no sense/need/pointThe use of nearly similar words - Until and unless & each and everySome facial beauty standardsWhy is “alike” not possible in this sentence? (Choosing from: alike, similar to, exactly and just as)Why is it 'audience with', not 'audience of'?Another way of saying “to almost make something”Was vs Were - subjective or not?Reporting someones suggestionIs it correct to say “He was breaking his own record.” after ten minutes of victory?“Point out” vs “Mention”
Which culture used no personal names?
In the comics, have any of the Robins called their costume "target attraction" for villains?
Is there a push, in the United States, to use gender-neutral language and gender pronouns (when they are given)?
How can I turn on Adventure Sync?
How many records can an Apex Batch process
Is it now possible to undetectably cross the Arctic Ocean on ski/kayak?
How should i play this 4/4 measure with 4 quarter notes and 1 whole note in it
2 Guards, 3 Keys, 2 Locks
Is it possible to unmount a partition table?
How to create a vimrc macro using :sort?
A curious 5x5 square
How to plot two axis bar chart side by side
Neither Raman nor IR Active vibrational modes
What is this game with a red cricket pushing a ball?
What do you call a document which has no content?
How to give a rationality-inducing drug to an entire software company?
How can I learn to write better questions to test for conceptual understanding?
What does the British parliament hope to achieve by requesting a third Brexit extension?
I am often given, occasionally stolen, rarely sold, and never borrowed
What power does the UK parliament hold over a Prime Minister whom they refuse to remove from power?
Who can change WIP limit in DoW when urgent work emerges?
Does an excessive table violate normalization rules?
I got this nail stuck in my tire, should I plug or replace?
Can a Tundra Storm Herald Barbarian pre-emptively freeze the water of a Decanter of Endless Water?
no sense/need/point
The use of nearly similar words - Until and unless & each and everySome facial beauty standardsWhy is “alike” not possible in this sentence? (Choosing from: alike, similar to, exactly and just as)Why is it 'audience with', not 'audience of'?Another way of saying “to almost make something”Was vs Were - subjective or not?Reporting someones suggestionIs it correct to say “He was breaking his own record.” after ten minutes of victory?“Point out” vs “Mention”
.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty
margin-bottom:0;
As the first space flights lasted just a few minutes, there was no sense to carry food onboard.
As the first space flights lasted just a few minutes, there was no need to carry food onboard.
As the first space flights lasted just a few minutes, there was no point to carry food onboard.
Which one is correct and why? For my eyes and ears all are ok, but only one is supposed to be right.
word-choice
add a comment
|
As the first space flights lasted just a few minutes, there was no sense to carry food onboard.
As the first space flights lasted just a few minutes, there was no need to carry food onboard.
As the first space flights lasted just a few minutes, there was no point to carry food onboard.
Which one is correct and why? For my eyes and ears all are ok, but only one is supposed to be right.
word-choice
add a comment
|
As the first space flights lasted just a few minutes, there was no sense to carry food onboard.
As the first space flights lasted just a few minutes, there was no need to carry food onboard.
As the first space flights lasted just a few minutes, there was no point to carry food onboard.
Which one is correct and why? For my eyes and ears all are ok, but only one is supposed to be right.
word-choice
As the first space flights lasted just a few minutes, there was no sense to carry food onboard.
As the first space flights lasted just a few minutes, there was no need to carry food onboard.
As the first space flights lasted just a few minutes, there was no point to carry food onboard.
Which one is correct and why? For my eyes and ears all are ok, but only one is supposed to be right.
word-choice
word-choice
asked May 4 at 16:12
ziolekziolek
1298 bronze badges
1298 bronze badges
add a comment
|
add a comment
|
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
To my ears, no need and no point will both do, but they have different syntax:
no need to carry food on board.
but
no point in carrying food on board.
No sense is slightly different. It has the same syntax as ''no point'', but it implies that the action is foolish, rather than just unnecessary.
1
No sense has slightly different syntax: at least in my dialect, it's no sense carrying, without in.
– Anonymous
May 5 at 9:53
For me the in is optional with both point and sense.
– Colin Fine
May 5 at 15:37
add a comment
|
All three are fine, but mean somewhat different things, depending on what you want to say. If you intend something like:
The flights were so short that no one expected the astronauts would become hungry and have to eat
then "need" is correct, or synonyms such as require, necessitate, call for, or (one definition of) demand.
If instead you want to say:
The flights were so short that it would have been useless to bring food (since the astronauts did not have time to eat)
then "point" works, or synonyms such as reason.
Lastly if you want to say:
The flights were so short that it would have been unreasonable (i.e. nonsensical) to bring food (for whatever reason, such as the extra weight would have affected the ship's trajectory)
then "sense" works, or related synonyms such as value, logic, use or advantage.
Note that both "sense" and "point" are words that sounds better (at least to me) paired with the gerund rather than the infinitive:
As the first space flights lasted just a few minutes, there was no sense/point carrying food onboard.
add a comment
|
Your Answer
StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "481"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);
else
createEditor();
);
function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader:
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/"u003ecc by-sa 4.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
,
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);
);
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fell.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f209341%2fno-sense-need-point%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
To my ears, no need and no point will both do, but they have different syntax:
no need to carry food on board.
but
no point in carrying food on board.
No sense is slightly different. It has the same syntax as ''no point'', but it implies that the action is foolish, rather than just unnecessary.
1
No sense has slightly different syntax: at least in my dialect, it's no sense carrying, without in.
– Anonymous
May 5 at 9:53
For me the in is optional with both point and sense.
