How to add 1 milliseconds to a datetime string?SQL Server 2008 datetime index performance bugConverting Cursor based filtering logic to CTE basedupdating the entire column with datetime values based on other values in the rowHow to Concatenate DateTime to nvarchar fieldINSERT Statement error message references column I am not including in queryUsing IF clause or while clause in OUTER APPLY

What's an "add" chord?

Clarifications on Poisson Regression

Adding two latex variables in Tikz beamer

"Chess is 90% tactics" - should a player focus more on tactics in order to improve?

Would nuclear bombs be effective against clouds of nanites?

Google just EOLed the original Pixel. How long until it's a brick?

Use field calculator QGIS: if value in one column, then value in new column

What is the lowest level at which a human can beat the 100m world record (or: the presumed human limit) without using magic?

A Simple Battleship Game

Where is a warlock's soul?

Is a Senate trial required after the House impeaches a president?

Ungrouping French Guiana from France in Natural Earth data using QGIS?

Is it safe to delete the default "postgres" role?

"Ich habe Durst" vs "Ich bin durstig": Which is more common?

Grep over multiple files redirecting to a different filename each time

How to talk about things I'm ashamed of, without showing this shame through non-verbal-communication?

CO₂ level is high enough that it reduces cognitive ability. Isn't that a reason to worry?

Prevent sleep if CPU usage is high

What type of beer is best for beer battered fish?

Time machine in Interstellar movie

How to write numbers in the form of using foreach or ...?

Perils of having a moon consisting of valuable material

What is the meaning of Text inside of AMS logo

How do I get a planar traveling party to use survival/spell slots for food/drink instead of an artificer's Replicate Magic Item infusion?



How to add 1 milliseconds to a datetime string?


SQL Server 2008 datetime index performance bugConverting Cursor based filtering logic to CTE basedupdating the entire column with datetime values based on other values in the rowHow to Concatenate DateTime to nvarchar fieldINSERT Statement error message references column I am not including in queryUsing IF clause or while clause in OUTER APPLY






.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty
margin-bottom:0;









15

















Based on a select, I can return x rows like this:



1 2019-07-23 10:14:04.000
1 2019-07-23 10:14:11.000
2 2019-07-23 10:45:32.000
1 2019-07-23 10:45:33.000


We have all milliseconds with 0.



Is there a way to add 1 by 1 milliseconds, so the select would look like this:



1 2019-07-23 10:14:04.001
1 2019-07-23 10:14:11.002
2 2019-07-23 10:45:32.003
1 2019-07-23 10:45:33.004


I'm trying to create a cursor or even a update with no success.



This is the query to get the results I want:



 select top 10 ModifiedOn 
from [SCHEMA].[dbo].[TABLE]
where FIELD between '2019-07-23 00:00' and '2019-07-23 23:59'


There are 81k values. The field is DATETIME.










share|improve this question























  • 2





    Are you trying to add 1 millisecond to row 1, 2 milliseconds to row 2, 3 milliseconds to row 3, etc.?

    – John Eisbrener
    Jul 23 at 13:38

















15

















Based on a select, I can return x rows like this:



1 2019-07-23 10:14:04.000
1 2019-07-23 10:14:11.000
2 2019-07-23 10:45:32.000
1 2019-07-23 10:45:33.000


We have all milliseconds with 0.



Is there a way to add 1 by 1 milliseconds, so the select would look like this:



1 2019-07-23 10:14:04.001
1 2019-07-23 10:14:11.002
2 2019-07-23 10:45:32.003
1 2019-07-23 10:45:33.004


I'm trying to create a cursor or even a update with no success.



This is the query to get the results I want:



 select top 10 ModifiedOn 
from [SCHEMA].[dbo].[TABLE]
where FIELD between '2019-07-23 00:00' and '2019-07-23 23:59'


There are 81k values. The field is DATETIME.










share|improve this question























  • 2





    Are you trying to add 1 millisecond to row 1, 2 milliseconds to row 2, 3 milliseconds to row 3, etc.?

    – John Eisbrener
    Jul 23 at 13:38













15












15








15


1






Based on a select, I can return x rows like this:



1 2019-07-23 10:14:04.000
1 2019-07-23 10:14:11.000
2 2019-07-23 10:45:32.000
1 2019-07-23 10:45:33.000


We have all milliseconds with 0.



Is there a way to add 1 by 1 milliseconds, so the select would look like this:



1 2019-07-23 10:14:04.001
1 2019-07-23 10:14:11.002
2 2019-07-23 10:45:32.003
1 2019-07-23 10:45:33.004


I'm trying to create a cursor or even a update with no success.



This is the query to get the results I want:



 select top 10 ModifiedOn 
from [SCHEMA].[dbo].[TABLE]
where FIELD between '2019-07-23 00:00' and '2019-07-23 23:59'


There are 81k values. The field is DATETIME.










share|improve this question

















Based on a select, I can return x rows like this:



1 2019-07-23 10:14:04.000
1 2019-07-23 10:14:11.000
2 2019-07-23 10:45:32.000
1 2019-07-23 10:45:33.000


We have all milliseconds with 0.



