Estimate related to the Möbius functionAsymptotic density of k-almost primesWalsh Fourier Transform of the Möbius functionAsymptotics for the number of ways to sum primes such that the sum is <= nHow does Yitang Zhang use Cauchy's inequality and Theorem 2 to obtain the error term coming from the $S_2$ sumReferences to proofs of upper and lower bounds on the number of coprimes in an interval?Small quotients of smooth numbers

Estimate related to the Möbius function


Asymptotic density of k-almost primesWalsh Fourier Transform of the Möbius functionAsymptotics for the number of ways to sum primes such that the sum is <= nHow does Yitang Zhang use Cauchy's inequality and Theorem 2 to obtain the error term coming from the $S_2$ sumReferences to proofs of upper and lower bounds on the number of coprimes in an interval?Small quotients of smooth numbers













4














$begingroup$


I need to know, or at least have a good bound for, the asymptotic behaviour on $x$ of amount of integers less or equal than $x$ that are square free and with exactly $k$ primes on its decomposition. That is the cardinal of the following set
$$
mathcalJ_T(x,k) = n in mathbbN : n le x, Omega(n)=k , n mbox is square free .$$

Other way to describe this cardinal, using the Möbius function, is
$$ |mathcalJ_T(x,k) | = sum_Omega(n) = k, n le x |mu(n)|.$$



I am looking for the asymptotic behaviour on $x$, but this will depend also on $k$ in some way. The bound given using
$$
sum_Omega(n) = k, n le x |mu(n)| le sum_n le x |mu(n)| le frac6xpi^2 + O(sqrtx) ll x,
$$


is not good enought for my purposes.



Thanks in advanced, any reference or idea is helpful










share|cite|improve this question












$endgroup$














  • $begingroup$
    Hi it seems you want k fairly small relative to x in which case you can achieve this quite classically. Prof. Harcos has given you exactly the technique you need to do it: Selberg-Delange. But if you prefer to just cite a result, then express via Möbius inversion (using sum_ n mu(d)) the number of such squarefree integers leq x with omega(n) = k as an alternating sum of, for each dleq x^1/2, the number of integers leq x/d^2 with exactly k - omega(d) prime factors, and then insert the classical asymptotic for the number of such integers due to, I think, Selberg. Link below:
    $endgroup$
    – alpoge
    May 29 at 23:16










  • $begingroup$
    mathoverflow.net/questions/35927/…
    $endgroup$
    – alpoge
    May 29 at 23:17










  • $begingroup$
    Let me take a moment to point out the following in an answer on that thread. It is noted that Gauss empirically observed that the number of integers leq x with two prime factors seems to grow like x loglogx / logx. Who among us, even with our computers, has seen loglogx grow?! (Canonical quote about loglogx going to infinity with dignity.) What intuition...
    $endgroup$
    – alpoge
    May 29 at 23:21















4














$begingroup$


I need to know, or at least have a good bound for, the asymptotic behaviour on $x$ of amount of integers less or equal than $x$ that are square free and with exactly $k$ primes on its decomposition. That is the cardinal of the following set
$$
mathcalJ_T(x,k) = n in mathbbN : n le x, Omega(n)=k , n mbox is square free .$$

Other way to describe this cardinal, using the Möbius function, is
$$ |mathcalJ_T(x,k) | = sum_Omega(n) = k, n le x |mu(n)|.$$



I am looking for the asymptotic behaviour on $x$, but this will depend also on $k$ in some way. The bound given using
$$
sum_Omega(n) = k, n le x |mu(n)| le sum_n le x |mu(n)| le frac6xpi^2 + O(sqrtx) ll x,
$$


is not good enought for my purposes.