– Colin Fine
May 5 at 15:37
add a comment
|
To my ears, no need and no point will both do, but they have different syntax:
no need to carry food on board.
but
no point in carrying food on board.
No sense is slightly different. It has the same syntax as ''no point'', but it implies that the action is foolish, rather than just unnecessary.
1
No sense has slightly different syntax: at least in my dialect, it's no sense carrying, without in.
– Anonymous
May 5 at 9:53
For me the in is optional with both point and sense.
– Colin Fine
May 5 at 15:37
add a comment
|
To my ears, no need and no point will both do, but they have different syntax:
no need to carry food on board.
but
no point in carrying food on board.
No sense is slightly different. It has the same syntax as ''no point'', but it implies that the action is foolish, rather than just unnecessary.
To my ears, no need and no point will both do, but they have different syntax:
no need to carry food on board.
but
no point in carrying food on board.
No sense is slightly different. It has the same syntax as ''no point'', but it implies that the action is foolish, rather than just unnecessary.
answered May 4 at 16:18
Colin FineColin Fine
38.3k3 gold badges53 silver badges69 bronze badges
38.3k3 gold badges53 silver badges69 bronze badges
1
No sense has slightly different syntax: at least in my dialect, it's no sense carrying, without in.
– Anonymous
May 5 at 9:53
For me the in is optional with both point and sense.
– Colin Fine
May 5 at 15:37
add a comment
|
1
No sense has slightly different syntax: at least in my dialect, it's no sense carrying, without in.
– Anonymous
May 5 at 9:53
For me the in is optional with both point and sense.
– Colin Fine
May 5 at 15:37
1
1
No sense has slightly different syntax: at least in my dialect, it's no sense carrying, without in.
– Anonymous
May 5 at 9:53
No sense has slightly different syntax: at least in my dialect, it's no sense carrying, without in.
– Anonymous
May 5 at 9:53
For me the in is optional with both point and sense.
– Colin Fine
May 5 at 15:37
For me the in is optional with both point and sense.
– Colin Fine
May 5 at 15:37
add a comment
|
All three are fine, but mean somewhat different things, depending on what you want to say. If you intend something like:
The flights were so short that no one expected the astronauts would become hungry and have to eat
then "need" is correct, or synonyms such as require, necessitate, call for, or (one definition of) demand.
If instead you want to say:
The flights were so short that it would have been useless to bring food (since the astronauts did not have time to eat)
then "point" works, or synonyms such as reason.
Lastly if you want to say:
The flights were so short that it would have been unreasonable (i.e. nonsensical) to bring food (for whatever reason, such as the extra weight would have affected the ship's trajectory)
then "sense" works, or related synonyms such as value, logic, use or advantage.
Note that both "sense" and "point" are words that sounds better (at least to me) paired with the gerund rather than the infinitive:
As the first space flights lasted just a few minutes, there was no sense/point carrying food onboard.
add a comment
|
All three are fine, but mean somewhat different things, depending on what you want to say. If you intend something like:
The flights were so short that no one expected the astronauts would become hungry and have to eat
then "need" is correct, or synonyms such as require, necessitate, call for, or (one definition of) demand.
If instead you want to say:
The flights were so short that it would have been useless to bring food (since the astronauts did not have time to eat)
then "point" works, or synonyms such as reason.
Lastly if you want to say:
The flights were so short that it would have been unreasonable (i.e. nonsensical) to bring food (for whatever reason, such as the extra weight would have affected the ship's trajectory)
then "sense" works, or related synonyms such as value, logic, use or advantage.
Note that both "sense" and "point" are words that sounds better (at least to me) paired with the gerund rather than the infinitive:
As the first space flights lasted just a few minutes, there was no sense/point carrying food onboard.
add a comment
|
All three are fine, but mean somewhat different things, depending on what you want to say. If you intend something like:
The flights were so short that no one expected the astronauts would become hungry and have to eat
then "need" is correct, or synonyms such as require, necessitate, call for, or (one definition of) demand.
If instead you want to say:
The flights were so short that it would have been useless to bring food (since the astronauts did not have time to eat)
then "point" works, or synonyms such as reason.
Lastly if you want to say:
The flights were so short that it would have been unreasonable (i.e. nonsensical) to bring food (for whatever reason, such as the extra weight would have affected the ship's trajectory)
then "sense" works, or related synonyms such as value, logic, use or advantage.
Note that both "sense" and "point" are words that sounds better (at least to me) paired with the gerund rather than the infinitive:
As the first space flights lasted just a few minutes, there was no sense/point carrying food onboard.
All three are fine, but mean somewhat different things, depending on what you want to say. If you intend something like:
The flights were so short that no one expected the astronauts would become hungry and have to eat
then "need" is correct, or synonyms such as require, necessitate, call for, or (one definition of) demand.
If instead you want to say:
The flights were so short that it would have been useless to bring food (since the astronauts did not have time to eat)
then "point" works, or synonyms such as reason.
Lastly if you want to say:
The flights were so short that it would have been unreasonable (i.e. nonsensical) to bring food (for whatever reason, such as the extra weight would have affected the ship's trajectory)
then "sense" works, or related synonyms such as value, logic, use or advantage.
Note that both "sense" and "point" are words that sounds better (at least to me) paired with the gerund rather than the infinitive:
As the first space flights lasted just a few minutes, there was no sense/point carrying food onboard.
answered May 4 at 16:36
AndrewAndrew
83.6k6 gold badges90 silver badges177 bronze badges
83.6k6 gold badges90 silver badges177 bronze badges
add a comment
|
add a comment
|
Thanks for contributing an answer to English Language Learners Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fell.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f209341%2fno-sense-need-point%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown