How to find the determinant of this matrix? (A spherical-Cartesian transformation Jacobian matrix) The 2019 Stack Overflow Developer Survey Results Are InHow to compute the following JacobianCalculating the Jacobian of inverse functionsMatrix calculation with sinusoidsUsing the Jacobian matrix to find surface area without a change of basis.Transforming vector field into spherical coordinates. Why and how does this method work?Compute the determinant of circulant matrix with entries $cos jtheta$Find the rotation/reflection angle for orthogonal matrix AJacobian matrix vs. Transformation matrixFurthest point in direction ellipsoid with Newton's methodCalculate the determinant of this $5 times 5$ matrixWhat is the correct matrix form for transforming spherical coordinate to Cartesian?
What did it mean to "align" a radio?
Which Sci-Fi work first showed weapon of galactic-scale mass destruction?
How to support a colleague who finds meetings extremely tiring?
Right tool to dig six foot holes?
Should I use my personal e-mail address, or my workplace one, when registering to external websites for work purposes?
Button changing it's text & action. Good or terrible?
Apparent duplicates between Haynes service instructions and MOT
Are there incongruent pythagorean triangles with the same perimeter and same area?
What is the meaning of Triage in Cybersec world?
Building a conditional check constraint
Worn-tile Scrabble
Geography at the pixel level
What do the Banks children have against barley water?
What is the motivation for a law requiring 2 parties to consent for recording a conversation
Identify This Plant (Flower)
What to do when moving next to a bird sanctuary with a loosely-domesticated cat?
Am I thawing this London Broil safely?
One word riddle: Vowel in the middle
Shouldn't "much" here be used instead of "more"?
Can you compress metal and what would be the consequences?
What is the meaning of the verb "bear" in this context?
What does ひと匙 mean in this manga and has it been used colloquially?
Why isn't airport relocation done gradually?
Output the Arecibo Message
How to find the determinant of this matrix? (A spherical-Cartesian transformation Jacobian matrix)
The 2019 Stack Overflow Developer Survey Results Are InHow to compute the following JacobianCalculating the Jacobian of inverse functionsMatrix calculation with sinusoidsUsing the Jacobian matrix to find surface area without a change of basis.Transforming vector field into spherical coordinates. Why and how does this method work?Compute the determinant of circulant matrix with entries $cos jtheta$Find the rotation/reflection angle for orthogonal matrix AJacobian matrix vs. Transformation matrixFurthest point in direction ellipsoid with Newton's methodCalculate the determinant of this $5 times 5$ matrixWhat is the correct matrix form for transforming spherical coordinate to Cartesian?
$begingroup$
I meet a difficult determinant question as the followings:
$$
textMatrix A is given as:
$$
$$
A=beginbmatrixfracpartial xpartial r&fracpartial xpartialtheta&fracpartial xpartialphi\fracpartial ypartial r&fracpartial ypartialtheta&fracpartial ypartialphi\fracpartial zpartial r&fracpartial zpartialtheta&fracpartial zpartialphiendbmatrix
$$
$$
textwhere x=rsinthetacosphitext, y=rsinthetasinphitext, and z=rcostheta.text Find determinants det(A)text, det(A^-1)text, and det(A^2).
$$
I tried to simplify it, but just got:
$$
A=beginbmatrixsinthetacosphi&rcosthetacosphi&-rsinthetasinphi\sinthetasinphi&rcosthetasinphi&rsinthetacosphi\costheta&-rsintheta&0endbmatrix
$$
Because it is wired, I have also searched the Internet. But till now all I know is that this is just a spherical-Cartesian transformation formula using Jacobian matrix. (Maybe we can make a breakthough here?)
I can only solve $det(A)$ by directly calculating it, $det(A)=r^2sintheta$ .
However, I think it is still hard to find the inverse matrix, needless to say the huge calculation to get $A^2$. As I think, there must be some ways to simplify it.