Thanks in advanced, any reference or idea is helpful










share|cite|improve this question












$endgroup$














  • $begingroup$
    Hi it seems you want k fairly small relative to x in which case you can achieve this quite classically. Prof. Harcos has given you exactly the technique you need to do it: Selberg-Delange. But if you prefer to just cite a result, then express via Möbius inversion (using sum_ n mu(d)) the number of such squarefree integers leq x with omega(n) = k as an alternating sum of, for each dleq x^1/2, the number of integers leq x/d^2 with exactly k - omega(d) prime factors, and then insert the classical asymptotic for the number of such integers due to, I think, Selberg. Link below:
    $endgroup$
    – alpoge
    May 29 at 23:16










  • $begingroup$
    mathoverflow.net/questions/35927/…
    $endgroup$
    – alpoge
    May 29 at 23:17










  • $begingroup$
    Let me take a moment to point out the following in an answer on that thread. It is noted that Gauss empirically observed that the number of integers leq x with two prime factors seems to grow like x loglogx / logx. Who among us, even with our computers, has seen loglogx grow?! (Canonical quote about loglogx going to infinity with dignity.) What intuition...
    $endgroup$
    – alpoge
    May 29 at 23:21













4












4








4





$begingroup$


I need to know, or at least have a good bound for, the asymptotic behaviour on $x$ of amount of integers less or equal than $x$ that are square free and with exactly $k$ primes on its decomposition. That is the cardinal of the following set
$$
mathcalJ_T(x,k) = n in mathbbN : n le x, Omega(n)=k , n mbox is square free .$$

Other way to describe this cardinal, using the Möbius function, is
$$ |mathcalJ_T(x,k) | = sum_Omega(n) = k, n le x |mu(n)|.$$



I am looking for the asymptotic behaviour on $x$, but this will depend also on $k$ in some way. The bound given using
$$
sum_Omega(n) = k, n le x |mu(n)| le sum_n le x |mu(n)| le frac6xpi^2 + O(sqrtx) ll x,
$$


is not good enought for my purposes.



Thanks in advanced, any reference or idea is helpful










share|cite|improve this question












$endgroup$




I need to know, or at least have a good bound for, the asymptotic behaviour on $x$ of amount of integers less or equal than $x$ that are square free and with exactly $k$ primes on its decomposition. That is the cardinal of the following set
$$
mathcalJ_T(x,k) = n in mathbbN : n le x, Omega(n)=k , n mbox is square free .$$

Other way to describe this cardinal, using the Möbius function, is
$$ |mathcalJ_T(x,k) | = sum_Omega(n) = k, n le x |mu(n)|.$$



I am looking for the asymptotic behaviour on $x$, but this will depend also on $k$ in some way. The bound given using
$$
sum_Omega(n) = k, n le x |mu(n)| le sum_n le x |mu(n)| le frac6xpi^2 + O(sqrtx) ll x,
$$


is not good enought for my purposes.



Thanks in advanced, any reference or idea is helpful







nt.number-theory analytic-number-theory prime-numbers asymptotics






share|cite|improve this question
















share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question








edited May 30 at 3:38









user64494

2,3009 silver badges18 bronze badges




2,3009 silver badges18 bronze badges










asked May 29 at 17:43









Martin MansillaMartin Mansilla

263 bronze badges




263 bronze badges














  • $begingroup$
    Hi it seems you want k fairly small relative to x in which case you can achieve this quite classically. Prof. Harcos has given you exactly the technique you need to do it: Selberg-Delange. But if you prefer to just cite a result, then express via Möbius inversion (using sum_ n mu(d)) the number of such squarefree integers leq x with omega(n) = k as an alternating sum of, for each dleq x^1/2, the number of integers leq x/d^2 with exactly k - omega(d) prime factors, and then insert the classical asymptotic for the number of such integers due to, I think, Selberg. Link below:
    $endgroup$
    – alpoge
    May 29 at 23:16










  • $begingroup$
    mathoverflow.net/questions/35927/…
    $endgroup$
    – alpoge
    May 29 at 23:17










  • $begingroup$
    Let me take a moment to point out the following in an answer on that thread. It is noted that Gauss empirically observed that the number of integers leq x with two prime factors seems to grow like x loglogx / logx. Who among us, even with our computers, has seen loglogx grow?! (Canonical quote about loglogx going to infinity with dignity.) What intuition...
    $endgroup$
    – alpoge
    May 29 at 23:21
















