How to find the determinant of this matrix? (A spherical-Cartesian transformation Jacobian matrix) The 2019 Stack Overflow Developer Survey Results Are InHow to compute the following JacobianCalculating the Jacobian of inverse functionsMatrix calculation with sinusoidsUsing the Jacobian matrix to find surface area without a change of basis.Transforming vector field into spherical coordinates. Why and how does this method work?Compute the determinant of circulant matrix with entries $cos jtheta$Find the rotation/reflection angle for orthogonal matrix AJacobian matrix vs. Transformation matrixFurthest point in direction ellipsoid with Newton's methodCalculate the determinant of this $5 times 5$ matrixWhat is the correct matrix form for transforming spherical coordinate to Cartesian?

What did it mean to "align" a radio?

Which Sci-Fi work first showed weapon of galactic-scale mass destruction?

How to support a colleague who finds meetings extremely tiring?

Right tool to dig six foot holes?

Should I use my personal e-mail address, or my workplace one, when registering to external websites for work purposes?

Button changing it's text & action. Good or terrible?

Apparent duplicates between Haynes service instructions and MOT

Are there incongruent pythagorean triangles with the same perimeter and same area?

What is the meaning of Triage in Cybersec world?

Building a conditional check constraint

Worn-tile Scrabble

Geography at the pixel level

What do the Banks children have against barley water?

What is the motivation for a law requiring 2 parties to consent for recording a conversation

Identify This Plant (Flower)

What to do when moving next to a bird sanctuary with a loosely-domesticated cat?

Am I thawing this London Broil safely?

One word riddle: Vowel in the middle

Shouldn't "much" here be used instead of "more"?

Can you compress metal and what would be the consequences?

What is the meaning of the verb "bear" in this context?

What does ひと匙 mean in this manga and has it been used colloquially?

Why isn't airport relocation done gradually?

Output the Arecibo Message



How to find the determinant of this matrix? (A spherical-Cartesian transformation Jacobian matrix)



The 2019 Stack Overflow Developer Survey Results Are InHow to compute the following JacobianCalculating the Jacobian of inverse functionsMatrix calculation with sinusoidsUsing the Jacobian matrix to find surface area without a change of basis.Transforming vector field into spherical coordinates. Why and how does this method work?Compute the determinant of circulant matrix with entries $cos jtheta$Find the rotation/reflection angle for orthogonal matrix AJacobian matrix vs. Transformation matrixFurthest point in direction ellipsoid with Newton's methodCalculate the determinant of this $5 times 5$ matrixWhat is the correct matrix form for transforming spherical coordinate to Cartesian?










5












$begingroup$


I meet a difficult determinant question as the followings:
$$
textMatrix A is given as:
$$

$$
A=beginbmatrixfracpartial xpartial r&fracpartial xpartialtheta&fracpartial xpartialphi\fracpartial ypartial r&fracpartial ypartialtheta&fracpartial ypartialphi\fracpartial zpartial r&fracpartial zpartialtheta&fracpartial zpartialphiendbmatrix
$$

$$
textwhere x=rsinthetacosphitext, y=rsinthetasinphitext, and z=rcostheta.text Find determinants det(A)text, det(A^-1)text, and det(A^2).
$$

I tried to simplify it, but just got:
$$
A=beginbmatrixsinthetacosphi&rcosthetacosphi&-rsinthetasinphi\sinthetasinphi&rcosthetasinphi&rsinthetacosphi\costheta&-rsintheta&0endbmatrix
$$

Because it is wired, I have also searched the Internet. But till now all I know is that this is just a spherical-Cartesian transformation formula using Jacobian matrix. (Maybe we can make a breakthough here?)

I can only solve $det(A)$ by directly calculating it, $det(A)=r^2sintheta$ .

However, I think it is still hard to find the inverse matrix, needless to say the huge calculation to get $A^2$. As I think, there must be some ways to simplify it.

Could anyone kindly teach me that whether there is any way to simplify $A$, so as to calculate the determinant?Thank you!










share|cite|improve this question









New contributor




Peter Nova is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.







