What is the size of a set of sets of the empty set , , ?Set Operations with Empty setsOn the size of a non-empty family of non-empty sets such that every set in the family has a proper subset also in the familyIs $varnothing $ an empty set?Is the empty set a member of any collection of sets?Is the empty set countable?What is an Empty set?Subsets of the empty setWhat's the difference between a null set and an empty set?Do all non-empty sets of natural numbers contain a smallest number?

What's the girl's name?

Sold item on eBay, buyer wants it to be delivered to another country, and pay by bank transfer

Find the length of a number's "base-jumping" path

Is it possible to write Quake's fast InvSqrt() function in Rust?

Germany's Ladenschlussgesetz in comparison to a debatable law in Israel

Is there a conflict between YAGNI and SRP?

If thermodynamics says entropy always increases, how can the universe end in heat death?

How to open terminal output with a texteditor without the creation of a new file?

Can I travel to UK as a cabin crew after being refused entry to Ireland?

What is the point of teaching Coding and robotics to kids as young as 6 years old?

What is a short code for generating this matrix in R?

Finding how much time it takes for a complete Earth revolution around the Sun

Mixing 3.5 hdd and 2.5 hdd in LSI RAID 1

Why only sine waves?

Star developer didn’t get a promotion because he isn’t a people person, so he has scaled back his contributions. How can I motivate him?

Can I omit the second noun in どのかばんが森さんのかばんですか?

How are names of enharmonic notes determined?

What difference does horsepower make? If the engine can spin the propeller fast enough, why does it need power behind it?

Is there any statement that bhakti destroys karma?

Is the Wilcoxon rank-sum test a nonparametric alternative to the two sample t-test? Null hypotheses are different

How to resolve the transporter conundrum in a FTL spaceship?

Selecting Primes from list of list

How to verify router firmware is legit?

Is it acceptable to have a fraction in an eigenvector?



What is the size of a set of sets of the empty set , , ?


Set Operations with Empty setsOn the size of a non-empty family of non-empty sets such that every set in the family has a proper subset also in the familyIs $varnothing $ an empty set?Is the empty set a member of any collection of sets?Is the empty set countable?What is an Empty set?Subsets of the empty setWhat's the difference between a null set and an empty set?Do all non-empty sets of natural numbers contain a smallest number?






.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty
margin-bottom:0;

.everyonelovesstackoverflowposition:absolute;height:1px;width:1px;opacity:0;top:0;left:0;pointer-events:none;








2















$begingroup$


What is the size of a set of sets of the empty set , , ?



I am not sure if the empty set, in this case, can be considered as a set and make the size 3 or if it is 2 or 0.



thanks










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$














  • $begingroup$
    one $)$ is meant to be $}$ I believe. There are three elements in the set.
    $endgroup$
    – Alvin Lepik
    Sep 20 at 14:19










  • $begingroup$
    That's not an empty set.
    $endgroup$
    – Lord Shark the Unknown
    Sep 20 at 14:22






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    As you are probably aware, $$ represents the empty set. $$ represents the set containing the empty set, and so on. Your set has in it the empty set, the set containing the empty set, and the set containing the set that contains the empty set. How many distinct elements do you have?
    $endgroup$
    – Cameron Williams
    Sep 20 at 14:22










  • $begingroup$
    The empty set is a set. It just has nothing in it. This set has three things in it. On thing is the empty set, the second thing is a set containing the empty set. The third thing is a set containing a set containing the empty set. That's three things. The things may be nothing more than an empty bag, a bag with an empty bag in it, and a bag containing a bag with an empty bag; so the may have nothing of substance, but they are still things.
    $endgroup$
    – fleablood
    Sep 20 at 15:34










  • $begingroup$
    It would be easier to read if you use ,and ; to add a little space, as $;,,,,;$
    $endgroup$
    – DanielWainfleet
    Sep 21 at 2:24

















2















$begingroup$


What is the size of a set of sets of the empty set , , ?