  • $begingroup$
    Hi it seems you want k fairly small relative to x in which case you can achieve this quite classically. Prof. Harcos has given you exactly the technique you need to do it: Selberg-Delange. But if you prefer to just cite a result, then express via Möbius inversion (using sum_ n mu(d)) the number of such squarefree integers leq x with omega(n) = k as an alternating sum of, for each dleq x^1/2, the number of integers leq x/d^2 with exactly k - omega(d) prime factors, and then insert the classical asymptotic for the number of such integers due to, I think, Selberg. Link below:
    $endgroup$
    – alpoge
    May 29 at 23:16










  • $begingroup$
    mathoverflow.net/questions/35927/…
    $endgroup$
    – alpoge
    May 29 at 23:17










  • $begingroup$
    Let me take a moment to point out the following in an answer on that thread. It is noted that Gauss empirically observed that the number of integers leq x with two prime factors seems to grow like x loglogx / logx. Who among us, even with our computers, has seen loglogx grow?! (Canonical quote about loglogx going to infinity with dignity.) What intuition...
    $endgroup$
    – alpoge
    May 29 at 23:21















$begingroup$
Hi it seems you want k fairly small relative to x in which case you can achieve this quite classically. Prof. Harcos has given you exactly the technique you need to do it: Selberg-Delange. But if you prefer to just cite a result, then express via Möbius inversion (using sum_ n mu(d)) the number of such squarefree integers leq x with omega(n) = k as an alternating sum of, for each dleq x^1/2, the number of integers leq x/d^2 with exactly k - omega(d) prime factors, and then insert the classical asymptotic for the number of such integers due to, I think, Selberg. Link below:
$endgroup$
– alpoge
May 29 at 23:16




$begingroup$
Hi it seems you want k fairly small relative to x in which case you can achieve this quite classically. Prof. Harcos has given you exactly the technique you need to do it: Selberg-Delange. But if you prefer to just cite a result, then express via Möbius inversion (using sum_ n mu(d)) the number of such squarefree integers leq x with omega(n) = k as an alternating sum of, for each dleq x^1/2, the number of integers leq x/d^2 with exactly k - omega(d) prime factors, and then insert the classical asymptotic for the number of such integers due to, I think, Selberg. Link below:
$endgroup$
– alpoge
May 29 at 23:16












$begingroup$
mathoverflow.net/questions/35927/…
$endgroup$
– alpoge
May 29 at 23:17




$begingroup$
mathoverflow.net/questions/35927/…
$endgroup$
– alpoge
May 29 at 23:17












$begingroup$
Let me take a moment to point out the following in an answer on that thread. It is noted that Gauss empirically observed that the number of integers leq x with two prime factors seems to grow like x loglogx / logx. Who among us, even with our computers, has seen loglogx grow?! (Canonical quote about loglogx going to infinity with dignity.) What intuition...
$endgroup$
– alpoge
May 29 at 23:21




$begingroup$
Let me take a moment to point out the following in an answer on that thread. It is noted that Gauss empirically observed that the number of integers leq x with two prime factors seems to grow like x loglogx / logx. Who among us, even with our computers, has seen loglogx grow?! (Canonical quote about loglogx going to infinity with dignity.) What intuition...
$endgroup$
– alpoge
May 29 at 23:21










2 Answers
2






active

oldest

votes


















8
















$begingroup$

It hasn't been pointed out yet that you can derive the answer simply directly from the statement of the Selberg–Sathe theorem, which gives (for fixed $k$) the asymptotic formulas
beginalign*
# nle xcolon omega(n) = k &sim frac xlog x frac(loglog x)^k-1(k-1)! \
# nle xcolon Omega(n) = k &sim frac xlog x frac(loglog x)^k-1(k-1)!.
endalign*

(Here $omega$ and $Omega$ count the prime factors of $n$ without and with multiplicity, respectively.)



Note that any nonsquarefree integer $n$ with $Omega(n) = k$ satisfies $omega(n) = j$ for some $1le jle k-1$. Therefore the bounds
beginalign*
# nle xcolon Omega(n) = k,, ntext is squarefree &le # nle xcolon Omega(n) = k \
# nle xcolon Omega(n) = k,, ntext is squarefree &ge # nle xcolon Omega(n) = k - sum_j=1^k-1 # nle xcolon omega(n) = j ,
endalign*

together with the Selberg–Sathe asymptotic formulas above, immediately imply that
$$
# nle xcolon Omega(n) = k,, ntext is squarefree sim frac xlog x frac(loglog x)^k-1(k-1)!.
$$



This argument can be made to work with some uniformity in $k$ as well (I think $k=o(loglog x)$ is what is needed).






share|cite|improve this answer










$endgroup$






















    9
















    $begingroup$

    You can derive a very precise asymptotic expansion of your quantity by the Selberg-Delange method.



