Drawing without replacement: why is the order of draw irrelevant?Need Explanation with Probability Problem from textbookA question regarding drawing balls of differing colors from an urn before a certain number of draws occur without replacement.3 balls drawn from 1 urn - probability all same color (with/without replacement)Probability without replacement questionsBalls with and without replacementPicking balls blindfolded without replacementProbability of drawing balls without replacement in first and last drawAre expectation of with replacement and without replacement same? When?Choosing one type of ball without replacement.Drawing Balls Without Replacement
What causes standard door hinges to close up to a certain amount automatically?
short story about mars colony vote influenced by French sounding song
Can I use I2C over 2m cables?
A variant of the Shortest Path Problem
Multiple stock symbols for same company with in USA
Dedicated solver for convex problems
Paper accepted at a probably predatory conference, how shall I proceed?
Change computer name Ubuntu
5v home network
Is sleeping on the ground in cold weather better than on an air mattress?
Based on true story rules
An employee has low self-confidence, and is performing poorly. How can I help?
Is there a practical way of making democratic-like system skewed towards competence?
Why is matter-antimatter asymmetry surprising, if asymmetry can be generated by a random walk in which particles go into black holes?
What is joint estimation?
How to handle shared mortgage payment if one person can't pay their share?
Is it possible to do a low carb diet for a month in Sicily?
What can I do to avoid potential charges for bribery?
Are there any privately owned large commercial airports?
Does these arithmetic means on Pythagorean triangles converge?
How can I make "acts of patience" exciting?
Why did Batman design Robin's suit with only the underwear without pants?
Drawing Super Mario Bros.....in LaTeX
Is there an engine that finds the best "practical" move?
Drawing without replacement: why is the order of draw irrelevant?
Need Explanation with Probability Problem from textbookA question regarding drawing balls of differing colors from an urn before a certain number of draws occur without replacement.3 balls drawn from 1 urn - probability all same color (with/without replacement)Probability without replacement questionsBalls with and without replacementPicking balls blindfolded without replacementProbability of drawing balls without replacement in first and last drawAre expectation of with replacement and without replacement same? When?Choosing one type of ball without replacement.Drawing Balls Without Replacement
.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty
margin-bottom:0;
.everyonelovesstackoverflowposition:absolute;height:1px;width:1px;opacity:0;top:0;left:0;pointer-events:none;
$begingroup$
I am trying to wrap my head around this problem:
Daniel randomly chooses balls from the group of $6$ red and $4$ green. What is the probability that he picks $2$ red and $3$ green if balls are drawn without replacement.
What I remember from my college days that the probability is found by this formula:
$$P(A)=fracbinom62binom43binom105=frac521$$
Is this correct? I am trying to understand why this works. Wouldn't probability depend on the order of balls drawn as the number of balls is changing after each draw? I get how we obtain numerator and denominator, I just feel that the probability should be dependent on the order. For example, the probability to pick red first is $frac610$ so the probability for the second draw becomes $frac59$ for red and $frac49$ for green. But if the first picked ball is green, the probability for the second draw becomes $frac69$ for red and $frac39$ for green. What am I missing?
probability probability-theory
$endgroup$
add a comment
|
$begingroup$
I am trying to wrap my head around this problem:
Daniel randomly chooses balls from the group of $6$ red and $4$ green. What is the probability that he picks $2$ red and $3$ green if balls are drawn without replacement.
What I remember from my college days that the probability is found by this formula:
$$P(A)=fracbinom62binom43binom105=frac521$$
Is this correct? I am trying to understand why this works. Wouldn't probability depend on the order of balls drawn as the number of balls is changing after each draw? I get how we obtain numerator and denominator, I just feel that the probability should be dependent on the order. For example, the probability to pick red first is $frac610$ so the probability for the second draw becomes $frac59$ for red and $frac49$ for green. But if the first picked ball is green, the probability for the second draw becomes $frac69$ for red and $frac39$ for green. What am I missing?
probability probability-theory
$endgroup$
1
$begingroup$
Usually the "nominator" is called numerator.
$endgroup$
– callculus
Apr 18 at 12:12
$begingroup$
@callculus: yes, of, course, I need coffee :)
$endgroup$
– Vasya
Apr 18 at 12:20
2
$begingroup$
The order doesn't matter because $P(A)$ is ultimately the sum of various conditional probabilities, and addition is both commutative and associative.