I am not sure if the empty set, in this case, can be considered as a set and make the size 3 or if it is 2 or 0.



thanks










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$














  • $begingroup$
    one $)$ is meant to be $}$ I believe. There are three elements in the set.
    $endgroup$
    – Alvin Lepik
    Sep 20 at 14:19










  • $begingroup$
    That's not an empty set.
    $endgroup$
    – Lord Shark the Unknown
    Sep 20 at 14:22






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    As you are probably aware, $$ represents the empty set. $$ represents the set containing the empty set, and so on. Your set has in it the empty set, the set containing the empty set, and the set containing the set that contains the empty set. How many distinct elements do you have?
    $endgroup$
    – Cameron Williams
    Sep 20 at 14:22










  • $begingroup$
    The empty set is a set. It just has nothing in it. This set has three things in it. On thing is the empty set, the second thing is a set containing the empty set. The third thing is a set containing a set containing the empty set. That's three things. The things may be nothing more than an empty bag, a bag with an empty bag in it, and a bag containing a bag with an empty bag; so the may have nothing of substance, but they are still things.
    $endgroup$
    – fleablood
    Sep 20 at 15:34










  • $begingroup$
    It would be easier to read if you use ,and ; to add a little space, as $;,,,,;$
    $endgroup$
    – DanielWainfleet
    Sep 21 at 2:24













2













2









2





$begingroup$


What is the size of a set of sets of the empty set , , ?



I am not sure if the empty set, in this case, can be considered as a set and make the size 3 or if it is 2 or 0.



thanks










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$




What is the size of a set of sets of the empty set , , ?



I am not sure if the empty set, in this case, can be considered as a set and make the size 3 or if it is 2 or 0.



thanks







elementary-set-theory






share|cite|improve this question















share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question








edited Sep 20 at 15:19









Andrés E. Caicedo

68.1k8 gold badges171 silver badges268 bronze badges




68.1k8 gold badges171 silver badges268 bronze badges










asked Sep 20 at 14:15









TakobellTakobell

816 bronze badges




816 bronze badges














  • $begingroup$
    one $)$ is meant to be $}$ I believe. There are three elements in the set.
    $endgroup$
    – Alvin Lepik
    Sep 20 at 14:19










  • $begingroup$
    That's not an empty set.
    $endgroup$
    – Lord Shark the Unknown
    Sep 20 at 14:22






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    As you are probably aware, $$ represents the empty set. $$ represents the set containing the empty set, and so on. Your set has in it the empty set, the set containing the empty set, and the set containing the set that contains the empty set. How many distinct elements do you have?
    $endgroup$
    – Cameron Williams
    Sep 20 at 14:22










  • $begingroup$
    The empty set is a set. It just has nothing in it. This set has three things in it. On thing is the empty set, the second thing is a set containing the empty set. The third thing is a set containing a set containing the empty set. That's three things. The things may be nothing more than an empty bag, a bag with an empty bag in it, and a bag containing a bag with an empty bag; so the may have nothing of substance, but they are still things.
    $endgroup$
    – fleablood
    Sep 20 at 15:34










  • $begingroup$
    It would be easier to read if you use ,and ; to add a little space, as $;,,,,;$
    $endgroup$
    – DanielWainfleet
    Sep 21 at 2:24
















  • $begingroup$
    one $)$ is meant to be $}$ I believe. There are three elements in the set.
    $endgroup$
    – Alvin Lepik
    Sep 20 at 14:19










  • $begingroup$
    That's not an empty set.
    $endgroup$
    – Lord Shark the Unknown
    Sep 20 at 14:22






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    As you are probably aware, $$ represents the empty set. $$ represents the set containing the empty set, and so on. Your set has in it the empty set, the set containing the empty set, and the set containing the set that contains the empty set. How many distinct elements do you have?
    $endgroup$
    – Cameron Williams
    Sep 20 at 14:22










  • $begingroup$
    The empty set is a set. It just has nothing in it. This set has three things in it. On thing is the empty set, the second thing is a set containing the empty set. The third thing is a set containing a set containing the empty set. That's three things. The things may be nothing more than an empty bag, a bag with an empty bag in it, and a bag containing a bag with an empty bag; so the may have nothing of substance, but they are still things.
    $endgroup$
    – fleablood
    Sep 20 at 15:34










  • $begingroup$
    It would be easier to read if you use ,and ; to add a little space, as $;,,,,;$
    $endgroup$
    – DanielWainfleet
    Sep 21 at 2:24















