Do Shazam and Man of Steel exist in same universe? The 2019 Stack Overflow Developer Survey Results Are InWill Billy Batson grow up to look like Shazam?How did the final confrontation in Man of Steel get resolved?How does Superman accelerate when he flies in Man of Steel?Why does General Zod need armor in the Man of Steel film?Lara's pregnancy in Man of SteelWhy use titles like 'Dark Knight' and 'Man of Steel'?Is there really a bugle trophy in Man of Steel?Why does Superman scream at the end of Man of Steel?Man of Steel Easter EggsWhy is Clark out doing random odd jobs all over in Man of Steel?What was Wonder Woman doing during the events of Man of Steel?

Does HR tell a hiring manager about salary negotiations?

Can I have a signal generator on while it's not connected?

A word that means fill it to the required quantity

Button changing its text & action. Good or terrible?

Why can't devices on different VLANs, but on the same subnet, communicate?

For what reasons would an animal species NOT cross a *horizontal* land bridge?

Why don't hard Brexiteers insist on a hard border to prevent illegal immigration after Brexit?

How come people say “Would of”?

How to type a long/em dash `—`

Worn-tile Scrabble

Why doesn't shell automatically fix "useless use of cat"?

Why couldn't they take pictures of a closer black hole?

What is the meaning of Triage in Cybersec world?

What is this sharp, curved notch on my knife for?

Dropping list elements from nested list after evaluation

How do I free up internal storage if I don't have any apps downloaded?

What does Linus Torvalds mean when he says that Git "never ever" tracks a file?

Falsification in Math vs Science

Are spiders unable to hurt humans, especially very small spiders?

How did passengers keep warm on sail ships?

Mathematics of imaging the black hole

What do I do when my TA workload is more than expected?

Ubuntu Server install with full GUI

What is the motivation for a law requiring 2 parties to consent for recording a conversation



Do Shazam and Man of Steel exist in same universe?



The 2019 Stack Overflow Developer Survey Results Are InWill Billy Batson grow up to look like Shazam?How did the final confrontation in Man of Steel get resolved?How does Superman accelerate when he flies in Man of Steel?Why does General Zod need armor in the Man of Steel film?Lara's pregnancy in Man of SteelWhy use titles like 'Dark Knight' and 'Man of Steel'?Is there really a bugle trophy in Man of Steel?Why does Superman scream at the end of Man of Steel?Man of Steel Easter EggsWhy is Clark out doing random odd jobs all over in Man of Steel?What was Wonder Woman doing during the events of Man of Steel?










8















In the mid-credit scene, we see Shazam invites Superman to his school in the lunch break.



From previous knowledge, we know that Shazam has been a part of Justice League. But there was no cameo of any of the Justice league character in the film, and that of Superman is faceless.



Do these two films exist in the same universe under the same franchise?



Somewhere on Youtube (a review channel), I heard, Henry Cavill didn't have dates for Shazam, was that the real reason?










share|improve this question
























  • Are they really calling the character Shazam?

    – Ben Plont
    2 days ago






  • 2





    @BenPlont There needs to be a side character that relentlessly teases him for the name. "Isn't there a better name you can use?" Played by Brie Larson...

    – Harper
    2 days ago







  • 2





    @BenPlont what else would the main character in a movie called Shazam be called (I know the Marvel issue).

    – JPhi1618
    2 days ago











  • @BenPlont they didn't even use the name Captain Marvel in Captain Marvel.

    – OrangeDog
    yesterday






  • 1





    @OrangeDog But we know from our knowledge that the character Carol Danvers is Captain Marvel and so is Billy Batson known to us as SHAZAM

    – RC0993
    yesterday















8















In the mid-credit scene, we see Shazam invites Superman to his school in the lunch break.



From previous knowledge, we know that Shazam has been a part of Justice League. But there was no cameo of any of the Justice league character in the film, and that of Superman is faceless.



Do these two films exist in the same universe under the same franchise?