$endgroup$
– chepner
Apr 18 at 14:04
add a comment
|
$begingroup$
I am trying to wrap my head around this problem:
Daniel randomly chooses balls from the group of $6$ red and $4$ green. What is the probability that he picks $2$ red and $3$ green if balls are drawn without replacement.
What I remember from my college days that the probability is found by this formula:
$$P(A)=fracbinom62binom43binom105=frac521$$
Is this correct? I am trying to understand why this works. Wouldn't probability depend on the order of balls drawn as the number of balls is changing after each draw? I get how we obtain numerator and denominator, I just feel that the probability should be dependent on the order. For example, the probability to pick red first is $frac610$ so the probability for the second draw becomes $frac59$ for red and $frac49$ for green. But if the first picked ball is green, the probability for the second draw becomes $frac69$ for red and $frac39$ for green. What am I missing?
probability probability-theory
$endgroup$
I am trying to wrap my head around this problem:
Daniel randomly chooses balls from the group of $6$ red and $4$ green. What is the probability that he picks $2$ red and $3$ green if balls are drawn without replacement.
What I remember from my college days that the probability is found by this formula:
$$P(A)=fracbinom62binom43binom105=frac521$$
Is this correct? I am trying to understand why this works. Wouldn't probability depend on the order of balls drawn as the number of balls is changing after each draw? I get how we obtain numerator and denominator, I just feel that the probability should be dependent on the order. For example, the probability to pick red first is $frac610$ so the probability for the second draw becomes $frac59$ for red and $frac49$ for green. But if the first picked ball is green, the probability for the second draw becomes $frac69$ for red and $frac39$ for green. What am I missing?
probability probability-theory
probability probability-theory
edited Apr 18 at 22:10
JeffC
1053 bronze badges
1053 bronze badges
asked Apr 18 at 12:05
VasyaVasya
5,3571 gold badge8 silver badges19 bronze badges
5,3571 gold badge8 silver badges19 bronze badges
1
$begingroup$
Usually the "nominator" is called numerator.
$endgroup$
– callculus
Apr 18 at 12:12
$begingroup$
@callculus: yes, of, course, I need coffee :)
$endgroup$
– Vasya
Apr 18 at 12:20
2
$begingroup$
The order doesn't matter because $P(A)$ is ultimately the sum of various conditional probabilities, and addition is both commutative and associative.
$endgroup$
– chepner
Apr 18 at 14:04
add a comment
|
1
$begingroup$
Usually the "nominator" is called numerator.
$endgroup$
– callculus
Apr 18 at 12:12
$begingroup$
@callculus: yes, of, course, I need coffee :)
$endgroup$
– Vasya
Apr 18 at 12:20
2
$begingroup$
The order doesn't matter because $P(A)$ is ultimately the sum of various conditional probabilities, and addition is both commutative and associative.
$endgroup$
– chepner
Apr 18 at 14:04
1
1
$begingroup$
Usually the "nominator" is called numerator.
$endgroup$
– callculus
Apr 18 at 12:12
$begingroup$
Usually the "nominator" is called numerator.
$endgroup$
– callculus
Apr 18 at 12:12
$begingroup$
@callculus: yes, of, course, I need coffee :)
$endgroup$
– Vasya
Apr 18 at 12:20
$begingroup$
@callculus: yes, of, course, I need coffee :)
$endgroup$
– Vasya
Apr 18 at 12:20
2
2
$begingroup$
The order doesn't matter because $P(A)$ is ultimately the sum of various conditional probabilities, and addition is both commutative and associative.
$endgroup$
– chepner
Apr 18 at 14:04
$begingroup$
The order doesn't matter because $P(A)$ is ultimately the sum of various conditional probabilities, and addition is both commutative and associative.