$endgroup$











  • $begingroup$
    Why can't you "solve" (=calculate?) $det A$? It's bare for calculation.
    $endgroup$
    – Saucy O'Path
    2 days ago










  • $begingroup$
    Thank you @Saucy O'Path, it is true that we just need to calculate, then we could get det(A)=r^2sinθ. I initially thought that maybe we could simplify A by add/sub the row/cow of the matrix to make things easier......
    $endgroup$
    – Peter Nova
    2 days ago











  • $begingroup$
    Nah, it's largely a matter of grouping all the $sin^2+cos^2$ that appear when you make the products.
    $endgroup$
    – Saucy O'Path
    2 days ago










  • $begingroup$
    Of course you can calculate the determinant by reducing it using properties of determinant (like this for example). This is a standard result.
    $endgroup$
    – StubbornAtom
    2 days ago
















5












$begingroup$


I meet a difficult determinant question as the followings:
$$
textMatrix A is given as:
$$

$$
A=beginbmatrixfracpartial xpartial r&fracpartial xpartialtheta&fracpartial xpartialphi\fracpartial ypartial r&fracpartial ypartialtheta&fracpartial ypartialphi\fracpartial zpartial r&fracpartial zpartialtheta&fracpartial zpartialphiendbmatrix
$$

$$
textwhere x=rsinthetacosphitext, y=rsinthetasinphitext, and z=rcostheta.text Find determinants det(A)text, det(A^-1)text, and det(A^2).
$$

I tried to simplify it, but just got:
$$
A=beginbmatrixsinthetacosphi&rcosthetacosphi&-rsinthetasinphi\sinthetasinphi&rcosthetasinphi&rsinthetacosphi\costheta&-rsintheta&0endbmatrix
$$

Because it is wired, I have also searched the Internet. But till now all I know is that this is just a spherical-Cartesian transformation formula using Jacobian matrix. (Maybe we can make a breakthough here?)

I can only solve $det(A)$ by directly calculating it, $det(A)=r^2sintheta$ .

However, I think it is still hard to find the inverse matrix, needless to say the huge calculation to get $A^2$. As I think, there must be some ways to simplify it.

Could anyone kindly teach me that whether there is any way to simplify $A$, so as to calculate the determinant?Thank you!










share|cite|improve this question









New contributor




Peter Nova is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.







$endgroup$











  • $begingroup$
    Why can't you "solve" (=calculate?) $det A$? It's bare for calculation.
    $endgroup$
    – Saucy O'Path
    2 days ago










  • $begingroup$
    Thank you @Saucy O'Path, it is true that we just need to calculate, then we could get det(A)=r^2sinθ. I initially thought that maybe we could simplify A by add/sub the row/cow of the matrix to make things easier......
    $endgroup$
    – Peter Nova
    2 days ago











  • $begingroup$
    Nah, it's largely a matter of grouping all the $sin^2+cos^2$ that appear when you make the products.
    $endgroup$
    – Saucy O'Path
    2 days ago










  • $begingroup$
    Of course you can calculate the determinant by reducing it using properties of determinant (like this for example). This is a standard result.
    $endgroup$
    – StubbornAtom
    2 days ago














5












5








5


1



$begingroup$


I meet a difficult determinant question as the followings:
$$
textMatrix A is given as:
$$

$$
A=beginbmatrixfracpartial xpartial r&fracpartial xpartialtheta&fracpartial xpartialphi\fracpartial ypartial r&fracpartial ypartialtheta&fracpartial ypartialphi\fracpartial zpartial r&fracpartial zpartialtheta&fracpartial zpartialphiendbmatrix
$$

$$
textwhere x=rsinthetacosphitext, y=rsinthetasinphitext, and z=rcostheta.text Find determinants det(A)text, det(A^-1)text, and det(A^2).
$$

I tried to simplify it, but just got:
$$
A=beginbmatrixsinthetacosphi&rcosthetacosphi&-rsinthetasinphi\sinthetasinphi&rcosthetasinphi&rsinthetacosphi\costheta&-rsintheta&0endbmatrix
$$

Because it is wired, I have also searched the Internet. But till now all I know is that this is just a spherical-Cartesian transformation formula using Jacobian matrix. (Maybe we can make a breakthough here?)

I can only solve $det(A)$ by directly calculating it, $det(A)=r^2sintheta$ .

However, I think it is still hard to find the inverse matrix, needless to say the huge calculation to get $A^2$. As I think, there must be some ways to simplify it.

Could anyone kindly teach me that whether there is any way to simplify $A$, so as to calculate the determinant?Thank you!










share|cite|improve this question









New contributor




Peter Nova is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.