Could anyone kindly teach me that whether there is any way to simplify $A$, so as to calculate the determinant?Thank you!
linear-algebra matrices determinant
New contributor
Peter Nova is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
I meet a difficult determinant question as the followings:
$$
textMatrix A is given as:
$$
$$
A=beginbmatrixfracpartial xpartial r&fracpartial xpartialtheta&fracpartial xpartialphi\fracpartial ypartial r&fracpartial ypartialtheta&fracpartial ypartialphi\fracpartial zpartial r&fracpartial zpartialtheta&fracpartial zpartialphiendbmatrix
$$
$$
textwhere x=rsinthetacosphitext, y=rsinthetasinphitext, and z=rcostheta.text Find determinants det(A)text, det(A^-1)text, and det(A^2).
$$
I tried to simplify it, but just got:
$$
A=beginbmatrixsinthetacosphi&rcosthetacosphi&-rsinthetasinphi\sinthetasinphi&rcosthetasinphi&rsinthetacosphi\costheta&-rsintheta&0endbmatrix
$$
Because it is wired, I have also searched the Internet. But till now all I know is that this is just a spherical-Cartesian transformation formula using Jacobian matrix. (Maybe we can make a breakthough here?)
I can only solve $det(A)$ by directly calculating it, $det(A)=r^2sintheta$ .
However, I think it is still hard to find the inverse matrix, needless to say the huge calculation to get $A^2$. As I think, there must be some ways to simplify it.
Could anyone kindly teach me that whether there is any way to simplify $A$, so as to calculate the determinant?Thank you!
linear-algebra matrices determinant
New contributor
Peter Nova is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
Why can't you "solve" (=calculate?) $det A$? It's bare for calculation.
$endgroup$
– Saucy O'Path
2 days ago
$begingroup$
Thank you @Saucy O'Path, it is true that we just need to calculate, then we could get det(A)=r^2sinθ. I initially thought that maybe we could simplify A by add/sub the row/cow of the matrix to make things easier......
$endgroup$
– Peter Nova
2 days ago
$begingroup$
Nah, it's largely a matter of grouping all the $sin^2+cos^2$ that appear when you make the products.
$endgroup$
– Saucy O'Path
2 days ago
$begingroup$
Of course you can calculate the determinant by reducing it using properties of determinant (like this for example). This is a standard result.
$endgroup$
– StubbornAtom
2 days ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
I meet a difficult determinant question as the followings:
$$
textMatrix A is given as:
$$
$$
A=beginbmatrixfracpartial xpartial r&fracpartial xpartialtheta&fracpartial xpartialphi\fracpartial ypartial r&fracpartial ypartialtheta&fracpartial ypartialphi\fracpartial zpartial r&fracpartial zpartialtheta&fracpartial zpartialphiendbmatrix
$$
$$
textwhere x=rsinthetacosphitext, y=rsinthetasinphitext, and z=rcostheta.text Find determinants det(A)text, det(A^-1)text, and det(A^2).
$$
I tried to simplify it, but just got:
$$
A=beginbmatrixsinthetacosphi&rcosthetacosphi&-rsinthetasinphi\sinthetasinphi&rcosthetasinphi&rsinthetacosphi\costheta&-rsintheta&0endbmatrix
$$
Because it is wired, I have also searched the Internet. But till now all I know is that this is just a spherical-Cartesian transformation formula using Jacobian matrix. (Maybe we can make a breakthough here?)
I can only solve $det(A)$ by directly calculating it, $det(A)=r^2sintheta$ .
However, I think it is still hard to find the inverse matrix, needless to say the huge calculation to get $A^2$. As I think, there must be some ways to simplify it.
