What could be the right powersource for 15 seconds lifespan disposable giant chainsaw? The 2019 Stack Overflow Developer Survey Results Are InWhich edge shape is better to cut things with for a chain sword type/style?If we had easier access to antimatter, how could we use it?Space weaponry?Can one Battlestar conquer Earth?Could the principle of the zero point energy universe be used for infinite energy?Sci-fi Science: Physics of Impossibru: “Force fields”In a SciFi world, how could a “suit” cary 1000X+ times the wearer's weight/volume?Feasibility of a village improving its economy through hot springsThe time it takes to advance a medieval period country to a spacefaring intergalactic countryWhat (modern) weapons could be used to destroy skeletal enemies as completely as possible?What would be the ideal way to weaponize plasma?

APIPA and LAN Broadcast Domain

Straighten subgroup lattice

Does adding complexity mean a more secure cipher?

Mathematics of imaging the black hole

Ubuntu Server install with full GUI

Is it possible for absolutely everyone to attain enlightenment?

What information about me do stores get via my credit card?

Accepted by European university, rejected by all American ones I applied to? Possible reasons?

Relationship between Gromov-Witten and Taubes' Gromov invariant

When should I buy a clipper card after flying to Oakland?

What is this sharp, curved notch on my knife for?

For what reasons would an animal species NOT cross a *horizontal* land bridge?

Why couldn't they take pictures of a closer black hole?

What is this business jet?

Does HR tell a hiring manager about salary negotiations?

What is the most efficient way to store a numeric range?

How much of the clove should I use when using big garlic heads?

Why does the nucleus not repel itself?

If I can cast sorceries at instant speed, can I use sorcery-speed activated abilities at instant speed?

Why don't hard Brexiteers insist on a hard border to prevent illegal immigration after Brexit?

What to do when moving next to a bird sanctuary with a loosely-domesticated cat?

What's the name of these plastic connectors

Did the UK government pay "millions and millions of dollars" to try to snag Julian Assange?

Will it cause any balance problems to have PCs level up and gain the benefits of a long rest mid-fight?



What could be the right powersource for 15 seconds lifespan disposable giant chainsaw?



The 2019 Stack Overflow Developer Survey Results Are InWhich edge shape is better to cut things with for a chain sword type/style?If we had easier access to antimatter, how could we use it?Space weaponry?Can one Battlestar conquer Earth?Could the principle of the zero point energy universe be used for infinite energy?Sci-fi Science: Physics of Impossibru: “Force fields”In a SciFi world, how could a “suit” cary 1000X+ times the wearer's weight/volume?Feasibility of a village improving its economy through hot springsThe time it takes to advance a medieval period country to a spacefaring intergalactic countryWhat (modern) weapons could be used to destroy skeletal enemies as completely as possible?What would be the ideal way to weaponize plasma?










35












$begingroup$


Imagine when a jet fighter swoops in to drop a 400 pounds giant chainsaw to you just so that you can use it to grind down one problematic enemy into a pulp then discard it a foot away from you. What power source would suit such a weapon with only 1 instant use before breaking itself apart?










share|improve this question











$endgroup$







  • 12




    $begingroup$
    This whole concept seems unwise to me. 400lbs is crazy amount of weight to wield, which assume the chainsaw survives landing, and it lands near you. Range is way too close to have a problematic enemy for my comfort. Instead how about 100lbs or so of frag grenades or similar you can use from a safe distance. Range, damages, easy to use, and multiples can be deployed to same target easily.
    $endgroup$
    – cybernard
    2 days ago






  • 35




    $begingroup$
    @cybernard The whole concept is batshit insane. It's obviously intended for a fictional universe driven by the rule of cool and not by rationality.
    $endgroup$
    – Philipp
    2 days ago







  • 14




    $begingroup$
    @Philipp there is rule of cool and there's stuff that breaks the suspension of disbelief. I do believe that with chainsaw planes, any hope for realism goes right out the window... which doesn't necessarily make the resulting fiction bad, but it does make the need for defined inner workings quite a bit less necessary.
    $endgroup$
    – John Dvorak
    2 days ago






  • 15




    $begingroup$
    In a universe where coolness trumps sanity when it comes to conflict, chainsaw planes make perfect sense. As do superhero landings (They’re hell on the knees), giant floating air fortresses and flashy uniforms with the underpants on the outside. Basically this is the kind of thing any superhero film could benefit from.
    $endgroup$
    – Joe Bloggs
    2 days ago






  • 12




    $begingroup$
    I initially read this as the jet dropping the chainsaw directly on the enemy, which is also awesome.
    $endgroup$
    – TKK
    yesterday















35












$begingroup$


Imagine when a jet fighter swoops in to drop a 400 pounds giant chainsaw to you just so that you can use it to grind down one problematic enemy into a pulp then discard it a foot away from you. What power source would suit such a weapon with only 1 instant use before breaking itself apart?










share|improve this question











$endgroup$







  • 12




    $begingroup$
    This whole concept seems unwise to me. 400lbs is crazy amount of weight to wield, which assume the chainsaw survives landing, and it lands near you. Range is way too close to have a problematic enemy for my comfort. Instead how about 100lbs or so of frag grenades or similar you can use from a safe distance. Range, damages, easy to use, and multiples can be deployed to same target easily.
    $endgroup$
    – cybernard
    2 days ago






  • 35




    $begingroup$
    @cybernard The whole concept is batshit insane. It's obviously intended for a fictional universe driven by the rule of cool and not by rationality.
    $endgroup$
    – Philipp
    2 days ago







  • 14




    $begingroup$
    @Philipp there is rule of cool and there's stuff that breaks the suspension of disbelief. I do believe that with chainsaw planes, any hope for realism goes right out the window... which doesn't necessarily make the resulting fiction bad, but it does make the need for defined inner workings quite a bit less necessary.
    $endgroup$
    – John Dvorak
    2 days ago






  • 15




    $begingroup$
    In a universe where coolness trumps sanity when it comes to conflict, chainsaw planes make perfect sense. As do superhero landings (They’re hell on the knees), giant floating air fortresses and flashy uniforms with the underpants on the outside. Basically this is the kind of thing any superhero film could benefit from.
    $endgroup$
    – Joe Bloggs
    2 days ago






  • 12




    $begingroup$
    I initially read this as the jet dropping the chainsaw directly on the enemy, which is also awesome.
    $endgroup$
    – TKK
    yesterday













35












35








35


4



$begingroup$


Imagine when a jet fighter swoops in to drop a 400 pounds giant chainsaw to you just so that you can use it to grind down one problematic enemy into a pulp then discard it a foot away from you. What power source would suit such a weapon with only 1 instant use before breaking itself apart?










share|improve this question











$endgroup$




Imagine when a jet fighter swoops in to drop a 400 pounds giant chainsaw to you just so that you can use it to grind down one problematic enemy into a pulp then discard it a foot away from you. What power source would suit such a weapon with only 1 instant use before breaking itself apart?







reality-check technology science-fiction energy






share|improve this question















share|improve this question













share|improve this question




share|improve this question








edited 2 days ago









Cyn

11.2k12453




11.2k12453










asked 2 days ago









67ironwhale67ironwhale

18925




18925







  • 12




    $begingroup$
    This whole concept seems unwise to me. 400lbs is crazy amount of weight to wield, which assume the chainsaw survives landing, and it lands near you. Range is way too close to have a problematic enemy for my comfort. Instead how about 100lbs or so of frag grenades or similar you can use from a safe distance. Range, damages, easy to use, and multiples can be deployed to same target easily.
    $endgroup$
    – cybernard
    2 days ago






  • 35




    $begingroup$
    @cybernard The whole concept is batshit insane. It's obviously intended for a fictional universe driven by the rule of cool and not by rationality.
    $endgroup$
    – Philipp
    2 days ago







  • 14




    $begingroup$
    @Philipp there is rule of cool and there's stuff that breaks the suspension of disbelief. I do believe that with chainsaw planes, any hope for realism goes right out the window... which doesn't necessarily make the resulting fiction bad, but it does make the need for defined inner workings quite a bit less necessary.
    $endgroup$
    – John Dvorak
    2 days ago






  • 15




    $begingroup$
    In a universe where coolness trumps sanity when it comes to conflict, chainsaw planes make perfect sense. As do superhero landings (They’re hell on the knees), giant floating air fortresses and flashy uniforms with the underpants on the outside. Basically this is the kind of thing any superhero film could benefit from.
    $endgroup$
    – Joe Bloggs
    2 days ago






  • 12




    $begingroup$
    I initially read this as the jet dropping the chainsaw directly on the enemy, which is also awesome.
    $endgroup$
    – TKK
    yesterday












  • 12




    $begingroup$
    This whole concept seems unwise to me. 400lbs is crazy amount of weight to wield, which assume the chainsaw survives landing, and it lands near you. Range is way too close to have a problematic enemy for my comfort. Instead how about 100lbs or so of frag grenades or similar you can use from a safe distance. Range, damages, easy to use, and multiples can be deployed to same target easily.
    $endgroup$
    – cybernard
    2 days ago






  • 35




    $begingroup$
    @cybernard The whole concept is batshit insane. It's obviously intended for a fictional universe driven by the rule of cool and not by rationality.
    $endgroup$
    – Philipp
    2 days ago







  • 14




    $begingroup$
    @Philipp there is rule of cool and there's stuff that breaks the suspension of disbelief. I do believe that with chainsaw planes, any hope for realism goes right out the window... which doesn't necessarily make the resulting fiction bad, but it does make the need for defined inner workings quite a bit less necessary.
    $endgroup$
    – John Dvorak
    2 days ago






  • 15




    $begingroup$
    In a universe where coolness trumps sanity when it comes to conflict, chainsaw planes make perfect sense. As do superhero landings (They’re hell on the knees), giant floating air fortresses and flashy uniforms with the underpants on the outside. Basically this is the kind of thing any superhero film could benefit from.
    $endgroup$
    – Joe Bloggs
    2 days ago






  • 12




    $begingroup$
    I initially read this as the jet dropping the chainsaw directly on the enemy, which is also awesome.
    $endgroup$
    – TKK
    yesterday







12




12




$begingroup$
This whole concept seems unwise to me. 400lbs is crazy amount of weight to wield, which assume the chainsaw survives landing, and it lands near you. Range is way too close to have a problematic enemy for my comfort. Instead how about 100lbs or so of frag grenades or similar you can use from a safe distance. Range, damages, easy to use, and multiples can be deployed to same target easily.
$endgroup$
– cybernard
2 days ago




$begingroup$
This whole concept seems unwise to me. 400lbs is crazy amount of weight to wield, which assume the chainsaw survives landing, and it lands near you. Range is way too close to have a problematic enemy for my comfort. Instead how about 100lbs or so of frag grenades or similar you can use from a safe distance. Range, damages, easy to use, and multiples can be deployed to same target easily.
$endgroup$
– cybernard
2 days ago




35




35




$begingroup$
@cybernard The whole concept is batshit insane. It's obviously intended for a fictional universe driven by the rule of cool and not by rationality.
$endgroup$
– Philipp
2 days ago





$begingroup$
@cybernard The whole concept is batshit insane. It's obviously intended for a fictional universe driven by the rule of cool and not by rationality.
$endgroup$
– Philipp
2 days ago





14




14




$begingroup$
@Philipp there is rule of cool and there's stuff that breaks the suspension of disbelief. I do believe that with chainsaw planes, any hope for realism goes right out the window... which doesn't necessarily make the resulting fiction bad, but it does make the need for defined inner workings quite a bit less necessary.
$endgroup$
– John Dvorak
2 days ago




$begingroup$
@Philipp there is rule of cool and there's stuff that breaks the suspension of disbelief. I do believe that with chainsaw planes, any hope for realism goes right out the window... which doesn't necessarily make the resulting fiction bad, but it does make the need for defined inner workings quite a bit less necessary.
$endgroup$
– John Dvorak
2 days ago




15




15




$begingroup$
In a universe where coolness trumps sanity when it comes to conflict, chainsaw planes make perfect sense. As do superhero landings (They’re hell on the knees), giant floating air fortresses and flashy uniforms with the underpants on the outside. Basically this is the kind of thing any superhero film could benefit from.
$endgroup$
– Joe Bloggs
2 days ago




$begingroup$
In a universe where coolness trumps sanity when it comes to conflict, chainsaw planes make perfect sense. As do superhero landings (They’re hell on the knees), giant floating air fortresses and flashy uniforms with the underpants on the outside. Basically this is the kind of thing any superhero film could benefit from.
$endgroup$
– Joe Bloggs
2 days ago




12




12




$begingroup$
I initially read this as the jet dropping the chainsaw directly on the enemy, which is also awesome.
$endgroup$
– TKK
yesterday




$begingroup$
I initially read this as the jet dropping the chainsaw directly on the enemy, which is also awesome.
$endgroup$
– TKK
yesterday










20 Answers
20






active

oldest

votes


















107












$begingroup$

Giant coiled spring.



It would uncoil itself and drive the chain. It would provide loads of power on demand. Storing that kind of energy as a coiled spring is dangerous, but I see that as a positive thing for your scenario.






share|improve this answer









$endgroup$








  • 12




    $begingroup$
    +1 for being rechargeable
    $endgroup$
    – Trevor D
    2 days ago






  • 3




    $begingroup$
    I like this. It's not very realistic, but it sure as heck is cool..
    $endgroup$
    – John Dvorak
    2 days ago






  • 25




    $begingroup$
    @JohnDvorak Ah yes, the quest for a realistic power source for a single use jet-delivered chainsaw.
    $endgroup$
    – corsiKa
    yesterday






  • 3




    $begingroup$
    I like it as super practical. Any electric source requires an electric motor. This is the energy source and the source of rotational motion, all in one package.
    $endgroup$
    – cmm
    yesterday






  • 11




    $begingroup$
    Spring tension can hold the drive train together as well. When the spring looses tension it could literally fall apart as the question suggests. If you've ever taken apart a tape measure and had a part slip out of your hands you'll get what I'm talking about.
    $endgroup$
    – JPhi1618
    yesterday


















32












$begingroup$

Pyrotechnics, in the form of twin spinning rockets rotating the saw axle. You have jet fighters, missiles would look like an obvious option. And as a bonus, a faulty device would explode throwing shrapnel into the enemy.






share|improve this answer











$endgroup$








  • 3




    $begingroup$
    I think I like this, not because it is the best answer, but because it is sooo bad that it fits perfectly with an air-dropped, single use, 400lb chainsaw.
    $endgroup$
    – Nosajimiki
    15 hours ago


















27












$begingroup$

Capacitors. These are electric components which store an electric charge for a limited amount of time and can release it very rapidly. They are relatively cheap and easy to manufacture. They are also reusable, but that doesn't matter in this case.



Capacitors can be manufactured in many different ways depending on their desired characteristics. But in general they have a lower energy density than chemical power cells, but they can release their stored energy a lot faster.



Capacitors are usually not designed to hold a charge for longer than a couple hours, so the capacitors either need to be charged before the mission or during the mission from the fighter's internal power supply.






share|improve this answer











$endgroup$








  • 6




    $begingroup$
    "... usually not designed to hold a charge..." ?? Depends drastically on the application. Whatever you do, never touch the flyback capacitor on a CRT without shorting it first. They hold significant voltage for years.
    $endgroup$
    – Carl Witthoft
    2 days ago






  • 2




    $begingroup$
    @CarlWitthoft, years is a bit of an exaggeration. The self discharge rate of capacitors (as in no bleeder resistors) is still in the range of days. Supercapacitors have a lower self discharge rate but is still not remotely in the realm of years. Though, I'm always happy to be wrong, I did some quick checking but maybe I missed some edge case where that's true.
    $endgroup$
    – Jarrod Christman
    2 days ago







  • 8




    $begingroup$
    Capacitor 'hold time' depends on design and materials used. While they'll slowly leak it is well within the realm of possibility to design such a capacitor that could be charged on loading of the weapon and last for a 6-12 hour mission with useful load. Also keep in mind that 'discharged' doesn't always mean 'empty' - Very large caps can still hold enough to give you a solid kick years later, even if they're well below 'useful' levels that it was intended to be used at. In short: Don't lick caps.
    $endgroup$
    – TheLuckless
    2 days ago






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    I updated the answer in light of the recent comments.
    $endgroup$
    – Philipp
    2 days ago






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    @NathanHinchey, almost all capacitors that 'hold a charge' years later have actually self-charged, just a little bit. Industrial capacitors have to be stored with the terminals shorted out or they can hurt the next person who goes to touch them. There's no useful power really, but they can get to a couple of percent of their voltage rating if you leave them alone.
    $endgroup$
    – Sean Boddy
    yesterday


















19












$begingroup$

Launching from a plane, that chainsaw is going to waste a lot of nice gravitational energy, which could be used for much more interesting tasks, such as providing motion to the chainsaw itself.



So, the chainsaw itself is tethered to the plane with a very long roller chain, which is connected to a pinion inside the chainsaw (think of a Beyblade launcher).

When launched from the plane, the chainsaw falls, so that the roller chain makes the pinion start rotating. The pinion will then transmit the motion to the chainsaw, so that it will rotate at full speed when touching ground!



Alternatively, a parachute could open and hold a reel with the roller chain tethered to the chainsaw, which is still falling relative to the parachute.






share|improve this answer











$endgroup$








  • 2




    $begingroup$
    basically a flywheel, charged by gravity
    $endgroup$
    – ChuckCottrill
    yesterday






  • 2




    $begingroup$
    This could cause the chainsaw to fall more slowly, as some of it's gravitational energy is being co-opted to spin it. How about letting the chainsaw fall with a slack roller chain, then when the person catches it, the roller chain, which is still attached to the jet, gets yanked away by the jet, starting the chainsaw. Like a combination of launching a beyblade and using a string attached to your dog's collar to yank a loose tooth out.
    $endgroup$
    – Jared K
    yesterday










  • $begingroup$
    +1 for beating even the "pyrotechnics" answer in how ridiculously entertaining it would be to see.
    $endgroup$
    – mtraceur
    2 hours ago


















17












$begingroup$

I would go for a pneumatic solution. It can support easily a 40 pound high pressure container storing sufficient energy for 15 seconds.






share|improve this answer








New contributor




user9 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.