$begingroup$
one $)$ is meant to be $}$ I believe. There are three elements in the set.
$endgroup$
– Alvin Lepik
Sep 20 at 14:19




$begingroup$
one $)$ is meant to be $}$ I believe. There are three elements in the set.
$endgroup$
– Alvin Lepik
Sep 20 at 14:19












$begingroup$
That's not an empty set.
$endgroup$
– Lord Shark the Unknown
Sep 20 at 14:22




$begingroup$
That's not an empty set.
$endgroup$
– Lord Shark the Unknown
Sep 20 at 14:22




1




1




$begingroup$
As you are probably aware, $$ represents the empty set. $$ represents the set containing the empty set, and so on. Your set has in it the empty set, the set containing the empty set, and the set containing the set that contains the empty set. How many distinct elements do you have?
$endgroup$
– Cameron Williams
Sep 20 at 14:22




$begingroup$
As you are probably aware, $$ represents the empty set. $$ represents the set containing the empty set, and so on. Your set has in it the empty set, the set containing the empty set, and the set containing the set that contains the empty set. How many distinct elements do you have?
$endgroup$
– Cameron Williams
Sep 20 at 14:22












$begingroup$
The empty set is a set. It just has nothing in it. This set has three things in it. On thing is the empty set, the second thing is a set containing the empty set. The third thing is a set containing a set containing the empty set. That's three things. The things may be nothing more than an empty bag, a bag with an empty bag in it, and a bag containing a bag with an empty bag; so the may have nothing of substance, but they are still things.
$endgroup$
– fleablood
Sep 20 at 15:34




$begingroup$
The empty set is a set. It just has nothing in it. This set has three things in it. On thing is the empty set, the second thing is a set containing the empty set. The third thing is a set containing a set containing the empty set. That's three things. The things may be nothing more than an empty bag, a bag with an empty bag in it, and a bag containing a bag with an empty bag; so the may have nothing of substance, but they are still things.
$endgroup$
– fleablood
Sep 20 at 15:34












$begingroup$
It would be easier to read if you use ,and ; to add a little space, as $;,,,,;$
$endgroup$
– DanielWainfleet
Sep 21 at 2:24




$begingroup$
It would be easier to read if you use ,and ; to add a little space, as $;,,,,;$
$endgroup$
– DanielWainfleet
Sep 21 at 2:24










3 Answers
3






active

oldest

votes


















8

















$begingroup$

Your set can be written as $a,b,c$ where $a$ happens to be the emptyset, $b$ happens to be the set containing the empty set, and $c$ happens to be the set containing the set containing the emptyset.



You should not have any trouble seeing that $a,b,c$ is of size three so long as they are all distinct. The only possible source of confusion in this is in recognizing that each of $emptyset, emptyset$ and $emptyset$ are not only valid possible elements of a set, but are distinct and different than one another. Indeed, they are all valid possible elements of sets and are all different than one another. Remember that the "depth" of each is relevant and is part of what makes these distinct.






share|cite|improve this answer












$endgroup$













  • $begingroup$
    but a,b can be writen as ∅, a,b and its size is 2
    $endgroup$
    – Takobell
    Sep 20 at 15:21










  • $begingroup$
    @TarekHich yes, well, I did include pointing out that $aneq b$, $aneq c$ and $bneq c$ that $a,b,c$ are distinct, and any set $a,b,c$ where $a,b,c$ are distinct is of size three.
    $endgroup$
    – JMoravitz
    Sep 20 at 15:22










  • $begingroup$
    In the event that $x$ and $y$ are distinct and neither are equal to the emptyset, then $emptyset,x,y$ is still of size three. The only reason why $emptyset,a,b$ was of size two in your example in the comment was because $emptyset$ and $a$ were in reality the same element.
    $endgroup$
    – JMoravitz
    Sep 20 at 15:24






  • 4




    $begingroup$
    TarekHich: "but a,b can be writen as ∅, a,b and its size is 2" and JMoravitz: "yes, well". Me: Um, no..... $a,b$ can not be written as $emptyset, a, b$. The empty set is a thing and it is not in $a,b$ and it is in $emptyset, a,b$. Maybe you meant say we can write $a,b$ as $ , a, b$ where "$ $" is nothing. But $emptyset = $ is not nothing. It is something. "$ $" isn't anything at all. $emptyset$ doesn't HAVE anything at all but it IS something.
    $endgroup$
    – fleablood
    Sep 20 at 15:42











