How is the problem, ⟨G⟩ in Logspace?Logspace TransducerWhy is it necessary to use binary numbers in logspace?Reachibility between first and last layer in grid graph in logspaceIs the power of a natural number logspace-computable?

How to get the sum, difference, product, and quotient from a macro in ConTeXt or plain TeX?

How does "unlimited holidays" work in practice?

What's a good use case for SELECT * in production code?

Advance of d4 in the Ruy Lopez

My professor changed a take-home test to an in-class test with no notice. Can I fight the grade?

If password expiration is applied, should door-lock expiration be applied too?

How do I solve this equation with Mathematica?

I can't understand how probability makes sense

Select polygons with 5 or more points

Why 401k contribution as % of salary vs. fixed amount per pay check?

Bought a book that is in the public domain ... but the T&A of company says I can't redistribute it

I peer reviewed a paper and found it to be sound - technically and language-wise. How should I write the review report?

Why is tan short for tangent?

How can I offer my prayers for an atheist?

Do one quarter of Swedes named 'Ali' have a criminal record?

What does "Massage with salt" mean in a recipe?

My advisor wants me to make my PhD thesis weaker

How can I pass a collection of exceptions as a root cause?

Why is it runway "1" instead of "01" in America?

Barring Epic Boons, is there a way to gain immunity to fire damage?

How often are there lunar eclipses on Jupiter

Why are the norm symbols || not aligned in this situation?

Combining two plots with separate frame tick styles

Why would Earth be long-term unsuitable for an advanced alien species that's already colonized it?



How is the problem, G has no triangle in Logspace?


Logspace TransducerWhy is it necessary to use binary numbers in logspace?Reachibility between first and last layer in grid graph in logspaceIs the power of a natural number logspace-computable?






.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty
margin-bottom:0;









5















$begingroup$


I read this problem as a part of my course curriculum, in my professor's notes. I am not able to understand about the standard solution, that if I list all the possible triplets of vertices as 3-tuples in the tape, then how come my solution is limited to log-space?



As far as my understanding, listing all the 3-tuples in the tape would need $binomn3$ combinations, and hence, $O(n^3)$ space.



I am not able to find the flaw in my understanding, grateful ever for the hint.



P.S. This reference is from our course slide:




Let $L$ be the language $⟨G⟩ : $. Then $L$ can be recognized in log-space as follows: On the work tape, the machine $M$ can write all 3-tuples of the vertices of $G$. For each tuple written, the machine checks if there is a triangle passing through those vertices. If all tests fail, then $M$ accepts, otherwise $M$ rejects. The space used by $M$ is enough to store three vertex identifiers, therefore $L$ is in log-space.











share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$





















    5















    $begingroup$


    I read this problem as a part of my course curriculum, in my professor's notes. I am not able to understand about the standard solution, that if I list all the possible triplets of vertices as 3-tuples in the tape, then how come my solution is limited to log-space?



    As far as my understanding, listing all the 3-tuples in the tape would need $binomn3$ combinations, and hence, $O(n^3)$ space.



    I am not able to find the flaw in my understanding, grateful ever for the hint.



    P.S. This reference is from our course slide:




    Let $L$ be the language $⟨G⟩ : $. Then $L$ can be recognized in log-space as follows: On the work tape, the machine $M$ can write all 3-tuples of the vertices of $G$. For each tuple written, the machine checks if there is a triangle passing through those vertices. If all tests fail, then $M$ accepts, otherwise $M$ rejects. The space used by $M$ is enough to store three vertex identifiers, therefore $L$ is in log-space.











    share|cite|improve this question











    $endgroup$

















      5













      5









      5


      1



      $begingroup$


      I read this problem as a part of my course curriculum, in my professor's notes. I am not able to understand about the standard solution, that if I list all the possible triplets of vertices as 3-tuples in the tape, then how come my solution is limited to log-space?



      As far as my understanding, listing all the 3-tuples in the tape would need $binomn3$ combinations, and hence, $O(n^3)$ space.