Somewhere on Youtube (a review channel), I heard, Henry Cavill didn't have dates for Shazam, was that the real reason?










share|improve this question
























  • Are they really calling the character Shazam?

    – Ben Plont
    2 days ago






  • 2





    @BenPlont There needs to be a side character that relentlessly teases him for the name. "Isn't there a better name you can use?" Played by Brie Larson...

    – Harper
    2 days ago







  • 2





    @BenPlont what else would the main character in a movie called Shazam be called (I know the Marvel issue).

    – JPhi1618
    2 days ago











  • @BenPlont they didn't even use the name Captain Marvel in Captain Marvel.

    – OrangeDog
    yesterday






  • 1





    @OrangeDog But we know from our knowledge that the character Carol Danvers is Captain Marvel and so is Billy Batson known to us as SHAZAM

    – RC0993
    yesterday













8












8








8








In the mid-credit scene, we see Shazam invites Superman to his school in the lunch break.



From previous knowledge, we know that Shazam has been a part of Justice League. But there was no cameo of any of the Justice league character in the film, and that of Superman is faceless.



Do these two films exist in the same universe under the same franchise?



Somewhere on Youtube (a review channel), I heard, Henry Cavill didn't have dates for Shazam, was that the real reason?










share|improve this question
















In the mid-credit scene, we see Shazam invites Superman to his school in the lunch break.



From previous knowledge, we know that Shazam has been a part of Justice League. But there was no cameo of any of the Justice league character in the film, and that of Superman is faceless.



Do these two films exist in the same universe under the same franchise?



Somewhere on Youtube (a review channel), I heard, Henry Cavill didn't have dates for Shazam, was that the real reason?







character dc-extended-universe shazam






share|improve this question















share|improve this question













share|improve this question




share|improve this question








edited 2 days ago









Ankit Sharma

76.6k63408621




76.6k63408621










asked 2 days ago









RC0993RC0993

26515




26515












  • Are they really calling the character Shazam?

    – Ben Plont
    2 days ago






  • 2





    @BenPlont There needs to be a side character that relentlessly teases him for the name. "Isn't there a better name you can use?" Played by Brie Larson...

    – Harper
    2 days ago







  • 2





    @BenPlont what else would the main character in a movie called Shazam be called (I know the Marvel issue).

    – JPhi1618
    2 days ago











  • @BenPlont they didn't even use the name Captain Marvel in Captain Marvel.

    – OrangeDog
    yesterday






  • 1





    @OrangeDog But we know from our knowledge that the character Carol Danvers is Captain Marvel and so is Billy Batson known to us as SHAZAM

    – RC0993
    yesterday

















  • Are they really calling the character Shazam?

    – Ben Plont
    2 days ago






  • 2





    @BenPlont There needs to be a side character that relentlessly teases him for the name. "Isn't there a better name you can use?" Played by Brie Larson...

    – Harper
    2 days ago







  • 2





    @BenPlont what else would the main character in a movie called Shazam be called (I know the Marvel issue).

    – JPhi1618
    2 days ago











  • @BenPlont they didn't even use the name Captain Marvel in Captain Marvel.

    – OrangeDog
    yesterday






  • 1





    @OrangeDog But we know from our knowledge that the character Carol Danvers is Captain Marvel and so is Billy Batson known to us as SHAZAM

    – RC0993
    yesterday
















Are they really calling the character Shazam?

– Ben Plont
2 days ago





Are they really calling the character Shazam?

– Ben Plont
2 days ago




2




2





@BenPlont There needs to be a side character that relentlessly teases him for the name. "Isn't there a better name you can use?" Played by Brie Larson...

– Harper
2 days ago






@BenPlont There needs to be a side character that relentlessly teases him for the name. "Isn't there a better name you can use?" Played by Brie Larson...

– Harper
2 days ago





2




2





@BenPlont what else would the main character in a movie called Shazam be called (I know the Marvel issue).

– JPhi1618
2 days ago





@BenPlont what else would the main character in a movie called Shazam be called (I know the Marvel issue).