    I recommend that you adapt, to your situation, the arguments of Section II.6.1 of Tenenbaum: Introduction to analytic and probabilistic number theory. The starting point of your analysis should be the formula
    $$sum_text$n$ square-freez^omega(n)n^-s=prod_pleft(1+fraczp^sright).$$
    Then you will need to "factor out" $zeta(s)^z$ and proceed as in the mentioned chapter, where the analysis is carried out without the restriction that $n$ is square-free.






    share|cite|improve this answer












    $endgroup$
















      Your Answer








      StackExchange.ready(function()
      var channelOptions =
      tags: "".split(" "),
      id: "504"
      ;
      initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

      StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
      // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
      if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
      StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
      createEditor();
      );

      else
      createEditor();

      );

      function createEditor()
      StackExchange.prepareEditor(
      heartbeatType: 'answer',
      autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
      convertImagesToLinks: true,
      noModals: true,
      showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
      reputationToPostImages: 10,
      bindNavPrevention: true,
      postfix: "",
      imageUploader:
      brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
      contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/"u003ecc by-sa 4.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
      allowUrls: true
      ,
      noCode: true, onDemand: true,
      discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
      ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
      );



      );














      draft saved

      draft discarded
















      StackExchange.ready(
      function ()
      StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmathoverflow.net%2fquestions%2f332797%2festimate-related-to-the-m%25c3%25b6bius-function%23new-answer', 'question_page');

      );

      Post as a guest















      Required, but never shown


























      2 Answers
      2






      active

      oldest

      votes








      2 Answers
      2






      active

      oldest

      votes









      active

      oldest

      votes






      active

      oldest

      votes









      8
















      $begingroup$

      It hasn't been pointed out yet that you can derive the answer simply directly from the statement of the Selberg–Sathe theorem, which gives (for fixed $k$) the asymptotic formulas
      beginalign*
      # nle xcolon omega(n) = k &sim frac xlog x frac(loglog x)^k-1(k-1)! \
      # nle xcolon Omega(n) = k &sim frac xlog x frac(loglog x)^k-1(k-1)!.
      endalign*

      (Here $omega$ and $Omega$ count the prime factors of $n$ without and with multiplicity, respectively.)



      Note that any nonsquarefree integer $n$ with $Omega(n) = k$ satisfies $omega(n) = j$ for some $1le jle k-1$. Therefore the bounds
      beginalign*
      # nle xcolon Omega(n) = k,, ntext is squarefree &le # nle xcolon Omega(n) = k \
      # nle xcolon Omega(n) = k,, ntext is squarefree &ge # nle xcolon Omega(n) = k - sum_j=1^k-1 # nle xcolon omega(n) = j ,
      endalign*

      together with the Selberg–Sathe asymptotic formulas above, immediately imply that
      $$
      # nle xcolon Omega(n) = k,, ntext is squarefree sim frac xlog x frac(loglog x)^k-1(k-1)!.
      $$



      This argument can be made to work with some uniformity in $k$ as well (I think $k=o(loglog x)$ is what is needed).






      share|cite|improve this answer










      $endgroup$



















        8
















        $begingroup$

        It hasn't been pointed out yet that you can derive the answer simply directly from the statement of the Selberg–Sathe theorem, which gives (for fixed $k$) the asymptotic formulas
        beginalign*
        # nle xcolon omega(n) = k &sim frac xlog x frac(loglog x)^k-1(k-1)! \
        # nle xcolon Omega(n) = k &sim frac xlog x frac(loglog x)^k-1(k-1)!.
        endalign*

        (Here $omega$ and $Omega$ count the prime factors of $n$ without and with multiplicity, respectively.)



