election should only occur if there is cross-party support. If there is, then all it takes is a single motion in the Commons (with the 2/3 majority). Passing a new Act of Parliament takes longer, requires the agreement of the Lords - and can be amended. The danger of opposition amendments makes this unattractive to the current government.
– Steve Melnikoff
Sep 25 at 16:59
1
With a majority vote, yes - but the current government doesn't have one.
– Steve Melnikoff
Sep 25 at 17:03
1
@Ben: a government with a majority certainly can, as it can simply decline to put it on the schedule. However, if the opposition are able to gain control of the schedule, then the govt may not be able to do that - in the Commons. In the Lords, the procedures are different, and no party has a majority, so I'm not sure; but it seems unlikely, as the Lords were content to pass the Benn bill.
– Steve Melnikoff
Sep 25 at 17:08
1
@Ben at the moment the government wants a general election and the opposition does not. So if anyone would try to bypass the FTPA with a new act of parliament it would be the government rather than the opposition.
– phoog
Sep 25 at 17:16
3
@Ben A somewhat simplified way of thinking about the situation is to believe there are three groups: hard leavers (like e.g. Gove), soft leavers (e.g. May) and remainers (e.g. Clarke). None of the groups can get their way in Parliament because the two other groups will unite to stop them. Unless it's something like the Benn Bill which aims to prevent a hard Brexit. Collectively Parliament doesn't know what it wants but knows what it doesn't want.
– richardb
Sep 26 at 8:09
|
show 5 more comments
Yes. Any Act of Parliament can be amended or repealed by a later Act of Parliament.
To quote Wikipedia:
No Parliament can bind a future parliament (that is, it cannot pass a law that cannot be changed or reversed by a future Parliament).
4
@Ben: the idea is that an early general election should only occur if there is cross-party support. If there is, then all it takes is a single motion in the Commons (with the 2/3 majority). Passing a new Act of Parliament takes longer, requires the agreement of the Lords - and can be amended. The danger of opposition amendments makes this unattractive to the current government.
– Steve Melnikoff
Sep 25 at 16:59
1
With a majority vote, yes - but the current government doesn't have one.
– Steve Melnikoff
Sep 25 at 17:03
1
@Ben: a government with a majority certainly can, as it can simply decline to put it on the schedule. However, if the opposition are able to gain control of the schedule, then the govt may not be able to do that - in the Commons. In the Lords, the procedures are different, and no party has a majority, so I'm not sure; but it seems unlikely, as the Lords were content to pass the Benn bill.
– Steve Melnikoff
Sep 25 at 17:08
1
@Ben at the moment the government wants a general election and the opposition does not. So if anyone would try to bypass the FTPA with a new act of parliament it would be the government rather than the opposition.
– phoog
Sep 25 at 17:16
3
@Ben A somewhat simplified way of thinking about the situation is to believe there are three groups: hard leavers (like e.g. Gove), soft leavers (e.g. May) and remainers (e.g. Clarke). None of the groups can get their way in Parliament because the two other groups will unite to stop them. Unless it's something like the Benn Bill which aims to prevent a hard Brexit. Collectively Parliament doesn't know what it wants but knows what it doesn't want.
– richardb
Sep 26 at 8:09
|
show 5 more comments
Yes. Any Act of Parliament can be amended or repealed by a later Act of Parliament.
To quote Wikipedia:
No Parliament can bind a future parliament (that is, it cannot pass a law that cannot be changed or reversed by a future Parliament).
Yes. Any Act of Parliament can be amended or repealed by a later Act of Parliament.
To quote Wikipedia:
No Parliament can bind a future parliament (that is, it cannot pass a law that cannot be changed or reversed by a future Parliament).
answered Sep 25 at 16:53
Steve MelnikoffSteve Melnikoff
7,9462 gold badges26 silver badges49 bronze badges
7,9462 gold badges26 silver badges49 bronze badges
4
@Ben: the idea is that an early general election should only occur if there is cross-party support. If there is, then all it takes is a single motion in the Commons (with the 2/3 majority). Passing a new Act of Parliament takes longer, requires the agreement of the Lords - and can be amended. The danger of opposition amendments makes this unattractive to the current government.
– Steve Melnikoff
Sep 25 at 16:59
1
With a majority vote, yes - but the current government doesn't have one.
– Steve Melnikoff
Sep 25 at 17:03
1
@Ben: a government with a majority certainly can, as it can simply decline to put it on the schedule. However, if the opposition are able to gain control of the schedule, then the govt may not be able to do that - in the Commons. In the Lords, the procedures are different, and no party has a majority, so I'm not sure; but it seems unlikely, as the Lords were content to pass the Benn bill.
– Steve Melnikoff
Sep 25 at 17:08
1
@Ben at the moment the government wants a general election and the opposition does not. So if anyone would try to bypass the FTPA with a new act of parliament it would be the government rather than the opposition.