$endgroup$




I meet a difficult determinant question as the followings:
$$
textMatrix A is given as:
$$

$$
A=beginbmatrixfracpartial xpartial r&fracpartial xpartialtheta&fracpartial xpartialphi\fracpartial ypartial r&fracpartial ypartialtheta&fracpartial ypartialphi\fracpartial zpartial r&fracpartial zpartialtheta&fracpartial zpartialphiendbmatrix
$$

$$
textwhere x=rsinthetacosphitext, y=rsinthetasinphitext, and z=rcostheta.text Find determinants det(A)text, det(A^-1)text, and det(A^2).
$$

I tried to simplify it, but just got:
$$
A=beginbmatrixsinthetacosphi&rcosthetacosphi&-rsinthetasinphi\sinthetasinphi&rcosthetasinphi&rsinthetacosphi\costheta&-rsintheta&0endbmatrix
$$

Because it is wired, I have also searched the Internet. But till now all I know is that this is just a spherical-Cartesian transformation formula using Jacobian matrix. (Maybe we can make a breakthough here?)

I can only solve $det(A)$ by directly calculating it, $det(A)=r^2sintheta$ .

However, I think it is still hard to find the inverse matrix, needless to say the huge calculation to get $A^2$. As I think, there must be some ways to simplify it.

Could anyone kindly teach me that whether there is any way to simplify $A$, so as to calculate the determinant?Thank you!







linear-algebra matrices determinant






share|cite|improve this question









New contributor




Peter Nova is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.











share|cite|improve this question









New contributor




Peter Nova is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.









share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question








edited 2 days ago







Peter Nova













New contributor




Peter Nova is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.









asked 2 days ago









Peter NovaPeter Nova

284




284




New contributor




Peter Nova is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.





New contributor





Peter Nova is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.






Peter Nova is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.











  • $begingroup$
    Why can't you "solve" (=calculate?) $det A$? It's bare for calculation.
    $endgroup$
    – Saucy O'Path
    2 days ago










  • $begingroup$
    Thank you @Saucy O'Path, it is true that we just need to calculate, then we could get det(A)=r^2sinθ. I initially thought that maybe we could simplify A by add/sub the row/cow of the matrix to make things easier......
    $endgroup$
    – Peter Nova
    2 days ago











  • $begingroup$
    Nah, it's largely a matter of grouping all the $sin^2+cos^2$ that appear when you make the products.
    $endgroup$
    – Saucy O'Path
    2 days ago










  • $begingroup$
    Of course you can calculate the determinant by reducing it using properties of determinant (like this for example). This is a standard result.
    $endgroup$
    – StubbornAtom
    2 days ago

















  • $begingroup$
    Why can't you "solve" (=calculate?) $det A$? It's bare for calculation.
    $endgroup$
    – Saucy O'Path
    2 days ago










  • $begingroup$
    Thank you @Saucy O'Path, it is true that we just need to calculate, then we could get det(A)=r^2sinθ. I initially thought that maybe we could simplify A by add/sub the row/cow of the matrix to make things easier......
    $endgroup$
    – Peter Nova
    2 days ago











  • $begingroup$
    Nah, it's largely a matter of grouping all the $sin^2+cos^2$ that appear when you make the products.
    $endgroup$
    – Saucy O'Path
    2 days ago










  • $begingroup$
    Of course you can calculate the determinant by reducing it using properties of determinant (like this for example). This is a standard result.
    $endgroup$
    – StubbornAtom
    2 days ago
















$begingroup$
Why can't you "solve" (=calculate?) $det A$? It's bare for calculation.
$endgroup$
– Saucy O'Path
2 days ago




$begingroup$
Why can't you "solve" (=calculate?) $det A$? It's bare for calculation.
$endgroup$
– Saucy O'Path
2 days ago












$begingroup$
Thank you @Saucy O'Path, it is true that we just need to calculate, then we could get det(A)=r^2sinθ. I initially thought that maybe we could simplify A by add/sub the row/cow of the matrix to make things easier......
$endgroup$
– Peter Nova
2 days ago





$begingroup$
Thank you @Saucy O'Path, it is true that we just need to calculate, then we could get det(A)=r^2sinθ. I initially thought that maybe we could simplify A by add/sub the row/cow of the matrix to make things easier......
$endgroup$
– Peter Nova
2 days ago