  • $begingroup$
    @fleablood perhaps you missed where I said $a$ is the empty set. Are you implying x,y can't be written in the case that x=y or is somehow different than x? Remember we are dealing with sets and not multisets
    $endgroup$
    – JMoravitz
    Sep 20 at 15:59



















2

















$begingroup$

As you are only interested in the number of elements in the set and not in the elements themself, you basically just have to count the commas, so your set has three elements, so three is its size.






share|cite|improve this answer










$endgroup$













  • $begingroup$
    I have mixed feelings about this answer. On the one hand it directly gets that a set has a list of things-- that the content of the things doesn't matter. But on the other hand it begs and avoids the questions. Also consider $apple, orange, banana,banana, peach, cherry$. That has has five commas but only four items. And $a,a$ has a comma indicating two items but it actually has only one.
    $endgroup$
    – fleablood
    Sep 20 at 19:33


















2

















$begingroup$

  1. The empty set is indeed an element of this set.





share|cite|improve this answer










$endgroup$















    Your Answer








    StackExchange.ready(function()
    var channelOptions =
    tags: "".split(" "),
    id: "69"
    ;
    initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

    StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
    // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
    if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
    StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
    createEditor();
    );

    else
    createEditor();

    );

    function createEditor()
    StackExchange.prepareEditor(
    heartbeatType: 'answer',
    autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
    convertImagesToLinks: true,
    noModals: true,
    showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
    reputationToPostImages: 10,
    bindNavPrevention: true,
    postfix: "",
    imageUploader:
    brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
    contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/"u003ecc by-sa 4.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
    allowUrls: true
    ,
    noCode: true, onDemand: true,
    discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
    ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
    );



    );














    draft saved

    draft discarded
















    StackExchange.ready(
    function ()
    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3363391%2fwhat-is-the-size-of-a-set-of-sets-of-the-empty-set%23new-answer', 'question_page');

    );

    Post as a guest















    Required, but never shown


























    3 Answers
    3






    active

    oldest

    votes








    3 Answers
    3






    active

    oldest

    votes









    active

    oldest

    votes






    active

    oldest

    votes









    8

















    $begingroup$

    Your set can be written as $a,b,c$ where $a$ happens to be the emptyset, $b$ happens to be the set containing the empty set, and $c$ happens to be the set containing the set containing the emptyset.



    You should not have any trouble seeing that $a,b,c$ is of size three so long as they are all distinct. The only possible source of confusion in this is in recognizing that each of $emptyset, emptyset$ and $emptyset$ are not only valid possible elements of a set, but are distinct and different than one another. Indeed, they are all valid possible elements of sets and are all different than one another. Remember that the "depth" of each is relevant and is part of what makes these distinct.






    share|cite|improve this answer












    $endgroup$













    • $begingroup$
      but a,b can be writen as ∅, a,b and its size is 2
      $endgroup$
      – Takobell
      Sep 20 at 15:21










    • $begingroup$
      @TarekHich yes, well, I did include pointing out that $aneq b$, $aneq c$ and $bneq c$ that $a,b,c$ are distinct, and any set $a,b,c$ where $a,b,c$ are distinct is of size three.
      $endgroup$
      – JMoravitz
      Sep 20 at 15:22










    • $begingroup$
      In the event that $x$ and $y$ are distinct and neither are equal to the emptyset, then $emptyset,x,y$ is still of size three. The only reason why $emptyset,a,b$ was of size two in your example in the comment was because $emptyset$ and $a$ were in reality the same element.
      $endgroup$
      – JMoravitz
      Sep 20 at 15:24






    • 4




      $begingroup$
      TarekHich: "but a,b can be writen as ∅, a,b and its size is 2" and JMoravitz: "yes, well". Me: Um, no..... $a,b$ can not be written as $emptyset, a, b$. The empty set is a thing and it is not in $a,b$ and it is in $emptyset, a,b$. Maybe you meant say we can write $a,b$ as $ , a, b$ where "$ $" is nothing. But $emptyset = $ is not nothing. It is something. "$ $" isn't anything at all. $emptyset$ doesn't HAVE anything at all but it IS something.
      $endgroup$
      – fleablood
      Sep 20 at 15:42











    • $begingroup$
      @fleablood perhaps you missed where I said $a$ is the empty set. Are you implying x,y can't be written in the case that x=y or is somehow different than x? Remember we are dealing with sets and not multisets
      $endgroup$
      – JMoravitz
      Sep 20 at 15:59
















    8

















    $begingroup$

    Your set can be written as $a,b,c$ where $a$ happens to be the emptyset, $b$ happens to be the set containing the empty set, and $c$ happens to be the set containing the set containing the emptyset.



    You should not have any trouble seeing that $a,b,c$ is of size three so long as they are all distinct. The only possible source of confusion in this is in recognizing that each of $emptyset, emptyset$ and $emptyset$ are not only valid possible elements of a set, but are distinct and different than one another. Indeed, they are all valid possible elements of sets and are all different than one another. Remember that the "depth" of each is relevant and is part of what makes these distinct.






    share|cite|improve this answer












    $endgroup$













    • $begingroup$
      but a,b can be writen as ∅, a,b and its size is 2
      $endgroup$
      – Takobell
      Sep 20 at 15:21










    • $begingroup$
      @TarekHich yes, well, I did include pointing out that $aneq b$, $aneq c$ and $bneq c$ that $a,b,c$ are distinct, and any set $a,b,c$ where $a,b,c$ are distinct is of size three.
      $endgroup$
      – JMoravitz
      Sep 20 at 15:22










    • $begingroup$
      In the event that $x$ and $y$ are distinct and neither are equal to the emptyset, then $emptyset,x,y$ is still of size three. The only reason why $emptyset,a,b$ was of size two in your example in the comment was because $emptyset$ and $a$ were in reality the same element.
      $endgroup$
      – JMoravitz
      Sep 20 at 15:24






    • 4




      $begingroup$
      TarekHich: "but a,b can be writen as ∅, a,b and its size is 2" and JMoravitz: "yes, well". Me: Um, no..... $a,b$ can not be written as $emptyset, a, b$. The empty set is a thing and it is not in $a,b$ and it is in $emptyset, a,b$. Maybe you meant say we can write $a,b$ as $ , a, b$ where "$ $" is nothing. But $emptyset = $ is not nothing. It is something. "$ $" isn't anything at all. $emptyset$ doesn't HAVE anything at all but it IS something.
      $endgroup$
      – fleablood
      Sep 20 at 15:42











    • $begingroup$
      @fleablood perhaps you missed where I said $a$ is the empty set. Are you implying x,y can't be written in the case that x=y or is somehow different than x? Remember we are dealing with sets and not multisets
      $endgroup$
      – JMoravitz
      Sep 20 at 15:59














    8















    8











    8







    $begingroup$

    Your set can be written as $a,b,c$ where $a$ happens to be the emptyset, $b$ happens to be the set containing the empty set, and $c$ happens to be the set containing the set containing the emptyset.



    You should not have any trouble seeing that $a,b,c$ is of size three so long as they are all distinct. The only possible source of confusion in this is in recognizing that each of $emptyset, emptyset$ and $emptyset$ are not only valid possible elements of a set, but are distinct and different than one another. Indeed, they are all valid possible elements of sets and are all different than one another. Remember that the "depth" of each is relevant and is part of what makes these distinct.






    share|cite|improve this answer












    $endgroup$



    Your set can be written as $a,b,c$ where $a$ happens to be the emptyset, $b$ happens to be the set containing the empty set, and $c$ happens to be the set containing the set containing the emptyset.



    You should not have any trouble seeing that $a,b,c$ is of size three so long as they are all distinct. The only possible source of confusion in this is in recognizing that each of $emptyset, emptyset$ and $emptyset$ are not only valid possible elements of a set, but are distinct and different than one another. Indeed, they are all valid possible elements of sets and are all different than one another. Remember that the "depth" of each is relevant and is part of what makes these distinct.







    share|cite|improve this answer















    share|cite|improve this answer




    share|cite|improve this answer








    edited Sep 20 at 15:25

























    answered Sep 20 at 14:30









    JMoravitzJMoravitz

    57.6k4 gold badges46 silver badges94 bronze badges




    57.6k4 gold badges46 silver badges94 bronze badges














    • $begingroup$
      but a,b can be writen as ∅, a,b and its size is 2
      $endgroup$
      – Takobell
      Sep 20 at 15:21










    • $begingroup$
      @TarekHich yes, well, I did include pointing out that $aneq b$, $aneq c$ and $bneq c$ that $a,b,c$ are distinct, and any set $a,b,c$ where $a,b,c$ are distinct is of size three.
      $endgroup$
      – JMoravitz
      Sep 20 at 15:22










    • $begingroup$
      In the event that $x$ and $y$ are distinct and neither are equal to the emptyset, then $emptyset,x,y$ is still of size three. The only reason why $emptyset,a,b$ was of size two in your example in the comment was because $emptyset$ and $a$ were in reality the same element.
      $endgroup$
      – JMoravitz
      Sep 20 at 15:24






    • 4




      $begingroup$
      TarekHich: "but a,b can be writen as ∅, a,b and its size is 2" and JMoravitz: "yes, well". Me: Um, no..... $a,b$ can not be written as $emptyset, a, b$. The empty set is a thing and it is not in $a,b$ and it is in $emptyset, a,b$. Maybe you meant say we can write $a,b$ as $ , a, b$ where "$ $" is nothing. But $emptyset = $ is not nothing. It is something. "$ $" isn't anything at all. $emptyset$ doesn't HAVE anything at all but it IS something.
      $endgroup$
      – fleablood
      Sep 20 at 15:42











    • $begingroup$
      @fleablood perhaps you missed where I said $a$ is the empty set. Are you implying x,y can't be written in the case that x=y or is somehow different than x? Remember we are dealing with sets and not multisets
      $endgroup$
      – JMoravitz
      Sep 20 at 15:59

















    • $begingroup$
      but a,b can be writen as ∅, a,b and its size is 2
      $endgroup$
      – Takobell
      Sep 20 at 15:21










    • $begingroup$
      @TarekHich yes, well, I did include pointing out that $aneq b$, $aneq c$ and $bneq c$ that $a,b,c$ are distinct, and any set $a,b,c$ where $a,b,c$ are distinct is of size three.
      $endgroup$
      – JMoravitz
      Sep 20 at 15:22










    • $begingroup$
      In the event that $x$ and $y$ are distinct and neither are equal to the emptyset, then $emptyset,x,y$ is still of size three. The only reason why $emptyset,a,b$ was of size two in your example in the comment was because $emptyset$ and $a$ were in reality the same element.
      $endgroup$
      – JMoravitz
      Sep 20 at 15:24






    • 4




      $begingroup$
      TarekHich: "but a,b can be writen as ∅, a,b and its size is 2" and JMoravitz: "yes, well". Me: Um, no..... $a,b$ can not be written as $emptyset, a, b$. The empty set is a thing and it is not in $a,b$ and it is in $emptyset, a,b$. Maybe you meant say we can write $a,b$ as $ , a, b$ where "$ $" is nothing. But $emptyset = $ is not nothing. It is something. "$ $" isn't anything at all. $emptyset$ doesn't HAVE anything at all but it IS something.
      $endgroup$
      – fleablood
      Sep 20 at 15:42











    • $begingroup$
      @fleablood perhaps you missed where I said $a$ is the empty set. Are you implying x,y can't be written in the case that x=y or is somehow different than x? Remember we are dealing with sets and not multisets
      $endgroup$
      – JMoravitz
      Sep 20 at 15:59
















    $begingroup$
    but a,b can be writen as ∅, a,b and its size is 2
    $endgroup$
    – Takobell
    Sep 20 at 15:21




    $begingroup$
    but a,b can be writen as ∅, a,b and its size is 2
    $endgroup$
    – Takobell
    Sep 20 at 15:21