$endgroup$
– chepner
Apr 18 at 14:04
add a comment
|
4 Answers
4
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
If you took into consideration the order, you would get the same result but the calculation would be a bit more difficult:
- all possible sequences of $5$ balls respecting order (as if they were distinguishable): $10cdot 9cdot 8cdot 7 cdot 6$
- all possible selections of $colorred2$ out of $colorred6$ red balls: $colorredbinom62$
- all possible selections of $colorgreen3$ out of $colorgreen4$ green balls: $colorgreenbinom43$
- all possible arrangements of the selected $colorred2+colorgreen3$ balls: $5!$
All together
$$fraccolorredbinom62cdot colorgreenbinom43 cdot 5!10cdot 9cdot 8cdot 7 cdot 6 = fraccolorredbinom62cdot colorgreenbinom43frac10!5!cdot 5!= frac521$$
$endgroup$
add a comment
|
$begingroup$
The probability of picking a red ball first and then a green ball is
$$ frac610 cdot frac49 $$
The probability of picking a green ball first and then a red ball is
$$ frac410 cdot frac69 $$
Notice that the numbers in the denominator are the same, while the numbers in
the numerator are the same but in reverse order? Multiplication is commutative.
Another way of looking at this: we don't care about the process you go through in picking the balls, as long as it is fair: each possible outcome (i.e. each possible subset of
$5$ of the $10$ balls, where we consider the balls as in principle distinguishable) has the same probability. If this is the case, you just need to count the number of
outcomes that belong to the event you're considering, and divide by the total number of
outcomes.
$endgroup$
1
$begingroup$
Thank you for the explanation, as I started writing it down I came to the same conclusion but it's very helpful to see the problem from a different perspective!
$endgroup$
– Vasya
Apr 18 at 12:25
add a comment
|
$begingroup$
You can comprehend the calculation in a simpler way with smaller numbers.
Daniel randomly chooses balls from the group of $3$ red and $2$ green. What
is the probability that he picks $2$ red and $2$ green if balls are drawn
without replacement.
Indeed we have to regard the order. There are $frac4!2!cdot 2!=6$ ways to draw 2 red and 2 green balls:
$$colorgreengcolorgreengcolorredrcolorredr, colorgreengcolorredrcolorgreengcolorredr, colorgreengcolorredrcolorredrcolorgreeng, colorredrcolorgreengcolorgreengcolorredr, colorredrcolorgreengcolorredrcolorgreeng, colorredrcolorredrcolorgreengcolorgreeng$$
Each way has the same probability: $frac35cdot frac24cdot frac23cdot frac12 quad (ggrr)$
Multiplying with 6 (ways) we get $6cdot frac35cdot frac24cdot frac23cdot frac12=frac35=0.6 $
Using binomial coefficients we get $fracbinom32cdot binom22binom54=frac3cdot 15=frac35=0.6$
And we get the same result.
$endgroup$
add a comment
|
$begingroup$
There is a principle called "conservation of expected evidence" that says that if you have events A and B, then when you calculate the probability of A without knowing whether B happens, the result should be the same as the expected value of the probability over the possible results of B.
In this case, let A be the probability that the second ball is red, and B be the probability the first one is green. The principle says that P(A) = P(A|B)P(B)+P(A|~B)P(~B). That is, if you split A into two cases of A and B versus A and not B, the total probability should just be the probability of A. If you roll a die and flip a coin, the probability of getting a 1 one the die should change if you split it into P(die=1,coin=heads) plus P(die=1,coin=tails).
We have the following values for those probabilities:
P(A) = $frac610$
P(A|B) = $frac5 9 $
P(B) = $frac610$
P(A|~B) = $frac 6 9 $
P(~B) = $frac 4 10$
So the equation is $frac610 = frac5 9 frac610+frac 6 9 frac 4 10=frac30+249*10 = frac549*10=frac9*69*10=frac 6 10$
If you have ten cards, 6 red and 4 green, and you shuffle them, would the probability of the first one being red be any different from the probability of the second one being red?