$begingroup$
Nah, it's largely a matter of grouping all the $sin^2+cos^2$ that appear when you make the products.
$endgroup$
– Saucy O'Path
2 days ago




$begingroup$
Nah, it's largely a matter of grouping all the $sin^2+cos^2$ that appear when you make the products.
$endgroup$
– Saucy O'Path
2 days ago












$begingroup$
Of course you can calculate the determinant by reducing it using properties of determinant (like this for example). This is a standard result.
$endgroup$
– StubbornAtom
2 days ago





$begingroup$
Of course you can calculate the determinant by reducing it using properties of determinant (like this for example). This is a standard result.
$endgroup$
– StubbornAtom
2 days ago











2 Answers
2






active

oldest

votes


















2












$begingroup$

By using the Rule of Sarrus,
$$beginalign
det(A)&=(sinthetacosphi)(rcosthetasinphi)(0)\
&,,,+(sinthetasinphi)(-rsintheta)(-rsinthetasinphi)\
&,,,+(costheta)(rcosthetacosphi)(rsinthetacosphi)\
&,,,-(-rsinthetasinphi)(rcosthetasinphi)(costheta)\
&,,,-(rsinthetacosphi)(-rsintheta)(sinthetacosphi)\
&,,,-(0)(rcosthetacosphi)(sinthetasinphi)\
&=0+r^2sin^3thetasin^2phi+r^2sinthetacos^2thetacos^2phi+r^2sinthetasin^2phicos^2theta+r^2sin^3thetacos^2phi-0\
&=r^2sin^3theta(sin^2phi+cos^2phi)+r^2sinthetacos^2theta(sin^2phi+cos^2phi)\
&=r^2sin^3theta+r^2sinthetacos^2theta\
&=r^2sintheta(sin^2theta+cos^2theta)\
&boxed=r^2sintheta\
endalign$$

Now in order to find $det(A^-1)$ and $det(A^2)$ we can use the fact that $det(AB)=det(A)cdotdet(B)$ to get
$$det(I)=det(AA^-1)=det(A)det(A^-1)=r^2sinthetadet(A^-1)=1$$
$$therefore det(A^-1)=frac1r^2sintheta$$
$$det(A^2)=(det(A))^2=(r^2sintheta)^2=r^4sin^2theta$$






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    Thank you so much! I thought too much on determinant calculation and simplification, but ignored the most important thing -- A is also a matrix. Thank you! I will remember this lesson.
    $endgroup$
    – Peter Nova
    2 days ago


















4












$begingroup$

If you were really clever (e.g., if you already knew the answer, or thought hard about what a Jacobian in a different coordinate system represents), you could compute $det(A)$ by computing $det(B)det(A) = det (BA)$, where $det B$ was particularly easy.



Picking
$$
B = pmatrixcos phi & sin phi & 0 \
-sin phi & cos phi, & 0 \
0 & 0 & 1
$$

generates a matrix $BA$ whose form is rather simpler than that of $A$ (there's no $phi$, for instance!), while $det B$ is evidently $1$.



But I thing the question-asker's intent here is that you're just supposed to do the algebra and practice trig simplification.






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    Yeah... I just only thought about the calculation method from a determinant prospect, just want to somehow simplify it. But I ignored A is also a matrix... Thank you for your answer too! (But I think maybe I cannot think up this B immediately =-O , I will fight in the future study)
    $endgroup$
    – Peter Nova
    2 days ago











Your Answer





StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function ()
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix)
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
);
);
, "mathjax-editing");

StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);

else
createEditor();

);

function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader:
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
,
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);



);






Peter Nova is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.









draft saved

draft discarded


















StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3179472%2fhow-to-find-the-determinant-of-this-matrix-a-spherical-cartesian-transformatio%23new-answer', 'question_page');

);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown

























2 Answers
2






active

oldest

votes








2 Answers
2






active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes









2












$begingroup$

By using the Rule of Sarrus,
$$beginalign
det(A)&=(sinthetacosphi)(rcosthetasinphi)(0)\
&,,,+(sinthetasinphi)(-rsintheta)(-rsinthetasinphi)\
&,,,+(costheta)(rcosthetacosphi)(rsinthetacosphi)\
&,,,-(-rsinthetasinphi)(rcosthetasinphi)(costheta)\
&,,,-(rsinthetacosphi)(-rsintheta)(sinthetacosphi)\
&,,,-(0)(rcosthetacosphi)(sinthetasinphi)\
&=0+r^2sin^3thetasin^2phi+r^2sinthetacos^2thetacos^2phi+r^2sinthetasin^2phicos^2theta+r^2sin^3thetacos^2phi-0\
&=r^2sin^3theta(sin^2phi+cos^2phi)+r^2sinthetacos^2theta(sin^2phi+cos^2phi)\
&=r^2sin^3theta+r^2sinthetacos^2theta\
&=r^2sintheta(sin^2theta+cos^2theta)\
&boxed=r^2sintheta\
endalign$$