      I am not able to find the flaw in my understanding, grateful ever for the hint.



      P.S. This reference is from our course slide:




      Let $L$ be the language $⟨G⟩ : $. Then $L$ can be recognized in log-space as follows: On the work tape, the machine $M$ can write all 3-tuples of the vertices of $G$. For each tuple written, the machine checks if there is a triangle passing through those vertices. If all tests fail, then $M$ accepts, otherwise $M$ rejects. The space used by $M$ is enough to store three vertex identifiers, therefore $L$ is in log-space.











      share|cite|improve this question











      $endgroup$




      I read this problem as a part of my course curriculum, in my professor's notes. I am not able to understand about the standard solution, that if I list all the possible triplets of vertices as 3-tuples in the tape, then how come my solution is limited to log-space?



      As far as my understanding, listing all the 3-tuples in the tape would need $binomn3$ combinations, and hence, $O(n^3)$ space.



      I am not able to find the flaw in my understanding, grateful ever for the hint.



      P.S. This reference is from our course slide:




      Let $L$ be the language $⟨G⟩ : $. Then $L$ can be recognized in log-space as follows: On the work tape, the machine $M$ can write all 3-tuples of the vertices of $G$. For each tuple written, the machine checks if there is a triangle passing through those vertices. If all tests fail, then $M$ accepts, otherwise $M$ rejects. The space used by $M$ is enough to store three vertex identifiers, therefore $L$ is in log-space.








      graphs turing-machines space-complexity






      share|cite|improve this question















      share|cite|improve this question













      share|cite|improve this question




      share|cite|improve this question








      edited Sep 20 at 5:40









      Nayuki

      5883 silver badges11 bronze badges




      5883 silver badges11 bronze badges










      asked Sep 18 at 9:04









      Shirley SamShirley Sam

      856 bronze badges




      856 bronze badges























          2 Answers
          2






          active

          oldest

          votes


















          15

















          $begingroup$

          You don't need to first write all 3-tuples and then check, for each of them, whether it induces a triangle.



          You can just enumerate the 3-tuples one at a time and reject as soon as you find one that induces a triangle. If you reach past the last 3-tuple then the graph contains no triangle and you can accept.






          share|cite|improve this answer










          $endgroup$














          • $begingroup$
            So we need to choose a 3-tuple non deterministically right?
            $endgroup$
            – Shirley Sam
            Sep 18 at 9:31






          • 5




            $begingroup$
            There is no need to use nondeterminism. Let $n$ be the number of vertices of $G$ and suppose that they are indexed from $0$. A 3-tuple is just 3 integers $a,b,c$. Initially $a=b=c=0$. To generate the next 3-tuple simply increment $c$ by one, if it is equal to $n$ set it to 0 and increment $b$ by one. If $b$ is equal to $n$, set it to 0 and increment $a$ by one. If $a$ is equal to $n$ you are done enumerating all 3-tuples. For each tuple that you generate in this way, check whether it induces a triangle. If so, reject. If it doesn't, move to the next tuple. If you reach the end, accept.
            $endgroup$
            – Steven
            Sep 18 at 9:42







          • 1




            $begingroup$
            Thankyou, I got it!!
            $endgroup$
            – Shirley Sam
            Sep 18 at 10:39


















          19

















          $begingroup$

          FOR x := 1 TO n DO
          FOR y := 1 TO n DO
          FOR z := 1 TO n DO
          IF E(x,y) && E(y,z) && E(z,x) THEN REJECT
          ACCEPT


          Each of the variables x, y and z requires $Theta(log textttn)$ bits to store an integer between $1$ and $textttn$.






          share|cite|improve this answer










          $endgroup$
















            Your Answer








            StackExchange.ready(function()
            var channelOptions =
            tags: "".split(" "),
            id: "419"
            ;
            initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

            StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
            // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
            if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
            StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
            createEditor();
            );

            else
            createEditor();

            );

            function createEditor()
            StackExchange.prepareEditor(
            heartbeatType: 'answer',
            autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
            convertImagesToLinks: false,
            noModals: true,
            showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
            reputationToPostImages: null,
            bindNavPrevention: true,
            postfix: "",
            imageUploader:
            brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
            contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/"u003ecc by-sa 4.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
            allowUrls: true
            ,
            onDemand: true,
            discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
            ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
            );



            );














            draft saved

            draft discarded
















            StackExchange.ready(
            function ()
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fcs.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f114885%2fhow-is-the-problem-g-g-has-no-triangle-in-logspace%23new-answer', 'question_page');

            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown


























            2 Answers
            2






            active

            oldest

            votes








            2 Answers
            2






            active

            oldest

            votes









            active

            oldest

            votes






            active

            oldest

            votes









            15

















            $begingroup$

            You don't need to first write all 3-tuples and then check, for each of them, whether it induces a triangle.



            You can just enumerate the 3-tuples one at a time and reject as soon as you find one that induces a triangle. If you reach past the last 3-tuple then the graph contains no triangle and you can accept.






            share|cite|improve this answer










            $endgroup$














            • $begingroup$
              So we need to choose a 3-tuple non deterministically right?
              $endgroup$
              – Shirley Sam
              Sep 18 at 9:31






            • 5




              $begingroup$
              There is no need to use nondeterminism. Let $n$ be the number of vertices of $G$ and suppose that they are indexed from $0$. A 3-tuple is just 3 integers $a,b,c$. Initially $a=b=c=0$. To generate the next 3-tuple simply increment $c$ by one, if it is equal to $n$ set it to 0 and increment $b$ by one. If $b$ is equal to $n$, set it to 0 and increment $a$ by one. If $a$ is equal to $n$ you are done enumerating all 3-tuples. For each tuple that you generate in this way, check whether it induces a triangle. If so, reject. If it doesn't, move to the next tuple. If you reach the end, accept.
              $endgroup$
              – Steven
              Sep 18 at 9:42







            • 1




              $begingroup$
              Thankyou, I got it!!
              $endgroup$
              – Shirley Sam
              Sep 18 at 10:39















            15

















            $begingroup$

            You don't need to first write all 3-tuples and then check, for each of them, whether it induces a triangle.



            You can just enumerate the 3-tuples one at a time and reject as soon as you find one that induces a triangle. If you reach past the last 3-tuple then the graph contains no triangle and you can accept.






            share|cite|improve this answer










            $endgroup$














            • $begingroup$
              So we need to choose a 3-tuple non deterministically right?
              $endgroup$
              – Shirley Sam
              Sep 18 at 9:31






            • 5




              $begingroup$
              There is no need to use nondeterminism. Let $n$ be the number of vertices of $G$ and suppose that they are indexed from $0$. A 3-tuple is just 3 integers $a,b,c$. Initially $a=b=c=0$. To generate the next 3-tuple simply increment $c$ by one, if it is equal to $n$ set it to 0 and increment $b$ by one. If $b$ is equal to $n$, set it to 0 and increment $a$ by one. If $a$ is equal to $n$ you are done enumerating all 3-tuples. For each tuple that you generate in this way, check whether it induces a triangle. If so, reject. If it doesn't, move to the next tuple. If you reach the end, accept.
              $endgroup$
              – Steven
              Sep 18 at 9:42







            • 1




              $begingroup$
              Thankyou, I got it!!
              $endgroup$
              – Shirley Sam
              Sep 18 at 10:39













            15















            15











            15







            $begingroup$

            You don't need to first write all 3-tuples and then check, for each of them, whether it induces a triangle.



            You can just enumerate the 3-tuples one at a time and reject as soon as you find one that induces a triangle. If you reach past the last 3-tuple then the graph contains no triangle and you can accept.






            share|cite|improve this answer










            $endgroup$



            You don't need to first write all 3-tuples and then check, for each of them, whether it induces a triangle.



            You can just enumerate the 3-tuples one at a time and reject as soon as you find one that induces a triangle. If you reach past the last 3-tuple then the graph contains no triangle and you can accept.







            share|cite|improve this answer













            share|cite|improve this answer




            share|cite|improve this answer










            answered Sep 18 at 9:30









            StevenSteven

            2,5198 silver badges15 bronze badges




            2,5198 silver badges15 bronze badges














            • $begingroup$
              So we need to choose a 3-tuple non deterministically right?
              $endgroup$
              – Shirley Sam
              Sep 18 at 9:31






            • 5




              $begingroup$
              There is no need to use nondeterminism. Let $n$ be the number of vertices of $G$ and suppose that they are indexed from $0$. A 3-tuple is just 3 integers $a,b,c$. Initially $a=b=c=0$. To generate the next 3-tuple simply increment $c$ by one, if it is equal to $n$ set it to 0 and increment $b$ by one. If $b$ is equal to $n$, set it to 0 and increment $a$ by one. If $a$ is equal to $n$ you are done enumerating all 3-tuples. For each tuple that you generate in this way, check whether it induces a triangle. If so, reject. If it doesn't, move to the next tuple. If you reach the end, accept.
              $endgroup$
              – Steven
              Sep 18 at 9:42







            • 1




              $begingroup$
              Thankyou, I got it!!
              $endgroup$
              – Shirley Sam
              Sep 18 at 10:39
















            • $begingroup$
              So we need to choose a 3-tuple non deterministically right?
              $endgroup$
              – Shirley Sam
              Sep 18 at 9:31






            • 5




              $begingroup$
              There is no need to use nondeterminism. Let $n$ be the number of vertices of $G$ and suppose that they are indexed from $0$. A 3-tuple is just 3 integers $a,b,c$. Initially $a=b=c=0$. To generate the next 3-tuple simply increment $c$ by one, if it is equal to $n$ set it to 0 and increment $b$ by one. If $b$ is equal to $n$, set it to 0 and increment $a$ by one. If $a$ is equal to $n$ you are done enumerating all 3-tuples. For each tuple that you generate in this way, check whether it induces a triangle. If so, reject. If it doesn't, move to the next tuple. If you reach the end, accept.
              $endgroup$
              – Steven
              Sep 18 at 9:42







            • 1




              $begingroup$
              Thankyou, I got it!!
              $endgroup$
              – Shirley Sam
              Sep 18 at 10:39















            $begingroup$
            So we need to choose a 3-tuple non deterministically right?
            $endgroup$
            – Shirley Sam
            Sep 18 at 9:31




            $begingroup$
            So we need to choose a 3-tuple non deterministically right?
            $endgroup$
            – Shirley Sam
            Sep 18 at 9:31




            5




            5




            $begingroup$
            There is no need to use nondeterminism. Let $n$ be the number of vertices of $G$ and suppose that they are indexed from $0$. A 3-tuple is just 3 integers $a,b,c$. Initially $a=b=c=0$. To generate the next 3-tuple simply increment $c$ by one, if it is equal to $n$ set it to 0 and increment $b$ by one. If $b$ is equal to $n$, set it to 0 and increment $a$ by one. If $a$ is equal to $n$ you are done enumerating all 3-tuples. For each tuple that you generate in this way, check whether it induces a triangle. If so, reject. If it doesn't, move to the next tuple. If you reach the end, accept.
            $endgroup$
            – Steven
            Sep 18 at 9:42





            $begingroup$
            There is no need to use nondeterminism. Let $n$ be the number of vertices of $G$ and suppose that they are indexed from $0$. A 3-tuple is just 3 integers $a,b,c$. Initially $a=b=c=0$. To generate the next 3-tuple simply increment $c$ by one, if it is equal to $n$ set it to 0 and increment $b$ by one. If $b$ is equal to $n$, set it to 0 and increment $a$ by one. If $a$ is equal to $n$ you are done enumerating all 3-tuples. For each tuple that you generate in this way, check whether it induces a triangle. If so, reject. If it doesn't, move to the next tuple. If you reach the end, accept.
            $endgroup$
            – Steven
            Sep 18 at 9:42





            1




            1




            $begingroup$
            Thankyou, I got it!!
            $endgroup$
            – Shirley Sam
            Sep 18 at 10:39




            $begingroup$
            Thankyou, I got it!!
            $endgroup$
            – Shirley Sam
            Sep 18 at 10:39













            19

















            $begingroup$

            FOR x := 1 TO n DO
            FOR y := 1 TO n DO
            FOR z := 1 TO n DO
            IF E(x,y) && E(y,z) && E(z,x) THEN REJECT
            ACCEPT


            Each of the variables x, y and z requires $Theta(log textttn)$ bits to store an integer between $1$ and $textttn$.






            share|cite|improve this answer










            $endgroup$



















              19

















              $begingroup$

              FOR x := 1 TO n DO
              FOR y := 1 TO n DO
              FOR z := 1 TO n DO
              IF E(x,y) && E(y,z) && E(z,x) THEN REJECT
              ACCEPT


              Each of the variables x, y and z requires $Theta(log textttn)$ bits to store an integer between $1$ and $textttn$.






              share|cite|improve this answer










              $endgroup$

















                19















                19











                19







                $begingroup$

                FOR x := 1 TO n DO
                FOR y := 1 TO n DO
                FOR z := 1 TO n DO
                IF E(x,y) && E(y,z) && E(z,x) THEN REJECT
                ACCEPT


                Each of the variables x, y and z requires $Theta(log textttn)$ bits to store an integer between $1$ and $textttn$.






                share|cite|improve this answer










                $endgroup$



                FOR x := 1 TO n DO
                FOR y := 1 TO n DO
                FOR z := 1 TO n DO
                IF E(x,y) && E(y,z) && E(z,x) THEN REJECT
                ACCEPT


                Each of the variables x, y and z requires $Theta(log textttn)$ bits to store an integer between $1$ and $textttn$.







                share|cite|improve this answer













                share|cite|improve this answer




                share|cite|improve this answer










                answered Sep 18 at 11:26









                David RicherbyDavid Richerby

                75.9k17 gold badges117 silver badges208 bronze badges




                75.9k17 gold badges117 silver badges208 bronze badges































                    draft saved

                    draft discarded















































                    Thanks for contributing an answer to Computer Science Stack Exchange!


                    • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                    But avoid


                    • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                    • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

                    Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


                    To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




                    draft saved


                    draft discarded














                    StackExchange.ready(
                    function ()
                    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fcs.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f114885%2fhow-is-the-problem-g-g-has-no-triangle-in-logspace%23new-answer', 'question_page');

                    );

                    Post as a guest















                    Required, but never shown





















































                    Required, but never shown














                    Required, but never shown












                    Required, but never shown







                    Required, but never shown

































                    Required, but never shown














                    Required, but never shown












                    Required, but never shown







                    Required, but never shown









                    Popular posts from this blog

                    Tamil (spriik) Luke uk diar | Nawigatjuun

                    Align equal signs while including text over equalitiesAMS align: left aligned text/math plus multicolumn alignmentMultiple alignmentsAligning equations in multiple placesNumbering and aligning an equation with multiple columnsHow to align one equation with another multline equationUsing \ in environments inside the begintabularxNumber equations and preserving alignment of equal signsHow can I align equations to the left and to the right?Double equation alignment problem within align enviromentAligned within align: Why are they right-aligned?

                    Where does the image of a data connector as a sharp metal spike originate from?Where does the concept of infected people turning into zombies only after death originate from?Where does the motif of a reanimated human head originate?Where did the notion that Dragons could speak originate?Where does the archetypal image of the 'Grey' alien come from?Where did the suffix '-Man' originate?Where does the notion of being injured or killed by an illusion originate?Where did the term “sophont” originate?Where does the trope of magic spells being driven by advanced technology originate from?Where did the term “the living impaired” originate?