– phoog
Sep 25 at 17:16
3
@Ben A somewhat simplified way of thinking about the situation is to believe there are three groups: hard leavers (like e.g. Gove), soft leavers (e.g. May) and remainers (e.g. Clarke). None of the groups can get their way in Parliament because the two other groups will unite to stop them. Unless it's something like the Benn Bill which aims to prevent a hard Brexit. Collectively Parliament doesn't know what it wants but knows what it doesn't want.
– richardb
Sep 26 at 8:09
|
show 5 more comments
4
@Ben: the idea is that an early general election should only occur if there is cross-party support. If there is, then all it takes is a single motion in the Commons (with the 2/3 majority). Passing a new Act of Parliament takes longer, requires the agreement of the Lords - and can be amended. The danger of opposition amendments makes this unattractive to the current government.
– Steve Melnikoff
Sep 25 at 16:59
1
With a majority vote, yes - but the current government doesn't have one.
– Steve Melnikoff
Sep 25 at 17:03
1
@Ben: a government with a majority certainly can, as it can simply decline to put it on the schedule. However, if the opposition are able to gain control of the schedule, then the govt may not be able to do that - in the Commons. In the Lords, the procedures are different, and no party has a majority, so I'm not sure; but it seems unlikely, as the Lords were content to pass the Benn bill.
– Steve Melnikoff
Sep 25 at 17:08
1
@Ben at the moment the government wants a general election and the opposition does not. So if anyone would try to bypass the FTPA with a new act of parliament it would be the government rather than the opposition.
– phoog
Sep 25 at 17:16
3
@Ben A somewhat simplified way of thinking about the situation is to believe there are three groups: hard leavers (like e.g. Gove), soft leavers (e.g. May) and remainers (e.g. Clarke). None of the groups can get their way in Parliament because the two other groups will unite to stop them. Unless it's something like the Benn Bill which aims to prevent a hard Brexit. Collectively Parliament doesn't know what it wants but knows what it doesn't want.
– richardb
Sep 26 at 8:09
4
4
@Ben: the idea is that an early general election should only occur if there is cross-party support. If there is, then all it takes is a single motion in the Commons (with the 2/3 majority). Passing a new Act of Parliament takes longer, requires the agreement of the Lords - and can be amended. The danger of opposition amendments makes this unattractive to the current government.
– Steve Melnikoff
Sep 25 at 16:59
@Ben: the idea is that an early general election should only occur if there is cross-party support. If there is, then all it takes is a single motion in the Commons (with the 2/3 majority). Passing a new Act of Parliament takes longer, requires the agreement of the Lords - and can be amended. The danger of opposition amendments makes this unattractive to the current government.
– Steve Melnikoff
Sep 25 at 16:59
1
1
With a majority vote, yes - but the current government doesn't have one.
– Steve Melnikoff
Sep 25 at 17:03
With a majority vote, yes - but the current government doesn't have one.
– Steve Melnikoff
Sep 25 at 17:03
1
1
@Ben: a government with a majority certainly can, as it can simply decline to put it on the schedule. However, if the opposition are able to gain control of the schedule, then the govt may not be able to do that - in the Commons. In the Lords, the procedures are different, and no party has a majority, so I'm not sure; but it seems unlikely, as the Lords were content to pass the Benn bill.
– Steve Melnikoff
Sep 25 at 17:08
@Ben: a government with a majority certainly can, as it can simply decline to put it on the schedule. However, if the opposition are able to gain control of the schedule, then the govt may not be able to do that - in the Commons. In the Lords, the procedures are different, and no party has a majority, so I'm not sure; but it seems unlikely, as the Lords were content to pass the Benn bill.
– Steve Melnikoff
Sep 25 at 17:08
1
1
@Ben at the moment the government wants a general election and the opposition does not. So if anyone would try to bypass the FTPA with a new act of parliament it would be the government rather than the opposition.
– phoog
Sep 25 at 17:16
@Ben at the moment the government wants a general election and the opposition does not. So if anyone would try to bypass the FTPA with a new act of parliament it would be the government rather than the opposition.
– phoog
Sep 25 at 17:16
3
3
@Ben A somewhat simplified way of thinking about the situation is to believe there are three groups: hard leavers (like e.g. Gove), soft leavers (e.g. May) and remainers (e.g. Clarke). None of the groups can get their way in Parliament because the two other groups will unite to stop them. Unless it's something like the Benn Bill which aims to prevent a hard Brexit. Collectively Parliament doesn't know what it wants but knows what it doesn't want.
– richardb
Sep 26 at 8:09
@Ben A somewhat simplified way of thinking about the situation is to believe there are three groups: hard leavers (like e.g. Gove), soft leavers (e.g. May) and remainers (e.g. Clarke). None of the groups can get their way in Parliament because the two other groups will unite to stop them. Unless it's something like the Benn Bill which aims to prevent a hard Brexit. Collectively Parliament doesn't know what it wants but knows what it doesn't want.
– richardb
Sep 26 at 8:09
|
show 5 more comments
2
Passage in the commons by a simple majority is not sufficient for a bill to become law. The house of lords must also be involved.
– phoog
Sep 25 at 17:14