$endgroup$
add a comment
|
Your Answer
StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);
else
createEditor();
);
function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader:
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/"u003ecc by-sa 4.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
,
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);
);
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3192310%2fdrawing-without-replacement-why-is-the-order-of-draw-irrelevant%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
4 Answers
4
active
oldest
votes
4 Answers
4
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
If you took into consideration the order, you would get the same result but the calculation would be a bit more difficult:
- all possible sequences of $5$ balls respecting order (as if they were distinguishable): $10cdot 9cdot 8cdot 7 cdot 6$
- all possible selections of $colorred2$ out of $colorred6$ red balls: $colorredbinom62$
- all possible selections of $colorgreen3$ out of $colorgreen4$ green balls: $colorgreenbinom43$
- all possible arrangements of the selected $colorred2+colorgreen3$ balls: $5!$
All together
$$fraccolorredbinom62cdot colorgreenbinom43 cdot 5!10cdot 9cdot 8cdot 7 cdot 6 = fraccolorredbinom62cdot colorgreenbinom43frac10!5!cdot 5!= frac521$$
$endgroup$
add a comment
|
$begingroup$
If you took into consideration the order, you would get the same result but the calculation would be a bit more difficult:
- all possible sequences of $5$ balls respecting order (as if they were distinguishable): $10cdot 9cdot 8cdot 7 cdot 6$
- all possible selections of $colorred2$ out of $colorred6$ red balls: $colorredbinom62$
- all possible selections of $colorgreen3$ out of $colorgreen4$ green balls: $colorgreenbinom43$
- all possible arrangements of the selected $colorred2+colorgreen3$ balls: $5!$
All together
$$fraccolorredbinom62cdot colorgreenbinom43 cdot 5!10cdot 9cdot 8cdot 7 cdot 6 = fraccolorredbinom62cdot colorgreenbinom43frac10!5!cdot 5!= frac521$$
$endgroup$
add a comment
|
$begingroup$
If you took into consideration the order, you would get the same result but the calculation would be a bit more difficult:
- all possible sequences of $5$ balls respecting order (as if they were distinguishable): $10cdot 9cdot 8cdot 7 cdot 6$
- all possible selections of $colorred2$ out of $colorred6$ red balls: $colorredbinom62$
- all possible selections of $colorgreen3$ out of $colorgreen4$ green balls: $colorgreenbinom43$
- all possible arrangements of the selected $colorred2+colorgreen3$ balls: $5!$
All together
$$fraccolorredbinom62cdot colorgreenbinom43 cdot 5!10cdot 9cdot 8cdot 7 cdot 6 = fraccolorredbinom62cdot colorgreenbinom43frac10!5!cdot 5!= frac521$$
$endgroup$
If you took into consideration the order, you would get the same result but the calculation would be a bit more difficult:
- all possible sequences of $5$ balls respecting order (as if they were distinguishable): $10cdot 9cdot 8cdot 7 cdot 6$
- all possible selections of $colorred2$ out of $colorred6$ red balls: $colorredbinom62$
- all possible selections of $colorgreen3$ out of $colorgreen4$ green balls: $colorgreenbinom43$
- all possible arrangements of the selected $colorred2+colorgreen3$ balls: $5!$
All together
$$fraccolorredbinom62cdot colorgreenbinom43 cdot 5!10cdot 9cdot 8cdot 7 cdot 6 = fraccolorredbinom62cdot colorgreenbinom43frac10!5!cdot 5!= frac521$$
answered Apr 18 at 12:22
trancelocationtrancelocation
17.4k1 gold badge11 silver badges30 bronze badges
17.4k1 gold badge11 silver badges30 bronze badges
add a comment
|
add a comment
|
$begingroup$
The probability of picking a red ball first and then a green ball is
$$ frac610 cdot frac49 $$
The probability of picking a green ball first and then a red ball is
$$ frac410 cdot frac69 $$
Notice that the numbers in the denominator are the same, while the numbers in
the numerator are the same but in reverse order? Multiplication is commutative.
Another way of looking at this: we don't care about the process you go through in picking the balls, as long as it is fair: each possible outcome (i.e. each possible subset of
$5$ of the $10$ balls, where we consider the balls as in principle distinguishable) has the same probability. If this is the case, you just need to count the number of
outcomes that belong to the event you're considering, and divide by the total number of
outcomes.
$endgroup$
1
$begingroup$
Thank you for the explanation, as I started writing it down I came to the same conclusion but it's very helpful to see the problem from a different perspective!
$endgroup$
– Vasya
Apr 18 at 12:25
add a comment
|
$begingroup$
The probability of picking a red ball first and then a green ball is
$$ frac610 cdot frac49 $$
The probability of picking a green ball first and then a red ball is
$$ frac410 cdot frac69 $$
Notice that the numbers in the denominator are the same, while the numbers in
the numerator are the same but in reverse order? Multiplication is commutative.
