Distance from One Planned maintenance scheduled April 17/18, 2019 at 00:00UTC (8:00pm US/Eastern) Announcing the arrival of Valued Associate #679: Cesar Manara Unicorn Meta Zoo #1: Why another podcast?Find a high-scoring 53-digit prime number chainDo better than chanceMaking π from 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9Eight distinct numbers in the tableMy time-travelling adventureLeast amount of (n)x(n+1) tiles to perfectly cover a 7x7 floor with two irregular tilesI am not sure if this is related to magic squares but is something that is unanswered in my mind since I was a kidMore than equilibriumAn odd way to subtract digitsHappy Pi-Day! Try to solve this “PiDoku”

How do I automatically answer y in bash script?

When communicating altitude with a '9' in it, should it be pronounced "nine hundred" or "niner hundred"?

How to rotate it perfectly?

Why use gamma over alpha radiation?

Unable to start mainnet node docker container

Biased dice probability question

Is drag coefficient lowest at zero angle of attack?

What do you call the holes in a flute?

Antler Helmet: Can it work?

Stars Make Stars

Cauchy Sequence Characterized only By Directly Neighbouring Sequence Members

What is the largest species of polychaete?

What was the last x86 CPU that did not have the x87 floating-point unit built in?

What is the electric potential inside a point charge?

What do I do if technical issues prevent me from filing my return on time?

Passing functions in C++

How do I keep my slimes from escaping their pens?

Are my PIs rude or am I just being too sensitive?

Can a zero nonce be safely used with AES-GCM if the key is random and never used again?

Was credit for the black hole image misattributed?

Is 1 ppb equal to 1 μg/kg?

How many things? AとBがふたつ

Determine whether f is a function, an injection, a surjection

Classification of bundles, Postnikov towers, obstruction theory, local coefficients



Distance from One



Planned maintenance scheduled April 17/18, 2019 at 00:00UTC (8:00pm US/Eastern)
Announcing the arrival of Valued Associate #679: Cesar Manara
Unicorn Meta Zoo #1: Why another podcast?Find a high-scoring 53-digit prime number chainDo better than chanceMaking π from 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9Eight distinct numbers in the tableMy time-travelling adventureLeast amount of (n)x(n+1) tiles to perfectly cover a 7x7 floor with two irregular tilesI am not sure if this is related to magic squares but is something that is unanswered in my mind since I was a kidMore than equilibriumAn odd way to subtract digitsHappy Pi-Day! Try to solve this “PiDoku”










1












$begingroup$


For random natural number $N_0 > 1$, we find $N_1$ by the rule:




$N_i+1 = fracN_i2$ if $N_i$ is even



$N_i+1 = 3N_i + 1$ if $N_i$ is odd




If $N_1$ isn't equal to $1$, we find $N_2$ by applying the same rule on $N_1$.



$N_0$ is at a distance $X$ from $1$, when after exactly $X$ applications of the rule, we get $1$ for the first time.




What's the amount of natural numbers at distance 61 from 1 ?











share|improve this question











$endgroup$











  • $begingroup$
    This stems from the $3n+1$ conjecture! $(+1)$ :D
    $endgroup$
    – user477343
    Apr 11 at 11:48











  • $begingroup$
    Clarification needed: is the final question "what is the sum of all the natural numbers that are a distance of 61 from 1?", or does this mean "how many natural numbers are a distance of 61 from 1?"
    $endgroup$
    – Hugh
    Apr 11 at 21:03










  • $begingroup$
    It's asking how many (count)
    $endgroup$
    – Kradec na kysmet
    2 days ago















1












$begingroup$


For random natural number $N_0 > 1$, we find $N_1$ by the rule:




$N_i+1 = fracN_i2$ if $N_i$ is even



$N_i+1 = 3N_i + 1$ if $N_i$ is odd




If $N_1$ isn't equal to $1$, we find $N_2$ by applying the same rule on $N_1$.