Is there a way to add 1 by 1 milliseconds, so the select would look like this:



1 2019-07-23 10:14:04.001
1 2019-07-23 10:14:11.002
2 2019-07-23 10:45:32.003
1 2019-07-23 10:45:33.004


I'm trying to create a cursor or even a update with no success.



This is the query to get the results I want:



 select top 10 ModifiedOn 
from [SCHEMA].[dbo].[TABLE]
where FIELD between '2019-07-23 00:00' and '2019-07-23 23:59'


There are 81k values. The field is DATETIME.







sql-server sql-server-2008 datetime varchar






share|improve this question
















share|improve this question













share|improve this question




share|improve this question








edited Jul 26 at 13:55









Glorfindel

1,2131 gold badge9 silver badges16 bronze badges




1,2131 gold badge9 silver badges16 bronze badges










asked Jul 23 at 13:06









Racer SQLRacer SQL

3,5685 gold badges31 silver badges77 bronze badges




3,5685 gold badges31 silver badges77 bronze badges










  • 2





    Are you trying to add 1 millisecond to row 1, 2 milliseconds to row 2, 3 milliseconds to row 3, etc.?

    – John Eisbrener
    Jul 23 at 13:38












  • 2





    Are you trying to add 1 millisecond to row 1, 2 milliseconds to row 2, 3 milliseconds to row 3, etc.?

    – John Eisbrener
    Jul 23 at 13:38







2




2





Are you trying to add 1 millisecond to row 1, 2 milliseconds to row 2, 3 milliseconds to row 3, etc.?

– John Eisbrener
Jul 23 at 13:38





Are you trying to add 1 millisecond to row 1, 2 milliseconds to row 2, 3 milliseconds to row 3, etc.?

– John Eisbrener
Jul 23 at 13:38










5 Answers
5






active

oldest

votes


















33


















Datetime is not precise to the level of 1 millisecond. What you are asking for is not possible unless you change to a different datatype (i.e. datetime2).



Documentation



Important quote:




Accuracy Rounded to increments of .000, .003, or .007 seconds







share|improve this answer

































    13


















    The DateAdd function is what you are looking for.



    Use millisecond as the first parameter to the function, to tell it that you are adding milliseconds. Then use 1 as the second parameter, for the number of milliseconds to add.



    Here is an example, grabbing the current time into a variable, and then adding one millisecond to it and saving the result as a second variable, and then printing each variable



    Declare @RightNow as DateTime2
    Declare @RightNowPlusAMillisecond as DateTime2

    Select @RightNow = Getdate()
    Select @RightNowPlusAMillisecond = DateAdd(millisecond,1,@RightNow)

    Print @RightNow
    Print @RightNowPlusAMillisecond


    Results:



    2019-07-23 08:25:38.3500000
    2019-07-23 08:25:38.3510000


    Note:



    As Forrest points out in another answer, the datetime data type does not guarantee millisecond precision. It rounds to increments of .000, .003, or .007 seconds. If you want millisecond precision, use datetime2.






    share|improve this answer



































      13


















      @Doug-Deden has the right starting point, but I just wanted to try to answer what I thought was the original intention of the question - how to apply it to a result set with increasing milliseconds per row.



      In that case, you can use ROW_NUMBER and a Common Table Expression (edit as needed for you table structure, including joins, etc.).



      Select to show values:



      ;WITH CTE AS (
      SELECT t.my_id, t.my_date_column, ROW_NUMBER() OVER (ORDER BY my_date_column, my_id DESC) AS R
      FROM Table1 t
      )
      SELECT TOP 1000 *, DATEADD(MILLISECOND, R, CAST(my_date_column AS datetime2)) [new_date]
      FROM CTE
      ORDER BY my_date_column


      Update joins back to original table:



      ;WITH CTE AS (
      SELECT t.my_id, t.my_date_column, ROW_NUMBER() OVER (ORDER BY my_date_column, my_id DESC) AS R
      FROM Table1 t
      )
      UPDATE t SET
      my_date_column = DATEADD(MILLISECOND, R, CAST(my_date_column AS datetime2))
      FROM CTE c
      JOIN Table1 t ON c.my_id = t.my_id





      share|improve this answer




























      • This CTE is updatable. No need to join back to Table1. Just do UPDATE CTE SET my_date_column =...

        – Steven Hibble
        Jul 29 at 15:58


















      4


















      I have done it using DATETIME2(3).



      As you can see on the query below, it is more economic:



      declare @dt1 datetime2(3)
      declare @dt2 datetime2

      SELECT @DT1 = SYSDATETIME()
      SELECT @DT2= SYSDATETIME()

      SELECT [THE LENGTH OF DATETIME2]=DATALENGTH(@DT2)
      ,[THE LENGTH OF DATETIME2(3)]=DATALENGTH(@DT1)


      enter image description here



      The differences between datetime and datetime2 are well explained here.