$endgroup$








  • 3




    $begingroup$
    Also consider the giant farting sound on, ahem, discharge. Use methane as the gas, and then light the exhaust, and use the flame jets. IDK how, but use them.
    $endgroup$
    – Neal
    2 days ago







  • 1




    $begingroup$
    @Neal simple: what's better than a chainsaw at maiming your enemy? The MurderCo Rocket-Propelled Chainsaw (patents pending)! Why use measly human (or whatever other species) appendages to thrust your chainsaw into your enemy when our patented diverters use the combustion exhaust to launch it at your enemy? Warning, adult supervision required, MurderCo is not responsible for loss of limbs or life, property damage, or damages caused by Acts of Stupid (which includes all actions taken using the MurderCo RPC).
    $endgroup$
    – Doktor J
    2 days ago










  • $begingroup$
    A flatulentic turbocharged curled discharge. Are we still talking about Taco Bell?
    $endgroup$
    – Juha Untinen
    yesterday


















11












$begingroup$

As an alternative to coiled spring you can have your own gyro core (or flywheel).



Make a small and dense wheel to rotate very fast on pins in your chainsaw, virtually without energy loss, and then give it all away to chain blades. After it is discharged it becomes a useless piece of metal without any electronics or stuff. It is also much safer to operate than coiled spring.



If anything it will also stabilize delivery of this chainsaw.






share|improve this answer









$endgroup$








  • 3




    $begingroup$
    Trying to manoeuvre such a weapon would be nigh on impossible if you used it to store any appreciable energy, surely?
    $endgroup$
    – Joe Bloggs
    2 days ago










  • $begingroup$
    You could put your gyro core into gyro stabilizer, which will let you handle such weapon. Or maybe it's not even necessary given the question details.
    $endgroup$
    – alamar
    2 days ago






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Probably storing the spun up weapons in opposite-spun pairs always would compensate some unwanted effect AND stabilize your aircraft?
    $endgroup$
    – rackandboneman
    yesterday










  • $begingroup$
    Just use counter-rotating gyros.
    $endgroup$
    – RBarryYoung
    yesterday


















11












$begingroup$

While the question does not explicitly specify this, I think it is reasonable to specify some, er, specifications.



  • Extreme energy density. The goal of this weapon seems to be to deliver as much destruction as possible in 15 seconds, in a 400lb package which is probably the weight limit for the weapon stores on the jet. It is desirable that the majority of this 400lb is gnawing teeth of mushy annihilation, and only a small part is fuel and power source.


  • Extreme reliability. If a air-dropped 400lb giant disposable chainsaw seems like the best way out of a situation, you are probably in deep, deep trouble. You don't want to be yanking a starter cord on a dodgy two-stroke while the Tentacles of Kaza'An the Soul Destroyer of Mag-Uhn squeeze the life out of your fellow unlucky party members. You shouldn't have to carefully lubricate the moving parts of your jammed chainsaw while the Teeth of Brig-Wrath the Extirpator of Zw'n-Thragg dismember your group members. You want to have instant destruction available the moment you receive the weapon. You might even want to be able to use the device on Frizhger the Mauling Shark-Fish, submerged in the Sea of Despair.


Obviously, air-breathing engines are no good, what with the underwater Mauling Shark-Fish (also, the torrential rains on Zw'n-Thragg!). Electrics are really not great either - they require careful isolation from the environment, and frankly, the energy density of batteries are quite terrible - you don't want to run out of power halfway one of Kaza'An's Tentacles.



The obvious solution is a hydrazine turbine engine. Hydrazine is an extremely reactive fuel, that does not need an external source of oxygen. It is used as a rocket fuel (where energy density is key). A turbine engine probably has the highest power-to-weight ratio of any rotating engine, and furthermore it only has a single moving part, which can be connected with a single reduction gear to the saw chain. The reaction products of running hydrazine over a catalyst such as iridium are extremely hot nitrogen and hydrogen gas, the latter of which can also combust once it does come into contact with the outside air.



The end result is a screeching whining chainsaw of death spitting blue flames from its exhaust. Chances are the extirpation days of Brig-Wrath are soon over.






share|improve this answer









$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    I like your logic, but why bother with the complexity of a turbine and reduction gearing when you could put hydrazine rockets on the chain itself
    $endgroup$
    – Robin Bennett
    yesterday






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    @Robin I considered that but half of the rockets will be facing the chainsaw operators. An alternative is to have a rocket pointing directly at the chain but in these case the chain needs to be a compromise between gnawy teethiness and power transfer. All in all I liked the turbine option best.
    $endgroup$
    – Sanchises
    yesterday










  • $begingroup$
    +1 for pointing out the kinds of circumstances required for this kind of weapon and delivery system to even be considered.
    $endgroup$
    – Perkins
    yesterday










  • $begingroup$
    @Perkins Circumstances such as, but not limited to, the examples listed above. :)
    $endgroup$
    – Sanchises
    yesterday






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    @MerseyViking No need to be so negative! The decomposition products of hydrazine are hydrogen, nitrogen and ammonia. Only the latter is mildly toxic in elevated quantities, but does not case acid rain. The only real problem is the Miak Salmon infestation - a rare fish that uses proton pumps in its gills to convert dissolved ammonia to a liquorice-like substance dubbed Sal'Miak by the local population.
    $endgroup$
    – Sanchises
    13 hours ago


















7












$begingroup$

Well if you only need it very briefly I'd recommend a power cell.



Where batteries provide a slow trickle of stored energy over time,power cells can dump all of their energy in an instant. So that chainsaw purpose built to be disposable but very deadly could literally be torn apart from the energy it exerts in its short period of activity.



Also this means that being disposable the chainsaw would be made of cheaper materials. Since the power cell never needs to be replaced as it is a one-off use it can be made non-rechargeable and self-destructing. Not in the way it blows up when used, but it burns out the internal storage from the incredible heat and shock of the energy release.



All in all, the chainsaws shall exist. And they shall be terrifying. Maybe just make the edge out of carbon nano-tubes? Nano-tubes can also be used to store energy within their mass much like batteries or power cells. So you could literally make the chainsaw one giant power cell made of an extremely energy dense but light material that at 400 lbs would have enough power to immolate an elephant entirely most likely.



Your chainsaw would have the power of a bomb, all put towards a few glorious seconds to a minute at most of incredibly destructive power as the blade super heats and the chainsaw loses cohesion as the power which simultaneously kept it together suddenly runs out.



I hope this helps.






share|improve this answer











$endgroup$








  • 4




    $begingroup$
    Aren't batteries and power cells the same thing? A battery is a group of several cells linked together. If you cut open something like an AA battery, you will find button cells inside of it. Even car batteries are made up of several different cells.
    $endgroup$
    – Liam Morris
    2 days ago










  • $begingroup$
    @LiamMorris In fact, it may even be the opposite: each power gives you some power, so you want as many as possible to have the highest possible power (but for the shortest time)
    $endgroup$
    – Eth
    2 days ago






  • 2




    $begingroup$
    Maybe use super capacitors. They can deliver huge amount of power in short time.
    $endgroup$
    – jnovacho
    2 days ago










  • $begingroup$
    @jnovacho Good idea. I will write an answer based on this.
    $endgroup$
    – Philipp
    2 days ago






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    That moment where tired me put power cell instead of fuel cell. -.- I am talking about fuel cells made using carbon nano-tubes.
    $endgroup$
    – Jeremy Barrett
    yesterday


















4












$begingroup$

The parameters of the problem are:



  1. Single-use ordnance

  2. Power-to-weight is a significant constraint

  3. Brief duration of discharge

  4. Cheap-ish (we're talking about a disposable giant chainsaw here)

So you're probably looking at a chemical energy source that needs to be converted to mechanical energy. That rules out any high-explosive, and anyway, explosives expend much of their energy in brisance.



Fuels like Otto II driving a turbine are one possibility, if you'd like the system to be self-contained (i.e. not subject the user to exhaust fumes). If that is not a serious consideration (e.g. you are okay with a fire-belching disposable giant chainsaw), then the parameters of the problem closely resemble the energy requirements of a rocket.



I'm partial to a powderized-aluminum + ammonium nitrate mixture, myself.






share|improve this answer








New contributor




Arthur Chan is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.






$endgroup$




















    3












    $begingroup$

    Googling "battery in missiles" led me to the page of a company manufacturing and selling such solutions.



    I am guessing your solution would be "thermal battery". I do not think they are selling a solution just for you but the duration and power can be tailored to application. Also, such batteries are used by military using similar "mil-tech" would probably fit the back story.



    Also such batteries are single use, durable, reliable and have long shelf life.



    Some of the other battery chemistries they offer might work better for you, so you might want to check them out. They might be rechargeable though.






    share|improve this answer









    $endgroup$












    • $begingroup$
      Also known as "molten salt battery"
      $endgroup$
      – IronEagle
      yesterday


















    2












    $begingroup$

    Well possibly the easiest power source to use would be a battery, you can accurately determine how much ‘life’ it could give to a piece of electronics by setting the max capacity and charging it until it is full.



    Although, if your problem is just that you need to get the chainsaws down safely, i would recommend using parachutes or heavily padded drop boxes to ensure the contents were undamaged. At that point you could use whatever fuel you liked as it would not be damaged from the fall.



    However, i don’t think you’d want to use chainsaws, especially ones that heavy, as weapons. They are not particularly effective, are slow and 400 pounds is about the weight of two humans. At that point you might as well be using a giant maul instead. Here is an answer where i explained the issues with chainsaw weapons. There is also a link to a youtube video in my answer which demonstrates my point.






    share|improve this answer











    $endgroup$








    • 3




      $begingroup$
      But chainsaws are FUN . Signed, Anonymous From Texas
      $endgroup$
      – Carl Witthoft
      2 days ago


















    2












    $begingroup$

    Since this is the sort of weapon that Coyote would be using against Roadrunner, it must be powered by the future power supply du jour.



    In the 1950s that would have meant nuclear power, nowadays everything is battery powered, though some consider that the future is in hydrogen.



    It very much depends on the tone of the situation you're creating.



    The clean and neat nature of modern hydrogen fuel cells and batteries may not fit the context, so you might want to find some way of making it spew smoke and fire as it's powered up, that means coal or at the least diesel powered.






    share|improve this answer









    $endgroup$












    • $begingroup$
      If you're looking for something in an 'industrial' style (spewing fire and smoke) where it doesn't have to work for very long, and is insensitive to the health of the users, you could go for boron-doped 'zip' fuels, used in aircraft and rockets, and should be roughly compatible with diesel engines (at least briefly!) As an added bonus: the flames are green!
      $endgroup$
      – Avi Cherry
      3 hours ago


















    2












    $begingroup$

    I would go for a chemistry based solution. Think of current engines; they are all based on the concept of explosions. Now think of a giant explosion happening on release of the chainsaw. It would create enough pressure to power the chainsaw for quite some time.






    share|improve this answer









    $endgroup$




















      1












      $begingroup$

      Expanding on Willk's answer here:



      You have a "lander" and a chainsaw. The chainsaw is spring-powered. The lander has multiple rotors, say 3, that both break the fall and charge spring. It would basically look like a quadrocopter with a chainsaw at the bottom falling down.



      A ratchet prevents the spring from discharging. A trigger mechanism in the chainsaw releases the ratchet and directs its power from the rotor coupling to the saw's chain - the chainsaw is running, purely from the energy from the fall.






      share|improve this answer









      $endgroup$




















        1












        $begingroup$

        Dual liquid explosive, the force would trash the mechanism but its a one use weapon.






        share|improve this answer









        $endgroup$








        • 1




          $begingroup$
          These are normally called binary explosives, just for reference.
          $endgroup$
          – ltmauve
          yesterday


















        1












        $begingroup$

        Coffman (shotgun) starter



        The Coffman starter uses a propellant fit in a shotgun shell, with the standard shotgun primer (blasting cap). It generates up to 15 seconds of pneumatic force to start large aviation and tractor engines.



        Famously used on the movie Flight of the Phoenix (both versions).



        Adjust size for energy need, but it's just the right energy density, weight and burn rate for the job.






        share|improve this answer









        $endgroup$




















          0












          $begingroup$

          If a massive chainsaw is deployed from a jet, it should be powered by Mr. Torgue's specialty. The large weight is needed to contain and direct the C4 detonation inside to spin the chain. Maybe also the back side is stronger than the front, creating the possibility for the chain blade to launch through the enemy.






          share|improve this answer








          New contributor




          Yamcha_Kippur is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
          Check out our Code of Conduct.






          $endgroup$




















            0












            $begingroup$

            You don't need a power source.



            Humans generally have a terminal speed of 53m/s. Your chainsaw, due to weight and profile, will probably have a greater final velocity.



            A 400 pounds piece of metal hitting you at 53m/s will impart you with approximately 2.54 x 108 joules, or ~ 70,555.5 wh. That's equivalent to the detonation of around 60~65 kilograms of TNT. It will turn the target to a pulp just by its kinetic delivery, as well as anyone else nearby.






            share|improve this answer









            $endgroup$




















              0












              $begingroup$

              While not a chain saw, much of the effect could be delivered cheaply and reliably by a 400lb coiled spring, which has saw teeth etched into the edges. This can be deployed from the plane itself (uncoiling and lashing at the target as the plane screams overhead. Alternatively, the hero can be braced with his back to a tree or a wall and pull out the pin or cut the cord holding the coil closed, it lashes out like an Urumi from hell, striking with considerable kinetic energy and razor sharp cutting teeth.



              enter image description here



              As you can imagine, there is nothing close to what I am describing. Take this, increase the size to account for the 400lbs of spring steel, serrate the edges and have a cord or pin holding it closd against the spring tension



              Considering a 400 lb coil of spring steel would actually be quite long, you would also have a considerable advantage of reach over most opponents, who would either think the plane is too low to drop a bomb, or the hero is too far away from then (and whatever is that drum like object he is holding?), so fail to take proper precautions.






              share|improve this answer









              $endgroup$




















                0












                $begingroup$

                Build the chainsaw with a heavy flywheel. Add a heavy duty piston/foot that the chainsaw lands on when dropped towards you. When that piston hits ground at high collision speeds it spins up the flywheel, which directly powers the chain. You run over and grab it, go to work for your 15 seconds of glory.



                No power source beyond gravity and the flywheel needed. Being all mechanical and built tough it possibly wouldn't even fall apart, later it gets picked up and reset for another drop.






                share|improve this answer









                $endgroup$













                  Your Answer





                  StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
                  return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function ()
                  StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix)
                  StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
                  );
                  );
                  , "mathjax-editing");

                  StackExchange.ready(function()
                  var channelOptions =
                  tags: "".split(" "),
                  id: "579"
                  ;
                  initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

                  StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
                  // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
                  if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
                  StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
                  createEditor();
                  );

                  else
                  createEditor();

                  );

                  function createEditor()
                  StackExchange.prepareEditor(
                  heartbeatType: 'answer',
                  autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
                  convertImagesToLinks: false,
                  noModals: true,
                  showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
                  reputationToPostImages: null,
                  bindNavPrevention: true,
                  postfix: "",
                  imageUploader:
                  brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
                  contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
                  allowUrls: true
                  ,
                  noCode: true, onDemand: true,
                  discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
                  ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
                  );



                  );













                  draft saved

                  draft discarded


















                  StackExchange.ready(
                  function ()
                  StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fworldbuilding.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f143551%2fwhat-could-be-the-right-powersource-for-15-seconds-lifespan-disposable-giant-cha%23new-answer', 'question_page');

                  );

                  Post as a guest















                  Required, but never shown

























                  20 Answers
                  20






                  active

                  oldest

                  votes








                  20 Answers
                  20






                  active

                  oldest

                  votes









                  active

                  oldest

                  votes






                  active

                  oldest

                  votes









                  107












                  $begingroup$

                  Giant coiled spring.



                  It would uncoil itself and drive the chain. It would provide loads of power on demand. Storing that kind of energy as a coiled spring is dangerous, but I see that as a positive thing for your scenario.






                  share|improve this answer









                  $endgroup$








                  • 12




                    $begingroup$
                    +1 for being rechargeable
                    $endgroup$
                    – Trevor D
                    2 days ago






                  • 3




                    $begingroup$
                    I like this. It's not very realistic, but it sure as heck is cool..
                    $endgroup$
                    – John Dvorak
                    2 days ago






                  • 25




                    $begingroup$
                    @JohnDvorak Ah yes, the quest for a realistic power source for a single use jet-delivered chainsaw.
                    $endgroup$
                    – corsiKa
                    yesterday






                  • 3




                    $begingroup$
                    I like it as super practical. Any electric source requires an electric motor. This is the energy source and the source of rotational motion, all in one package.
                    $endgroup$
                    – cmm
                    yesterday






                  • 11




                    $begingroup$
                    Spring tension can hold the drive train together as well. When the spring looses tension it could literally fall apart as the question suggests. If you've ever taken apart a tape measure and had a part slip out of your hands you'll get what I'm talking about.
                    $endgroup$
                    – JPhi1618
                    yesterday















                  107












                  $begingroup$

                  Giant coiled spring.