$N_0$ is at a distance $X$ from $1$, when after exactly $X$ applications of the rule, we get $1$ for the first time.




What's the amount of natural numbers at distance 61 from 1 ?











share|improve this question











$endgroup$











  • $begingroup$
    This stems from the $3n+1$ conjecture! $(+1)$ :D
    $endgroup$
    – user477343
    Apr 11 at 11:48











  • $begingroup$
    Clarification needed: is the final question "what is the sum of all the natural numbers that are a distance of 61 from 1?", or does this mean "how many natural numbers are a distance of 61 from 1?"
    $endgroup$
    – Hugh
    Apr 11 at 21:03










  • $begingroup$
    It's asking how many (count)
    $endgroup$
    – Kradec na kysmet
    2 days ago













1












1








1





$begingroup$


For random natural number $N_0 > 1$, we find $N_1$ by the rule:




$N_i+1 = fracN_i2$ if $N_i$ is even



$N_i+1 = 3N_i + 1$ if $N_i$ is odd




If $N_1$ isn't equal to $1$, we find $N_2$ by applying the same rule on $N_1$.



$N_0$ is at a distance $X$ from $1$, when after exactly $X$ applications of the rule, we get $1$ for the first time.




What's the amount of natural numbers at distance 61 from 1 ?











share|improve this question











$endgroup$




For random natural number $N_0 > 1$, we find $N_1$ by the rule:




$N_i+1 = fracN_i2$ if $N_i$ is even



$N_i+1 = 3N_i + 1$ if $N_i$ is odd




If $N_1$ isn't equal to $1$, we find $N_2$ by applying the same rule on $N_1$.



$N_0$ is at a distance $X$ from $1$, when after exactly $X$ applications of the rule, we get $1$ for the first time.




What's the amount of natural numbers at distance 61 from 1 ?








mathematics






share|improve this question















share|improve this question













share|improve this question




share|improve this question








edited Apr 11 at 11:15









jafe

26k475255




26k475255










asked Apr 11 at 11:00









Kradec na kysmetKradec na kysmet

918




918











  • $begingroup$
    This stems from the $3n+1$ conjecture! $(+1)$ :D
    $endgroup$
    – user477343
    Apr 11 at 11:48











  • $begingroup$
    Clarification needed: is the final question "what is the sum of all the natural numbers that are a distance of 61 from 1?", or does this mean "how many natural numbers are a distance of 61 from 1?"
    $endgroup$
    – Hugh
    Apr 11 at 21:03










  • $begingroup$
    It's asking how many (count)
    $endgroup$
    – Kradec na kysmet
    2 days ago
















  • $begingroup$
    This stems from the $3n+1$ conjecture! $(+1)$ :D
    $endgroup$
    – user477343
    Apr 11 at 11:48











  • $begingroup$
    Clarification needed: is the final question "what is the sum of all the natural numbers that are a distance of 61 from 1?", or does this mean "how many natural numbers are a distance of 61 from 1?"
    $endgroup$
    – Hugh
    Apr 11 at 21:03










  • $begingroup$
    It's asking how many (count)
    $endgroup$
    – Kradec na kysmet
    2 days ago















$begingroup$
This stems from the $3n+1$ conjecture! $(+1)$ :D
$endgroup$
– user477343
Apr 11 at 11:48





$begingroup$
This stems from the $3n+1$ conjecture! $(+1)$ :D
$endgroup$
– user477343
Apr 11 at 11:48













$begingroup$
Clarification needed: is the final question "what is the sum of all the natural numbers that are a distance of 61 from 1?", or does this mean "how many natural numbers are a distance of 61 from 1?"
$endgroup$
– Hugh
Apr 11 at 21:03




$begingroup$
Clarification needed: is the final question "what is the sum of all the natural numbers that are a distance of 61 from 1?", or does this mean "how many natural numbers are a distance of 61 from 1?"
$endgroup$
– Hugh
Apr 11 at 21:03












$begingroup$
It's asking how many (count)
$endgroup$
– Kradec na kysmet
2 days ago




$begingroup$
It's asking how many (count)
$endgroup$
– Kradec na kysmet
2 days ago










1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes


















9












$begingroup$

I don't know if this is strictly a puzzle but more of a computational programming exercise.