      For this exercise
      I create a temp table for testing purposes, and populate it with 999 different random dates from 01-jan-2019 and today (23-july-2019)



      and then in order, I set the milliseconds from 1 to 999



      SET NOCOUNT ON
      SET TRANSACTION ISOLATION LEVEL READ UNCOMMITTED
      SET NOEXEC OFF

      IF OBJECT_ID ('TEMPDB..#T1') IS NOT NULL
      DROP TABLE #T1

      CREATE TABLE #t1(the_date DATETIME2(3) NOT NULL PRIMARY KEY CLUSTERED )
      GO

      -- run this 999 times - hopefully there will be no duplicates
      -- SELECT 204*24*60*60 - today is 23-july-2019 - the 203rd day of the year
      DECLARE @DT DATETIME2(3)
      SELECT @DT = CONVERT(DATETIME2(3),
      DATEADD(SECOND, ABS(CHECKSUM(NEWID()) % 17625600),
      '2019-01-01'),120)

      --SELECT @DT

      IF NOT EXISTS( SELECT 1 FROM #T1 WHERE THE_DATE = @DT)
      INSERT INTO #T1 VALUES (@DT)
      GO 999


      --check it out what we have
      SELECT * FROM #T1

      --get the date and the new date
      SELECT
      THE_DATE
      ,THE_NEW_DATE= DATEADD(MILLISECOND, ROW_NUMBER() OVER (ORDER BY THE_DATE), THE_DATE )
      FROM #T1


      and this is what I get: (partial view)



      enter image description here






      share|improve this answer



































        2


















        One of the other posters is correct; DATETIME (in T-SQL) is not accurate to the millisecond (it is accurate to the centisecond).



        For that level of accuracy, you want to use DATETIME2.



        Here is an example of converting a string datetime to datetime2,
        then adding 1 millisecond, and lastly, converting back to a string.



        select convert(
        varchar(MAX), --in T-SQL, varchar length is optional
        dateadd(
        millisecond,
        1,
        convert(
        datetime2,
        '2019-07-23 12:01:23.11'
        )
        )
        )





        share|improve this answer























        • 3





          Please don't specify varchar without length.

          – Aaron Bertrand
          Jul 23 at 15:01












        Your Answer








        StackExchange.ready(function()
        var channelOptions =
        tags: "".split(" "),
        id: "182"
        ;
        initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

        StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
        // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
        if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
        StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
        createEditor();
        );

        else
        createEditor();

        );

        function createEditor()
        StackExchange.prepareEditor(
        heartbeatType: 'answer',
        autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
        convertImagesToLinks: false,
        noModals: true,
        showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
        reputationToPostImages: null,
        bindNavPrevention: true,
        postfix: "",
        imageUploader:
        brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
        contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/"u003ecc by-sa 4.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
        allowUrls: true
        ,
        onDemand: true,
        discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
        ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
        );



        );














        draft saved

        draft discarded
















        StackExchange.ready(
        function ()
        StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fdba.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f243534%2fhow-to-add-1-milliseconds-to-a-datetime-string%23new-answer', 'question_page');

        );

        Post as a guest















        Required, but never shown


























        5 Answers
        5






        active

        oldest

        votes








        5 Answers
        5






        active

        oldest

        votes









        active

        oldest

        votes






        active

        oldest

        votes









        33


















        Datetime is not precise to the level of 1 millisecond. What you are asking for is not possible unless you change to a different datatype (i.e. datetime2).



        Documentation



        Important quote:




        Accuracy Rounded to increments of .000, .003, or .007 seconds







        share|improve this answer






























          33


















          Datetime is not precise to the level of 1 millisecond. What you are asking for is not possible unless you change to a different datatype (i.e. datetime2).



          Documentation



          Important quote:




          Accuracy Rounded to increments of .000, .003, or .007 seconds







          share|improve this answer




























            33














            33










            33









            Datetime is not precise to the level of 1 millisecond. What you are asking for is not possible unless you change to a different datatype (i.e. datetime2).



            Documentation



            Important quote:




            Accuracy Rounded to increments of .000, .003, or .007 seconds







            share|improve this answer














            Datetime is not precise to the level of 1 millisecond. What you are asking for is not possible unless you change to a different datatype (i.e. datetime2).



            Documentation



            Important quote:




            Accuracy Rounded to increments of .000, .003, or .007 seconds








            share|improve this answer













            share|improve this answer




            share|improve this answer










            answered Jul 23 at 14:07









            ForrestForrest

            3,6351 gold badge10 silver badges28 bronze badges




            3,6351 gold badge10 silver badges28 bronze badges


























                13


















                The DateAdd function is what you are looking for.



                Use millisecond as the first parameter to the function, to tell it that you are adding milliseconds. Then use 1 as the second parameter, for the number of milliseconds to add.