Now in order to find $det(A^-1)$ and $det(A^2)$ we can use the fact that $det(AB)=det(A)cdotdet(B)$ to get
$$det(I)=det(AA^-1)=det(A)det(A^-1)=r^2sinthetadet(A^-1)=1$$
$$therefore det(A^-1)=frac1r^2sintheta$$
$$det(A^2)=(det(A))^2=(r^2sintheta)^2=r^4sin^2theta$$






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    Thank you so much! I thought too much on determinant calculation and simplification, but ignored the most important thing -- A is also a matrix. Thank you! I will remember this lesson.
    $endgroup$
    – Peter Nova
    2 days ago















2












$begingroup$

By using the Rule of Sarrus,
$$beginalign
det(A)&=(sinthetacosphi)(rcosthetasinphi)(0)\
&,,,+(sinthetasinphi)(-rsintheta)(-rsinthetasinphi)\
&,,,+(costheta)(rcosthetacosphi)(rsinthetacosphi)\
&,,,-(-rsinthetasinphi)(rcosthetasinphi)(costheta)\
&,,,-(rsinthetacosphi)(-rsintheta)(sinthetacosphi)\
&,,,-(0)(rcosthetacosphi)(sinthetasinphi)\
&=0+r^2sin^3thetasin^2phi+r^2sinthetacos^2thetacos^2phi+r^2sinthetasin^2phicos^2theta+r^2sin^3thetacos^2phi-0\
&=r^2sin^3theta(sin^2phi+cos^2phi)+r^2sinthetacos^2theta(sin^2phi+cos^2phi)\
&=r^2sin^3theta+r^2sinthetacos^2theta\
&=r^2sintheta(sin^2theta+cos^2theta)\
&boxed=r^2sintheta\
endalign$$

Now in order to find $det(A^-1)$ and $det(A^2)$ we can use the fact that $det(AB)=det(A)cdotdet(B)$ to get
$$det(I)=det(AA^-1)=det(A)det(A^-1)=r^2sinthetadet(A^-1)=1$$
$$therefore det(A^-1)=frac1r^2sintheta$$
$$det(A^2)=(det(A))^2=(r^2sintheta)^2=r^4sin^2theta$$






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    Thank you so much! I thought too much on determinant calculation and simplification, but ignored the most important thing -- A is also a matrix. Thank you! I will remember this lesson.
    $endgroup$
    – Peter Nova
    2 days ago













2












2








2





$begingroup$

By using the Rule of Sarrus,
$$beginalign
det(A)&=(sinthetacosphi)(rcosthetasinphi)(0)\
&,,,+(sinthetasinphi)(-rsintheta)(-rsinthetasinphi)\
&,,,+(costheta)(rcosthetacosphi)(rsinthetacosphi)\
&,,,-(-rsinthetasinphi)(rcosthetasinphi)(costheta)\
&,,,-(rsinthetacosphi)(-rsintheta)(sinthetacosphi)\
&,,,-(0)(rcosthetacosphi)(sinthetasinphi)\
&=0+r^2sin^3thetasin^2phi+r^2sinthetacos^2thetacos^2phi+r^2sinthetasin^2phicos^2theta+r^2sin^3thetacos^2phi-0\
&=r^2sin^3theta(sin^2phi+cos^2phi)+r^2sinthetacos^2theta(sin^2phi+cos^2phi)\
&=r^2sin^3theta+r^2sinthetacos^2theta\
&=r^2sintheta(sin^2theta+cos^2theta)\
&boxed=r^2sintheta\
endalign$$

Now in order to find $det(A^-1)$ and $det(A^2)$ we can use the fact that $det(AB)=det(A)cdotdet(B)$ to get
$$det(I)=det(AA^-1)=det(A)det(A^-1)=r^2sinthetadet(A^-1)=1$$
$$therefore det(A^-1)=frac1r^2sintheta$$
$$det(A^2)=(det(A))^2=(r^2sintheta)^2=r^4sin^2theta$$