Could anyone kindly teach me that whether there is any way to simplify $A$, so as to calculate the determinant?Thank you!
linear-algebra matrices determinant
New contributor
Peter Nova is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
$endgroup$
I meet a difficult determinant question as the followings:
$$
textMatrix A is given as:
$$
$$
A=beginbmatrixfracpartial xpartial r&fracpartial xpartialtheta&fracpartial xpartialphi\fracpartial ypartial r&fracpartial ypartialtheta&fracpartial ypartialphi\fracpartial zpartial r&fracpartial zpartialtheta&fracpartial zpartialphiendbmatrix
$$
$$
textwhere x=rsinthetacosphitext, y=rsinthetasinphitext, and z=rcostheta.text Find determinants det(A)text, det(A^-1)text, and det(A^2).
$$
I tried to simplify it, but just got:
$$
A=beginbmatrixsinthetacosphi&rcosthetacosphi&-rsinthetasinphi\sinthetasinphi&rcosthetasinphi&rsinthetacosphi\costheta&-rsintheta&0endbmatrix
$$
Because it is wired, I have also searched the Internet. But till now all I know is that this is just a spherical-Cartesian transformation formula using Jacobian matrix. (Maybe we can make a breakthough here?)
I can only solve $det(A)$ by directly calculating it, $det(A)=r^2sintheta$ .
However, I think it is still hard to find the inverse matrix, needless to say the huge calculation to get $A^2$. As I think, there must be some ways to simplify it.
Could anyone kindly teach me that whether there is any way to simplify $A$, so as to calculate the determinant?Thank you!
linear-algebra matrices determinant
linear-algebra matrices determinant
New contributor
Peter Nova is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
New contributor
Peter Nova is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
edited 2 days ago
Peter Nova
New contributor
Peter Nova is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
asked 2 days ago
Peter NovaPeter Nova
284
284
New contributor
Peter Nova is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
New contributor
Peter Nova is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
Peter Nova is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
$begingroup$
Why can't you "solve" (=calculate?) $det A$? It's bare for calculation.
$endgroup$
– Saucy O'Path
2 days ago
$begingroup$
Thank you @Saucy O'Path, it is true that we just need to calculate, then we could get det(A)=r^2sinθ. I initially thought that maybe we could simplify A by add/sub the row/cow of the matrix to make things easier......
$endgroup$
– Peter Nova
2 days ago
$begingroup$
Nah, it's largely a matter of grouping all the $sin^2+cos^2$ that appear when you make the products.
$endgroup$
– Saucy O'Path
2 days ago
$begingroup$
Of course you can calculate the determinant by reducing it using properties of determinant (like this for example). This is a standard result.
$endgroup$
– StubbornAtom
2 days ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Why can't you "solve" (=calculate?) $det A$? It's bare for calculation.
$endgroup$
– Saucy O'Path
2 days ago
$begingroup$
Thank you @Saucy O'Path, it is true that we just need to calculate, then we could get det(A)=r^2sinθ. I initially thought that maybe we could simplify A by add/sub the row/cow of the matrix to make things easier......
$endgroup$
– Peter Nova
2 days ago
$begingroup$
Nah, it's largely a matter of grouping all the $sin^2+cos^2$ that appear when you make the products.
$endgroup$
– Saucy O'Path
2 days ago
$begingroup$
Of course you can calculate the determinant by reducing it using properties of determinant (like this for example). This is a standard result.
$endgroup$
– StubbornAtom
2 days ago
$begingroup$
Why can't you "solve" (=calculate?) $det A$? It's bare for calculation.
$endgroup$
– Saucy O'Path
2 days ago
$begingroup$
Why can't you "solve" (=calculate?) $det A$? It's bare for calculation.
$endgroup$
– Saucy O'Path
2 days ago
$begingroup$
Thank you @Saucy O'Path, it is true that we just need to calculate, then we could get det(A)=r^2sinθ. I initially thought that maybe we could simplify A by add/sub the row/cow of the matrix to make things easier......
$endgroup$
– Peter Nova
2 days ago
$begingroup$
Thank you @Saucy O'Path, it is true that we just need to calculate, then we could get det(A)=r^2sinθ. I initially thought that maybe we could simplify A by add/sub the row/cow of the matrix to make things easier......
$endgroup$
– Peter Nova
2 days ago
$begingroup$
Nah, it's largely a matter of grouping all the $sin^2+cos^2$ that appear when you make the products.
$endgroup$
– Saucy O'Path
2 days ago
$begingroup$
Nah, it's largely a matter of grouping all the $sin^2+cos^2$ that appear when you make the products.