– JPhi1618
2 days ago













@BenPlont they didn't even use the name Captain Marvel in Captain Marvel.

– OrangeDog
yesterday





@BenPlont they didn't even use the name Captain Marvel in Captain Marvel.

– OrangeDog
yesterday




1




1





@OrangeDog But we know from our knowledge that the character Carol Danvers is Captain Marvel and so is Billy Batson known to us as SHAZAM

– RC0993
yesterday





@OrangeDog But we know from our knowledge that the character Carol Danvers is Captain Marvel and so is Billy Batson known to us as SHAZAM

– RC0993
yesterday










1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes


















8














Do these two films exist in the same universe under the same franchise?



Yes, and it has been said many times. Such as from indianexpress:




The movie is completely trackable on its own merit. That said, there a lot of fun little nods/homages/Easter eggs that can be enjoyed should one be caught up in the DCEU.”- Zachary Levi




Even director discussed about Aquaman joke too.



From Rrunpee:




According to every reliable internet source, Shazam is indeed set within the larger universe of the DC superheroes, at least from the ‘official DCEU starting point’ with Man of Steel, in 2013.




And they also list other sources too:




Screenrant says: the producers went to great lengths to only show background action figures the DCEU featured to date, holding back on
characters they haven’t allotted movie time to yet. It’s a deliberate
thing. It’s world-building.



ING.com reports: “So while Superman was battling Zod and then Batman and then Doomsday and then death and then Steppenwolf, Billy
Batson was being tossed around the foster care system.”




Also from CBR:




In an interview with Entertainment Weekly, Shazam! producer Peter Safran said "I wouldn’t be surprised to see Shazam play a role in the DCU. He exists in that world." What's more, there is already a plan in place, should the character make further appearances in other films. Since actor Asher Angel, who plays young Billy Batson in the film, will continue to grow up at a rapid pace, there is a contingency to make this all work. "It’s something we’ve considered and have plans in place for sequels that take into account those realities," Safran teased.




I might have missed many other such interviews but I guess you got the point.



Henry Cavill didn't have dates for Shazam, was that the real reason?



Yes, he was not available, from inverse:




“And, of course, I wanted Henry Cavill to pop up. But he was unavailable, which was disappointing.”



Sandberg remembers feeling vexed. “It’s the end of the movie. What are
we going to do?” Determined to stick as close as possible to the
original idea, he enlisted Zachary Levi’s stunt double to wear
Superman’s costume and opted to shoot the Last Son of Krypton only
from the neck down. It didn’t calm Sandberg’s nerves, however.



“We had Zack’s stunt double do it, but I was worried. Is this gonna
feel cheap? Is this not gonna work? To cut before you see his face, is
this gonna feel cheap? Are people gonna feel cheated?”



Later on in post-production, Sandberg finally relaxed when he saw the
scene cut together.



“It just made us laugh,” he says. “You see Freddy’s reaction and a
hard cut to credits, and it’s just funny. It turned out better than
what it was originally, where he sat down and had a little chat.”







share|improve this answer

























  • completely trackable on its own merit is his personal opinion. Is there any particular reason for not having a cameo? It literally showed Superman faceless, why not just get Cavill to potray his own character? I suppose your answer is acceptable as it is directly towards the question. I will wait for sometime before accepting it though.

    – RC0993
    2 days ago











  • @RC0993 it's low budget film and affording cameo maybe tough for them. And Cavil might be out of DCEU, we never know

    – Ankit Sharma
    2 days ago











  • @RC0993 updated with more info

    – Ankit Sharma
    2 days ago











  • [UPVOTE] That's insightful. Although it's low budget film and affording cameo maybe tough for them I still don't buy this to be true (more like a guess). But I liked the research behind this answer. :)

    – RC0993
    2 days ago







  • 1





    movieweb.com/henry-cavill-superman-statement-warner-bros

    – Ankit Sharma
    2 days ago


















1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes








1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes









8














Do these two films exist in the same universe under the same franchise?