                Here is an example, grabbing the current time into a variable, and then adding one millisecond to it and saving the result as a second variable, and then printing each variable



                Declare @RightNow as DateTime2
                Declare @RightNowPlusAMillisecond as DateTime2

                Select @RightNow = Getdate()
                Select @RightNowPlusAMillisecond = DateAdd(millisecond,1,@RightNow)

                Print @RightNow
                Print @RightNowPlusAMillisecond


                Results:



                2019-07-23 08:25:38.3500000
                2019-07-23 08:25:38.3510000


                Note:



                As Forrest points out in another answer, the datetime data type does not guarantee millisecond precision. It rounds to increments of .000, .003, or .007 seconds. If you want millisecond precision, use datetime2.






                share|improve this answer
































                  13


















                  The DateAdd function is what you are looking for.



                  Use millisecond as the first parameter to the function, to tell it that you are adding milliseconds. Then use 1 as the second parameter, for the number of milliseconds to add.



                  Here is an example, grabbing the current time into a variable, and then adding one millisecond to it and saving the result as a second variable, and then printing each variable



                  Declare @RightNow as DateTime2
                  Declare @RightNowPlusAMillisecond as DateTime2

                  Select @RightNow = Getdate()
                  Select @RightNowPlusAMillisecond = DateAdd(millisecond,1,@RightNow)

                  Print @RightNow
                  Print @RightNowPlusAMillisecond


                  Results:



                  2019-07-23 08:25:38.3500000
                  2019-07-23 08:25:38.3510000


                  Note:



                  As Forrest points out in another answer, the datetime data type does not guarantee millisecond precision. It rounds to increments of .000, .003, or .007 seconds. If you want millisecond precision, use datetime2.






                  share|improve this answer






























                    13














                    13










                    13









                    The DateAdd function is what you are looking for.



                    Use millisecond as the first parameter to the function, to tell it that you are adding milliseconds. Then use 1 as the second parameter, for the number of milliseconds to add.



                    Here is an example, grabbing the current time into a variable, and then adding one millisecond to it and saving the result as a second variable, and then printing each variable



                    Declare @RightNow as DateTime2
                    Declare @RightNowPlusAMillisecond as DateTime2

                    Select @RightNow = Getdate()
                    Select @RightNowPlusAMillisecond = DateAdd(millisecond,1,@RightNow)

                    Print @RightNow
                    Print @RightNowPlusAMillisecond


                    Results:



                    2019-07-23 08:25:38.3500000
                    2019-07-23 08:25:38.3510000


                    Note:



                    As Forrest points out in another answer, the datetime data type does not guarantee millisecond precision. It rounds to increments of .000, .003, or .007 seconds. If you want millisecond precision, use datetime2.






                    share|improve this answer
















                    The DateAdd function is what you are looking for.



                    Use millisecond as the first parameter to the function, to tell it that you are adding milliseconds. Then use 1 as the second parameter, for the number of milliseconds to add.



                    Here is an example, grabbing the current time into a variable, and then adding one millisecond to it and saving the result as a second variable, and then printing each variable



                    Declare @RightNow as DateTime2
                    Declare @RightNowPlusAMillisecond as DateTime2

                    Select @RightNow = Getdate()
                    Select @RightNowPlusAMillisecond = DateAdd(millisecond,1,@RightNow)

                    Print @RightNow
                    Print @RightNowPlusAMillisecond


                    Results:



                    2019-07-23 08:25:38.3500000
                    2019-07-23 08:25:38.3510000


                    Note:



                    As Forrest points out in another answer, the datetime data type does not guarantee millisecond precision. It rounds to increments of .000, .003, or .007 seconds. If you want millisecond precision, use datetime2.







                    share|improve this answer















                    share|improve this answer




                    share|improve this answer








                    edited Jul 23 at 16:23

























                    answered Jul 23 at 13:29









                    Doug DedenDoug Deden

                    85310 bronze badges




                    85310 bronze badges
























                        13


















                        @Doug-Deden has the right starting point, but I just wanted to try to answer what I thought was the original intention of the question - how to apply it to a result set with increasing milliseconds per row.



                        In that case, you can use ROW_NUMBER and a Common Table Expression (edit as needed for you table structure, including joins, etc.).



                        Select to show values:



                        ;WITH CTE AS (
                        SELECT t.my_id, t.my_date_column, ROW_NUMBER() OVER (ORDER BY my_date_column, my_id DESC) AS R
                        FROM Table1 t
                        )
                        SELECT TOP 1000 *, DATEADD(MILLISECOND, R, CAST(my_date_column AS datetime2)) [new_date]
                        FROM CTE
                        ORDER BY my_date_column


                        Update joins back to original table:



                        ;WITH CTE AS (
                        SELECT t.my_id, t.my_date_column, ROW_NUMBER() OVER (ORDER BY my_date_column, my_id DESC) AS R
                        FROM Table1 t
                        )
                        UPDATE t SET
                        my_date_column = DATEADD(MILLISECOND, R, CAST(my_date_column AS datetime2))
                        FROM CTE c
                        JOIN Table1 t ON c.my_id = t.my_id





                        share|improve this answer




























                        • This CTE is updatable. No need to join back to Table1. Just do UPDATE CTE SET my_date_column =...