$endgroup$
– Saucy O'Path
2 days ago
$begingroup$
Of course you can calculate the determinant by reducing it using properties of determinant (like this for example). This is a standard result.
$endgroup$
– StubbornAtom
2 days ago
$begingroup$
Of course you can calculate the determinant by reducing it using properties of determinant (like this for example). This is a standard result.
$endgroup$
– StubbornAtom
2 days ago
add a comment |
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
By using the Rule of Sarrus,
$$beginalign
det(A)&=(sinthetacosphi)(rcosthetasinphi)(0)\
&,,,+(sinthetasinphi)(-rsintheta)(-rsinthetasinphi)\
&,,,+(costheta)(rcosthetacosphi)(rsinthetacosphi)\
&,,,-(-rsinthetasinphi)(rcosthetasinphi)(costheta)\
&,,,-(rsinthetacosphi)(-rsintheta)(sinthetacosphi)\
&,,,-(0)(rcosthetacosphi)(sinthetasinphi)\
&=0+r^2sin^3thetasin^2phi+r^2sinthetacos^2thetacos^2phi+r^2sinthetasin^2phicos^2theta+r^2sin^3thetacos^2phi-0\
&=r^2sin^3theta(sin^2phi+cos^2phi)+r^2sinthetacos^2theta(sin^2phi+cos^2phi)\
&=r^2sin^3theta+r^2sinthetacos^2theta\
&=r^2sintheta(sin^2theta+cos^2theta)\
&boxed=r^2sintheta\
endalign$$
Now in order to find $det(A^-1)$ and $det(A^2)$ we can use the fact that $det(AB)=det(A)cdotdet(B)$ to get
$$det(I)=det(AA^-1)=det(A)det(A^-1)=r^2sinthetadet(A^-1)=1$$
$$therefore det(A^-1)=frac1r^2sintheta$$
$$det(A^2)=(det(A))^2=(r^2sintheta)^2=r^4sin^2theta$$
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
Thank you so much! I thought too much on determinant calculation and simplification, but ignored the most important thing -- A is also a matrix. Thank you! I will remember this lesson.
$endgroup$
– Peter Nova
2 days ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
If you were really clever (e.g., if you already knew the answer, or thought hard about what a Jacobian in a different coordinate system represents), you could compute $det(A)$ by computing $det(B)det(A) = det (BA)$, where $det B$ was particularly easy.
Picking
$$
B = pmatrixcos phi & sin phi & 0 \
-sin phi & cos phi, & 0 \
0 & 0 & 1
$$
generates a matrix $BA$ whose form is rather simpler than that of $A$ (there's no $phi$, for instance!), while $det B$ is evidently $1$.
But I thing the question-asker's intent here is that you're just supposed to do the algebra and practice trig simplification.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
Yeah... I just only thought about the calculation method from a determinant prospect, just want to somehow simplify it. But I ignored A is also a matrix... Thank you for your answer too! (But I think maybe I cannot think up this B immediately =-O , I will fight in the future study)
$endgroup$
– Peter Nova
2 days ago
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function ()
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix)
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
);
);
, "mathjax-editing");
StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);
else
createEditor();
);
function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader:
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
,
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);
);
Peter Nova is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3179472%2fhow-to-find-the-determinant-of-this-matrix-a-spherical-cartesian-transformatio%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
By using the Rule of Sarrus,
$$beginalign
det(A)&=(sinthetacosphi)(rcosthetasinphi)(0)\
&,,,+(sinthetasinphi)(-rsintheta)(-rsinthetasinphi)\
&,,,+(costheta)(rcosthetacosphi)(rsinthetacosphi)\
&,,,-(-rsinthetasinphi)(rcosthetasinphi)(costheta)\
&,,,-(rsinthetacosphi)(-rsintheta)(sinthetacosphi)\
&,,,-(0)(rcosthetacosphi)(sinthetasinphi)\
&=0+r^2sin^3thetasin^2phi+r^2sinthetacos^2thetacos^2phi+r^2sinthetasin^2phicos^2theta+r^2sin^3thetacos^2phi-0\
&=r^2sin^3theta(sin^2phi+cos^2phi)+r^2sinthetacos^2theta(sin^2phi+cos^2phi)\
&=r^2sin^3theta+r^2sinthetacos^2theta\
&=r^2sintheta(sin^2theta+cos^2theta)\
&boxed=r^2sintheta\
endalign$$
Now in order to find $det(A^-1)$ and $det(A^2)$ we can use the fact that $det(AB)=det(A)cdotdet(B)$ to get
$$det(I)=det(AA^-1)=det(A)det(A^-1)=r^2sinthetadet(A^-1)=1$$
$$therefore det(A^-1)=frac1r^2sintheta$$
$$det(A^2)=(det(A))^2=(r^2sintheta)^2=r^4sin^2theta$$
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
Thank you so much! I thought too much on determinant calculation and simplification, but ignored the most important thing -- A is also a matrix. Thank you! I will remember this lesson.