Yes, and it has been said many times. Such as from indianexpress:




The movie is completely trackable on its own merit. That said, there a lot of fun little nods/homages/Easter eggs that can be enjoyed should one be caught up in the DCEU.”- Zachary Levi




Even director discussed about Aquaman joke too.



From Rrunpee:




According to every reliable internet source, Shazam is indeed set within the larger universe of the DC superheroes, at least from the ‘official DCEU starting point’ with Man of Steel, in 2013.




And they also list other sources too:




Screenrant says: the producers went to great lengths to only show background action figures the DCEU featured to date, holding back on
characters they haven’t allotted movie time to yet. It’s a deliberate
thing. It’s world-building.



ING.com reports: “So while Superman was battling Zod and then Batman and then Doomsday and then death and then Steppenwolf, Billy
Batson was being tossed around the foster care system.”




Also from CBR:




In an interview with Entertainment Weekly, Shazam! producer Peter Safran said "I wouldn’t be surprised to see Shazam play a role in the DCU. He exists in that world." What's more, there is already a plan in place, should the character make further appearances in other films. Since actor Asher Angel, who plays young Billy Batson in the film, will continue to grow up at a rapid pace, there is a contingency to make this all work. "It’s something we’ve considered and have plans in place for sequels that take into account those realities," Safran teased.




I might have missed many other such interviews but I guess you got the point.



Henry Cavill didn't have dates for Shazam, was that the real reason?



Yes, he was not available, from inverse:




“And, of course, I wanted Henry Cavill to pop up. But he was unavailable, which was disappointing.”



Sandberg remembers feeling vexed. “It’s the end of the movie. What are
we going to do?” Determined to stick as close as possible to the
original idea, he enlisted Zachary Levi’s stunt double to wear
Superman’s costume and opted to shoot the Last Son of Krypton only
from the neck down. It didn’t calm Sandberg’s nerves, however.



“We had Zack’s stunt double do it, but I was worried. Is this gonna
feel cheap? Is this not gonna work? To cut before you see his face, is
this gonna feel cheap? Are people gonna feel cheated?”



Later on in post-production, Sandberg finally relaxed when he saw the
scene cut together.



“It just made us laugh,” he says. “You see Freddy’s reaction and a
hard cut to credits, and it’s just funny. It turned out better than
what it was originally, where he sat down and had a little chat.”







share|improve this answer

























  • completely trackable on its own merit is his personal opinion. Is there any particular reason for not having a cameo? It literally showed Superman faceless, why not just get Cavill to potray his own character? I suppose your answer is acceptable as it is directly towards the question. I will wait for sometime before accepting it though.

    – RC0993
    2 days ago











  • @RC0993 it's low budget film and affording cameo maybe tough for them. And Cavil might be out of DCEU, we never know

    – Ankit Sharma
    2 days ago











  • @RC0993 updated with more info

    – Ankit Sharma
    2 days ago











  • [UPVOTE] That's insightful. Although it's low budget film and affording cameo maybe tough for them I still don't buy this to be true (more like a guess). But I liked the research behind this answer. :)

    – RC0993
    2 days ago







  • 1





    movieweb.com/henry-cavill-superman-statement-warner-bros

    – Ankit Sharma
    2 days ago















8














Do these two films exist in the same universe under the same franchise?



Yes, and it has been said many times. Such as from indianexpress:




The movie is completely trackable on its own merit. That said, there a lot of fun little nods/homages/Easter eggs that can be enjoyed should one be caught up in the DCEU.”- Zachary Levi




Even director discussed about Aquaman joke too.



From Rrunpee:




According to every reliable internet source, Shazam is indeed set within the larger universe of the DC superheroes, at least from the ‘official DCEU starting point’ with Man of Steel, in 2013.




And they also list other sources too:




Screenrant says: the producers went to great lengths to only show background action figures the DCEU featured to date, holding back on
characters they haven’t allotted movie time to yet. It’s a deliberate
thing. It’s world-building.