Many people on this site will already be familiar with the iterative function in the set-up to this problem as that from the famous Collatz conjecture. As you would expect, much research has been conducted into the properties of this function and there is even an entry on OEIS which describes the number of numbers that are exactly $n$ steps away from $1$, see here.



The value for $61$ is not listed here but they do give functions in a few different languages to obtain the number of steps for arbitrary $n$, and, saying that, it's not terribly difficult to write one yourself, for which the result is




$$1040490$$




Some other interesting things




This is a nice graph from Wikipedia showing the numbers which are within $20$ steps of $1$: enter image description here Also, the general pattern of the sequence tends to settle into exponential growth with ratio between adjacent terms thought to approach $frac3 + sqrt216$, which is something I didn't know before.







share|improve this answer









$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    The link you shared is for just 3*x + 1
    $endgroup$
    – Kradec na kysmet
    Apr 11 at 11:51






  • 2




    $begingroup$
    @Kradecnakysmet It's sometimes called the "3x+1" problem but the set-up is as you've described.
    $endgroup$
    – hexomino
    Apr 11 at 11:53










  • $begingroup$
    How did you count it so fast, is there formula for it ?
    $endgroup$
    – Kradec na kysmet
    Apr 11 at 12:23










  • $begingroup$
    Here's one interesting way to look at this issue: once you hit 2^X, you are X steps away from 1. The only way to get to 1 is to be at 2, then 4, etc. So, really your somewhat random walk ends on any power of 2.
    $endgroup$
    – Jim
    Apr 11 at 18:40












Your Answer








StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "559"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);

else
createEditor();

);

function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader:
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
,
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);



);













draft saved

draft discarded


















StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fpuzzling.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f81644%2fdistance-from-one%23new-answer', 'question_page');

);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown

























1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes








1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes









9












$begingroup$

I don't know if this is strictly a puzzle but more of a computational programming exercise.



Many people on this site will already be familiar with the iterative function in the set-up to this problem as that from the famous Collatz conjecture. As you would expect, much research has been conducted into the properties of this function and there is even an entry on OEIS which describes the number of numbers that are exactly $n$ steps away from $1$, see here.



The value for $61$ is not listed here but they do give functions in a few different languages to obtain the number of steps for arbitrary $n$, and, saying that, it's not terribly difficult to write one yourself, for which the result is




$$1040490$$




Some other interesting things




This is a nice graph from Wikipedia showing the numbers which are within $20$ steps of $1$: enter image description here Also, the general pattern of the sequence tends to settle into exponential growth with ratio between adjacent terms thought to approach $frac3 + sqrt216$, which is something I didn't know before.







share|improve this answer









$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    The link you shared is for just 3*x + 1
    $endgroup$
    – Kradec na kysmet
    Apr 11 at 11:51






  • 2




    $begingroup$
    @Kradecnakysmet It's sometimes called the "3x+1" problem but the set-up is as you've described.
    $endgroup$
    – hexomino
    Apr 11 at 11:53










  • $begingroup$
    How did you count it so fast, is there formula for it ?
    $endgroup$
    – Kradec na kysmet
    Apr 11 at 12:23










  • $begingroup$
    Here's one interesting way to look at this issue: once you hit 2^X, you are X steps away from 1. The only way to get to 1 is to be at 2, then 4, etc. So, really your somewhat random walk ends on any power of 2.
    $endgroup$
    – Jim
    Apr 11 at 18:40
















9












$begingroup$

I don't know if this is strictly a puzzle but more of a computational programming exercise.



Many people on this site will already be familiar with the iterative function in the set-up to this problem as that from the famous Collatz conjecture. As you would expect, much research has been conducted into the properties of this function and there is even an entry on OEIS which describes the number of numbers that are exactly $n$ steps away from $1$, see here.



The value for $61$ is not listed here but they do give functions in a few different languages to obtain the number of steps for arbitrary $n$, and, saying that, it's not terribly difficult to write one yourself, for which the result is




$$1040490$$




Some other interesting things




This is a nice graph from Wikipedia showing the numbers which are within $20$ steps of $1$: enter image description here Also, the general pattern of the sequence tends to settle into exponential growth with ratio between adjacent terms thought to approach $frac3 + sqrt216$, which is something I didn't know before.







share|improve this answer









$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    The link you shared is for just 3*x + 1
    $endgroup$
    – Kradec na kysmet
    Apr 11 at 11:51






  • 2




    $begingroup$
    @Kradecnakysmet It's sometimes called the "3x+1" problem but the set-up is as you've described.
    $endgroup$
    – hexomino
    Apr 11 at 11:53










  • $begingroup$
    How did you count it so fast, is there formula for it ?
    $endgroup$
    – Kradec na kysmet
    Apr 11 at 12:23










  • $begingroup$
    Here's one interesting way to look at this issue: once you hit 2^X, you are X steps away from 1. The only way to get to 1 is to be at 2, then 4, etc. So, really your somewhat random walk ends on any power of 2.
    $endgroup$
    – Jim
    Apr 11 at 18:40














9












9








9





$begingroup$

I don't know if this is strictly a puzzle but more of a computational programming exercise.



Many people on this site will already be familiar with the iterative function in the set-up to this problem as that from the famous Collatz conjecture. As you would expect, much research has been conducted into the properties of this function and there is even an entry on OEIS which describes the number of numbers that are exactly $n$ steps away from $1$, see here.



The value for $61$ is not listed here but they do give functions in a few different languages to obtain the number of steps for arbitrary $n$, and, saying that, it's not terribly difficult to write one yourself, for which the result is




$$1040490$$




Some other interesting things




This is a nice graph from Wikipedia showing the numbers which are within $20$ steps of $1$: enter image description here Also, the general pattern of the sequence tends to settle into exponential growth with ratio between adjacent terms thought to approach $frac3 + sqrt216$, which is something I didn't know before.







share|improve this answer









$endgroup$



I don't know if this is strictly a puzzle but more of a computational programming exercise.



Many people on this site will already be familiar with the iterative function in the set-up to this problem as that from the famous Collatz conjecture. As you would expect, much research has been conducted into the properties of this function and there is even an entry on OEIS which describes the number of numbers that are exactly $n$ steps away from $1$, see here.



The value for $61$ is not listed here but they do give functions in a few different languages to obtain the number of steps for arbitrary $n$, and, saying that, it's not terribly difficult to write one yourself, for which the result is




$$1040490$$




Some other interesting things




This is a nice graph from Wikipedia showing the numbers which are within $20$ steps of $1$: enter image description here Also, the general pattern of the sequence tends to settle into exponential growth with ratio between adjacent terms thought to approach $frac3 + sqrt216$, which is something I didn't know before.








share|improve this answer












share|improve this answer



share|improve this answer










answered Apr 11 at 11:42









hexominohexomino

47.1k4143221




47.1k4143221











  • $begingroup$
    The link you shared is for just 3*x + 1
    $endgroup$
    – Kradec na kysmet
    Apr 11 at 11:51






  • 2




    $begingroup$
    @Kradecnakysmet It's sometimes called the "3x+1" problem but the set-up is as you've described.
    $endgroup$
    – hexomino
    Apr 11 at 11:53










  • $begingroup$
    How did you count it so fast, is there formula for it ?
    $endgroup$
    – Kradec na kysmet
    Apr 11 at 12:23