        Note that any nonsquarefree integer $n$ with $Omega(n) = k$ satisfies $omega(n) = j$ for some $1le jle k-1$. Therefore the bounds
        beginalign*
        # nle xcolon Omega(n) = k,, ntext is squarefree &le # nle xcolon Omega(n) = k \
        # nle xcolon Omega(n) = k,, ntext is squarefree &ge # nle xcolon Omega(n) = k - sum_j=1^k-1 # nle xcolon omega(n) = j ,
        endalign*

        together with the Selberg–Sathe asymptotic formulas above, immediately imply that
        $$
        # nle xcolon Omega(n) = k,, ntext is squarefree sim frac xlog x frac(loglog x)^k-1(k-1)!.
        $$



        This argument can be made to work with some uniformity in $k$ as well (I think $k=o(loglog x)$ is what is needed).






        share|cite|improve this answer










        $endgroup$

















          8














          8










          8







          $begingroup$

          It hasn't been pointed out yet that you can derive the answer simply directly from the statement of the Selberg–Sathe theorem, which gives (for fixed $k$) the asymptotic formulas
          beginalign*
          # nle xcolon omega(n) = k &sim frac xlog x frac(loglog x)^k-1(k-1)! \
          # nle xcolon Omega(n) = k &sim frac xlog x frac(loglog x)^k-1(k-1)!.
          endalign*

          (Here $omega$ and $Omega$ count the prime factors of $n$ without and with multiplicity, respectively.)



          Note that any nonsquarefree integer $n$ with $Omega(n) = k$ satisfies $omega(n) = j$ for some $1le jle k-1$. Therefore the bounds
          beginalign*
          # nle xcolon Omega(n) = k,, ntext is squarefree &le # nle xcolon Omega(n) = k \
          # nle xcolon Omega(n) = k,, ntext is squarefree &ge # nle xcolon Omega(n) = k - sum_j=1^k-1 # nle xcolon omega(n) = j ,
          endalign*

          together with the Selberg–Sathe asymptotic formulas above, immediately imply that
          $$
          # nle xcolon Omega(n) = k,, ntext is squarefree sim frac xlog x frac(loglog x)^k-1(k-1)!.
          $$



          This argument can be made to work with some uniformity in $k$ as well (I think $k=o(loglog x)$ is what is needed).






          share|cite|improve this answer










          $endgroup$



          It hasn't been pointed out yet that you can derive the answer simply directly from the statement of the Selberg–Sathe theorem, which gives (for fixed $k$) the asymptotic formulas
          beginalign*
          # nle xcolon omega(n) = k &sim frac xlog x frac(loglog x)^k-1(k-1)! \
          # nle xcolon Omega(n) = k &sim frac xlog x frac(loglog x)^k-1(k-1)!.
          endalign*

          (Here $omega$ and $Omega$ count the prime factors of $n$ without and with multiplicity, respectively.)



          Note that any nonsquarefree integer $n$ with $Omega(n) = k$ satisfies $omega(n) = j$ for some $1le jle k-1$. Therefore the bounds
          beginalign*
          # nle xcolon Omega(n) = k,, ntext is squarefree &le # nle xcolon Omega(n) = k \
          # nle xcolon Omega(n) = k,, ntext is squarefree &ge # nle xcolon Omega(n) = k - sum_j=1^k-1 # nle xcolon omega(n) = j ,
          endalign*

          together with the Selberg–Sathe asymptotic formulas above, immediately imply that
          $$
          # nle xcolon Omega(n) = k,, ntext is squarefree sim frac xlog x frac(loglog x)^k-1(k-1)!.
          $$



          This argument can be made to work with some uniformity in $k$ as well (I think $k=o(loglog x)$ is what is needed).







          share|cite|improve this answer













          share|cite|improve this answer




          share|cite|improve this answer










          answered May 29 at 23:54









          Greg MartinGreg Martin

          10.3k1 gold badge40 silver badges64 bronze badges




          10.3k1 gold badge40 silver badges64 bronze badges
























              9
















              $begingroup$

              You can derive a very precise asymptotic expansion of your quantity by the Selberg-Delange method.