ING.com reports: “So while Superman was battling Zod and then Batman and then Doomsday and then death and then Steppenwolf, Billy
Batson was being tossed around the foster care system.”




Also from CBR:




In an interview with Entertainment Weekly, Shazam! producer Peter Safran said "I wouldn’t be surprised to see Shazam play a role in the DCU. He exists in that world." What's more, there is already a plan in place, should the character make further appearances in other films. Since actor Asher Angel, who plays young Billy Batson in the film, will continue to grow up at a rapid pace, there is a contingency to make this all work. "It’s something we’ve considered and have plans in place for sequels that take into account those realities," Safran teased.




I might have missed many other such interviews but I guess you got the point.



Henry Cavill didn't have dates for Shazam, was that the real reason?



Yes, he was not available, from inverse:




“And, of course, I wanted Henry Cavill to pop up. But he was unavailable, which was disappointing.”



Sandberg remembers feeling vexed. “It’s the end of the movie. What are
we going to do?” Determined to stick as close as possible to the
original idea, he enlisted Zachary Levi’s stunt double to wear
Superman’s costume and opted to shoot the Last Son of Krypton only
from the neck down. It didn’t calm Sandberg’s nerves, however.



“We had Zack’s stunt double do it, but I was worried. Is this gonna
feel cheap? Is this not gonna work? To cut before you see his face, is
this gonna feel cheap? Are people gonna feel cheated?”



Later on in post-production, Sandberg finally relaxed when he saw the
scene cut together.



“It just made us laugh,” he says. “You see Freddy’s reaction and a
hard cut to credits, and it’s just funny. It turned out better than
what it was originally, where he sat down and had a little chat.”







share|improve this answer

























  • completely trackable on its own merit is his personal opinion. Is there any particular reason for not having a cameo? It literally showed Superman faceless, why not just get Cavill to potray his own character? I suppose your answer is acceptable as it is directly towards the question. I will wait for sometime before accepting it though.

    – RC0993
    2 days ago











  • @RC0993 it's low budget film and affording cameo maybe tough for them. And Cavil might be out of DCEU, we never know

    – Ankit Sharma
    2 days ago











  • @RC0993 updated with more info

    – Ankit Sharma
    2 days ago











  • [UPVOTE] That's insightful. Although it's low budget film and affording cameo maybe tough for them I still don't buy this to be true (more like a guess). But I liked the research behind this answer. :)

    – RC0993
    2 days ago







  • 1





    movieweb.com/henry-cavill-superman-statement-warner-bros

    – Ankit Sharma
    2 days ago













8












8








8







Do these two films exist in the same universe under the same franchise?



Yes, and it has been said many times. Such as from indianexpress:




The movie is completely trackable on its own merit. That said, there a lot of fun little nods/homages/Easter eggs that can be enjoyed should one be caught up in the DCEU.”- Zachary Levi




Even director discussed about Aquaman joke too.



From Rrunpee:




According to every reliable internet source, Shazam is indeed set within the larger universe of the DC superheroes, at least from the ‘official DCEU starting point’ with Man of Steel, in 2013.




And they also list other sources too:




Screenrant says: the producers went to great lengths to only show background action figures the DCEU featured to date, holding back on
characters they haven’t allotted movie time to yet. It’s a deliberate
thing. It’s world-building.



ING.com reports: “So while Superman was battling Zod and then Batman and then Doomsday and then death and then Steppenwolf, Billy
Batson was being tossed around the foster care system.”




Also from CBR:




In an interview with Entertainment Weekly, Shazam! producer Peter Safran said "I wouldn’t be surprised to see Shazam play a role in the DCU. He exists in that world." What's more, there is already a plan in place, should the character make further appearances in other films. Since actor Asher Angel, who plays young Billy Batson in the film, will continue to grow up at a rapid pace, there is a contingency to make this all work. "It’s something we’ve considered and have plans in place for sequels that take into account those realities," Safran teased.




I might have missed many other such interviews but I guess you got the point.