                          – Steven Hibble
                          Jul 29 at 15:58















                        13


















                        @Doug-Deden has the right starting point, but I just wanted to try to answer what I thought was the original intention of the question - how to apply it to a result set with increasing milliseconds per row.



                        In that case, you can use ROW_NUMBER and a Common Table Expression (edit as needed for you table structure, including joins, etc.).



                        Select to show values:



                        ;WITH CTE AS (
                        SELECT t.my_id, t.my_date_column, ROW_NUMBER() OVER (ORDER BY my_date_column, my_id DESC) AS R
                        FROM Table1 t
                        )
                        SELECT TOP 1000 *, DATEADD(MILLISECOND, R, CAST(my_date_column AS datetime2)) [new_date]
                        FROM CTE
                        ORDER BY my_date_column


                        Update joins back to original table:



                        ;WITH CTE AS (
                        SELECT t.my_id, t.my_date_column, ROW_NUMBER() OVER (ORDER BY my_date_column, my_id DESC) AS R
                        FROM Table1 t
                        )
                        UPDATE t SET
                        my_date_column = DATEADD(MILLISECOND, R, CAST(my_date_column AS datetime2))
                        FROM CTE c
                        JOIN Table1 t ON c.my_id = t.my_id





                        share|improve this answer




























                        • This CTE is updatable. No need to join back to Table1. Just do UPDATE CTE SET my_date_column =...

                          – Steven Hibble
                          Jul 29 at 15:58













                        13














                        13










                        13









                        @Doug-Deden has the right starting point, but I just wanted to try to answer what I thought was the original intention of the question - how to apply it to a result set with increasing milliseconds per row.



                        In that case, you can use ROW_NUMBER and a Common Table Expression (edit as needed for you table structure, including joins, etc.).



                        Select to show values:



                        ;WITH CTE AS (
                        SELECT t.my_id, t.my_date_column, ROW_NUMBER() OVER (ORDER BY my_date_column, my_id DESC) AS R
                        FROM Table1 t
                        )
                        SELECT TOP 1000 *, DATEADD(MILLISECOND, R, CAST(my_date_column AS datetime2)) [new_date]
                        FROM CTE
                        ORDER BY my_date_column


                        Update joins back to original table:



                        ;WITH CTE AS (
                        SELECT t.my_id, t.my_date_column, ROW_NUMBER() OVER (ORDER BY my_date_column, my_id DESC) AS R
                        FROM Table1 t
                        )
                        UPDATE t SET
                        my_date_column = DATEADD(MILLISECOND, R, CAST(my_date_column AS datetime2))
                        FROM CTE c
                        JOIN Table1 t ON c.my_id = t.my_id





                        share|improve this answer
















                        @Doug-Deden has the right starting point, but I just wanted to try to answer what I thought was the original intention of the question - how to apply it to a result set with increasing milliseconds per row.



                        In that case, you can use ROW_NUMBER and a Common Table Expression (edit as needed for you table structure, including joins, etc.).



                        Select to show values:



                        ;WITH CTE AS (
                        SELECT t.my_id, t.my_date_column, ROW_NUMBER() OVER (ORDER BY my_date_column, my_id DESC) AS R
                        FROM Table1 t
                        )
                        SELECT TOP 1000 *, DATEADD(MILLISECOND, R, CAST(my_date_column AS datetime2)) [new_date]
                        FROM CTE
                        ORDER BY my_date_column


                        Update joins back to original table:



                        ;WITH CTE AS (
                        SELECT t.my_id, t.my_date_column, ROW_NUMBER() OVER (ORDER BY my_date_column, my_id DESC) AS R
                        FROM Table1 t
                        )
                        UPDATE t SET
                        my_date_column = DATEADD(MILLISECOND, R, CAST(my_date_column AS datetime2))
                        FROM CTE c
                        JOIN Table1 t ON c.my_id = t.my_id






                        share|improve this answer















                        share|improve this answer




                        share|improve this answer








                        edited Jul 24 at 14:17









                        Marcello Miorelli

                        7,04329 gold badges83 silver badges182 bronze badges




                        7,04329 gold badges83 silver badges182 bronze badges










                        answered Jul 23 at 13:42









                        BlueGIBlueGI

                        2761 silver badge5 bronze badges




                        2761 silver badge5 bronze badges















                        • This CTE is updatable. No need to join back to Table1. Just do UPDATE CTE SET my_date_column =...

                          – Steven Hibble
                          Jul 29 at 15:58

















                        • This CTE is updatable. No need to join back to Table1. Just do UPDATE CTE SET my_date_column =...