  • $begingroup$
    Here's one interesting way to look at this issue: once you hit 2^X, you are X steps away from 1. The only way to get to 1 is to be at 2, then 4, etc. So, really your somewhat random walk ends on any power of 2.
    $endgroup$
    – Jim
    Apr 11 at 18:40

















  • $begingroup$
    The link you shared is for just 3*x + 1
    $endgroup$
    – Kradec na kysmet
    Apr 11 at 11:51






  • 2




    $begingroup$
    @Kradecnakysmet It's sometimes called the "3x+1" problem but the set-up is as you've described.
    $endgroup$
    – hexomino
    Apr 11 at 11:53










  • $begingroup$
    How did you count it so fast, is there formula for it ?
    $endgroup$
    – Kradec na kysmet
    Apr 11 at 12:23










  • $begingroup$
    Here's one interesting way to look at this issue: once you hit 2^X, you are X steps away from 1. The only way to get to 1 is to be at 2, then 4, etc. So, really your somewhat random walk ends on any power of 2.
    $endgroup$
    – Jim
    Apr 11 at 18:40
















$begingroup$
The link you shared is for just 3*x + 1
$endgroup$
– Kradec na kysmet
Apr 11 at 11:51




$begingroup$
The link you shared is for just 3*x + 1
$endgroup$
– Kradec na kysmet
Apr 11 at 11:51




2




2




$begingroup$
@Kradecnakysmet It's sometimes called the "3x+1" problem but the set-up is as you've described.
$endgroup$
– hexomino
Apr 11 at 11:53




$begingroup$
@Kradecnakysmet It's sometimes called the "3x+1" problem but the set-up is as you've described.
$endgroup$
– hexomino
Apr 11 at 11:53












$begingroup$
How did you count it so fast, is there formula for it ?
$endgroup$
– Kradec na kysmet
Apr 11 at 12:23




$begingroup$
How did you count it so fast, is there formula for it ?
$endgroup$
– Kradec na kysmet
Apr 11 at 12:23












$begingroup$
Here's one interesting way to look at this issue: once you hit 2^X, you are X steps away from 1. The only way to get to 1 is to be at 2, then 4, etc. So, really your somewhat random walk ends on any power of 2.
$endgroup$
– Jim
Apr 11 at 18:40





$begingroup$
Here's one interesting way to look at this issue: once you hit 2^X, you are X steps away from 1. The only way to get to 1 is to be at 2, then 4, etc. So, really your somewhat random walk ends on any power of 2.
$endgroup$
– Jim
Apr 11 at 18:40


















draft saved

draft discarded
















































Thanks for contributing an answer to Puzzling Stack Exchange!


  • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

But avoid


  • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

  • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




draft saved


draft discarded














StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fpuzzling.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f81644%2fdistance-from-one%23new-answer', 'question_page');

);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown





















































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown

































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown







Popular posts from this blog

Tamil (spriik) Luke uk diar | Nawigatjuun

Align equal signs while including text over equalitiesAMS align: left aligned text/math plus multicolumn alignmentMultiple alignmentsAligning equations in multiple placesNumbering and aligning an equation with multiple columnsHow to align one equation with another multline equationUsing \ in environments inside the begintabularxNumber equations and preserving alignment of equal signsHow can I align equations to the left and to the right?Double equation alignment problem within align enviromentAligned within align: Why are they right-aligned?

Training a classifier when some of the features are unknownWhy does Gradient Boosting regression predict negative values when there are no negative y-values in my training set?How to improve an existing (trained) classifier?What is effect when I set up some self defined predisctor variables?Why Matlab neural network classification returns decimal values on prediction dataset?Fitting and transforming text data in training, testing, and validation setsHow to quantify the performance of the classifier (multi-class SVM) using the test data?How do I control for some patients providing multiple samples in my training data?Training and Test setTraining a convolutional neural network for image denoising in MatlabShouldn't an autoencoder with #(neurons in hidden layer) = #(neurons in input layer) be “perfect”?