    $begingroup$
    @TarekHich yes, well, I did include pointing out that $aneq b$, $aneq c$ and $bneq c$ that $a,b,c$ are distinct, and any set $a,b,c$ where $a,b,c$ are distinct is of size three.
    $endgroup$
    – JMoravitz
    Sep 20 at 15:22




    $begingroup$
    @TarekHich yes, well, I did include pointing out that $aneq b$, $aneq c$ and $bneq c$ that $a,b,c$ are distinct, and any set $a,b,c$ where $a,b,c$ are distinct is of size three.
    $endgroup$
    – JMoravitz
    Sep 20 at 15:22












    $begingroup$
    In the event that $x$ and $y$ are distinct and neither are equal to the emptyset, then $emptyset,x,y$ is still of size three. The only reason why $emptyset,a,b$ was of size two in your example in the comment was because $emptyset$ and $a$ were in reality the same element.
    $endgroup$
    – JMoravitz
    Sep 20 at 15:24




    $begingroup$
    In the event that $x$ and $y$ are distinct and neither are equal to the emptyset, then $emptyset,x,y$ is still of size three. The only reason why $emptyset,a,b$ was of size two in your example in the comment was because $emptyset$ and $a$ were in reality the same element.
    $endgroup$
    – JMoravitz
    Sep 20 at 15:24




    4




    4




    $begingroup$
    TarekHich: "but a,b can be writen as ∅, a,b and its size is 2" and JMoravitz: "yes, well". Me: Um, no..... $a,b$ can not be written as $emptyset, a, b$. The empty set is a thing and it is not in $a,b$ and it is in $emptyset, a,b$. Maybe you meant say we can write $a,b$ as $ , a, b$ where "$ $" is nothing. But $emptyset = $ is not nothing. It is something. "$ $" isn't anything at all. $emptyset$ doesn't HAVE anything at all but it IS something.
    $endgroup$
    – fleablood
    Sep 20 at 15:42





    $begingroup$
    TarekHich: "but a,b can be writen as ∅, a,b and its size is 2" and JMoravitz: "yes, well". Me: Um, no..... $a,b$ can not be written as $emptyset, a, b$. The empty set is a thing and it is not in $a,b$ and it is in $emptyset, a,b$. Maybe you meant say we can write $a,b$ as $ , a, b$ where "$ $" is nothing. But $emptyset = $ is not nothing. It is something. "$ $" isn't anything at all. $emptyset$ doesn't HAVE anything at all but it IS something.
    $endgroup$
    – fleablood
    Sep 20 at 15:42













    $begingroup$
    @fleablood perhaps you missed where I said $a$ is the empty set. Are you implying x,y can't be written in the case that x=y or is somehow different than x? Remember we are dealing with sets and not multisets
    $endgroup$
    – JMoravitz
    Sep 20 at 15:59





    $begingroup$
    @fleablood perhaps you missed where I said $a$ is the empty set. Are you implying x,y can't be written in the case that x=y or is somehow different than x? Remember we are dealing with sets and not multisets
    $endgroup$
    – JMoravitz
    Sep 20 at 15:59














    2

















    $begingroup$

    As you are only interested in the number of elements in the set and not in the elements themself, you basically just have to count the commas, so your set has three elements, so three is its size.






    share|cite|improve this answer










    $endgroup$













    • $begingroup$
      I have mixed feelings about this answer. On the one hand it directly gets that a set has a list of things-- that the content of the things doesn't matter. But on the other hand it begs and avoids the questions. Also consider $apple, orange, banana,banana, peach, cherry$. That has has five commas but only four items. And $a,a$ has a comma indicating two items but it actually has only one.
      $endgroup$
      – fleablood
      Sep 20 at 19:33















    2

















    $begingroup$

    As you are only interested in the number of elements in the set and not in the elements themself, you basically just have to count the commas, so your set has three elements, so three is its size.






    share|cite|improve this answer










    $endgroup$













    • $begingroup$
      I have mixed feelings about this answer. On the one hand it directly gets that a set has a list of things-- that the content of the things doesn't matter. But on the other hand it begs and avoids the questions. Also consider $apple, orange, banana,banana, peach, cherry$. That has has five commas but only four items. And $a,a$ has a comma indicating two items but it actually has only one.
      $endgroup$
      – fleablood
      Sep 20 at 19:33