Another way of looking at this: we don't care about the process you go through in picking the balls, as long as it is fair: each possible outcome (i.e. each possible subset of
$5$ of the $10$ balls, where we consider the balls as in principle distinguishable) has the same probability. If this is the case, you just need to count the number of
outcomes that belong to the event you're considering, and divide by the total number of
outcomes.
$endgroup$
1
$begingroup$
Thank you for the explanation, as I started writing it down I came to the same conclusion but it's very helpful to see the problem from a different perspective!
$endgroup$
– Vasya
Apr 18 at 12:25
add a comment
|
$begingroup$
The probability of picking a red ball first and then a green ball is
$$ frac610 cdot frac49 $$
The probability of picking a green ball first and then a red ball is
$$ frac410 cdot frac69 $$
Notice that the numbers in the denominator are the same, while the numbers in
the numerator are the same but in reverse order? Multiplication is commutative.
Another way of looking at this: we don't care about the process you go through in picking the balls, as long as it is fair: each possible outcome (i.e. each possible subset of
$5$ of the $10$ balls, where we consider the balls as in principle distinguishable) has the same probability. If this is the case, you just need to count the number of
outcomes that belong to the event you're considering, and divide by the total number of
outcomes.
$endgroup$
The probability of picking a red ball first and then a green ball is
$$ frac610 cdot frac49 $$
The probability of picking a green ball first and then a red ball is
$$ frac410 cdot frac69 $$
Notice that the numbers in the denominator are the same, while the numbers in
the numerator are the same but in reverse order? Multiplication is commutative.
Another way of looking at this: we don't care about the process you go through in picking the balls, as long as it is fair: each possible outcome (i.e. each possible subset of
$5$ of the $10$ balls, where we consider the balls as in principle distinguishable) has the same probability. If this is the case, you just need to count the number of
outcomes that belong to the event you're considering, and divide by the total number of
outcomes.
answered Apr 18 at 12:20
Robert IsraelRobert Israel
348k23 gold badges242 silver badges507 bronze badges
348k23 gold badges242 silver badges507 bronze badges
1
$begingroup$
Thank you for the explanation, as I started writing it down I came to the same conclusion but it's very helpful to see the problem from a different perspective!
$endgroup$
– Vasya
Apr 18 at 12:25
add a comment
|
1
$begingroup$
Thank you for the explanation, as I started writing it down I came to the same conclusion but it's very helpful to see the problem from a different perspective!
$endgroup$
– Vasya
Apr 18 at 12:25
1
1
$begingroup$
Thank you for the explanation, as I started writing it down I came to the same conclusion but it's very helpful to see the problem from a different perspective!
$endgroup$
– Vasya
Apr 18 at 12:25
$begingroup$
Thank you for the explanation, as I started writing it down I came to the same conclusion but it's very helpful to see the problem from a different perspective!
$endgroup$
– Vasya
Apr 18 at 12:25
add a comment
|
$begingroup$
You can comprehend the calculation in a simpler way with smaller numbers.
Daniel randomly chooses balls from the group of $3$ red and $2$ green. What
is the probability that he picks $2$ red and $2$ green if balls are drawn
without replacement.
Indeed we have to regard the order. There are $frac4!2!cdot 2!=6$ ways to draw 2 red and 2 green balls:
$$colorgreengcolorgreengcolorredrcolorredr, colorgreengcolorredrcolorgreengcolorredr, colorgreengcolorredrcolorredrcolorgreeng, colorredrcolorgreengcolorgreengcolorredr, colorredrcolorgreengcolorredrcolorgreeng, colorredrcolorredrcolorgreengcolorgreeng$$
Each way has the same probability: $frac35cdot frac24cdot frac23cdot frac12 quad (ggrr)$
Multiplying with 6 (ways) we get $6cdot frac35cdot frac24cdot frac23cdot frac12=frac35=0.6 $
Using binomial coefficients we get $fracbinom32cdot binom22binom54=frac3cdot 15=frac35=0.6$
And we get the same result.
$endgroup$
add a comment
|
$begingroup$
You can comprehend the calculation in a simpler way with smaller numbers.
Daniel randomly chooses balls from the group of $3$ red and $2$ green. What
is the probability that he picks $2$ red and $2$ green if balls are drawn
without replacement.