Henry Cavill didn't have dates for Shazam, was that the real reason?



Yes, he was not available, from inverse:




“And, of course, I wanted Henry Cavill to pop up. But he was unavailable, which was disappointing.”



Sandberg remembers feeling vexed. “It’s the end of the movie. What are
we going to do?” Determined to stick as close as possible to the
original idea, he enlisted Zachary Levi’s stunt double to wear
Superman’s costume and opted to shoot the Last Son of Krypton only
from the neck down. It didn’t calm Sandberg’s nerves, however.



“We had Zack’s stunt double do it, but I was worried. Is this gonna
feel cheap? Is this not gonna work? To cut before you see his face, is
this gonna feel cheap? Are people gonna feel cheated?”



Later on in post-production, Sandberg finally relaxed when he saw the
scene cut together.



“It just made us laugh,” he says. “You see Freddy’s reaction and a
hard cut to credits, and it’s just funny. It turned out better than
what it was originally, where he sat down and had a little chat.”







share|improve this answer















Do these two films exist in the same universe under the same franchise?



Yes, and it has been said many times. Such as from indianexpress:




The movie is completely trackable on its own merit. That said, there a lot of fun little nods/homages/Easter eggs that can be enjoyed should one be caught up in the DCEU.”- Zachary Levi




Even director discussed about Aquaman joke too.



From Rrunpee:




According to every reliable internet source, Shazam is indeed set within the larger universe of the DC superheroes, at least from the ‘official DCEU starting point’ with Man of Steel, in 2013.




And they also list other sources too:




Screenrant says: the producers went to great lengths to only show background action figures the DCEU featured to date, holding back on
characters they haven’t allotted movie time to yet. It’s a deliberate
thing. It’s world-building.



ING.com reports: “So while Superman was battling Zod and then Batman and then Doomsday and then death and then Steppenwolf, Billy
Batson was being tossed around the foster care system.”




Also from CBR:




In an interview with Entertainment Weekly, Shazam! producer Peter Safran said "I wouldn’t be surprised to see Shazam play a role in the DCU. He exists in that world." What's more, there is already a plan in place, should the character make further appearances in other films. Since actor Asher Angel, who plays young Billy Batson in the film, will continue to grow up at a rapid pace, there is a contingency to make this all work. "It’s something we’ve considered and have plans in place for sequels that take into account those realities," Safran teased.




I might have missed many other such interviews but I guess you got the point.



Henry Cavill didn't have dates for Shazam, was that the real reason?



Yes, he was not available, from inverse:




“And, of course, I wanted Henry Cavill to pop up. But he was unavailable, which was disappointing.”



Sandberg remembers feeling vexed. “It’s the end of the movie. What are
we going to do?” Determined to stick as close as possible to the
original idea, he enlisted Zachary Levi’s stunt double to wear
Superman’s costume and opted to shoot the Last Son of Krypton only
from the neck down. It didn’t calm Sandberg’s nerves, however.



“We had Zack’s stunt double do it, but I was worried. Is this gonna
feel cheap? Is this not gonna work? To cut before you see his face, is
this gonna feel cheap? Are people gonna feel cheated?”



Later on in post-production, Sandberg finally relaxed when he saw the
scene cut together.



“It just made us laugh,” he says. “You see Freddy’s reaction and a
hard cut to credits, and it’s just funny. It turned out better than
what it was originally, where he sat down and had a little chat.”








share|improve this answer














share|improve this answer



share|improve this answer








edited 2 days ago

























answered 2 days ago









Ankit SharmaAnkit Sharma

76.6k63408621




76.6k63408621












  • completely trackable on its own merit is his personal opinion. Is there any particular reason for not having a cameo? It literally showed Superman faceless, why not just get Cavill to potray his own character? I suppose your answer is acceptable as it is directly towards the question. I will wait for sometime before accepting it though.