$endgroup$
– Peter Nova
2 days ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
By using the Rule of Sarrus,
$$beginalign
det(A)&=(sinthetacosphi)(rcosthetasinphi)(0)\
&,,,+(sinthetasinphi)(-rsintheta)(-rsinthetasinphi)\
&,,,+(costheta)(rcosthetacosphi)(rsinthetacosphi)\
&,,,-(-rsinthetasinphi)(rcosthetasinphi)(costheta)\
&,,,-(rsinthetacosphi)(-rsintheta)(sinthetacosphi)\
&,,,-(0)(rcosthetacosphi)(sinthetasinphi)\
&=0+r^2sin^3thetasin^2phi+r^2sinthetacos^2thetacos^2phi+r^2sinthetasin^2phicos^2theta+r^2sin^3thetacos^2phi-0\
&=r^2sin^3theta(sin^2phi+cos^2phi)+r^2sinthetacos^2theta(sin^2phi+cos^2phi)\
&=r^2sin^3theta+r^2sinthetacos^2theta\
&=r^2sintheta(sin^2theta+cos^2theta)\
&boxed=r^2sintheta\
endalign$$
Now in order to find $det(A^-1)$ and $det(A^2)$ we can use the fact that $det(AB)=det(A)cdotdet(B)$ to get
$$det(I)=det(AA^-1)=det(A)det(A^-1)=r^2sinthetadet(A^-1)=1$$
$$therefore det(A^-1)=frac1r^2sintheta$$
$$det(A^2)=(det(A))^2=(r^2sintheta)^2=r^4sin^2theta$$
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
Thank you so much! I thought too much on determinant calculation and simplification, but ignored the most important thing -- A is also a matrix. Thank you! I will remember this lesson.
$endgroup$
– Peter Nova
2 days ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
By using the Rule of Sarrus,
$$beginalign
det(A)&=(sinthetacosphi)(rcosthetasinphi)(0)\
&,,,+(sinthetasinphi)(-rsintheta)(-rsinthetasinphi)\
&,,,+(costheta)(rcosthetacosphi)(rsinthetacosphi)\
&,,,-(-rsinthetasinphi)(rcosthetasinphi)(costheta)\
&,,,-(rsinthetacosphi)(-rsintheta)(sinthetacosphi)\
&,,,-(0)(rcosthetacosphi)(sinthetasinphi)\
&=0+r^2sin^3thetasin^2phi+r^2sinthetacos^2thetacos^2phi+r^2sinthetasin^2phicos^2theta+r^2sin^3thetacos^2phi-0\
&=r^2sin^3theta(sin^2phi+cos^2phi)+r^2sinthetacos^2theta(sin^2phi+cos^2phi)\
&=r^2sin^3theta+r^2sinthetacos^2theta\
&=r^2sintheta(sin^2theta+cos^2theta)\
&boxed=r^2sintheta\
endalign$$
Now in order to find $det(A^-1)$ and $det(A^2)$ we can use the fact that $det(AB)=det(A)cdotdet(B)$ to get
$$det(I)=det(AA^-1)=det(A)det(A^-1)=r^2sinthetadet(A^-1)=1$$
$$therefore det(A^-1)=frac1r^2sintheta$$
$$det(A^2)=(det(A))^2=(r^2sintheta)^2=r^4sin^2theta$$
$endgroup$
By using the Rule of Sarrus,
$$beginalign
det(A)&=(sinthetacosphi)(rcosthetasinphi)(0)\
&,,,+(sinthetasinphi)(-rsintheta)(-rsinthetasinphi)\
&,,,+(costheta)(rcosthetacosphi)(rsinthetacosphi)\
&,,,-(-rsinthetasinphi)(rcosthetasinphi)(costheta)\
&,,,-(rsinthetacosphi)(-rsintheta)(sinthetacosphi)\
&,,,-(0)(rcosthetacosphi)(sinthetasinphi)\
&=0+r^2sin^3thetasin^2phi+r^2sinthetacos^2thetacos^2phi+r^2sinthetasin^2phicos^2theta+r^2sin^3thetacos^2phi-0\
&=r^2sin^3theta(sin^2phi+cos^2phi)+r^2sinthetacos^2theta(sin^2phi+cos^2phi)\