    2















    2











    2







    $begingroup$

    As you are only interested in the number of elements in the set and not in the elements themself, you basically just have to count the commas, so your set has three elements, so three is its size.






    share|cite|improve this answer










    $endgroup$



    As you are only interested in the number of elements in the set and not in the elements themself, you basically just have to count the commas, so your set has three elements, so three is its size.







    share|cite|improve this answer













    share|cite|improve this answer




    share|cite|improve this answer










    answered Sep 20 at 14:19









    MatthiasMatthias

    1427 bronze badges




    1427 bronze badges














    • $begingroup$
      I have mixed feelings about this answer. On the one hand it directly gets that a set has a list of things-- that the content of the things doesn't matter. But on the other hand it begs and avoids the questions. Also consider $apple, orange, banana,banana, peach, cherry$. That has has five commas but only four items. And $a,a$ has a comma indicating two items but it actually has only one.
      $endgroup$
      – fleablood
      Sep 20 at 19:33
















    • $begingroup$
      I have mixed feelings about this answer. On the one hand it directly gets that a set has a list of things-- that the content of the things doesn't matter. But on the other hand it begs and avoids the questions. Also consider $apple, orange, banana,banana, peach, cherry$. That has has five commas but only four items. And $a,a$ has a comma indicating two items but it actually has only one.
      $endgroup$
      – fleablood
      Sep 20 at 19:33















    $begingroup$
    I have mixed feelings about this answer. On the one hand it directly gets that a set has a list of things-- that the content of the things doesn't matter. But on the other hand it begs and avoids the questions. Also consider $apple, orange, banana,banana, peach, cherry$. That has has five commas but only four items. And $a,a$ has a comma indicating two items but it actually has only one.
    $endgroup$
    – fleablood
    Sep 20 at 19:33




    $begingroup$
    I have mixed feelings about this answer. On the one hand it directly gets that a set has a list of things-- that the content of the things doesn't matter. But on the other hand it begs and avoids the questions. Also consider $apple, orange, banana,banana, peach, cherry$. That has has five commas but only four items. And $a,a$ has a comma indicating two items but it actually has only one.
    $endgroup$
    – fleablood
    Sep 20 at 19:33











    2

















    $begingroup$

    1. The empty set is indeed an element of this set.





    share|cite|improve this answer










    $endgroup$


















      2

















      $begingroup$

      1. The empty set is indeed an element of this set.





      share|cite|improve this answer










      $endgroup$
















        2















        2











        2







        $begingroup$

        1. The empty set is indeed an element of this set.





        share|cite|improve this answer










        $endgroup$



        1. The empty set is indeed an element of this set.






        share|cite|improve this answer













        share|cite|improve this answer




        share|cite|improve this answer










        answered Sep 20 at 14:19









        7903766279037662

        1,16912 bronze badges




        1,16912 bronze badges































            draft saved

            draft discarded















































            Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


            • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

            But avoid


            • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

            • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

            Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


            To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




            draft saved


            draft discarded














            StackExchange.ready(
            function ()
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3363391%2fwhat-is-the-size-of-a-set-of-sets-of-the-empty-set%23new-answer', 'question_page');

            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown





















































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown

































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown









            Popular posts from this blog

            Distance measures on a map of a game The 2019 Stack Overflow Developer Survey Results Are Inmin distance in a graphShortest distance path on contour plotHow to plot a tilted map?Finding points outside of a diskDelaunay link distanceAnnulus from GeoDisks: drawing a ring on a mapNegative Correlation DistanceFind distance along a path (GPS coordinates)Finding position at given distance in a GeoPathMathematics behind distance estimation using camera

            How to get a smooth, uniform ParametricPlot of a 2D Region?How to plot a complicated Region?How to exclude a region from ParametricPlotHow discretize a region placing vertices on a specific non-uniform gridHow to transform a Plot or a ParametricPlot into a RegionHow can I get a smooth plot of a bounded region?Smooth ParametricPlot3D with RegionFunction?Smooth border of a region ParametricPlotSmooth region boundarySmooth region plot from list of pointsGet minimum y of a certain x in a region

            Genealogie vun de Merowenger Vum Merowech bis zum Chilperich I. | Navigatiounsmenü