                          – Steven Hibble
                          Jul 29 at 15:58
















                        This CTE is updatable. No need to join back to Table1. Just do UPDATE CTE SET my_date_column =...

                        – Steven Hibble
                        Jul 29 at 15:58





                        This CTE is updatable. No need to join back to Table1. Just do UPDATE CTE SET my_date_column =...

                        – Steven Hibble
                        Jul 29 at 15:58











                        4


















                        I have done it using DATETIME2(3).



                        As you can see on the query below, it is more economic:



                        declare @dt1 datetime2(3)
                        declare @dt2 datetime2

                        SELECT @DT1 = SYSDATETIME()
                        SELECT @DT2= SYSDATETIME()

                        SELECT [THE LENGTH OF DATETIME2]=DATALENGTH(@DT2)
                        ,[THE LENGTH OF DATETIME2(3)]=DATALENGTH(@DT1)


                        enter image description here



                        The differences between datetime and datetime2 are well explained here.



                        For this exercise
                        I create a temp table for testing purposes, and populate it with 999 different random dates from 01-jan-2019 and today (23-july-2019)



                        and then in order, I set the milliseconds from 1 to 999



                        SET NOCOUNT ON
                        SET TRANSACTION ISOLATION LEVEL READ UNCOMMITTED
                        SET NOEXEC OFF

                        IF OBJECT_ID ('TEMPDB..#T1') IS NOT NULL
                        DROP TABLE #T1

                        CREATE TABLE #t1(the_date DATETIME2(3) NOT NULL PRIMARY KEY CLUSTERED )
                        GO

                        -- run this 999 times - hopefully there will be no duplicates
                        -- SELECT 204*24*60*60 - today is 23-july-2019 - the 203rd day of the year
                        DECLARE @DT DATETIME2(3)
                        SELECT @DT = CONVERT(DATETIME2(3),
                        DATEADD(SECOND, ABS(CHECKSUM(NEWID()) % 17625600),
                        '2019-01-01'),120)

                        --SELECT @DT

                        IF NOT EXISTS( SELECT 1 FROM #T1 WHERE THE_DATE = @DT)
                        INSERT INTO #T1 VALUES (@DT)
                        GO 999


                        --check it out what we have
                        SELECT * FROM #T1

                        --get the date and the new date
                        SELECT
                        THE_DATE
                        ,THE_NEW_DATE= DATEADD(MILLISECOND, ROW_NUMBER() OVER (ORDER BY THE_DATE), THE_DATE )
                        FROM #T1


                        and this is what I get: (partial view)



                        enter image description here






                        share|improve this answer
































                          4


















                          I have done it using DATETIME2(3).



                          As you can see on the query below, it is more economic:



                          declare @dt1 datetime2(3)
                          declare @dt2 datetime2

                          SELECT @DT1 = SYSDATETIME()
                          SELECT @DT2= SYSDATETIME()

                          SELECT [THE LENGTH OF DATETIME2]=DATALENGTH(@DT2)
                          ,[THE LENGTH OF DATETIME2(3)]=DATALENGTH(@DT1)


                          enter image description here



                          The differences between datetime and datetime2 are well explained here.



                          For this exercise
                          I create a temp table for testing purposes, and populate it with 999 different random dates from 01-jan-2019 and today (23-july-2019)



                          and then in order, I set the milliseconds from 1 to 999



                          SET NOCOUNT ON
                          SET TRANSACTION ISOLATION LEVEL READ UNCOMMITTED
                          SET NOEXEC OFF

                          IF OBJECT_ID ('TEMPDB..#T1') IS NOT NULL
                          DROP TABLE #T1

                          CREATE TABLE #t1(the_date DATETIME2(3) NOT NULL PRIMARY KEY CLUSTERED )
                          GO

                          -- run this 999 times - hopefully there will be no duplicates
                          -- SELECT 204*24*60*60 - today is 23-july-2019 - the 203rd day of the year
                          DECLARE @DT DATETIME2(3)
                          SELECT @DT = CONVERT(DATETIME2(3),
                          DATEADD(SECOND, ABS(CHECKSUM(NEWID()) % 17625600),
                          '2019-01-01'),120)

                          --SELECT @DT

                          IF NOT EXISTS( SELECT 1 FROM #T1 WHERE THE_DATE = @DT)
                          INSERT INTO #T1 VALUES (@DT)
                          GO 999


                          --check it out what we have
                          SELECT * FROM #T1

                          --get the date and the new date
                          SELECT
                          THE_DATE
                          ,THE_NEW_DATE= DATEADD(MILLISECOND, ROW_NUMBER() OVER (ORDER BY THE_DATE), THE_DATE )
                          FROM #T1


                          and this is what I get: (partial view)



                          enter image description here






                          share|improve this answer






























                            4














                            4










                            4









                            I have done it using DATETIME2(3).



                            As you can see on the query below, it is more economic:



                            declare @dt1 datetime2(3)
                            declare @dt2 datetime2

                            SELECT @DT1 = SYSDATETIME()
                            SELECT @DT2= SYSDATETIME()

                            SELECT [THE LENGTH OF DATETIME2]=DATALENGTH(@DT2)
                            ,[THE LENGTH OF DATETIME2(3)]=DATALENGTH(@DT1)


                            enter image description here



                            The differences between datetime and datetime2 are well explained here.



                            For this exercise
                            I create a temp table for testing purposes, and populate it with 999 different random dates from 01-jan-2019 and today (23-july-2019)



                            and then in order, I set the milliseconds from 1 to 999



                            SET NOCOUNT ON
                            SET TRANSACTION ISOLATION LEVEL READ UNCOMMITTED
                            SET NOEXEC OFF

                            IF OBJECT_ID ('TEMPDB..#T1') IS NOT NULL
                            DROP TABLE #T1

                            CREATE TABLE #t1(the_date DATETIME2(3) NOT NULL PRIMARY KEY CLUSTERED )
                            GO

                            -- run this 999 times - hopefully there will be no duplicates
                            -- SELECT 204*24*60*60 - today is 23-july-2019 - the 203rd day of the year
                            DECLARE @DT DATETIME2(3)
                            SELECT @DT = CONVERT(DATETIME2(3),
                            DATEADD(SECOND, ABS(CHECKSUM(NEWID()) % 17625600),
                            '2019-01-01'),120)

                            --SELECT @DT

                            IF NOT EXISTS( SELECT 1 FROM #T1 WHERE THE_DATE = @DT)
                            INSERT INTO #T1 VALUES (@DT)
                            GO 999


                            --check it out what we have
                            SELECT * FROM #T1

                            --get the date and the new date
                            SELECT
                            THE_DATE
                            ,THE_NEW_DATE= DATEADD(MILLISECOND, ROW_NUMBER() OVER (ORDER BY THE_DATE), THE_DATE )
                            FROM #T1


                            and this is what I get: (partial view)



                            enter image description here






                            share|improve this answer
















                            I have done it using DATETIME2(3).



                            As you can see on the query below, it is more economic:



                            declare @dt1 datetime2(3)
                            declare @dt2 datetime2

                            SELECT @DT1 = SYSDATETIME()
                            SELECT @DT2= SYSDATETIME()

                            SELECT [THE LENGTH OF DATETIME2]=DATALENGTH(@DT2)
                            ,[THE LENGTH OF DATETIME2(3)]=DATALENGTH(@DT1)


                            enter image description here



                            The differences between datetime and datetime2 are well explained here.



                            For this exercise
                            I create a temp table for testing purposes, and populate it with 999 different random dates from 01-jan-2019 and today (23-july-2019)



                            and then in order, I set the milliseconds from 1 to 999



                            SET NOCOUNT ON
                            SET TRANSACTION ISOLATION LEVEL READ UNCOMMITTED
                            SET NOEXEC OFF

                            IF OBJECT_ID ('TEMPDB..#T1') IS NOT NULL
                            DROP TABLE #T1

                            CREATE TABLE #t1(the_date DATETIME2(3) NOT NULL PRIMARY KEY CLUSTERED )
                            GO

                            -- run this 999 times - hopefully there will be no duplicates
                            -- SELECT 204*24*60*60 - today is 23-july-2019 - the 203rd day of the year
                            DECLARE @DT DATETIME2(3)
                            SELECT @DT = CONVERT(DATETIME2(3),
                            DATEADD(SECOND, ABS(CHECKSUM(NEWID()) % 17625600),
                            '2019-01-01'),120)

                            --SELECT @DT

                            IF NOT EXISTS( SELECT 1 FROM #T1 WHERE THE_DATE = @DT)
                            INSERT INTO #T1 VALUES (@DT)
                            GO 999


                            --check it out what we have
                            SELECT * FROM #T1

                            --get the date and the new date
                            SELECT
                            THE_DATE
                            ,THE_NEW_DATE= DATEADD(MILLISECOND, ROW_NUMBER() OVER (ORDER BY THE_DATE), THE_DATE )
                            FROM #T1


                            and this is what I get: (partial view)



                            enter image description here







                            share|improve this answer















                            share|improve this answer




                            share|improve this answer








                            edited Jul 24 at 11:56

























                            answered Jul 23 at 18:06









                            Marcello MiorelliMarcello Miorelli

                            7,04329 gold badges83 silver badges182 bronze badges




                            7,04329 gold badges83 silver badges182 bronze badges
























                                2


















                                One of the other posters is correct; DATETIME (in T-SQL) is not accurate to the millisecond (it is accurate to the centisecond).



                                For that level of accuracy, you want to use DATETIME2.



                                Here is an example of converting a string datetime to datetime2,
                                then adding 1 millisecond, and lastly, converting back to a string.



                                select convert(
                                varchar(MAX), --in T-SQL, varchar length is optional
                                dateadd(
                                millisecond,
                                1,
                                convert(
                                datetime2,
                                '2019-07-23 12:01:23.11'
                                )
                                )
                                )





                                share|improve this answer























                                • 3





                                  Please don't specify varchar without length.

                                  – Aaron Bertrand
                                  Jul 23 at 15:01















                                2


















                                One of the other posters is correct; DATETIME (in T-SQL) is not accurate to the millisecond (it is accurate to the centisecond).



                                For that level of accuracy, you want to use DATETIME2.



                                Here is an example of converting a string datetime to datetime2,
                                then adding 1 millisecond, and lastly, converting back to a string.



                                select convert(
                                varchar(MAX), --in T-SQL, varchar length is optional
                                dateadd(
                                millisecond,
                                1,
                                convert(
                                datetime2,
                                '2019-07-23 12:01:23.11'
                                )
                                )
                                )





                                share|improve this answer























                                • 3





                                  Please don't specify varchar without length.

                                  – Aaron Bertrand
                                  Jul 23 at 15:01













                                2














                                2










                                2









                                One of the other posters is correct; DATETIME (in T-SQL) is not accurate to the millisecond (it is accurate to the centisecond).



                                For that level of accuracy, you want to use DATETIME2.



                                Here is an example of converting a string datetime to datetime2,
                                then adding 1 millisecond, and lastly, converting back to a string.



                                select convert(
                                varchar(MAX), --in T-SQL, varchar length is optional
                                dateadd(
                                millisecond,
                                1,
                                convert(
                                datetime2,
                                '2019-07-23 12:01:23.11'
                                )
                                )
                                )





                                share|improve this answer
















                                One of the other posters is correct; DATETIME (in T-SQL) is not accurate to the millisecond (it is accurate to the centisecond).



                                For that level of accuracy, you want to use DATETIME2.



                                Here is an example of converting a string datetime to datetime2,
                                then adding 1 millisecond, and lastly, converting back to a string.



                                select convert(
                                varchar(MAX), --in T-SQL, varchar length is optional
                                dateadd(
                                millisecond,
                                1,
                                convert(
                                datetime2,
                                '2019-07-23 12:01:23.11'
                                )
                                )
                                )






                                share|improve this answer















                                share|improve this answer




                                share|improve this answer








                                edited Jul 23 at 17:00









                                Marcello Miorelli

                                7,04329 gold badges83 silver badges182 bronze badges




                                7,04329 gold badges83 silver badges182 bronze badges










                                answered Jul 23 at 14:55









                                McDonalds Happy MealMcDonalds Happy Meal

                                716 bronze badges




                                716 bronze badges










                                • 3





                                  Please don't specify varchar without length.

                                  – Aaron Bertrand
                                  Jul 23 at 15:01












                                • 3





                                  Please don't specify varchar without length.

                                  – Aaron Bertrand
                                  Jul 23 at 15:01







                                3




                                3





                                Please don't specify varchar without length.

                                – Aaron Bertrand
                                Jul 23 at 15:01





                                Please don't specify varchar without length.

                                – Aaron Bertrand
                                Jul 23 at 15:01


















                                draft saved

                                draft discarded















































                                Thanks for contributing an answer to Database Administrators Stack Exchange!


                                • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                                But avoid


                                • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                                • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

                                To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




                                draft saved


                                draft discarded














                                StackExchange.ready(
                                function ()
                                StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fdba.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f243534%2fhow-to-add-1-milliseconds-to-a-datetime-string%23new-answer', 'question_page');

                                );

                                Post as a guest















                                Required, but never shown





















































                                Required, but never shown














                                Required, but never shown












                                Required, but never shown







                                Required, but never shown

































                                Required, but never shown














                                Required, but never shown












                                Required, but never shown







                                Required, but never shown









                                Popular posts from this blog

                                Tamil (spriik) Luke uk diar | Nawigatjuun

                                Align equal signs while including text over equalitiesAMS align: left aligned text/math plus multicolumn alignmentMultiple alignmentsAligning equations in multiple placesNumbering and aligning an equation with multiple columnsHow to align one equation with another multline equationUsing \ in environments inside the begintabularxNumber equations and preserving alignment of equal signsHow can I align equations to the left and to the right?Double equation alignment problem within align enviromentAligned within align: Why are they right-aligned?

                                Training a classifier when some of the features are unknownWhy does Gradient Boosting regression predict negative values when there are no negative y-values in my training set?How to improve an existing (trained) classifier?What is effect when I set up some self defined predisctor variables?Why Matlab neural network classification returns decimal values on prediction dataset?Fitting and transforming text data in training, testing, and validation setsHow to quantify the performance of the classifier (multi-class SVM) using the test data?How do I control for some patients providing multiple samples in my training data?Training and Test setTraining a convolutional neural network for image denoising in MatlabShouldn't an autoencoder with #(neurons in hidden layer) = #(neurons in input layer) be “perfect”?