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$



By using the Rule of Sarrus,
$$beginalign
det(A)&=(sinthetacosphi)(rcosthetasinphi)(0)\
&,,,+(sinthetasinphi)(-rsintheta)(-rsinthetasinphi)\
&,,,+(costheta)(rcosthetacosphi)(rsinthetacosphi)\
&,,,-(-rsinthetasinphi)(rcosthetasinphi)(costheta)\
&,,,-(rsinthetacosphi)(-rsintheta)(sinthetacosphi)\
&,,,-(0)(rcosthetacosphi)(sinthetasinphi)\
&=0+r^2sin^3thetasin^2phi+r^2sinthetacos^2thetacos^2phi+r^2sinthetasin^2phicos^2theta+r^2sin^3thetacos^2phi-0\
&=r^2sin^3theta(sin^2phi+cos^2phi)+r^2sinthetacos^2theta(sin^2phi+cos^2phi)\
&=r^2sin^3theta+r^2sinthetacos^2theta\
&=r^2sintheta(sin^2theta+cos^2theta)\
&boxed=r^2sintheta\
endalign$$

Now in order to find $det(A^-1)$ and $det(A^2)$ we can use the fact that $det(AB)=det(A)cdotdet(B)$ to get
$$det(I)=det(AA^-1)=det(A)det(A^-1)=r^2sinthetadet(A^-1)=1$$
$$therefore det(A^-1)=frac1r^2sintheta$$
$$det(A^2)=(det(A))^2=(r^2sintheta)^2=r^4sin^2theta$$







share|cite|improve this answer












share|cite|improve this answer



share|cite|improve this answer










answered 2 days ago









Peter ForemanPeter Foreman

6,9241318




6,9241318











  • $begingroup$
    Thank you so much! I thought too much on determinant calculation and simplification, but ignored the most important thing -- A is also a matrix. Thank you! I will remember this lesson.
    $endgroup$
    – Peter Nova
    2 days ago
















  • $begingroup$
    Thank you so much! I thought too much on determinant calculation and simplification, but ignored the most important thing -- A is also a matrix. Thank you! I will remember this lesson.
    $endgroup$
    – Peter Nova
    2 days ago















$begingroup$
Thank you so much! I thought too much on determinant calculation and simplification, but ignored the most important thing -- A is also a matrix. Thank you! I will remember this lesson.
$endgroup$
– Peter Nova
2 days ago




$begingroup$
Thank you so much! I thought too much on determinant calculation and simplification, but ignored the most important thing -- A is also a matrix. Thank you! I will remember this lesson.
$endgroup$
– Peter Nova
2 days ago











4












$begingroup$

If you were really clever (e.g., if you already knew the answer, or thought hard about what a Jacobian in a different coordinate system represents), you could compute $det(A)$ by computing $det(B)det(A) = det (BA)$, where $det B$ was particularly easy.



Picking
$$
B = pmatrixcos phi & sin phi & 0 \
-sin phi & cos phi, & 0 \
0 & 0 & 1
$$

generates a matrix $BA$ whose form is rather simpler than that of $A$ (there's no $phi$, for instance!), while $det B$ is evidently $1$.



But I thing the question-asker's intent here is that you're just supposed to do the algebra and practice trig simplification.






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    Yeah... I just only thought about the calculation method from a determinant prospect, just want to somehow simplify it. But I ignored A is also a matrix... Thank you for your answer too! (But I think maybe I cannot think up this B immediately =-O , I will fight in the future study)
    $endgroup$
    – Peter Nova
    2 days ago















4












$begingroup$

If you were really clever (e.g., if you already knew the answer, or thought hard about what a Jacobian in a different coordinate system represents), you could compute $det(A)$ by computing $det(B)det(A) = det (BA)$, where $det B$ was particularly easy.



Picking
$$
B = pmatrixcos phi & sin phi & 0 \
-sin phi & cos phi, & 0 \
0 & 0 & 1
$$

generates a matrix $BA$ whose form is rather simpler than that of $A$ (there's no $phi$, for instance!), while $det B$ is evidently $1$.



But I thing the question-asker's intent here is that you're just supposed to do the algebra and practice trig simplification.






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    Yeah... I just only thought about the calculation method from a determinant prospect, just want to somehow simplify it. But I ignored A is also a matrix... Thank you for your answer too! (But I think maybe I cannot think up this B immediately =-O , I will fight in the future study)
    $endgroup$
    – Peter Nova
    2 days ago













4












4








4





$begingroup$

If you were really clever (e.g., if you already knew the answer, or thought hard about what a Jacobian in a different coordinate system represents), you could compute $det(A)$ by computing $det(B)det(A) = det (BA)$, where $det B$ was particularly easy.



Picking
$$
B = pmatrixcos phi & sin phi & 0 \
-sin phi & cos phi, & 0 \
0 & 0 & 1
$$

generates a matrix $BA$ whose form is rather simpler than that of $A$ (there's no $phi$, for instance!), while $det B$ is evidently $1$.



But I thing the question-asker's intent here is that you're just supposed to do the algebra and practice trig simplification.






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$



If you were really clever (e.g., if you already knew the answer, or thought hard about what a Jacobian in a different coordinate system represents), you could compute $det(A)$ by computing $det(B)det(A) = det (BA)$, where $det B$ was particularly easy.



Picking
$$
B = pmatrixcos phi & sin phi & 0 \
-sin phi & cos phi, & 0 \
0 & 0 & 1
$$

generates a matrix $BA$ whose form is rather simpler than that of $A$ (there's no $phi$, for instance!), while $det B$ is evidently $1$.



But I thing the question-asker's intent here is that you're just supposed to do the algebra and practice trig simplification.







share|cite|improve this answer












share|cite|improve this answer



share|cite|improve this answer










answered 2 days ago









John HughesJohn Hughes

65.4k24293




65.4k24293











  • $begingroup$
    Yeah... I just only thought about the calculation method from a determinant prospect, just want to somehow simplify it. But I ignored A is also a matrix... Thank you for your answer too! (But I think maybe I cannot think up this B immediately =-O , I will fight in the future study)
    $endgroup$
    – Peter Nova
    2 days ago
















  • $begingroup$
    Yeah... I just only thought about the calculation method from a determinant prospect, just want to somehow simplify it. But I ignored A is also a matrix... Thank you for your answer too! (But I think maybe I cannot think up this B immediately =-O , I will fight in the future study)
    $endgroup$
    – Peter Nova
    2 days ago















$begingroup$
Yeah... I just only thought about the calculation method from a determinant prospect, just want to somehow simplify it. But I ignored A is also a matrix... Thank you for your answer too! (But I think maybe I cannot think up this B immediately =-O , I will fight in the future study)
$endgroup$
– Peter Nova
2 days ago




$begingroup$
Yeah... I just only thought about the calculation method from a determinant prospect, just want to somehow simplify it. But I ignored A is also a matrix... Thank you for your answer too! (But I think maybe I cannot think up this B immediately =-O , I will fight in the future study)
$endgroup$
– Peter Nova
2 days ago










Peter Nova is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.









draft saved

draft discarded


















Peter Nova is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.












Peter Nova is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.











Peter Nova is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.














Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


  • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

But avoid


  • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

  • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




draft saved


draft discarded














StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3179472%2fhow-to-find-the-determinant-of-this-matrix-a-spherical-cartesian-transformatio%23new-answer', 'question_page');

);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown





















































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown

































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown







Popular posts from this blog

Distance measures on a map of a game The 2019 Stack Overflow Developer Survey Results Are Inmin distance in a graphShortest distance path on contour plotHow to plot a tilted map?Finding points outside of a diskDelaunay link distanceAnnulus from GeoDisks: drawing a ring on a mapNegative Correlation DistanceFind distance along a path (GPS coordinates)Finding position at given distance in a GeoPathMathematics behind distance estimation using camera

How to get a smooth, uniform ParametricPlot of a 2D Region?How to plot a complicated Region?How to exclude a region from ParametricPlotHow discretize a region placing vertices on a specific non-uniform gridHow to transform a Plot or a ParametricPlot into a RegionHow can I get a smooth plot of a bounded region?Smooth ParametricPlot3D with RegionFunction?Smooth border of a region ParametricPlotSmooth region boundarySmooth region plot from list of pointsGet minimum y of a certain x in a region

Genealogie vun de Merowenger Vum Merowech bis zum Chilperich I. | Navigatiounsmenü