                  It would uncoil itself and drive the chain. It would provide loads of power on demand. Storing that kind of energy as a coiled spring is dangerous, but I see that as a positive thing for your scenario.






                  share|improve this answer









                  $endgroup$








                  • 12




                    $begingroup$
                    +1 for being rechargeable
                    $endgroup$
                    – Trevor D
                    2 days ago






                  • 3




                    $begingroup$
                    I like this. It's not very realistic, but it sure as heck is cool..
                    $endgroup$
                    – John Dvorak
                    2 days ago






                  • 25




                    $begingroup$
                    @JohnDvorak Ah yes, the quest for a realistic power source for a single use jet-delivered chainsaw.
                    $endgroup$
                    – corsiKa
                    yesterday






                  • 3




                    $begingroup$
                    I like it as super practical. Any electric source requires an electric motor. This is the energy source and the source of rotational motion, all in one package.
                    $endgroup$
                    – cmm
                    yesterday






                  • 11




                    $begingroup$
                    Spring tension can hold the drive train together as well. When the spring looses tension it could literally fall apart as the question suggests. If you've ever taken apart a tape measure and had a part slip out of your hands you'll get what I'm talking about.
                    $endgroup$
                    – JPhi1618
                    yesterday













                  107












                  107








                  107





                  $begingroup$

                  Giant coiled spring.



                  It would uncoil itself and drive the chain. It would provide loads of power on demand. Storing that kind of energy as a coiled spring is dangerous, but I see that as a positive thing for your scenario.






                  share|improve this answer









                  $endgroup$



                  Giant coiled spring.



                  It would uncoil itself and drive the chain. It would provide loads of power on demand. Storing that kind of energy as a coiled spring is dangerous, but I see that as a positive thing for your scenario.







                  share|improve this answer












                  share|improve this answer



                  share|improve this answer










                  answered 2 days ago









                  WillkWillk

                  117k28221489




                  117k28221489







                  • 12




                    $begingroup$
                    +1 for being rechargeable
                    $endgroup$
                    – Trevor D
                    2 days ago






                  • 3




                    $begingroup$
                    I like this. It's not very realistic, but it sure as heck is cool..
                    $endgroup$
                    – John Dvorak
                    2 days ago






                  • 25




                    $begingroup$
                    @JohnDvorak Ah yes, the quest for a realistic power source for a single use jet-delivered chainsaw.
                    $endgroup$
                    – corsiKa
                    yesterday






                  • 3




                    $begingroup$
                    I like it as super practical. Any electric source requires an electric motor. This is the energy source and the source of rotational motion, all in one package.
                    $endgroup$
                    – cmm
                    yesterday






                  • 11




                    $begingroup$
                    Spring tension can hold the drive train together as well. When the spring looses tension it could literally fall apart as the question suggests. If you've ever taken apart a tape measure and had a part slip out of your hands you'll get what I'm talking about.
                    $endgroup$
                    – JPhi1618
                    yesterday












                  • 12




                    $begingroup$
                    +1 for being rechargeable
                    $endgroup$
                    – Trevor D
                    2 days ago






                  • 3




                    $begingroup$
                    I like this. It's not very realistic, but it sure as heck is cool..
                    $endgroup$
                    – John Dvorak
                    2 days ago






                  • 25




                    $begingroup$
                    @JohnDvorak Ah yes, the quest for a realistic power source for a single use jet-delivered chainsaw.
                    $endgroup$
                    – corsiKa
                    yesterday






                  • 3




                    $begingroup$
                    I like it as super practical. Any electric source requires an electric motor. This is the energy source and the source of rotational motion, all in one package.
                    $endgroup$
                    – cmm
                    yesterday






                  • 11




                    $begingroup$
                    Spring tension can hold the drive train together as well. When the spring looses tension it could literally fall apart as the question suggests. If you've ever taken apart a tape measure and had a part slip out of your hands you'll get what I'm talking about.
                    $endgroup$
                    – JPhi1618
                    yesterday







                  12




                  12




                  $begingroup$
                  +1 for being rechargeable
                  $endgroup$
                  – Trevor D
                  2 days ago




                  $begingroup$
                  +1 for being rechargeable
                  $endgroup$
                  – Trevor D
                  2 days ago




                  3




                  3




                  $begingroup$
                  I like this. It's not very realistic, but it sure as heck is cool..
                  $endgroup$
                  – John Dvorak
                  2 days ago




                  $begingroup$
                  I like this. It's not very realistic, but it sure as heck is cool..
                  $endgroup$
                  – John Dvorak
                  2 days ago




                  25




                  25




                  $begingroup$
                  @JohnDvorak Ah yes, the quest for a realistic power source for a single use jet-delivered chainsaw.
                  $endgroup$
                  – corsiKa
                  yesterday




                  $begingroup$
                  @JohnDvorak Ah yes, the quest for a realistic power source for a single use jet-delivered chainsaw.
                  $endgroup$
                  – corsiKa
                  yesterday




                  3




                  3




                  $begingroup$
                  I like it as super practical. Any electric source requires an electric motor. This is the energy source and the source of rotational motion, all in one package.
                  $endgroup$
                  – cmm
                  yesterday




                  $begingroup$
                  I like it as super practical. Any electric source requires an electric motor. This is the energy source and the source of rotational motion, all in one package.
                  $endgroup$
                  – cmm
                  yesterday




                  11




                  11




                  $begingroup$
                  Spring tension can hold the drive train together as well. When the spring looses tension it could literally fall apart as the question suggests. If you've ever taken apart a tape measure and had a part slip out of your hands you'll get what I'm talking about.
                  $endgroup$
                  – JPhi1618
                  yesterday




                  $begingroup$
                  Spring tension can hold the drive train together as well. When the spring looses tension it could literally fall apart as the question suggests. If you've ever taken apart a tape measure and had a part slip out of your hands you'll get what I'm talking about.
                  $endgroup$
                  – JPhi1618
                  yesterday











                  32












                  $begingroup$

                  Pyrotechnics, in the form of twin spinning rockets rotating the saw axle. You have jet fighters, missiles would look like an obvious option. And as a bonus, a faulty device would explode throwing shrapnel into the enemy.






                  share|improve this answer











                  $endgroup$








                  • 3




                    $begingroup$
                    I think I like this, not because it is the best answer, but because it is sooo bad that it fits perfectly with an air-dropped, single use, 400lb chainsaw.
                    $endgroup$
                    – Nosajimiki
                    15 hours ago















                  32












                  $begingroup$

                  Pyrotechnics, in the form of twin spinning rockets rotating the saw axle. You have jet fighters, missiles would look like an obvious option. And as a bonus, a faulty device would explode throwing shrapnel into the enemy.






                  share|improve this answer











                  $endgroup$








                  • 3




                    $begingroup$
                    I think I like this, not because it is the best answer, but because it is sooo bad that it fits perfectly with an air-dropped, single use, 400lb chainsaw.
                    $endgroup$
                    – Nosajimiki
                    15 hours ago













                  32












                  32








                  32





                  $begingroup$

                  Pyrotechnics, in the form of twin spinning rockets rotating the saw axle. You have jet fighters, missiles would look like an obvious option. And as a bonus, a faulty device would explode throwing shrapnel into the enemy.






                  share|improve this answer











                  $endgroup$



                  Pyrotechnics, in the form of twin spinning rockets rotating the saw axle. You have jet fighters, missiles would look like an obvious option. And as a bonus, a faulty device would explode throwing shrapnel into the enemy.







                  share|improve this answer














                  share|improve this answer



                  share|improve this answer








                  edited 2 days ago









                  Lefty

                  1324




                  1324










                  answered 2 days ago









                  Dan FernandezDan Fernandez

                  58126




                  58126







                  • 3




                    $begingroup$
                    I think I like this, not because it is the best answer, but because it is sooo bad that it fits perfectly with an air-dropped, single use, 400lb chainsaw.
                    $endgroup$
                    – Nosajimiki
                    15 hours ago












                  • 3




                    $begingroup$
                    I think I like this, not because it is the best answer, but because it is sooo bad that it fits perfectly with an air-dropped, single use, 400lb chainsaw.
                    $endgroup$
                    – Nosajimiki
                    15 hours ago







                  3




                  3




                  $begingroup$
                  I think I like this, not because it is the best answer, but because it is sooo bad that it fits perfectly with an air-dropped, single use, 400lb chainsaw.
                  $endgroup$
                  – Nosajimiki
                  15 hours ago




                  $begingroup$
                  I think I like this, not because it is the best answer, but because it is sooo bad that it fits perfectly with an air-dropped, single use, 400lb chainsaw.
                  $endgroup$
                  – Nosajimiki
                  15 hours ago











                  27












                  $begingroup$

                  Capacitors. These are electric components which store an electric charge for a limited amount of time and can release it very rapidly. They are relatively cheap and easy to manufacture. They are also reusable, but that doesn't matter in this case.



                  Capacitors can be manufactured in many different ways depending on their desired characteristics. But in general they have a lower energy density than chemical power cells, but they can release their stored energy a lot faster.



                  Capacitors are usually not designed to hold a charge for longer than a couple hours, so the capacitors either need to be charged before the mission or during the mission from the fighter's internal power supply.






                  share|improve this answer











                  $endgroup$








                  • 6




                    $begingroup$
                    "... usually not designed to hold a charge..." ?? Depends drastically on the application. Whatever you do, never touch the flyback capacitor on a CRT without shorting it first. They hold significant voltage for years.
                    $endgroup$
                    – Carl Witthoft
                    2 days ago






                  • 2




                    $begingroup$
                    @CarlWitthoft, years is a bit of an exaggeration. The self discharge rate of capacitors (as in no bleeder resistors) is still in the range of days. Supercapacitors have a lower self discharge rate but is still not remotely in the realm of years. Though, I'm always happy to be wrong, I did some quick checking but maybe I missed some edge case where that's true.
                    $endgroup$
                    – Jarrod Christman
                    2 days ago







                  • 8




                    $begingroup$
                    Capacitor 'hold time' depends on design and materials used. While they'll slowly leak it is well within the realm of possibility to design such a capacitor that could be charged on loading of the weapon and last for a 6-12 hour mission with useful load. Also keep in mind that 'discharged' doesn't always mean 'empty' - Very large caps can still hold enough to give you a solid kick years later, even if they're well below 'useful' levels that it was intended to be used at. In short: Don't lick caps.
                    $endgroup$
                    – TheLuckless
                    2 days ago






                  • 1




                    $begingroup$
                    I updated the answer in light of the recent comments.
                    $endgroup$
                    – Philipp
                    2 days ago






                  • 1




                    $begingroup$
                    @NathanHinchey, almost all capacitors that 'hold a charge' years later have actually self-charged, just a little bit. Industrial capacitors have to be stored with the terminals shorted out or they can hurt the next person who goes to touch them. There's no useful power really, but they can get to a couple of percent of their voltage rating if you leave them alone.
                    $endgroup$
                    – Sean Boddy
                    yesterday















                  27












                  $begingroup$

                  Capacitors. These are electric components which store an electric charge for a limited amount of time and can release it very rapidly. They are relatively cheap and easy to manufacture. They are also reusable, but that doesn't matter in this case.



                  Capacitors can be manufactured in many different ways depending on their desired characteristics. But in general they have a lower energy density than chemical power cells, but they can release their stored energy a lot faster.



                  Capacitors are usually not designed to hold a charge for longer than a couple hours, so the capacitors either need to be charged before the mission or during the mission from the fighter's internal power supply.






                  share|improve this answer











                  $endgroup$








                  • 6




                    $begingroup$
                    "... usually not designed to hold a charge..." ?? Depends drastically on the application. Whatever you do, never touch the flyback capacitor on a CRT without shorting it first. They hold significant voltage for years.
                    $endgroup$
                    – Carl Witthoft
                    2 days ago






                  • 2




                    $begingroup$
                    @CarlWitthoft, years is a bit of an exaggeration. The self discharge rate of capacitors (as in no bleeder resistors) is still in the range of days. Supercapacitors have a lower self discharge rate but is still not remotely in the realm of years. Though, I'm always happy to be wrong, I did some quick checking but maybe I missed some edge case where that's true.
                    $endgroup$
                    – Jarrod Christman
                    2 days ago







                  • 8




                    $begingroup$
                    Capacitor 'hold time' depends on design and materials used. While they'll slowly leak it is well within the realm of possibility to design such a capacitor that could be charged on loading of the weapon and last for a 6-12 hour mission with useful load. Also keep in mind that 'discharged' doesn't always mean 'empty' - Very large caps can still hold enough to give you a solid kick years later, even if they're well below 'useful' levels that it was intended to be used at. In short: Don't lick caps.
                    $endgroup$
                    – TheLuckless
                    2 days ago






                  • 1




                    $begingroup$
                    I updated the answer in light of the recent comments.
                    $endgroup$
                    – Philipp
                    2 days ago






                  • 1




                    $begingroup$
                    @NathanHinchey, almost all capacitors that 'hold a charge' years later have actually self-charged, just a little bit. Industrial capacitors have to be stored with the terminals shorted out or they can hurt the next person who goes to touch them. There's no useful power really, but they can get to a couple of percent of their voltage rating if you leave them alone.
                    $endgroup$
                    – Sean Boddy
                    yesterday













                  27












                  27








                  27





                  $begingroup$

                  Capacitors. These are electric components which store an electric charge for a limited amount of time and can release it very rapidly. They are relatively cheap and easy to manufacture. They are also reusable, but that doesn't matter in this case.



                  Capacitors can be manufactured in many different ways depending on their desired characteristics. But in general they have a lower energy density than chemical power cells, but they can release their stored energy a lot faster.



                  Capacitors are usually not designed to hold a charge for longer than a couple hours, so the capacitors either need to be charged before the mission or during the mission from the fighter's internal power supply.






                  share|improve this answer











                  $endgroup$



                  Capacitors. These are electric components which store an electric charge for a limited amount of time and can release it very rapidly. They are relatively cheap and easy to manufacture. They are also reusable, but that doesn't matter in this case.



                  Capacitors can be manufactured in many different ways depending on their desired characteristics. But in general they have a lower energy density than chemical power cells, but they can release their stored energy a lot faster.



                  Capacitors are usually not designed to hold a charge for longer than a couple hours, so the capacitors either need to be charged before the mission or during the mission from the fighter's internal power supply.







                  share|improve this answer














                  share|improve this answer



                  share|improve this answer








                  edited 2 days ago

























                  answered 2 days ago









                  PhilippPhilipp

                  32k1267123




                  32k1267123







                  • 6




                    $begingroup$
                    "... usually not designed to hold a charge..." ?? Depends drastically on the application. Whatever you do, never touch the flyback capacitor on a CRT without shorting it first. They hold significant voltage for years.
                    $endgroup$
                    – Carl Witthoft
                    2 days ago






                  • 2




                    $begingroup$
                    @CarlWitthoft, years is a bit of an exaggeration. The self discharge rate of capacitors (as in no bleeder resistors) is still in the range of days. Supercapacitors have a lower self discharge rate but is still not remotely in the realm of years. Though, I'm always happy to be wrong, I did some quick checking but maybe I missed some edge case where that's true.
                    $endgroup$
                    – Jarrod Christman
                    2 days ago







                  • 8




                    $begingroup$
                    Capacitor 'hold time' depends on design and materials used. While they'll slowly leak it is well within the realm of possibility to design such a capacitor that could be charged on loading of the weapon and last for a 6-12 hour mission with useful load. Also keep in mind that 'discharged' doesn't always mean 'empty' - Very large caps can still hold enough to give you a solid kick years later, even if they're well below 'useful' levels that it was intended to be used at. In short: Don't lick caps.
                    $endgroup$
                    – TheLuckless
                    2 days ago






                  • 1




                    $begingroup$
                    I updated the answer in light of the recent comments.
                    $endgroup$
                    – Philipp
                    2 days ago






                  • 1




                    $begingroup$
                    @NathanHinchey, almost all capacitors that 'hold a charge' years later have actually self-charged, just a little bit. Industrial capacitors have to be stored with the terminals shorted out or they can hurt the next person who goes to touch them. There's no useful power really, but they can get to a couple of percent of their voltage rating if you leave them alone.
                    $endgroup$
                    – Sean Boddy
                    yesterday












                  • 6




                    $begingroup$
                    "... usually not designed to hold a charge..." ?? Depends drastically on the application. Whatever you do, never touch the flyback capacitor on a CRT without shorting it first. They hold significant voltage for years.
                    $endgroup$
                    – Carl Witthoft
                    2 days ago






                  • 2




                    $begingroup$
                    @CarlWitthoft, years is a bit of an exaggeration. The self discharge rate of capacitors (as in no bleeder resistors) is still in the range of days. Supercapacitors have a lower self discharge rate but is still not remotely in the realm of years. Though, I'm always happy to be wrong, I did some quick checking but maybe I missed some edge case where that's true.
                    $endgroup$
                    – Jarrod Christman
                    2 days ago







                  • 8




                    $begingroup$
                    Capacitor 'hold time' depends on design and materials used. While they'll slowly leak it is well within the realm of possibility to design such a capacitor that could be charged on loading of the weapon and last for a 6-12 hour mission with useful load. Also keep in mind that 'discharged' doesn't always mean 'empty' - Very large caps can still hold enough to give you a solid kick years later, even if they're well below 'useful' levels that it was intended to be used at. In short: Don't lick caps.
                    $endgroup$
                    – TheLuckless
                    2 days ago






                  • 1




                    $begingroup$
                    I updated the answer in light of the recent comments.
                    $endgroup$
                    – Philipp
                    2 days ago






                  • 1




                    $begingroup$
                    @NathanHinchey, almost all capacitors that 'hold a charge' years later have actually self-charged, just a little bit. Industrial capacitors have to be stored with the terminals shorted out or they can hurt the next person who goes to touch them. There's no useful power really, but they can get to a couple of percent of their voltage rating if you leave them alone.
                    $endgroup$
                    – Sean Boddy
                    yesterday







                  6




                  6




                  $begingroup$
                  "... usually not designed to hold a charge..." ?? Depends drastically on the application. Whatever you do, never touch the flyback capacitor on a CRT without shorting it first. They hold significant voltage for years.
                  $endgroup$
                  – Carl Witthoft
                  2 days ago




                  $begingroup$
                  "... usually not designed to hold a charge..." ?? Depends drastically on the application. Whatever you do, never touch the flyback capacitor on a CRT without shorting it first. They hold significant voltage for years.
                  $endgroup$
                  – Carl Witthoft
                  2 days ago




                  2




                  2




                  $begingroup$
                  @CarlWitthoft, years is a bit of an exaggeration. The self discharge rate of capacitors (as in no bleeder resistors) is still in the range of days. Supercapacitors have a lower self discharge rate but is still not remotely in the realm of years. Though, I'm always happy to be wrong, I did some quick checking but maybe I missed some edge case where that's true.
                  $endgroup$
                  – Jarrod Christman
                  2 days ago





                  $begingroup$
                  @CarlWitthoft, years is a bit of an exaggeration. The self discharge rate of capacitors (as in no bleeder resistors) is still in the range of days. Supercapacitors have a lower self discharge rate but is still not remotely in the realm of years. Though, I'm always happy to be wrong, I did some quick checking but maybe I missed some edge case where that's true.
                  $endgroup$
                  – Jarrod Christman
                  2 days ago





                  8




                  8




                  $begingroup$
                  Capacitor 'hold time' depends on design and materials used. While they'll slowly leak it is well within the realm of possibility to design such a capacitor that could be charged on loading of the weapon and last for a 6-12 hour mission with useful load. Also keep in mind that 'discharged' doesn't always mean 'empty' - Very large caps can still hold enough to give you a solid kick years later, even if they're well below 'useful' levels that it was intended to be used at. In short: Don't lick caps.
                  $endgroup$
                  – TheLuckless
                  2 days ago




                  $begingroup$
                  Capacitor 'hold time' depends on design and materials used. While they'll slowly leak it is well within the realm of possibility to design such a capacitor that could be charged on loading of the weapon and last for a 6-12 hour mission with useful load. Also keep in mind that 'discharged' doesn't always mean 'empty' - Very large caps can still hold enough to give you a solid kick years later, even if they're well below 'useful' levels that it was intended to be used at. In short: Don't lick caps.
                  $endgroup$
                  – TheLuckless
                  2 days ago




                  1




                  1




                  $begingroup$
                  I updated the answer in light of the recent comments.
                  $endgroup$
                  – Philipp
                  2 days ago




                  $begingroup$
                  I updated the answer in light of the recent comments.
                  $endgroup$
                  – Philipp
                  2 days ago




                  1




                  1




                  $begingroup$
                  @NathanHinchey, almost all capacitors that 'hold a charge' years later have actually self-charged, just a little bit. Industrial capacitors have to be stored with the terminals shorted out or they can hurt the next person who goes to touch them. There's no useful power really, but they can get to a couple of percent of their voltage rating if you leave them alone.
                  $endgroup$
                  – Sean Boddy
                  yesterday




                  $begingroup$
                  @NathanHinchey, almost all capacitors that 'hold a charge' years later have actually self-charged, just a little bit. Industrial capacitors have to be stored with the terminals shorted out or they can hurt the next person who goes to touch them. There's no useful power really, but they can get to a couple of percent of their voltage rating if you leave them alone.
                  $endgroup$
                  – Sean Boddy
                  yesterday











                  19












                  $begingroup$

                  Launching from a plane, that chainsaw is going to waste a lot of nice gravitational energy, which could be used for much more interesting tasks, such as providing motion to the chainsaw itself.



                  So, the chainsaw itself is tethered to the plane with a very long roller chain, which is connected to a pinion inside the chainsaw (think of a Beyblade launcher).

                  When launched from the plane, the chainsaw falls, so that the roller chain makes the pinion start rotating. The pinion will then transmit the motion to the chainsaw, so that it will rotate at full speed when touching ground!



                  Alternatively, a parachute could open and hold a reel with the roller chain tethered to the chainsaw, which is still falling relative to the parachute.






                  share|improve this answer











                  $endgroup$








                  • 2




                    $begingroup$
                    basically a flywheel, charged by gravity
                    $endgroup$
                    – ChuckCottrill
                    yesterday






                  • 2




                    $begingroup$
                    This could cause the chainsaw to fall more slowly, as some of it's gravitational energy is being co-opted to spin it. How about letting the chainsaw fall with a slack roller chain, then when the person catches it, the roller chain, which is still attached to the jet, gets yanked away by the jet, starting the chainsaw. Like a combination of launching a beyblade and using a string attached to your dog's collar to yank a loose tooth out.
                    $endgroup$
                    – Jared K
                    yesterday










                  • $begingroup$
                    +1 for beating even the "pyrotechnics" answer in how ridiculously entertaining it would be to see.
                    $endgroup$
                    – mtraceur
                    2 hours ago















                  19












                  $begingroup$

                  Launching from a plane, that chainsaw is going to waste a lot of nice gravitational energy, which could be used for much more interesting tasks, such as providing motion to the chainsaw itself.



                  So, the chainsaw itself is tethered to the plane with a very long roller chain, which is connected to a pinion inside the chainsaw (think of a Beyblade launcher).

                  When launched from the plane, the chainsaw falls, so that the roller chain makes the pinion start rotating. The pinion will then transmit the motion to the chainsaw, so that it will rotate at full speed when touching ground!



                  Alternatively, a parachute could open and hold a reel with the roller chain tethered to the chainsaw, which is still falling relative to the parachute.






                  share|improve this answer











                  $endgroup$








                  • 2




                    $begingroup$
                    basically a flywheel, charged by gravity
                    $endgroup$
                    – ChuckCottrill
                    yesterday






                  • 2




                    $begingroup$
                    This could cause the chainsaw to fall more slowly, as some of it's gravitational energy is being co-opted to spin it. How about letting the chainsaw fall with a slack roller chain, then when the person catches it, the roller chain, which is still attached to the jet, gets yanked away by the jet, starting the chainsaw. Like a combination of launching a beyblade and using a string attached to your dog's collar to yank a loose tooth out.
                    $endgroup$
                    – Jared K
                    yesterday










                  • $begingroup$
                    +1 for beating even the "pyrotechnics" answer in how ridiculously entertaining it would be to see.
                    $endgroup$
                    – mtraceur
                    2 hours ago













                  19












                  19








                  19





                  $begingroup$

                  Launching from a plane, that chainsaw is going to waste a lot of nice gravitational energy, which could be used for much more interesting tasks, such as providing motion to the chainsaw itself.



                  So, the chainsaw itself is tethered to the plane with a very long roller chain, which is connected to a pinion inside the chainsaw (think of a Beyblade launcher).

                  When launched from the plane, the chainsaw falls, so that the roller chain makes the pinion start rotating. The pinion will then transmit the motion to the chainsaw, so that it will rotate at full speed when touching ground!



                  Alternatively, a parachute could open and hold a reel with the roller chain tethered to the chainsaw, which is still falling relative to the parachute.






                  share|improve this answer











                  $endgroup$



                  Launching from a plane, that chainsaw is going to waste a lot of nice gravitational energy, which could be used for much more interesting tasks, such as providing motion to the chainsaw itself.



                  So, the chainsaw itself is tethered to the plane with a very long roller chain, which is connected to a pinion inside the chainsaw (think of a Beyblade launcher).

                  When launched from the plane, the chainsaw falls, so that the roller chain makes the pinion start rotating. The pinion will then transmit the motion to the chainsaw, so that it will rotate at full speed when touching ground!



                  Alternatively, a parachute could open and hold a reel with the roller chain tethered to the chainsaw, which is still falling relative to the parachute.







                  share|improve this answer














                  share|improve this answer



                  share|improve this answer








                  edited 2 days ago









                  Emilio M Bumachar

                  4,5681122




                  4,5681122










                  answered 2 days ago









                  McTroopersMcTroopers

                  1,2907




                  1,2907







                  • 2




                    $begingroup$
                    basically a flywheel, charged by gravity
                    $endgroup$
                    – ChuckCottrill
                    yesterday






                  • 2




                    $begingroup$
                    This could cause the chainsaw to fall more slowly, as some of it's gravitational energy is being co-opted to spin it. How about letting the chainsaw fall with a slack roller chain, then when the person catches it, the roller chain, which is still attached to the jet, gets yanked away by the jet, starting the chainsaw. Like a combination of launching a beyblade and using a string attached to your dog's collar to yank a loose tooth out.
                    $endgroup$
                    – Jared K
                    yesterday










                  • $begingroup$
                    +1 for beating even the "pyrotechnics" answer in how ridiculously entertaining it would be to see.
                    $endgroup$
                    – mtraceur
                    2 hours ago












                  • 2




                    $begingroup$
                    basically a flywheel, charged by gravity
                    $endgroup$
                    – ChuckCottrill
                    yesterday






                  • 2




                    $begingroup$
                    This could cause the chainsaw to fall more slowly, as some of it's gravitational energy is being co-opted to spin it. How about letting the chainsaw fall with a slack roller chain, then when the person catches it, the roller chain, which is still attached to the jet, gets yanked away by the jet, starting the chainsaw. Like a combination of launching a beyblade and using a string attached to your dog's collar to yank a loose tooth out.
                    $endgroup$
                    – Jared K
                    yesterday










                  • $begingroup$
                    +1 for beating even the "pyrotechnics" answer in how ridiculously entertaining it would be to see.
                    $endgroup$
                    – mtraceur
                    2 hours ago







                  2




                  2




                  $begingroup$
                  basically a flywheel, charged by gravity
                  $endgroup$
                  – ChuckCottrill
                  yesterday




                  $begingroup$
                  basically a flywheel, charged by gravity
                  $endgroup$
                  – ChuckCottrill
                  yesterday




                  2




                  2




                  $begingroup$
                  This could cause the chainsaw to fall more slowly, as some of it's gravitational energy is being co-opted to spin it. How about letting the chainsaw fall with a slack roller chain, then when the person catches it, the roller chain, which is still attached to the jet, gets yanked away by the jet, starting the chainsaw. Like a combination of launching a beyblade and using a string attached to your dog's collar to yank a loose tooth out.
                  $endgroup$
                  – Jared K
                  yesterday




                  $begingroup$
                  This could cause the chainsaw to fall more slowly, as some of it's gravitational energy is being co-opted to spin it. How about letting the chainsaw fall with a slack roller chain, then when the person catches it, the roller chain, which is still attached to the jet, gets yanked away by the jet, starting the chainsaw. Like a combination of launching a beyblade and using a string attached to your dog's collar to yank a loose tooth out.
                  $endgroup$
                  – Jared K
                  yesterday












                  $begingroup$
                  +1 for beating even the "pyrotechnics" answer in how ridiculously entertaining it would be to see.
                  $endgroup$
                  – mtraceur
                  2 hours ago




                  $begingroup$
                  +1 for beating even the "pyrotechnics" answer in how ridiculously entertaining it would be to see.
                  $endgroup$
                  – mtraceur
                  2 hours ago











                  17












                  $begingroup$

                  I would go for a pneumatic solution. It can support easily a 40 pound high pressure container storing sufficient energy for 15 seconds.






                  share|improve this answer








                  New contributor




                  user9 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
                  Check out our Code of Conduct.






                  $endgroup$








                  • 3




                    $begingroup$
                    Also consider the giant farting sound on, ahem, discharge. Use methane as the gas, and then light the exhaust, and use the flame jets. IDK how, but use them.
                    $endgroup$
                    – Neal
                    2 days ago







                  • 1




                    $begingroup$
                    @Neal simple: what's better than a chainsaw at maiming your enemy? The MurderCo Rocket-Propelled Chainsaw (patents pending)! Why use measly human (or whatever other species) appendages to thrust your chainsaw into your enemy when our patented diverters use the combustion exhaust to launch it at your enemy? Warning, adult supervision required, MurderCo is not responsible for loss of limbs or life, property damage, or damages caused by Acts of Stupid (which includes all actions taken using the MurderCo RPC).
                    $endgroup$
                    – Doktor J
                    2 days ago










                  • $begingroup$
                    A flatulentic turbocharged curled discharge. Are we still talking about Taco Bell?
                    $endgroup$
                    – Juha Untinen
                    yesterday















                  17












                  $begingroup$

                  I would go for a pneumatic solution. It can support easily a 40 pound high pressure container storing sufficient energy for 15 seconds.






                  share|improve this answer








                  New contributor




                  user9 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
                  Check out our Code of Conduct.






                  $endgroup$








                  • 3




                    $begingroup$
                    Also consider the giant farting sound on, ahem, discharge. Use methane as the gas, and then light the exhaust, and use the flame jets. IDK how, but use them.
                    $endgroup$
                    – Neal
                    2 days ago







                  • 1




                    $begingroup$
                    @Neal simple: what's better than a chainsaw at maiming your enemy? The MurderCo Rocket-Propelled Chainsaw (patents pending)! Why use measly human (or whatever other species) appendages to thrust your chainsaw into your enemy when our patented diverters use the combustion exhaust to launch it at your enemy? Warning, adult supervision required, MurderCo is not responsible for loss of limbs or life, property damage, or damages caused by Acts of Stupid (which includes all actions taken using the MurderCo RPC).
                    $endgroup$
                    – Doktor J
                    2 days ago










                  • $begingroup$
                    A flatulentic turbocharged curled discharge. Are we still talking about Taco Bell?
                    $endgroup$
                    – Juha Untinen
                    yesterday













                  17












                  17








                  17





                  $begingroup$

                  I would go for a pneumatic solution. It can support easily a 40 pound high pressure container storing sufficient energy for 15 seconds.






                  share|improve this answer








                  New contributor




                  user9 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
                  Check out our Code of Conduct.






                  $endgroup$



                  I would go for a pneumatic solution. It can support easily a 40 pound high pressure container storing sufficient energy for 15 seconds.







                  share|improve this answer








                  New contributor




                  user9 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
                  Check out our Code of Conduct.









                  share|improve this answer



                  share|improve this answer






                  New contributor




                  user9 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
                  Check out our Code of Conduct.









                  answered 2 days ago









                  user9user9

                  1712




                  1712




                  New contributor




                  user9 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
                  Check out our Code of Conduct.





                  New contributor





                  user9 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
                  Check out our Code of Conduct.






                  user9 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
                  Check out our Code of Conduct.







                  • 3




                    $begingroup$
                    Also consider the giant farting sound on, ahem, discharge. Use methane as the gas, and then light the exhaust, and use the flame jets. IDK how, but use them.
                    $endgroup$
                    – Neal
                    2 days ago







                  • 1




                    $begingroup$
                    @Neal simple: what's better than a chainsaw at maiming your enemy? The MurderCo Rocket-Propelled Chainsaw (patents pending)! Why use measly human (or whatever other species) appendages to thrust your chainsaw into your enemy when our patented diverters use the combustion exhaust to launch it at your enemy? Warning, adult supervision required, MurderCo is not responsible for loss of limbs or life, property damage, or damages caused by Acts of Stupid (which includes all actions taken using the MurderCo RPC).
                    $endgroup$
                    – Doktor J
                    2 days ago










                  • $begingroup$
                    A flatulentic turbocharged curled discharge. Are we still talking about Taco Bell?
                    $endgroup$
                    – Juha Untinen
                    yesterday












                  • 3




                    $begingroup$
                    Also consider the giant farting sound on, ahem, discharge. Use methane as the gas, and then light the exhaust, and use the flame jets. IDK how, but use them.
                    $endgroup$
                    – Neal
                    2 days ago







                  • 1




                    $begingroup$
                    @Neal simple: what's better than a chainsaw at maiming your enemy? The MurderCo Rocket-Propelled Chainsaw (patents pending)! Why use measly human (or whatever other species) appendages to thrust your chainsaw into your enemy when our patented diverters use the combustion exhaust to launch it at your enemy? Warning, adult supervision required, MurderCo is not responsible for loss of limbs or life, property damage, or damages caused by Acts of Stupid (which includes all actions taken using the MurderCo RPC).
                    $endgroup$
                    – Doktor J
                    2 days ago










                  • $begingroup$
                    A flatulentic turbocharged curled discharge. Are we still talking about Taco Bell?
                    $endgroup$
                    – Juha Untinen
                    yesterday







                  3




                  3




                  $begingroup$
                  Also consider the giant farting sound on, ahem, discharge. Use methane as the gas, and then light the exhaust, and use the flame jets. IDK how, but use them.
                  $endgroup$
                  – Neal
                  2 days ago





                  $begingroup$
                  Also consider the giant farting sound on, ahem, discharge. Use methane as the gas, and then light the exhaust, and use the flame jets. IDK how, but use them.
                  $endgroup$
                  – Neal
                  2 days ago





                  1




                  1




                  $begingroup$
                  @Neal simple: what's better than a chainsaw at maiming your enemy? The MurderCo Rocket-Propelled Chainsaw (patents pending)! Why use measly human (or whatever other species) appendages to thrust your chainsaw into your enemy when our patented diverters use the combustion exhaust to launch it at your enemy? Warning, adult supervision required, MurderCo is not responsible for loss of limbs or life, property damage, or damages caused by Acts of Stupid (which includes all actions taken using the MurderCo RPC).
                  $endgroup$
                  – Doktor J
                  2 days ago




                  $begingroup$
                  @Neal simple: what's better than a chainsaw at maiming your enemy? The MurderCo Rocket-Propelled Chainsaw (patents pending)! Why use measly human (or whatever other species) appendages to thrust your chainsaw into your enemy when our patented diverters use the combustion exhaust to launch it at your enemy? Warning, adult supervision required, MurderCo is not responsible for loss of limbs or life, property damage, or damages caused by Acts of Stupid (which includes all actions taken using the MurderCo RPC).
                  $endgroup$
                  – Doktor J
                  2 days ago












                  $begingroup$
                  A flatulentic turbocharged curled discharge. Are we still talking about Taco Bell?
                  $endgroup$
                  – Juha Untinen
                  yesterday




                  $begingroup$
                  A flatulentic turbocharged curled discharge. Are we still talking about Taco Bell?
                  $endgroup$
                  – Juha Untinen
                  yesterday











                  11












                  $begingroup$

                  As an alternative to coiled spring you can have your own gyro core (or flywheel).



                  Make a small and dense wheel to rotate very fast on pins in your chainsaw, virtually without energy loss, and then give it all away to chain blades. After it is discharged it becomes a useless piece of metal without any electronics or stuff. It is also much safer to operate than coiled spring.



                  If anything it will also stabilize delivery of this chainsaw.






                  share|improve this answer









                  $endgroup$








                  • 3




                    $begingroup$
                    Trying to manoeuvre such a weapon would be nigh on impossible if you used it to store any appreciable energy, surely?
                    $endgroup$
                    – Joe Bloggs
                    2 days ago










                  • $begingroup$
                    You could put your gyro core into gyro stabilizer, which will let you handle such weapon. Or maybe it's not even necessary given the question details.
                    $endgroup$
                    – alamar
                    2 days ago






                  • 1




                    $begingroup$
                    Probably storing the spun up weapons in opposite-spun pairs always would compensate some unwanted effect AND stabilize your aircraft?
                    $endgroup$
                    – rackandboneman
                    yesterday










                  • $begingroup$
                    Just use counter-rotating gyros.
                    $endgroup$
                    – RBarryYoung
                    yesterday















                  11












                  $begingroup$

                  As an alternative to coiled spring you can have your own gyro core (or flywheel).



                  Make a small and dense wheel to rotate very fast on pins in your chainsaw, virtually without energy loss, and then give it all away to chain blades. After it is discharged it becomes a useless piece of metal without any electronics or stuff. It is also much safer to operate than coiled spring.



                  If anything it will also stabilize delivery of this chainsaw.






                  share|improve this answer









                  $endgroup$








                  • 3




                    $begingroup$
                    Trying to manoeuvre such a weapon would be nigh on impossible if you used it to store any appreciable energy, surely?
                    $endgroup$
                    – Joe Bloggs
                    2 days ago










                  • $begingroup$
                    You could put your gyro core into gyro stabilizer, which will let you handle such weapon. Or maybe it's not even necessary given the question details.
                    $endgroup$
                    – alamar
                    2 days ago






                  • 1




                    $begingroup$
                    Probably storing the spun up weapons in opposite-spun pairs always would compensate some unwanted effect AND stabilize your aircraft?
                    $endgroup$
                    – rackandboneman
                    yesterday










                  • $begingroup$
                    Just use counter-rotating gyros.
                    $endgroup$
                    – RBarryYoung
                    yesterday













                  11












                  11








                  11





                  $begingroup$

                  As an alternative to coiled spring you can have your own gyro core (or flywheel).



                  Make a small and dense wheel to rotate very fast on pins in your chainsaw, virtually without energy loss, and then give it all away to chain blades. After it is discharged it becomes a useless piece of metal without any electronics or stuff. It is also much safer to operate than coiled spring.



                  If anything it will also stabilize delivery of this chainsaw.






                  share|improve this answer









                  $endgroup$



                  As an alternative to coiled spring you can have your own gyro core (or flywheel).



                  Make a small and dense wheel to rotate very fast on pins in your chainsaw, virtually without energy loss, and then give it all away to chain blades. After it is discharged it becomes a useless piece of metal without any electronics or stuff. It is also much safer to operate than coiled spring.



                  If anything it will also stabilize delivery of this chainsaw.







                  share|improve this answer












                  share|improve this answer



                  share|improve this answer










                  answered 2 days ago









                  alamaralamar

                  1,628316




                  1,628316







                  • 3




                    $begingroup$
                    Trying to manoeuvre such a weapon would be nigh on impossible if you used it to store any appreciable energy, surely?
                    $endgroup$
                    – Joe Bloggs
                    2 days ago










                  • $begingroup$
                    You could put your gyro core into gyro stabilizer, which will let you handle such weapon. Or maybe it's not even necessary given the question details.
                    $endgroup$
                    – alamar
                    2 days ago






                  • 1




                    $begingroup$
                    Probably storing the spun up weapons in opposite-spun pairs always would compensate some unwanted effect AND stabilize your aircraft?
                    $endgroup$
                    – rackandboneman
                    yesterday










                  • $begingroup$
                    Just use counter-rotating gyros.
                    $endgroup$
                    – RBarryYoung
                    yesterday












                  • 3




                    $begingroup$
                    Trying to manoeuvre such a weapon would be nigh on impossible if you used it to store any appreciable energy, surely?
                    $endgroup$
                    – Joe Bloggs
                    2 days ago










                  • $begingroup$
                    You could put your gyro core into gyro stabilizer, which will let you handle such weapon. Or maybe it's not even necessary given the question details.
                    $endgroup$
                    – alamar
                    2 days ago






                  • 1




                    $begingroup$
                    Probably storing the spun up weapons in opposite-spun pairs always would compensate some unwanted effect AND stabilize your aircraft?
                    $endgroup$
                    – rackandboneman
                    yesterday










                  • $begingroup$
                    Just use counter-rotating gyros.
                    $endgroup$
                    – RBarryYoung
                    yesterday







                  3




                  3




                  $begingroup$
                  Trying to manoeuvre such a weapon would be nigh on impossible if you used it to store any appreciable energy, surely?
                  $endgroup$
                  – Joe Bloggs
                  2 days ago




                  $begingroup$
                  Trying to manoeuvre such a weapon would be nigh on impossible if you used it to store any appreciable energy, surely?
                  $endgroup$
                  – Joe Bloggs
                  2 days ago












                  $begingroup$
                  You could put your gyro core into gyro stabilizer, which will let you handle such weapon. Or maybe it's not even necessary given the question details.
                  $endgroup$
                  – alamar
                  2 days ago




                  $begingroup$
                  You could put your gyro core into gyro stabilizer, which will let you handle such weapon. Or maybe it's not even necessary given the question details.
                  $endgroup$
                  – alamar
                  2 days ago




                  1




                  1




                  $begingroup$
                  Probably storing the spun up weapons in opposite-spun pairs always would compensate some unwanted effect AND stabilize your aircraft?
                  $endgroup$
                  – rackandboneman
                  yesterday




                  $begingroup$
                  Probably storing the spun up weapons in opposite-spun pairs always would compensate some unwanted effect AND stabilize your aircraft?
                  $endgroup$
                  – rackandboneman
                  yesterday












                  $begingroup$
                  Just use counter-rotating gyros.
                  $endgroup$
                  – RBarryYoung
                  yesterday




                  $begingroup$
                  Just use counter-rotating gyros.
                  $endgroup$
                  – RBarryYoung
                  yesterday











                  11












                  $begingroup$

                  While the question does not explicitly specify this, I think it is reasonable to specify some, er, specifications.



                  • Extreme energy density. The goal of this weapon seems to be to deliver as much destruction as possible in 15 seconds, in a 400lb package which is probably the weight limit for the weapon stores on the jet. It is desirable that the majority of this 400lb is gnawing teeth of mushy annihilation, and only a small part is fuel and power source.


                  • Extreme reliability. If a air-dropped 400lb giant disposable chainsaw seems like the best way out of a situation, you are probably in deep, deep trouble. You don't want to be yanking a starter cord on a dodgy two-stroke while the Tentacles of Kaza'An the Soul Destroyer of Mag-Uhn squeeze the life out of your fellow unlucky party members. You shouldn't have to carefully lubricate the moving parts of your jammed chainsaw while the Teeth of Brig-Wrath the Extirpator of Zw'n-Thragg dismember your group members. You want to have instant destruction available the moment you receive the weapon. You might even want to be able to use the device on Frizhger the Mauling Shark-Fish, submerged in the Sea of Despair.


                  Obviously, air-breathing engines are no good, what with the underwater Mauling Shark-Fish (also, the torrential rains on Zw'n-Thragg!). Electrics are really not great either - they require careful isolation from the environment, and frankly, the energy density of batteries are quite terrible - you don't want to run out of power halfway one of Kaza'An's Tentacles.



                  The obvious solution is a hydrazine turbine engine. Hydrazine is an extremely reactive fuel, that does not need an external source of oxygen. It is used as a rocket fuel (where energy density is key). A turbine engine probably has the highest power-to-weight ratio of any rotating engine, and furthermore it only has a single moving part, which can be connected with a single reduction gear to the saw chain. The reaction products of running hydrazine over a catalyst such as iridium are extremely hot nitrogen and hydrogen gas, the latter of which can also combust once it does come into contact with the outside air.



                  The end result is a screeching whining chainsaw of death spitting blue flames from its exhaust. Chances are the extirpation days of Brig-Wrath are soon over.






                  share|improve this answer









                  $endgroup$












                  • $begingroup$
                    I like your logic, but why bother with the complexity of a turbine and reduction gearing when you could put hydrazine rockets on the chain itself
                    $endgroup$
                    – Robin Bennett
                    yesterday






                  • 1




                    $begingroup$
                    @Robin I considered that but half of the rockets will be facing the chainsaw operators. An alternative is to have a rocket pointing directly at the chain but in these case the chain needs to be a compromise between gnawy teethiness and power transfer. All in all I liked the turbine option best.
                    $endgroup$
                    – Sanchises
                    yesterday










                  • $begingroup$
                    +1 for pointing out the kinds of circumstances required for this kind of weapon and delivery system to even be considered.
                    $endgroup$
                    – Perkins
                    yesterday










                  • $begingroup$
                    @Perkins Circumstances such as, but not limited to, the examples listed above. :)
                    $endgroup$
                    – Sanchises
                    yesterday






                  • 1




                    $begingroup$
                    @MerseyViking No need to be so negative! The decomposition products of hydrazine are hydrogen, nitrogen and ammonia. Only the latter is mildly toxic in elevated quantities, but does not case acid rain. The only real problem is the Miak Salmon infestation - a rare fish that uses proton pumps in its gills to convert dissolved ammonia to a liquorice-like substance dubbed Sal'Miak by the local population.
                    $endgroup$
                    – Sanchises
                    13 hours ago















                  11












                  $begingroup$

                  While the question does not explicitly specify this, I think it is reasonable to specify some, er, specifications.



                  • Extreme energy density. The goal of this weapon seems to be to deliver as much destruction as possible in 15 seconds, in a 400lb package which is probably the weight limit for the weapon stores on the jet. It is desirable that the majority of this 400lb is gnawing teeth of mushy annihilation, and only a small part is fuel and power source.


                  • Extreme reliability. If a air-dropped 400lb giant disposable chainsaw seems like the best way out of a situation, you are probably in deep, deep trouble. You don't want to be yanking a starter cord on a dodgy two-stroke while the Tentacles of Kaza'An the Soul Destroyer of Mag-Uhn squeeze the life out of your fellow unlucky party members. You shouldn't have to carefully lubricate the moving parts of your jammed chainsaw while the Teeth of Brig-Wrath the Extirpator of Zw'n-Thragg dismember your group members. You want to have instant destruction available the moment you receive the weapon. You might even want to be able to use the device on Frizhger the Mauling Shark-Fish, submerged in the Sea of Despair.


                  Obviously, air-breathing engines are no good, what with the underwater Mauling Shark-Fish (also, the torrential rains on Zw'n-Thragg!). Electrics are really not great either - they require careful isolation from the environment, and frankly, the energy density of batteries are quite terrible - you don't want to run out of power halfway one of Kaza'An's Tentacles.



                  The obvious solution is a hydrazine turbine engine. Hydrazine is an extremely reactive fuel, that does not need an external source of oxygen. It is used as a rocket fuel (where energy density is key). A turbine engine probably has the highest power-to-weight ratio of any rotating engine, and furthermore it only has a single moving part, which can be connected with a single reduction gear to the saw chain. The reaction products of running hydrazine over a catalyst such as iridium are extremely hot nitrogen and hydrogen gas, the latter of which can also combust once it does come into contact with the outside air.



                  The end result is a screeching whining chainsaw of death spitting blue flames from its exhaust. Chances are the extirpation days of Brig-Wrath are soon over.






                  share|improve this answer









                  $endgroup$












                  • $begingroup$
                    I like your logic, but why bother with the complexity of a turbine and reduction gearing when you could put hydrazine rockets on the chain itself
                    $endgroup$
                    – Robin Bennett
                    yesterday






                  • 1




                    $begingroup$
                    @Robin I considered that but half of the rockets will be facing the chainsaw operators. An alternative is to have a rocket pointing directly at the chain but in these case the chain needs to be a compromise between gnawy teethiness and power transfer. All in all I liked the turbine option best.
                    $endgroup$
                    – Sanchises
                    yesterday










                  • $begingroup$
                    +1 for pointing out the kinds of circumstances required for this kind of weapon and delivery system to even be considered.
                    $endgroup$
                    – Perkins
                    yesterday










                  • $begingroup$
                    @Perkins Circumstances such as, but not limited to, the examples listed above. :)
                    $endgroup$
                    – Sanchises
                    yesterday






                  • 1




                    $begingroup$
                    @MerseyViking No need to be so negative! The decomposition products of hydrazine are hydrogen, nitrogen and ammonia. Only the latter is mildly toxic in elevated quantities, but does not case acid rain. The only real problem is the Miak Salmon infestation - a rare fish that uses proton pumps in its gills to convert dissolved ammonia to a liquorice-like substance dubbed Sal'Miak by the local population.
                    $endgroup$
                    – Sanchises
                    13 hours ago













                  11












                  11








                  11





                  $begingroup$

                  While the question does not explicitly specify this, I think it is reasonable to specify some, er, specifications.



                  • Extreme energy density. The goal of this weapon seems to be to deliver as much destruction as possible in 15 seconds, in a 400lb package which is probably the weight limit for the weapon stores on the jet. It is desirable that the majority of this 400lb is gnawing teeth of mushy annihilation, and only a small part is fuel and power source.


                  • Extreme reliability. If a air-dropped 400lb giant disposable chainsaw seems like the best way out of a situation, you are probably in deep, deep trouble. You don't want to be yanking a starter cord on a dodgy two-stroke while the Tentacles of Kaza'An the Soul Destroyer of Mag-Uhn squeeze the life out of your fellow unlucky party members. You shouldn't have to carefully lubricate the moving parts of your jammed chainsaw while the Teeth of Brig-Wrath the Extirpator of Zw'n-Thragg dismember your group members. You want to have instant destruction available the moment you receive the weapon. You might even want to be able to use the device on Frizhger the Mauling Shark-Fish, submerged in the Sea of Despair.


                  Obviously, air-breathing engines are no good, what with the underwater Mauling Shark-Fish (also, the torrential rains on Zw'n-Thragg!). Electrics are really not great either - they require careful isolation from the environment, and frankly, the energy density of batteries are quite terrible - you don't want to run out of power halfway one of Kaza'An's Tentacles.



                  The obvious solution is a hydrazine turbine engine. Hydrazine is an extremely reactive fuel, that does not need an external source of oxygen. It is used as a rocket fuel (where energy density is key). A turbine engine probably has the highest power-to-weight ratio of any rotating engine, and furthermore it only has a single moving part, which can be connected with a single reduction gear to the saw chain. The reaction products of running hydrazine over a catalyst such as iridium are extremely hot nitrogen and hydrogen gas, the latter of which can also combust once it does come into contact with the outside air.



                  The end result is a screeching whining chainsaw of death spitting blue flames from its exhaust. Chances are the extirpation days of Brig-Wrath are soon over.






                  share|improve this answer









                  $endgroup$



                  While the question does not explicitly specify this, I think it is reasonable to specify some, er, specifications.



                  • Extreme energy density. The goal of this weapon seems to be to deliver as much destruction as possible in 15 seconds, in a 400lb package which is probably the weight limit for the weapon stores on the jet. It is desirable that the majority of this 400lb is gnawing teeth of mushy annihilation, and only a small part is fuel and power source.


                  • Extreme reliability. If a air-dropped 400lb giant disposable chainsaw seems like the best way out of a situation, you are probably in deep, deep trouble. You don't want to be yanking a starter cord on a dodgy two-stroke while the Tentacles of Kaza'An the Soul Destroyer of Mag-Uhn squeeze the life out of your fellow unlucky party members. You shouldn't have to carefully lubricate the moving parts of your jammed chainsaw while the Teeth of Brig-Wrath the Extirpator of Zw'n-Thragg dismember your group members. You want to have instant destruction available the moment you receive the weapon. You might even want to be able to use the device on Frizhger the Mauling Shark-Fish, submerged in the Sea of Despair.


                  Obviously, air-breathing engines are no good, what with the underwater Mauling Shark-Fish (also, the torrential rains on Zw'n-Thragg!). Electrics are really not great either - they require careful isolation from the environment, and frankly, the energy density of batteries are quite terrible - you don't want to run out of power halfway one of Kaza'An's Tentacles.



                  The obvious solution is a hydrazine turbine engine. Hydrazine is an extremely reactive fuel, that does not need an external source of oxygen. It is used as a rocket fuel (where energy density is key). A turbine engine probably has the highest power-to-weight ratio of any rotating engine, and furthermore it only has a single moving part, which can be connected with a single reduction gear to the saw chain. The reaction products of running hydrazine over a catalyst such as iridium are extremely hot nitrogen and hydrogen gas, the latter of which can also combust once it does come into contact with the outside air.



                  The end result is a screeching whining chainsaw of death spitting blue flames from its exhaust. Chances are the extirpation days of Brig-Wrath are soon over.







                  share|improve this answer












                  share|improve this answer



                  share|improve this answer










                  answered yesterday









                  SanchisesSanchises

                  1,234511




                  1,234511











                  • $begingroup$
                    I like your logic, but why bother with the complexity of a turbine and reduction gearing when you could put hydrazine rockets on the chain itself
                    $endgroup$
                    – Robin Bennett
                    yesterday






                  • 1




                    $begingroup$
                    @Robin I considered that but half of the rockets will be facing the chainsaw operators. An alternative is to have a rocket pointing directly at the chain but in these case the chain needs to be a compromise between gnawy teethiness and power transfer. All in all I liked the turbine option best.
                    $endgroup$
                    – Sanchises
                    yesterday










                  • $begingroup$
                    +1 for pointing out the kinds of circumstances required for this kind of weapon and delivery system to even be considered.
                    $endgroup$
                    – Perkins
                    yesterday










                  • $begingroup$
                    @Perkins Circumstances such as, but not limited to, the examples listed above. :)
                    $endgroup$
                    – Sanchises
                    yesterday






                  • 1




                    $begingroup$
                    @MerseyViking No need to be so negative! The decomposition products of hydrazine are hydrogen, nitrogen and ammonia. Only the latter is mildly toxic in elevated quantities, but does not case acid rain. The only real problem is the Miak Salmon infestation - a rare fish that uses proton pumps in its gills to convert dissolved ammonia to a liquorice-like substance dubbed Sal'Miak by the local population.
                    $endgroup$
                    – Sanchises
                    13 hours ago
















                  • $begingroup$
                    I like your logic, but why bother with the complexity of a turbine and reduction gearing when you could put hydrazine rockets on the chain itself
                    $endgroup$
                    – Robin Bennett
                    yesterday






                  • 1




                    $begingroup$
                    @Robin I considered that but half of the rockets will be facing the chainsaw operators. An alternative is to have a rocket pointing directly at the chain but in these case the chain needs to be a compromise between gnawy teethiness and power transfer. All in all I liked the turbine option best.
                    $endgroup$
                    – Sanchises
                    yesterday










                  • $begingroup$
                    +1 for pointing out the kinds of circumstances required for this kind of weapon and delivery system to even be considered.
                    $endgroup$
                    – Perkins
                    yesterday










                  • $begingroup$
                    @Perkins Circumstances such as, but not limited to, the examples listed above. :)
                    $endgroup$
                    – Sanchises
                    yesterday






                  • 1




                    $begingroup$
                    @MerseyViking No need to be so negative! The decomposition products of hydrazine are hydrogen, nitrogen and ammonia. Only the latter is mildly toxic in elevated quantities, but does not case acid rain. The only real problem is the Miak Salmon infestation - a rare fish that uses proton pumps in its gills to convert dissolved ammonia to a liquorice-like substance dubbed Sal'Miak by the local population.
                    $endgroup$
                    – Sanchises
                    13 hours ago















                  $begingroup$
                  I like your logic, but why bother with the complexity of a turbine and reduction gearing when you could put hydrazine rockets on the chain itself
                  $endgroup$
                  – Robin Bennett
                  yesterday




                  $begingroup$
                  I like your logic, but why bother with the complexity of a turbine and reduction gearing when you could put hydrazine rockets on the chain itself
                  $endgroup$
                  – Robin Bennett
                  yesterday




                  1




                  1




                  $begingroup$
                  @Robin I considered that but half of the rockets will be facing the chainsaw operators. An alternative is to have a rocket pointing directly at the chain but in these case the chain needs to be a compromise between gnawy teethiness and power transfer. All in all I liked the turbine option best.
                  $endgroup$
                  – Sanchises
                  yesterday




                  $begingroup$
                  @Robin I considered that but half of the rockets will be facing the chainsaw operators. An alternative is to have a rocket pointing directly at the chain but in these case the chain needs to be a compromise between gnawy teethiness and power transfer. All in all I liked the turbine option best.
                  $endgroup$
                  – Sanchises
                  yesterday












                  $begingroup$
                  +1 for pointing out the kinds of circumstances required for this kind of weapon and delivery system to even be considered.
                  $endgroup$
                  – Perkins
                  yesterday




                  $begingroup$
                  +1 for pointing out the kinds of circumstances required for this kind of weapon and delivery system to even be considered.
                  $endgroup$
                  – Perkins
                  yesterday












                  $begingroup$
                  @Perkins Circumstances such as, but not limited to, the examples listed above. :)
                  $endgroup$
                  – Sanchises
                  yesterday




                  $begingroup$
                  @Perkins Circumstances such as, but not limited to, the examples listed above. :)
                  $endgroup$
                  – Sanchises
                  yesterday




                  1




                  1




                  $begingroup$
                  @MerseyViking No need to be so negative! The decomposition products of hydrazine are hydrogen, nitrogen and ammonia. Only the latter is mildly toxic in elevated quantities, but does not case acid rain. The only real problem is the Miak Salmon infestation - a rare fish that uses proton pumps in its gills to convert dissolved ammonia to a liquorice-like substance dubbed Sal'Miak by the local population.
                  $endgroup$
                  – Sanchises
                  13 hours ago




                  $begingroup$
                  @MerseyViking No need to be so negative! The decomposition products of hydrazine are hydrogen, nitrogen and ammonia. Only the latter is mildly toxic in elevated quantities, but does not case acid rain. The only real problem is the Miak Salmon infestation - a rare fish that uses proton pumps in its gills to convert dissolved ammonia to a liquorice-like substance dubbed Sal'Miak by the local population.
                  $endgroup$
                  – Sanchises
                  13 hours ago











                  7












                  $begingroup$

                  Well if you only need it very briefly I'd recommend a power cell.



                  Where batteries provide a slow trickle of stored energy over time,power cells can dump all of their energy in an instant. So that chainsaw purpose built to be disposable but very deadly could literally be torn apart from the energy it exerts in its short period of activity.



                  Also this means that being disposable the chainsaw would be made of cheaper materials. Since the power cell never needs to be replaced as it is a one-off use it can be made non-rechargeable and self-destructing. Not in the way it blows up when used, but it burns out the internal storage from the incredible heat and shock of the energy release.



                  All in all, the chainsaws shall exist. And they shall be terrifying. Maybe just make the edge out of carbon nano-tubes? Nano-tubes can also be used to store energy within their mass much like batteries or power cells. So you could literally make the chainsaw one giant power cell made of an extremely energy dense but light material that at 400 lbs would have enough power to immolate an elephant entirely most likely.



                  Your chainsaw would have the power of a bomb, all put towards a few glorious seconds to a minute at most of incredibly destructive power as the blade super heats and the chainsaw loses cohesion as the power which simultaneously kept it together suddenly runs out.



                  I hope this helps.






                  share|improve this answer











                  $endgroup$








                  • 4




                    $begingroup$
                    Aren't batteries and power cells the same thing? A battery is a group of several cells linked together. If you cut open something like an AA battery, you will find button cells inside of it. Even car batteries are made up of several different cells.
                    $endgroup$
                    – Liam Morris
                    2 days ago










                  • $begingroup$
                    @LiamMorris In fact, it may even be the opposite: each power gives you some power, so you want as many as possible to have the highest possible power (but for the shortest time)
                    $endgroup$
                    – Eth
                    2 days ago






                  • 2




                    $begingroup$
                    Maybe use super capacitors. They can deliver huge amount of power in short time.
                    $endgroup$
                    – jnovacho
                    2 days ago










                  • $begingroup$
                    @jnovacho Good idea. I will write an answer based on this.
                    $endgroup$
                    – Philipp
                    2 days ago






                  • 1




                    $begingroup$
                    That moment where tired me put power cell instead of fuel cell. -.- I am talking about fuel cells made using carbon nano-tubes.
                    $endgroup$
                    – Jeremy Barrett
                    yesterday















                  7












                  $begingroup$

                  Well if you only need it very briefly I'd recommend a power cell.



                  Where batteries provide a slow trickle of stored energy over time,power cells can dump all of their energy in an instant. So that chainsaw purpose built to be disposable but very deadly could literally be torn apart from the energy it exerts in its short period of activity.



                  Also this means that being disposable the chainsaw would be made of cheaper materials. Since the power cell never needs to be replaced as it is a one-off use it can be made non-rechargeable and self-destructing. Not in the way it blows up when used, but it burns out the internal storage from the incredible heat and shock of the energy release.



                  All in all, the chainsaws shall exist. And they shall be terrifying. Maybe just make the edge out of carbon nano-tubes? Nano-tubes can also be used to store energy within their mass much like batteries or power cells. So you could literally make the chainsaw one giant power cell made of an extremely energy dense but light material that at 400 lbs would have enough power to immolate an elephant entirely most likely.



                  Your chainsaw would have the power of a bomb, all put towards a few glorious seconds to a minute at most of incredibly destructive power as the blade super heats and the chainsaw loses cohesion as the power which simultaneously kept it together suddenly runs out.



                  I hope this helps.






                  share|improve this answer











                  $endgroup$








                  • 4




                    $begingroup$
                    Aren't batteries and power cells the same thing? A battery is a group of several cells linked together. If you cut open something like an AA battery, you will find button cells inside of it. Even car batteries are made up of several different cells.
                    $endgroup$
                    – Liam Morris
                    2 days ago










                  • $begingroup$
                    @LiamMorris In fact, it may even be the opposite: each power gives you some power, so you want as many as possible to have the highest possible power (but for the shortest time)
                    $endgroup$
                    – Eth
                    2 days ago






                  • 2




                    $begingroup$
                    Maybe use super capacitors. They can deliver huge amount of power in short time.
                    $endgroup$
                    – jnovacho
                    2 days ago










                  • $begingroup$
                    @jnovacho Good idea. I will write an answer based on this.
                    $endgroup$
                    – Philipp
                    2 days ago






                  • 1




                    $begingroup$
                    That moment where tired me put power cell instead of fuel cell. -.- I am talking about fuel cells made using carbon nano-tubes.
                    $endgroup$
                    – Jeremy Barrett
                    yesterday













                  7












                  7








                  7





                  $begingroup$

                  Well if you only need it very briefly I'd recommend a power cell.



                  Where batteries provide a slow trickle of stored energy over time,power cells can dump all of their energy in an instant. So that chainsaw purpose built to be disposable but very deadly could literally be torn apart from the energy it exerts in its short period of activity.



                  Also this means that being disposable the chainsaw would be made of cheaper materials. Since the power cell never needs to be replaced as it is a one-off use it can be made non-rechargeable and self-destructing. Not in the way it blows up when used, but it burns out the internal storage from the incredible heat and shock of the energy release.



                  All in all, the chainsaws shall exist. And they shall be terrifying. Maybe just make the edge out of carbon nano-tubes? Nano-tubes can also be used to store energy within their mass much like batteries or power cells. So you could literally make the chainsaw one giant power cell made of an extremely energy dense but light material that at 400 lbs would have enough power to immolate an elephant entirely most likely.



                  Your chainsaw would have the power of a bomb, all put towards a few glorious seconds to a minute at most of incredibly destructive power as the blade super heats and the chainsaw loses cohesion as the power which simultaneously kept it together suddenly runs out.



                  I hope this helps.






                  share|improve this answer











                  $endgroup$



                  Well if you only need it very briefly I'd recommend a power cell.



                  Where batteries provide a slow trickle of stored energy over time,power cells can dump all of their energy in an instant. So that chainsaw purpose built to be disposable but very deadly could literally be torn apart from the energy it exerts in its short period of activity.



                  Also this means that being disposable the chainsaw would be made of cheaper materials. Since the power cell never needs to be replaced as it is a one-off use it can be made non-rechargeable and self-destructing. Not in the way it blows up when used, but it burns out the internal storage from the incredible heat and shock of the energy release.



                  All in all, the chainsaws shall exist. And they shall be terrifying. Maybe just make the edge out of carbon nano-tubes? Nano-tubes can also be used to store energy within their mass much like batteries or power cells. So you could literally make the chainsaw one giant power cell made of an extremely energy dense but light material that at 400 lbs would have enough power to immolate an elephant entirely most likely.



                  Your chainsaw would have the power of a bomb, all put towards a few glorious seconds to a minute at most of incredibly destructive power as the blade super heats and the chainsaw loses cohesion as the power which simultaneously kept it together suddenly runs out.



                  I hope this helps.







                  share|improve this answer














                  share|improve this answer



                  share|improve this answer








                  edited 2 days ago









                  Separatrix

                  85.6k31198332




                  85.6k31198332










                  answered 2 days ago









                  Jeremy BarrettJeremy Barrett

                  639115




                  639115







                  • 4




                    $begingroup$
                    Aren't batteries and power cells the same thing? A battery is a group of several cells linked together. If you cut open something like an AA battery, you will find button cells inside of it. Even car batteries are made up of several different cells.
                    $endgroup$
                    – Liam Morris
                    2 days ago










                  • $begingroup$
                    @LiamMorris In fact, it may even be the opposite: each power gives you some power, so you want as many as possible to have the highest possible power (but for the shortest time)
                    $endgroup$
                    – Eth
                    2 days ago






                  • 2




                    $begingroup$
                    Maybe use super capacitors. They can deliver huge amount of power in short time.
                    $endgroup$
                    – jnovacho
                    2 days ago










                  • $begingroup$
                    @jnovacho Good idea. I will write an answer based on this.
                    $endgroup$
                    – Philipp
                    2 days ago






                  • 1




                    $begingroup$
                    That moment where tired me put power cell instead of fuel cell. -.- I am talking about fuel cells made using carbon nano-tubes.
                    $endgroup$
                    – Jeremy Barrett
                    yesterday












                  • 4




                    $begingroup$
                    Aren't batteries and power cells the same thing? A battery is a group of several cells linked together. If you cut open something like an AA battery, you will find button cells inside of it. Even car batteries are made up of several different cells.
                    $endgroup$
                    – Liam Morris
                    2 days ago










                  • $begingroup$
                    @LiamMorris In fact, it may even be the opposite: each power gives you some power, so you want as many as possible to have the highest possible power (but for the shortest time)
                    $endgroup$
                    – Eth
                    2 days ago






                  • 2




                    $begingroup$
                    Maybe use super capacitors. They can deliver huge amount of power in short time.
                    $endgroup$
                    – jnovacho
                    2 days ago










                  • $begingroup$
                    @jnovacho Good idea. I will write an answer based on this.
                    $endgroup$
                    – Philipp
                    2 days ago






                  • 1




                    $begingroup$
                    That moment where tired me put power cell instead of fuel cell. -.- I am talking about fuel cells made using carbon nano-tubes.
                    $endgroup$
                    – Jeremy Barrett
                    yesterday







                  4




                  4




                  $begingroup$
                  Aren't batteries and power cells the same thing? A battery is a group of several cells linked together. If you cut open something like an AA battery, you will find button cells inside of it. Even car batteries are made up of several different cells.
                  $endgroup$
                  – Liam Morris
                  2 days ago




                  $begingroup$
                  Aren't batteries and power cells the same thing? A battery is a group of several cells linked together. If you cut open something like an AA battery, you will find button cells inside of it. Even car batteries are made up of several different cells.
                  $endgroup$
                  – Liam Morris
                  2 days ago












                  $begingroup$
                  @LiamMorris In fact, it may even be the opposite: each power gives you some power, so you want as many as possible to have the highest possible power (but for the shortest time)
                  $endgroup$
                  – Eth
                  2 days ago




                  $begingroup$
                  @LiamMorris In fact, it may even be the opposite: each power gives you some power, so you want as many as possible to have the highest possible power (but for the shortest time)
                  $endgroup$
                  – Eth
                  2 days ago




                  2




                  2




                  $begingroup$
                  Maybe use super capacitors. They can deliver huge amount of power in short time.
                  $endgroup$
                  – jnovacho
                  2 days ago




                  $begingroup$
                  Maybe use super capacitors. They can deliver huge amount of power in short time.
                  $endgroup$
                  – jnovacho
                  2 days ago












                  $begingroup$
                  @jnovacho Good idea. I will write an answer based on this.
                  $endgroup$
                  – Philipp
                  2 days ago




                  $begingroup$
                  @jnovacho Good idea. I will write an answer based on this.
                  $endgroup$
                  – Philipp
                  2 days ago




                  1




                  1




                  $begingroup$
                  That moment where tired me put power cell instead of fuel cell. -.- I am talking about fuel cells made using carbon nano-tubes.
                  $endgroup$
                  – Jeremy Barrett
                  yesterday




                  $begingroup$
                  That moment where tired me put power cell instead of fuel cell. -.- I am talking about fuel cells made using carbon nano-tubes.
                  $endgroup$
                  – Jeremy Barrett
                  yesterday











                  4












                  $begingroup$

                  The parameters of the problem are:



                  1. Single-use ordnance

                  2. Power-to-weight is a significant constraint

                  3. Brief duration of discharge

                  4. Cheap-ish (we're talking about a disposable giant chainsaw here)

                  So you're probably looking at a chemical energy source that needs to be converted to mechanical energy. That rules out any high-explosive, and anyway, explosives expend much of their energy in brisance.



                  Fuels like Otto II driving a turbine are one possibility, if you'd like the system to be self-contained (i.e. not subject the user to exhaust fumes). If that is not a serious consideration (e.g. you are okay with a fire-belching disposable giant chainsaw), then the parameters of the problem closely resemble the energy requirements of a rocket.



                  I'm partial to a powderized-aluminum + ammonium nitrate mixture, myself.






                  share|improve this answer








                  New contributor




                  Arthur Chan is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
                  Check out our Code of Conduct.






                  $endgroup$

















                    4












                    $begingroup$

                    The parameters of the problem are:



                    1. Single-use ordnance

                    2. Power-to-weight is a significant constraint

                    3. Brief duration of discharge

                    4. Cheap-ish (we're talking about a disposable giant chainsaw here)

                    So you're probably looking at a chemical energy source that needs to be converted to mechanical energy. That rules out any high-explosive, and anyway, explosives expend much of their energy in brisance.



                    Fuels like Otto II driving a turbine are one possibility, if you'd like the system to be self-contained (i.e. not subject the user to exhaust fumes). If that is not a serious consideration (e.g. you are okay with a fire-belching disposable giant chainsaw), then the parameters of the problem closely resemble the energy requirements of a rocket.



                    I'm partial to a powderized-aluminum + ammonium nitrate mixture, myself.






                    share|improve this answer








                    New contributor




                    Arthur Chan is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
                    Check out our Code of Conduct.






                    $endgroup$















                      4












                      4








                      4





                      $begingroup$

                      The parameters of the problem are:



                      1. Single-use ordnance

                      2. Power-to-weight is a significant constraint

                      3. Brief duration of discharge

                      4. Cheap-ish (we're talking about a disposable giant chainsaw here)

                      So you're probably looking at a chemical energy source that needs to be converted to mechanical energy. That rules out any high-explosive, and anyway, explosives expend much of their energy in brisance.



                      Fuels like Otto II driving a turbine are one possibility, if you'd like the system to be self-contained (i.e. not subject the user to exhaust fumes). If that is not a serious consideration (e.g. you are okay with a fire-belching disposable giant chainsaw), then the parameters of the problem closely resemble the energy requirements of a rocket.



                      I'm partial to a powderized-aluminum + ammonium nitrate mixture, myself.






                      share|improve this answer








                      New contributor




                      Arthur Chan is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
                      Check out our Code of Conduct.






                      $endgroup$



                      The parameters of the problem are:



                      1. Single-use ordnance

                      2. Power-to-weight is a significant constraint

                      3. Brief duration of discharge

                      4. Cheap-ish (we're talking about a disposable giant chainsaw here)

                      So you're probably looking at a chemical energy source that needs to be converted to mechanical energy. That rules out any high-explosive, and anyway, explosives expend much of their energy in brisance.



                      Fuels like Otto II driving a turbine are one possibility, if you'd like the system to be self-contained (i.e. not subject the user to exhaust fumes). If that is not a serious consideration (e.g. you are okay with a fire-belching disposable giant chainsaw), then the parameters of the problem closely resemble the energy requirements of a rocket.



                      I'm partial to a powderized-aluminum + ammonium nitrate mixture, myself.







                      share|improve this answer








                      New contributor




                      Arthur Chan is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
                      Check out our Code of Conduct.









                      share|improve this answer



                      share|improve this answer






                      New contributor




                      Arthur Chan is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
                      Check out our Code of Conduct.









                      answered yesterday









                      Arthur ChanArthur Chan

                      411




                      411




                      New contributor




                      Arthur Chan is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
                      Check out our Code of Conduct.





                      New contributor





                      Arthur Chan is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
                      Check out our Code of Conduct.






                      Arthur Chan is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
                      Check out our Code of Conduct.





















                          3












                          $begingroup$

                          Googling "battery in missiles" led me to the page of a company manufacturing and selling such solutions.



                          I am guessing your solution would be "thermal battery". I do not think they are selling a solution just for you but the duration and power can be tailored to application. Also, such batteries are used by military using similar "mil-tech" would probably fit the back story.



                          Also such batteries are single use, durable, reliable and have long shelf life.



                          Some of the other battery chemistries they offer might work better for you, so you might want to check them out. They might be rechargeable though.






                          share|improve this answer









                          $endgroup$












                          • $begingroup$
                            Also known as "molten salt battery"
                            $endgroup$
                            – IronEagle
                            yesterday















                          3












                          $begingroup$

                          Googling "battery in missiles" led me to the page of a company manufacturing and selling such solutions.



                          I am guessing your solution would be "thermal battery". I do not think they are selling a solution just for you but the duration and power can be tailored to application. Also, such batteries are used by military using similar "mil-tech" would probably fit the back story.



                          Also such batteries are single use, durable, reliable and have long shelf life.



                          Some of the other battery chemistries they offer might work better for you, so you might want to check them out. They might be rechargeable though.






                          share|improve this answer









                          $endgroup$












                          • $begingroup$
                            Also known as "molten salt battery"
                            $endgroup$
                            – IronEagle
                            yesterday













                          3












                          3








                          3





                          $begingroup$

                          Googling "battery in missiles" led me to the page of a company manufacturing and selling such solutions.



                          I am guessing your solution would be "thermal battery". I do not think they are selling a solution just for you but the duration and power can be tailored to application. Also, such batteries are used by military using similar "mil-tech" would probably fit the back story.



                          Also such batteries are single use, durable, reliable and have long shelf life.



                          Some of the other battery chemistries they offer might work better for you, so you might want to check them out. They might be rechargeable though.






                          share|improve this answer









                          $endgroup$



                          Googling "battery in missiles" led me to the page of a company manufacturing and selling such solutions.



                          I am guessing your solution would be "thermal battery". I do not think they are selling a solution just for you but the duration and power can be tailored to application. Also, such batteries are used by military using similar "mil-tech" would probably fit the back story.



                          Also such batteries are single use, durable, reliable and have long shelf life.



                          Some of the other battery chemistries they offer might work better for you, so you might want to check them out. They might be rechargeable though.







                          share|improve this answer












                          share|improve this answer



                          share|improve this answer










                          answered 2 days ago









                          Ville NiemiVille Niemi

                          35.1k260119




                          35.1k260119











                          • $begingroup$
                            Also known as "molten salt battery"
                            $endgroup$
                            – IronEagle
                            yesterday
















                          • $begingroup$
                            Also known as "molten salt battery"
                            $endgroup$
                            – IronEagle
                            yesterday















                          $begingroup$
                          Also known as "molten salt battery"
                          $endgroup$
                          – IronEagle
                          yesterday




                          $begingroup$
                          Also known as "molten salt battery"
                          $endgroup$
                          – IronEagle
                          yesterday











                          2












                          $begingroup$

                          Well possibly the easiest power source to use would be a battery, you can accurately determine how much ‘life’ it could give to a piece of electronics by setting the max capacity and charging it until it is full.



                          Although, if your problem is just that you need to get the chainsaws down safely, i would recommend using parachutes or heavily padded drop boxes to ensure the contents were undamaged. At that point you could use whatever fuel you liked as it would not be damaged from the fall.



                          However, i don’t think you’d want to use chainsaws, especially ones that heavy, as weapons. They are not particularly effective, are slow and 400 pounds is about the weight of two humans. At that point you might as well be using a giant maul instead. Here is an answer where i explained the issues with chainsaw weapons. There is also a link to a youtube video in my answer which demonstrates my point.






                          share|improve this answer











                          $endgroup$








                          • 3




                            $begingroup$
                            But chainsaws are FUN . Signed, Anonymous From Texas
                            $endgroup$
                            – Carl Witthoft
                            2 days ago















                          2












                          $begingroup$

                          Well possibly the easiest power source to use would be a battery, you can accurately determine how much ‘life’ it could give to a piece of electronics by setting the max capacity and charging it until it is full.



                          Although, if your problem is just that you need to get the chainsaws down safely, i would recommend using parachutes or heavily padded drop boxes to ensure the contents were undamaged. At that point you could use whatever fuel you liked as it would not be damaged from the fall.



                          However, i don’t think you’d want to use chainsaws, especially ones that heavy, as weapons. They are not particularly effective, are slow and 400 pounds is about the weight of two humans. At that point you might as well be using a giant maul instead. Here is an answer where i explained the issues with chainsaw weapons. There is also a link to a youtube video in my answer which demonstrates my point.






                          share|improve this answer











                          $endgroup$








                          • 3




                            $begingroup$
                            But chainsaws are FUN . Signed, Anonymous From Texas
                            $endgroup$
                            – Carl Witthoft
                            2 days ago













                          2












                          2








                          2





                          $begingroup$

                          Well possibly the easiest power source to use would be a battery, you can accurately determine how much ‘life’ it could give to a piece of electronics by setting the max capacity and charging it until it is full.



                          Although, if your problem is just that you need to get the chainsaws down safely, i would recommend using parachutes or heavily padded drop boxes to ensure the contents were undamaged. At that point you could use whatever fuel you liked as it would not be damaged from the fall.



                          However, i don’t think you’d want to use chainsaws, especially ones that heavy, as weapons. They are not particularly effective, are slow and 400 pounds is about the weight of two humans. At that point you might as well be using a giant maul instead. Here is an answer where i explained the issues with chainsaw weapons. There is also a link to a youtube video in my answer which demonstrates my point.






                          share|improve this answer











                          $endgroup$



                          Well possibly the easiest power source to use would be a battery, you can accurately determine how much ‘life’ it could give to a piece of electronics by setting the max capacity and charging it until it is full.



                          Although, if your problem is just that you need to get the chainsaws down safely, i would recommend using parachutes or heavily padded drop boxes to ensure the contents were undamaged. At that point you could use whatever fuel you liked as it would not be damaged from the fall.



                          However, i don’t think you’d want to use chainsaws, especially ones that heavy, as weapons. They are not particularly effective, are slow and 400 pounds is about the weight of two humans. At that point you might as well be using a giant maul instead. Here is an answer where i explained the issues with chainsaw weapons. There is also a link to a youtube video in my answer which demonstrates my point.







                          share|improve this answer














                          share|improve this answer



                          share|improve this answer








                          edited 2 days ago

























                          answered 2 days ago









                          Liam MorrisLiam Morris

                          1,804426




                          1,804426







                          • 3




                            $begingroup$
                            But chainsaws are FUN . Signed, Anonymous From Texas
                            $endgroup$
                            – Carl Witthoft
                            2 days ago












                          • 3




                            $begingroup$
                            But chainsaws are FUN . Signed, Anonymous From Texas
                            $endgroup$
                            – Carl Witthoft
                            2 days ago







                          3




                          3




                          $begingroup$
                          But chainsaws are FUN . Signed, Anonymous From Texas
                          $endgroup$
                          – Carl Witthoft
                          2 days ago




                          $begingroup$
                          But chainsaws are FUN . Signed, Anonymous From Texas
                          $endgroup$
                          – Carl Witthoft
                          2 days ago











                          2












                          $begingroup$

                          Since this is the sort of weapon that Coyote would be using against Roadrunner, it must be powered by the future power supply du jour.



                          In the 1950s that would have meant nuclear power, nowadays everything is battery powered, though some consider that the future is in hydrogen.



                          It very much depends on the tone of the situation you're creating.



                          The clean and neat nature of modern hydrogen fuel cells and batteries may not fit the context, so you might want to find some way of making it spew smoke and fire as it's powered up, that means coal or at the least diesel powered.






                          share|improve this answer









                          $endgroup$












                          • $begingroup$
                            If you're looking for something in an 'industrial' style (spewing fire and smoke) where it doesn't have to work for very long, and is insensitive to the health of the users, you could go for boron-doped 'zip' fuels, used in aircraft and rockets, and should be roughly compatible with diesel engines (at least briefly!) As an added bonus: the flames are green!
                            $endgroup$
                            – Avi Cherry
                            3 hours ago















                          2












                          $begingroup$

                          Since this is the sort of weapon that Coyote would be using against Roadrunner, it must be powered by the future power supply du jour.



                          In the 1950s that would have meant nuclear power, nowadays everything is battery powered, though some consider that the future is in hydrogen.



                          It very much depends on the tone of the situation you're creating.



                          The clean and neat nature of modern hydrogen fuel cells and batteries may not fit the context, so you might want to find some way of making it spew smoke and fire as it's powered up, that means coal or at the least diesel powered.






                          share|improve this answer









                          $endgroup$












                          • $begingroup$
                            If you're looking for something in an 'industrial' style (spewing fire and smoke) where it doesn't have to work for very long, and is insensitive to the health of the users, you could go for boron-doped 'zip' fuels, used in aircraft and rockets, and should be roughly compatible with diesel engines (at least briefly!) As an added bonus: the flames are green!
                            $endgroup$
                            – Avi Cherry
                            3 hours ago













                          2












                          2








                          2





                          $begingroup$

                          Since this is the sort of weapon that Coyote would be using against Roadrunner, it must be powered by the future power supply du jour.



                          In the 1950s that would have meant nuclear power, nowadays everything is battery powered, though some consider that the future is in hydrogen.



                          It very much depends on the tone of the situation you're creating.



                          The clean and neat nature of modern hydrogen fuel cells and batteries may not fit the context, so you might want to find some way of making it spew smoke and fire as it's powered up, that means coal or at the least diesel powered.






                          share|improve this answer









                          $endgroup$



                          Since this is the sort of weapon that Coyote would be using against Roadrunner, it must be powered by the future power supply du jour.



                          In the 1950s that would have meant nuclear power, nowadays everything is battery powered, though some consider that the future is in hydrogen.



                          It very much depends on the tone of the situation you're creating.



                          The clean and neat nature of modern hydrogen fuel cells and batteries may not fit the context, so you might want to find some way of making it spew smoke and fire as it's powered up, that means coal or at the least diesel powered.







                          share|improve this answer












                          share|improve this answer



                          share|improve this answer










                          answered 2 days ago









                          SeparatrixSeparatrix

                          85.6k31198332




                          85.6k31198332











                          • $begingroup$
                            If you're looking for something in an 'industrial' style (spewing fire and smoke) where it doesn't have to work for very long, and is insensitive to the health of the users, you could go for boron-doped 'zip' fuels, used in aircraft and rockets, and should be roughly compatible with diesel engines (at least briefly!) As an added bonus: the flames are green!
                            $endgroup$
                            – Avi Cherry
                            3 hours ago
















                          • $begingroup$
                            If you're looking for something in an 'industrial' style (spewing fire and smoke) where it doesn't have to work for very long, and is insensitive to the health of the users, you could go for boron-doped 'zip' fuels, used in aircraft and rockets, and should be roughly compatible with diesel engines (at least briefly!) As an added bonus: the flames are green!
                            $endgroup$
                            – Avi Cherry
                            3 hours ago















                          $begingroup$
                          If you're looking for something in an 'industrial' style (spewing fire and smoke) where it doesn't have to work for very long, and is insensitive to the health of the users, you could go for boron-doped 'zip' fuels, used in aircraft and rockets, and should be roughly compatible with diesel engines (at least briefly!) As an added bonus: the flames are green!
                          $endgroup$
                          – Avi Cherry
                          3 hours ago




                          $begingroup$
                          If you're looking for something in an 'industrial' style (spewing fire and smoke) where it doesn't have to work for very long, and is insensitive to the health of the users, you could go for boron-doped 'zip' fuels, used in aircraft and rockets, and should be roughly compatible with diesel engines (at least briefly!) As an added bonus: the flames are green!
                          $endgroup$
                          – Avi Cherry
                          3 hours ago











                          2












                          $begingroup$

                          I would go for a chemistry based solution. Think of current engines; they are all based on the concept of explosions. Now think of a giant explosion happening on release of the chainsaw. It would create enough pressure to power the chainsaw for quite some time.






                          share|improve this answer









                          $endgroup$

















                            2












                            $begingroup$

                            I would go for a chemistry based solution. Think of current engines; they are all based on the concept of explosions. Now think of a giant explosion happening on release of the chainsaw. It would create enough pressure to power the chainsaw for quite some time.






                            share|improve this answer









                            $endgroup$















                              2












                              2








                              2





                              $begingroup$

                              I would go for a chemistry based solution. Think of current engines; they are all based on the concept of explosions. Now think of a giant explosion happening on release of the chainsaw. It would create enough pressure to power the chainsaw for quite some time.






                              share|improve this answer









                              $endgroup$



                              I would go for a chemistry based solution. Think of current engines; they are all based on the concept of explosions. Now think of a giant explosion happening on release of the chainsaw. It would create enough pressure to power the chainsaw for quite some time.







                              share|improve this answer












                              share|improve this answer



                              share|improve this answer










                              answered 2 days ago









                              LMDLMD

                              3345




                              3345





















                                  1












                                  $begingroup$

                                  Expanding on Willk's answer here:



                                  You have a "lander" and a chainsaw. The chainsaw is spring-powered. The lander has multiple rotors, say 3, that both break the fall and charge spring. It would basically look like a quadrocopter with a chainsaw at the bottom falling down.



                                  A ratchet prevents the spring from discharging. A trigger mechanism in the chainsaw releases the ratchet and directs its power from the rotor coupling to the saw's chain - the chainsaw is running, purely from the energy from the fall.






                                  share|improve this answer









                                  $endgroup$

















                                    1












                                    $begingroup$

                                    Expanding on Willk's answer here:



                                    You have a "lander" and a chainsaw. The chainsaw is spring-powered. The lander has multiple rotors, say 3, that both break the fall and charge spring. It would basically look like a quadrocopter with a chainsaw at the bottom falling down.



                                    A ratchet prevents the spring from discharging. A trigger mechanism in the chainsaw releases the ratchet and directs its power from the rotor coupling to the saw's chain - the chainsaw is running, purely from the energy from the fall.






                                    share|improve this answer









                                    $endgroup$















                                      1












                                      1








                                      1





                                      $begingroup$

                                      Expanding on Willk's answer here:



                                      You have a "lander" and a chainsaw. The chainsaw is spring-powered. The lander has multiple rotors, say 3, that both break the fall and charge spring. It would basically look like a quadrocopter with a chainsaw at the bottom falling down.



                                      A ratchet prevents the spring from discharging. A trigger mechanism in the chainsaw releases the ratchet and directs its power from the rotor coupling to the saw's chain - the chainsaw is running, purely from the energy from the fall.