              I recommend that you adapt, to your situation, the arguments of Section II.6.1 of Tenenbaum: Introduction to analytic and probabilistic number theory. The starting point of your analysis should be the formula
              $$sum_text$n$ square-freez^omega(n)n^-s=prod_pleft(1+fraczp^sright).$$
              Then you will need to "factor out" $zeta(s)^z$ and proceed as in the mentioned chapter, where the analysis is carried out without the restriction that $n$ is square-free.






              share|cite|improve this answer












              $endgroup$



















                9
















                $begingroup$

                You can derive a very precise asymptotic expansion of your quantity by the Selberg-Delange method.



                I recommend that you adapt, to your situation, the arguments of Section II.6.1 of Tenenbaum: Introduction to analytic and probabilistic number theory. The starting point of your analysis should be the formula
                $$sum_text$n$ square-freez^omega(n)n^-s=prod_pleft(1+fraczp^sright).$$
                Then you will need to "factor out" $zeta(s)^z$ and proceed as in the mentioned chapter, where the analysis is carried out without the restriction that $n$ is square-free.






                share|cite|improve this answer












                $endgroup$

















                  9














                  9










                  9







                  $begingroup$

                  You can derive a very precise asymptotic expansion of your quantity by the Selberg-Delange method.



                  I recommend that you adapt, to your situation, the arguments of Section II.6.1 of Tenenbaum: Introduction to analytic and probabilistic number theory. The starting point of your analysis should be the formula
                  $$sum_text$n$ square-freez^omega(n)n^-s=prod_pleft(1+fraczp^sright).$$
                  Then you will need to "factor out" $zeta(s)^z$ and proceed as in the mentioned chapter, where the analysis is carried out without the restriction that $n$ is square-free.






                  share|cite|improve this answer












                  $endgroup$



                  You can derive a very precise asymptotic expansion of your quantity by the Selberg-Delange method.



                  I recommend that you adapt, to your situation, the arguments of Section II.6.1 of Tenenbaum: Introduction to analytic and probabilistic number theory. The starting point of your analysis should be the formula
                  $$sum_text$n$ square-freez^omega(n)n^-s=prod_pleft(1+fraczp^sright).$$
                  Then you will need to "factor out" $zeta(s)^z$ and proceed as in the mentioned chapter, where the analysis is carried out without the restriction that $n$ is square-free.







                  share|cite|improve this answer















                  share|cite|improve this answer




                  share|cite|improve this answer








                  edited May 29 at 19:05

























                  answered May 29 at 18:31









                  GH from MOGH from MO

                  64.3k5 gold badges163 silver badges243 bronze badges




                  64.3k5 gold badges163 silver badges243 bronze badges































                      draft saved

                      draft discarded















































                      Thanks for contributing an answer to MathOverflow!


                      • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                      But avoid


                      • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                      • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

                      Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


                      To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




                      draft saved


                      draft discarded














                      StackExchange.ready(
                      function ()
                      StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmathoverflow.net%2fquestions%2f332797%2festimate-related-to-the-m%25c3%25b6bius-function%23new-answer', 'question_page');

                      );

                      Post as a guest















                      Required, but never shown





















































                      Required, but never shown














                      Required, but never shown












                      Required, but never shown







                      Required, but never shown

































                      Required, but never shown














                      Required, but never shown












                      Required, but never shown







                      Required, but never shown









                      Popular posts from this blog

                      Distance measures on a map of a game The 2019 Stack Overflow Developer Survey Results Are Inmin distance in a graphShortest distance path on contour plotHow to plot a tilted map?Finding points outside of a diskDelaunay link distanceAnnulus from GeoDisks: drawing a ring on a mapNegative Correlation DistanceFind distance along a path (GPS coordinates)Finding position at given distance in a GeoPathMathematics behind distance estimation using camera

                      How to get a smooth, uniform ParametricPlot of a 2D Region?How to plot a complicated Region?How to exclude a region from ParametricPlotHow discretize a region placing vertices on a specific non-uniform gridHow to transform a Plot or a ParametricPlot into a RegionHow can I get a smooth plot of a bounded region?Smooth ParametricPlot3D with RegionFunction?Smooth border of a region ParametricPlotSmooth region boundarySmooth region plot from list of pointsGet minimum y of a certain x in a region

                      Genealogie vun de Merowenger Vum Merowech bis zum Chilperich I. | Navigatiounsmenü