Indeed we have to regard the order. There are $frac4!2!cdot 2!=6$ ways to draw 2 red and 2 green balls:
$$colorgreengcolorgreengcolorredrcolorredr, colorgreengcolorredrcolorgreengcolorredr, colorgreengcolorredrcolorredrcolorgreeng, colorredrcolorgreengcolorgreengcolorredr, colorredrcolorgreengcolorredrcolorgreeng, colorredrcolorredrcolorgreengcolorgreeng$$
Each way has the same probability: $frac35cdot frac24cdot frac23cdot frac12 quad (ggrr)$
Multiplying with 6 (ways) we get $6cdot frac35cdot frac24cdot frac23cdot frac12=frac35=0.6 $
Using binomial coefficients we get $fracbinom32cdot binom22binom54=frac3cdot 15=frac35=0.6$
And we get the same result.
$endgroup$
add a comment
|
$begingroup$
You can comprehend the calculation in a simpler way with smaller numbers.
Daniel randomly chooses balls from the group of $3$ red and $2$ green. What
is the probability that he picks $2$ red and $2$ green if balls are drawn
without replacement.
Indeed we have to regard the order. There are $frac4!2!cdot 2!=6$ ways to draw 2 red and 2 green balls:
$$colorgreengcolorgreengcolorredrcolorredr, colorgreengcolorredrcolorgreengcolorredr, colorgreengcolorredrcolorredrcolorgreeng, colorredrcolorgreengcolorgreengcolorredr, colorredrcolorgreengcolorredrcolorgreeng, colorredrcolorredrcolorgreengcolorgreeng$$
Each way has the same probability: $frac35cdot frac24cdot frac23cdot frac12 quad (ggrr)$
Multiplying with 6 (ways) we get $6cdot frac35cdot frac24cdot frac23cdot frac12=frac35=0.6 $
Using binomial coefficients we get $fracbinom32cdot binom22binom54=frac3cdot 15=frac35=0.6$
And we get the same result.
$endgroup$
You can comprehend the calculation in a simpler way with smaller numbers.
Daniel randomly chooses balls from the group of $3$ red and $2$ green. What
is the probability that he picks $2$ red and $2$ green if balls are drawn
without replacement.
Indeed we have to regard the order. There are $frac4!2!cdot 2!=6$ ways to draw 2 red and 2 green balls:
$$colorgreengcolorgreengcolorredrcolorredr, colorgreengcolorredrcolorgreengcolorredr, colorgreengcolorredrcolorredrcolorgreeng, colorredrcolorgreengcolorgreengcolorredr, colorredrcolorgreengcolorredrcolorgreeng, colorredrcolorredrcolorgreengcolorgreeng$$
Each way has the same probability: $frac35cdot frac24cdot frac23cdot frac12 quad (ggrr)$
Multiplying with 6 (ways) we get $6cdot frac35cdot frac24cdot frac23cdot frac12=frac35=0.6 $
Using binomial coefficients we get $fracbinom32cdot binom22binom54=frac3cdot 15=frac35=0.6$
And we get the same result.
edited Apr 18 at 12:35
answered Apr 18 at 12:30
callculuscallculus
20.7k4 gold badges17 silver badges32 bronze badges
20.7k4 gold badges17 silver badges32 bronze badges
add a comment
|
add a comment
|
$begingroup$
There is a principle called "conservation of expected evidence" that says that if you have events A and B, then when you calculate the probability of A without knowing whether B happens, the result should be the same as the expected value of the probability over the possible results of B.
In this case, let A be the probability that the second ball is red, and B be the probability the first one is green. The principle says that P(A) = P(A|B)P(B)+P(A|~B)P(~B). That is, if you split A into two cases of A and B versus A and not B, the total probability should just be the probability of A. If you roll a die and flip a coin, the probability of getting a 1 one the die should change if you split it into P(die=1,coin=heads) plus P(die=1,coin=tails).
We have the following values for those probabilities:
P(A) = $frac610$
P(A|B) = $frac5 9 $
P(B) = $frac610$
P(A|~B) = $frac 6 9 $
P(~B) = $frac 4 10$
So the equation is $frac610 = frac5 9 frac610+frac 6 9 frac 4 10=frac30+249*10 = frac549*10=frac9*69*10=frac 6 10$
If you have ten cards, 6 red and 4 green, and you shuffle them, would the probability of the first one being red be any different from the probability of the second one being red?
$endgroup$
add a comment
|
$begingroup$
There is a principle called "conservation of expected evidence" that says that if you have events A and B, then when you calculate the probability of A without knowing whether B happens, the result should be the same as the expected value of the probability over the possible results of B.
In this case, let A be the probability that the second ball is red, and B be the probability the first one is green. The principle says that P(A) = P(A|B)P(B)+P(A|~B)P(~B). That is, if you split A into two cases of A and B versus A and not B, the total probability should just be the probability of A. If you roll a die and flip a coin, the probability of getting a 1 one the die should change if you split it into P(die=1,coin=heads) plus P(die=1,coin=tails).
We have the following values for those probabilities:
P(A) = $frac610$
P(A|B) = $frac5 9 $
P(B) = $frac610$
P(A|~B) = $frac 6 9 $
P(~B) = $frac 4 10$
So the equation is $frac610 = frac5 9 frac610+frac 6 9 frac 4 10=frac30+249*10 = frac549*10=frac9*69*10=frac 6 10$
If you have ten cards, 6 red and 4 green, and you shuffle them, would the probability of the first one being red be any different from the probability of the second one being red?
$endgroup$
add a comment
|
$begingroup$
There is a principle called "conservation of expected evidence" that says that if you have events A and B, then when you calculate the probability of A without knowing whether B happens, the result should be the same as the expected value of the probability over the possible results of B.
In this case, let A be the probability that the second ball is red, and B be the probability the first one is green. The principle says that P(A) = P(A|B)P(B)+P(A|~B)P(~B). That is, if you split A into two cases of A and B versus A and not B, the total probability should just be the probability of A. If you roll a die and flip a coin, the probability of getting a 1 one the die should change if you split it into P(die=1,coin=heads) plus P(die=1,coin=tails).
We have the following values for those probabilities:
P(A) = $frac610$
P(A|B) = $frac5 9 $
P(B) = $frac610$
P(A|~B) = $frac 6 9 $
P(~B) = $frac 4 10$
So the equation is $frac610 = frac5 9 frac610+frac 6 9 frac 4 10=frac30+249*10 = frac549*10=frac9*69*10=frac 6 10$
If you have ten cards, 6 red and 4 green, and you shuffle them, would the probability of the first one being red be any different from the probability of the second one being red?
$endgroup$
There is a principle called "conservation of expected evidence" that says that if you have events A and B, then when you calculate the probability of A without knowing whether B happens, the result should be the same as the expected value of the probability over the possible results of B.
In this case, let A be the probability that the second ball is red, and B be the probability the first one is green. The principle says that P(A) = P(A|B)P(B)+P(A|~B)P(~B). That is, if you split A into two cases of A and B versus A and not B, the total probability should just be the probability of A. If you roll a die and flip a coin, the probability of getting a 1 one the die should change if you split it into P(die=1,coin=heads) plus P(die=1,coin=tails).
We have the following values for those probabilities:
P(A) = $frac610$
P(A|B) = $frac5 9 $
P(B) = $frac610$
P(A|~B) = $frac 6 9 $
P(~B) = $frac 4 10$
So the equation is $frac610 = frac5 9 frac610+frac 6 9 frac 4 10=frac30+249*10 = frac549*10=frac9*69*10=frac 6 10$
If you have ten cards, 6 red and 4 green, and you shuffle them, would the probability of the first one being red be any different from the probability of the second one being red?
answered Apr 18 at 15:17
AcccumulationAcccumulation
8,1252 gold badges9 silver badges20 bronze badges
8,1252 gold badges9 silver badges20 bronze badges
add a comment
|
add a comment
|
Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3192310%2fdrawing-without-replacement-why-is-the-order-of-draw-irrelevant%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
1
$begingroup$
Usually the "nominator" is called numerator.
$endgroup$
– callculus
Apr 18 at 12:12
$begingroup$
@callculus: yes, of, course, I need coffee :)
$endgroup$
– Vasya
Apr 18 at 12:20
2
$begingroup$
The order doesn't matter because $P(A)$ is ultimately the sum of various conditional probabilities, and addition is both commutative and associative.
$endgroup$
– chepner
Apr 18 at 14:04