                                      share|improve this answer









                                      $endgroup$



                                      Expanding on Willk's answer here:



                                      You have a "lander" and a chainsaw. The chainsaw is spring-powered. The lander has multiple rotors, say 3, that both break the fall and charge spring. It would basically look like a quadrocopter with a chainsaw at the bottom falling down.



                                      A ratchet prevents the spring from discharging. A trigger mechanism in the chainsaw releases the ratchet and directs its power from the rotor coupling to the saw's chain - the chainsaw is running, purely from the energy from the fall.







                                      share|improve this answer












                                      share|improve this answer



                                      share|improve this answer










                                      answered 2 days ago









                                      InfrisiosInfrisios

                                      1,11838




                                      1,11838





















                                          1












                                          $begingroup$

                                          Dual liquid explosive, the force would trash the mechanism but its a one use weapon.






                                          share|improve this answer









                                          $endgroup$








                                          • 1




                                            $begingroup$
                                            These are normally called binary explosives, just for reference.
                                            $endgroup$
                                            – ltmauve
                                            yesterday















                                          1












                                          $begingroup$

                                          Dual liquid explosive, the force would trash the mechanism but its a one use weapon.






                                          share|improve this answer









                                          $endgroup$








                                          • 1




                                            $begingroup$
                                            These are normally called binary explosives, just for reference.
                                            $endgroup$
                                            – ltmauve
                                            yesterday













                                          1












                                          1








                                          1





                                          $begingroup$

                                          Dual liquid explosive, the force would trash the mechanism but its a one use weapon.






                                          share|improve this answer









                                          $endgroup$



                                          Dual liquid explosive, the force would trash the mechanism but its a one use weapon.







                                          share|improve this answer












                                          share|improve this answer



                                          share|improve this answer










                                          answered 2 days ago









                                          ObakObak

                                          616




                                          616







                                          • 1




                                            $begingroup$
                                            These are normally called binary explosives, just for reference.
                                            $endgroup$
                                            – ltmauve
                                            yesterday












                                          • 1




                                            $begingroup$
                                            These are normally called binary explosives, just for reference.
                                            $endgroup$
                                            – ltmauve
                                            yesterday







                                          1




                                          1




                                          $begingroup$
                                          These are normally called binary explosives, just for reference.
                                          $endgroup$
                                          – ltmauve
                                          yesterday




                                          $begingroup$
                                          These are normally called binary explosives, just for reference.
                                          $endgroup$
                                          – ltmauve
                                          yesterday











                                          1












                                          $begingroup$

                                          Coffman (shotgun) starter



                                          The Coffman starter uses a propellant fit in a shotgun shell, with the standard shotgun primer (blasting cap). It generates up to 15 seconds of pneumatic force to start large aviation and tractor engines.



                                          Famously used on the movie Flight of the Phoenix (both versions).



                                          Adjust size for energy need, but it's just the right energy density, weight and burn rate for the job.






                                          share|improve this answer









                                          $endgroup$

















                                            1












                                            $begingroup$

                                            Coffman (shotgun) starter



                                            The Coffman starter uses a propellant fit in a shotgun shell, with the standard shotgun primer (blasting cap). It generates up to 15 seconds of pneumatic force to start large aviation and tractor engines.



                                            Famously used on the movie Flight of the Phoenix (both versions).



                                            Adjust size for energy need, but it's just the right energy density, weight and burn rate for the job.






                                            share|improve this answer









                                            $endgroup$















                                              1












                                              1








                                              1





                                              $begingroup$

                                              Coffman (shotgun) starter



                                              The Coffman starter uses a propellant fit in a shotgun shell, with the standard shotgun primer (blasting cap). It generates up to 15 seconds of pneumatic force to start large aviation and tractor engines.



                                              Famously used on the movie Flight of the Phoenix (both versions).



                                              Adjust size for energy need, but it's just the right energy density, weight and burn rate for the job.






                                              share|improve this answer









                                              $endgroup$



                                              Coffman (shotgun) starter



                                              The Coffman starter uses a propellant fit in a shotgun shell, with the standard shotgun primer (blasting cap). It generates up to 15 seconds of pneumatic force to start large aviation and tractor engines.



                                              Famously used on the movie Flight of the Phoenix (both versions).



                                              Adjust size for energy need, but it's just the right energy density, weight and burn rate for the job.







                                              share|improve this answer












                                              share|improve this answer



                                              share|improve this answer










                                              answered yesterday









                                              HarperHarper

                                              7,06211026




                                              7,06211026





















                                                  0












                                                  $begingroup$

                                                  If a massive chainsaw is deployed from a jet, it should be powered by Mr. Torgue's specialty. The large weight is needed to contain and direct the C4 detonation inside to spin the chain. Maybe also the back side is stronger than the front, creating the possibility for the chain blade to launch through the enemy.






                                                  share|improve this answer








                                                  New contributor




                                                  Yamcha_Kippur is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
                                                  Check out our Code of Conduct.






                                                  $endgroup$

















                                                    0












                                                    $begingroup$

                                                    If a massive chainsaw is deployed from a jet, it should be powered by Mr. Torgue's specialty. The large weight is needed to contain and direct the C4 detonation inside to spin the chain. Maybe also the back side is stronger than the front, creating the possibility for the chain blade to launch through the enemy.






                                                    share|improve this answer








                                                    New contributor




                                                    Yamcha_Kippur is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
                                                    Check out our Code of Conduct.






                                                    $endgroup$















                                                      0












                                                      0








                                                      0





                                                      $begingroup$

                                                      If a massive chainsaw is deployed from a jet, it should be powered by Mr. Torgue's specialty. The large weight is needed to contain and direct the C4 detonation inside to spin the chain. Maybe also the back side is stronger than the front, creating the possibility for the chain blade to launch through the enemy.






                                                      share|improve this answer








                                                      New contributor




                                                      Yamcha_Kippur is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
                                                      Check out our Code of Conduct.






                                                      $endgroup$



                                                      If a massive chainsaw is deployed from a jet, it should be powered by Mr. Torgue's specialty. The large weight is needed to contain and direct the C4 detonation inside to spin the chain. Maybe also the back side is stronger than the front, creating the possibility for the chain blade to launch through the enemy.







                                                      share|improve this answer








                                                      New contributor




                                                      Yamcha_Kippur is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
                                                      Check out our Code of Conduct.









                                                      share|improve this answer



                                                      share|improve this answer






                                                      New contributor




                                                      Yamcha_Kippur is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
                                                      Check out our Code of Conduct.









                                                      answered 7 hours ago









                                                      Yamcha_KippurYamcha_Kippur

                                                      1




                                                      1




                                                      New contributor




                                                      Yamcha_Kippur is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
                                                      Check out our Code of Conduct.





                                                      New contributor





                                                      Yamcha_Kippur is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
                                                      Check out our Code of Conduct.






                                                      Yamcha_Kippur is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
                                                      Check out our Code of Conduct.





















                                                          0












                                                          $begingroup$

                                                          You don't need a power source.



                                                          Humans generally have a terminal speed of 53m/s. Your chainsaw, due to weight and profile, will probably have a greater final velocity.



                                                          A 400 pounds piece of metal hitting you at 53m/s will impart you with approximately 2.54 x 108 joules, or ~ 70,555.5 wh. That's equivalent to the detonation of around 60~65 kilograms of TNT. It will turn the target to a pulp just by its kinetic delivery, as well as anyone else nearby.






                                                          share|improve this answer









                                                          $endgroup$

















                                                            0












                                                            $begingroup$

                                                            You don't need a power source.



                                                            Humans generally have a terminal speed of 53m/s. Your chainsaw, due to weight and profile, will probably have a greater final velocity.



                                                            A 400 pounds piece of metal hitting you at 53m/s will impart you with approximately 2.54 x 108 joules, or ~ 70,555.5 wh. That's equivalent to the detonation of around 60~65 kilograms of TNT. It will turn the target to a pulp just by its kinetic delivery, as well as anyone else nearby.






                                                            share|improve this answer









                                                            $endgroup$















                                                              0












                                                              0








                                                              0





                                                              $begingroup$

                                                              You don't need a power source.



                                                              Humans generally have a terminal speed of 53m/s. Your chainsaw, due to weight and profile, will probably have a greater final velocity.



                                                              A 400 pounds piece of metal hitting you at 53m/s will impart you with approximately 2.54 x 108 joules, or ~ 70,555.5 wh. That's equivalent to the detonation of around 60~65 kilograms of TNT. It will turn the target to a pulp just by its kinetic delivery, as well as anyone else nearby.






                                                              share|improve this answer









                                                              $endgroup$



                                                              You don't need a power source.



                                                              Humans generally have a terminal speed of 53m/s. Your chainsaw, due to weight and profile, will probably have a greater final velocity.



                                                              A 400 pounds piece of metal hitting you at 53m/s will impart you with approximately 2.54 x 108 joules, or ~ 70,555.5 wh. That's equivalent to the detonation of around 60~65 kilograms of TNT. It will turn the target to a pulp just by its kinetic delivery, as well as anyone else nearby.







                                                              share|improve this answer












                                                              share|improve this answer



                                                              share|improve this answer










                                                              answered 4 hours ago









                                                              RenanRenan

                                                              52.9k15120263




                                                              52.9k15120263





















                                                                  0












                                                                  $begingroup$

                                                                  While not a chain saw, much of the effect could be delivered cheaply and reliably by a 400lb coiled spring, which has saw teeth etched into the edges. This can be deployed from the plane itself (uncoiling and lashing at the target as the plane screams overhead. Alternatively, the hero can be braced with his back to a tree or a wall and pull out the pin or cut the cord holding the coil closed, it lashes out like an Urumi from hell, striking with considerable kinetic energy and razor sharp cutting teeth.



                                                                  enter image description here



                                                                  As you can imagine, there is nothing close to what I am describing. Take this, increase the size to account for the 400lbs of spring steel, serrate the edges and have a cord or pin holding it closd against the spring tension



                                                                  Considering a 400 lb coil of spring steel would actually be quite long, you would also have a considerable advantage of reach over most opponents, who would either think the plane is too low to drop a bomb, or the hero is too far away from then (and whatever is that drum like object he is holding?), so fail to take proper precautions.






                                                                  share|improve this answer









                                                                  $endgroup$

















                                                                    0












                                                                    $begingroup$

                                                                    While not a chain saw, much of the effect could be delivered cheaply and reliably by a 400lb coiled spring, which has saw teeth etched into the edges. This can be deployed from the plane itself (uncoiling and lashing at the target as the plane screams overhead. Alternatively, the hero can be braced with his back to a tree or a wall and pull out the pin or cut the cord holding the coil closed, it lashes out like an Urumi from hell, striking with considerable kinetic energy and razor sharp cutting teeth.



                                                                    enter image description here



                                                                    As you can imagine, there is nothing close to what I am describing. Take this, increase the size to account for the 400lbs of spring steel, serrate the edges and have a cord or pin holding it closd against the spring tension



                                                                    Considering a 400 lb coil of spring steel would actually be quite long, you would also have a considerable advantage of reach over most opponents, who would either think the plane is too low to drop a bomb, or the hero is too far away from then (and whatever is that drum like object he is holding?), so fail to take proper precautions.






                                                                    share|improve this answer









                                                                    $endgroup$















                                                                      0












                                                                      0








                                                                      0





                                                                      $begingroup$

                                                                      While not a chain saw, much of the effect could be delivered cheaply and reliably by a 400lb coiled spring, which has saw teeth etched into the edges. This can be deployed from the plane itself (uncoiling and lashing at the target as the plane screams overhead. Alternatively, the hero can be braced with his back to a tree or a wall and pull out the pin or cut the cord holding the coil closed, it lashes out like an Urumi from hell, striking with considerable kinetic energy and razor sharp cutting teeth.



                                                                      enter image description here



                                                                      As you can imagine, there is nothing close to what I am describing. Take this, increase the size to account for the 400lbs of spring steel, serrate the edges and have a cord or pin holding it closd against the spring tension



                                                                      Considering a 400 lb coil of spring steel would actually be quite long, you would also have a considerable advantage of reach over most opponents, who would either think the plane is too low to drop a bomb, or the hero is too far away from then (and whatever is that drum like object he is holding?), so fail to take proper precautions.






                                                                      share|improve this answer









                                                                      $endgroup$



                                                                      While not a chain saw, much of the effect could be delivered cheaply and reliably by a 400lb coiled spring, which has saw teeth etched into the edges. This can be deployed from the plane itself (uncoiling and lashing at the target as the plane screams overhead. Alternatively, the hero can be braced with his back to a tree or a wall and pull out the pin or cut the cord holding the coil closed, it lashes out like an Urumi from hell, striking with considerable kinetic energy and razor sharp cutting teeth.



                                                                      enter image description here



                                                                      As you can imagine, there is nothing close to what I am describing. Take this, increase the size to account for the 400lbs of spring steel, serrate the edges and have a cord or pin holding it closd against the spring tension



                                                                      Considering a 400 lb coil of spring steel would actually be quite long, you would also have a considerable advantage of reach over most opponents, who would either think the plane is too low to drop a bomb, or the hero is too far away from then (and whatever is that drum like object he is holding?), so fail to take proper precautions.







                                                                      share|improve this answer












                                                                      share|improve this answer



                                                                      share|improve this answer










                                                                      answered 3 hours ago









                                                                      ThucydidesThucydides

                                                                      82.5k680247




                                                                      82.5k680247





















                                                                          0












                                                                          $begingroup$

                                                                          Build the chainsaw with a heavy flywheel. Add a heavy duty piston/foot that the chainsaw lands on when dropped towards you. When that piston hits ground at high collision speeds it spins up the flywheel, which directly powers the chain. You run over and grab it, go to work for your 15 seconds of glory.



                                                                          No power source beyond gravity and the flywheel needed. Being all mechanical and built tough it possibly wouldn't even fall apart, later it gets picked up and reset for another drop.






                                                                          share|improve this answer









                                                                          $endgroup$

















                                                                            0












                                                                            $begingroup$

                                                                            Build the chainsaw with a heavy flywheel. Add a heavy duty piston/foot that the chainsaw lands on when dropped towards you. When that piston hits ground at high collision speeds it spins up the flywheel, which directly powers the chain. You run over and grab it, go to work for your 15 seconds of glory.



                                                                            No power source beyond gravity and the flywheel needed. Being all mechanical and built tough it possibly wouldn't even fall apart, later it gets picked up and reset for another drop.






                                                                            share|improve this answer









                                                                            $endgroup$















                                                                              0












                                                                              0








                                                                              0





                                                                              $begingroup$

                                                                              Build the chainsaw with a heavy flywheel. Add a heavy duty piston/foot that the chainsaw lands on when dropped towards you. When that piston hits ground at high collision speeds it spins up the flywheel, which directly powers the chain. You run over and grab it, go to work for your 15 seconds of glory.



                                                                              No power source beyond gravity and the flywheel needed. Being all mechanical and built tough it possibly wouldn't even fall apart, later it gets picked up and reset for another drop.






                                                                              share|improve this answer









                                                                              $endgroup$



                                                                              Build the chainsaw with a heavy flywheel. Add a heavy duty piston/foot that the chainsaw lands on when dropped towards you. When that piston hits ground at high collision speeds it spins up the flywheel, which directly powers the chain. You run over and grab it, go to work for your 15 seconds of glory.



                                                                              No power source beyond gravity and the flywheel needed. Being all mechanical and built tough it possibly wouldn't even fall apart, later it gets picked up and reset for another drop.







                                                                              share|improve this answer












                                                                              share|improve this answer



                                                                              share|improve this answer










                                                                              answered 2 hours ago









                                                                              Patrick HughesPatrick Hughes

                                                                              1113




                                                                              1113



























                                                                                  draft saved

                                                                                  draft discarded
















































                                                                                  Thanks for contributing an answer to Worldbuilding Stack Exchange!


                                                                                  • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                                                                                  But avoid


                                                                                  • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                                                                                  • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

                                                                                  Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


                                                                                  To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




                                                                                  draft saved


                                                                                  draft discarded














                                                                                  StackExchange.ready(
                                                                                  function ()
                                                                                  StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fworldbuilding.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f143551%2fwhat-could-be-the-right-powersource-for-15-seconds-lifespan-disposable-giant-cha%23new-answer', 'question_page');

                                                                                  );

                                                                                  Post as a guest















                                                                                  Required, but never shown





















































                                                                                  Required, but never shown














                                                                                  Required, but never shown












                                                                                  Required, but never shown







                                                                                  Required, but never shown

































                                                                                  Required, but never shown














                                                                                  Required, but never shown












                                                                                  Required, but never shown







                                                                                  Required, but never shown







                                                                                  Popular posts from this blog

                                                                                  Distance measures on a map of a game The 2019 Stack Overflow Developer Survey Results Are Inmin distance in a graphShortest distance path on contour plotHow to plot a tilted map?Finding points outside of a diskDelaunay link distanceAnnulus from GeoDisks: drawing a ring on a mapNegative Correlation DistanceFind distance along a path (GPS coordinates)Finding position at given distance in a GeoPathMathematics behind distance estimation using camera

                                                                                  How to get a smooth, uniform ParametricPlot of a 2D Region?How to plot a complicated Region?How to exclude a region from ParametricPlotHow discretize a region placing vertices on a specific non-uniform gridHow to transform a Plot or a ParametricPlot into a RegionHow can I get a smooth plot of a bounded region?Smooth ParametricPlot3D with RegionFunction?Smooth border of a region ParametricPlotSmooth region boundarySmooth region plot from list of pointsGet minimum y of a certain x in a region

                                                                                  Genealogie vun de Merowenger Vum Merowech bis zum Chilperich I. | Navigatiounsmenü