    – RC0993
    2 days ago











  • @RC0993 it's low budget film and affording cameo maybe tough for them. And Cavil might be out of DCEU, we never know

    – Ankit Sharma
    2 days ago











  • @RC0993 updated with more info

    – Ankit Sharma
    2 days ago











  • [UPVOTE] That's insightful. Although it's low budget film and affording cameo maybe tough for them I still don't buy this to be true (more like a guess). But I liked the research behind this answer. :)

    – RC0993
    2 days ago







  • 1





    movieweb.com/henry-cavill-superman-statement-warner-bros

    – Ankit Sharma
    2 days ago

















  • completely trackable on its own merit is his personal opinion. Is there any particular reason for not having a cameo? It literally showed Superman faceless, why not just get Cavill to potray his own character? I suppose your answer is acceptable as it is directly towards the question. I will wait for sometime before accepting it though.

    – RC0993
    2 days ago











  • @RC0993 it's low budget film and affording cameo maybe tough for them. And Cavil might be out of DCEU, we never know

    – Ankit Sharma
    2 days ago











  • @RC0993 updated with more info

    – Ankit Sharma
    2 days ago











  • [UPVOTE] That's insightful. Although it's low budget film and affording cameo maybe tough for them I still don't buy this to be true (more like a guess). But I liked the research behind this answer. :)

    – RC0993
    2 days ago







  • 1





    movieweb.com/henry-cavill-superman-statement-warner-bros

    – Ankit Sharma
    2 days ago
















completely trackable on its own merit is his personal opinion. Is there any particular reason for not having a cameo? It literally showed Superman faceless, why not just get Cavill to potray his own character? I suppose your answer is acceptable as it is directly towards the question. I will wait for sometime before accepting it though.

– RC0993
2 days ago





completely trackable on its own merit is his personal opinion. Is there any particular reason for not having a cameo? It literally showed Superman faceless, why not just get Cavill to potray his own character? I suppose your answer is acceptable as it is directly towards the question. I will wait for sometime before accepting it though.

– RC0993
2 days ago













@RC0993 it's low budget film and affording cameo maybe tough for them. And Cavil might be out of DCEU, we never know

– Ankit Sharma
2 days ago





@RC0993 it's low budget film and affording cameo maybe tough for them. And Cavil might be out of DCEU, we never know

– Ankit Sharma
2 days ago













@RC0993 updated with more info

– Ankit Sharma
2 days ago





@RC0993 updated with more info

– Ankit Sharma
2 days ago













[UPVOTE] That's insightful. Although it's low budget film and affording cameo maybe tough for them I still don't buy this to be true (more like a guess). But I liked the research behind this answer. :)

– RC0993
2 days ago






[UPVOTE] That's insightful. Although it's low budget film and affording cameo maybe tough for them I still don't buy this to be true (more like a guess). But I liked the research behind this answer. :)

– RC0993
2 days ago





1




1





movieweb.com/henry-cavill-superman-statement-warner-bros

– Ankit Sharma
2 days ago





movieweb.com/henry-cavill-superman-statement-warner-bros

– Ankit Sharma
2 days ago



Popular posts from this blog

Tamil (spriik) Luke uk diar | Nawigatjuun

Align equal signs while including text over equalitiesAMS align: left aligned text/math plus multicolumn alignmentMultiple alignmentsAligning equations in multiple placesNumbering and aligning an equation with multiple columnsHow to align one equation with another multline equationUsing \ in environments inside the begintabularxNumber equations and preserving alignment of equal signsHow can I align equations to the left and to the right?Double equation alignment problem within align enviromentAligned within align: Why are they right-aligned?

Where does the image of a data connector as a sharp metal spike originate from?Where does the concept of infected people turning into zombies only after death originate from?Where does the motif of a reanimated human head originate?Where did the notion that Dragons could speak originate?Where does the archetypal image of the 'Grey' alien come from?Where did the suffix '-Man' originate?Where does the notion of being injured or killed by an illusion originate?Where did the term “sophont” originate?Where does the trope of magic spells being driven by advanced technology originate from?Where did the term “the living impaired” originate?