&=r^2sin^3theta+r^2sinthetacos^2theta\
&=r^2sintheta(sin^2theta+cos^2theta)\
&boxed=r^2sintheta\
endalign$$
Now in order to find $det(A^-1)$ and $det(A^2)$ we can use the fact that $det(AB)=det(A)cdotdet(B)$ to get
$$det(I)=det(AA^-1)=det(A)det(A^-1)=r^2sinthetadet(A^-1)=1$$
$$therefore det(A^-1)=frac1r^2sintheta$$
$$det(A^2)=(det(A))^2=(r^2sintheta)^2=r^4sin^2theta$$
answered 2 days ago
Peter ForemanPeter Foreman
6,9241318
6,9241318
$begingroup$
Thank you so much! I thought too much on determinant calculation and simplification, but ignored the most important thing -- A is also a matrix. Thank you! I will remember this lesson.
$endgroup$
– Peter Nova
2 days ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Thank you so much! I thought too much on determinant calculation and simplification, but ignored the most important thing -- A is also a matrix. Thank you! I will remember this lesson.
$endgroup$
– Peter Nova
2 days ago
$begingroup$
Thank you so much! I thought too much on determinant calculation and simplification, but ignored the most important thing -- A is also a matrix. Thank you! I will remember this lesson.
$endgroup$
– Peter Nova
2 days ago
$begingroup$
Thank you so much! I thought too much on determinant calculation and simplification, but ignored the most important thing -- A is also a matrix. Thank you! I will remember this lesson.
$endgroup$
– Peter Nova
2 days ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
If you were really clever (e.g., if you already knew the answer, or thought hard about what a Jacobian in a different coordinate system represents), you could compute $det(A)$ by computing $det(B)det(A) = det (BA)$, where $det B$ was particularly easy.
Picking
$$
B = pmatrixcos phi & sin phi & 0 \
-sin phi & cos phi, & 0 \
0 & 0 & 1
$$
generates a matrix $BA$ whose form is rather simpler than that of $A$ (there's no $phi$, for instance!), while $det B$ is evidently $1$.
But I thing the question-asker's intent here is that you're just supposed to do the algebra and practice trig simplification.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
Yeah... I just only thought about the calculation method from a determinant prospect, just want to somehow simplify it. But I ignored A is also a matrix... Thank you for your answer too! (But I think maybe I cannot think up this B immediately =-O , I will fight in the future study)
$endgroup$
– Peter Nova
2 days ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
If you were really clever (e.g., if you already knew the answer, or thought hard about what a Jacobian in a different coordinate system represents), you could compute $det(A)$ by computing $det(B)det(A) = det (BA)$, where $det B$ was particularly easy.
Picking
$$
B = pmatrixcos phi & sin phi & 0 \
-sin phi & cos phi, & 0 \
0 & 0 & 1
$$
generates a matrix $BA$ whose form is rather simpler than that of $A$ (there's no $phi$, for instance!), while $det B$ is evidently $1$.
But I thing the question-asker's intent here is that you're just supposed to do the algebra and practice trig simplification.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
Yeah... I just only thought about the calculation method from a determinant prospect, just want to somehow simplify it. But I ignored A is also a matrix... Thank you for your answer too! (But I think maybe I cannot think up this B immediately =-O , I will fight in the future study)
$endgroup$
– Peter Nova
2 days ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
If you were really clever (e.g., if you already knew the answer, or thought hard about what a Jacobian in a different coordinate system represents), you could compute $det(A)$ by computing $det(B)det(A) = det (BA)$, where $det B$ was particularly easy.
Picking
$$
B = pmatrixcos phi & sin phi & 0 \
-sin phi & cos phi, & 0 \
0 & 0 & 1
$$
generates a matrix $BA$ whose form is rather simpler than that of $A$ (there's no $phi$, for instance!), while $det B$ is evidently $1$.
But I thing the question-asker's intent here is that you're just supposed to do the algebra and practice trig simplification.
$endgroup$
If you were really clever (e.g., if you already knew the answer, or thought hard about what a Jacobian in a different coordinate system represents), you could compute $det(A)$ by computing $det(B)det(A) = det (BA)$, where $det B$ was particularly easy.
Picking
$$
B = pmatrixcos phi & sin phi & 0 \
-sin phi & cos phi, & 0 \
0 & 0 & 1
$$
generates a matrix $BA$ whose form is rather simpler than that of $A$ (there's no $phi$, for instance!), while $det B$ is evidently $1$.
But I thing the question-asker's intent here is that you're just supposed to do the algebra and practice trig simplification.
answered 2 days ago
John HughesJohn Hughes
65.4k24293
65.4k24293
$begingroup$
Yeah... I just only thought about the calculation method from a determinant prospect, just want to somehow simplify it. But I ignored A is also a matrix... Thank you for your answer too! (But I think maybe I cannot think up this B immediately =-O , I will fight in the future study)
$endgroup$
– Peter Nova
2 days ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Yeah... I just only thought about the calculation method from a determinant prospect, just want to somehow simplify it. But I ignored A is also a matrix... Thank you for your answer too! (But I think maybe I cannot think up this B immediately =-O , I will fight in the future study)
$endgroup$
– Peter Nova
2 days ago
$begingroup$
Yeah... I just only thought about the calculation method from a determinant prospect, just want to somehow simplify it. But I ignored A is also a matrix... Thank you for your answer too! (But I think maybe I cannot think up this B immediately =-O , I will fight in the future study)
$endgroup$
– Peter Nova
2 days ago
$begingroup$
Yeah... I just only thought about the calculation method from a determinant prospect, just want to somehow simplify it. But I ignored A is also a matrix... Thank you for your answer too! (But I think maybe I cannot think up this B immediately =-O , I will fight in the future study)
$endgroup$
– Peter Nova
2 days ago
add a comment |
Peter Nova is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Peter Nova is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Peter Nova is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Peter Nova is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3179472%2fhow-to-find-the-determinant-of-this-matrix-a-spherical-cartesian-transformatio%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
$begingroup$
Why can't you "solve" (=calculate?) $det A$? It's bare for calculation.
$endgroup$
– Saucy O'Path
2 days ago
$begingroup$
Thank you @Saucy O'Path, it is true that we just need to calculate, then we could get det(A)=r^2sinθ. I initially thought that maybe we could simplify A by add/sub the row/cow of the matrix to make things easier......
$endgroup$
– Peter Nova
2 days ago
$begingroup$
Nah, it's largely a matter of grouping all the $sin^2+cos^2$ that appear when you make the products.
$endgroup$
– Saucy O'Path
2 days ago
$begingroup$
Of course you can calculate the determinant by reducing it using properties of determinant (like this for example). This is a standard result.
$endgroup$
– StubbornAtom
2 days ago