The locus of polynomials with specified root multiplicitiesEntire function interpolation with control over multiplicities/derivativesPolynomials having a common root with their derivativesStability of real polynomials with positive coefficients$pm1$-polynomials with a maximal non-real rootPolynomials with more than one common rootPolynomials with all but one root inside the unit discPolynomials with no multiple root

The locus of polynomials with specified root multiplicities


Entire function interpolation with control over multiplicities/derivativesPolynomials having a common root with their derivativesStability of real polynomials with positive coefficients$pm1$-polynomials with a maximal non-real rootPolynomials with more than one common rootPolynomials with all but one root inside the unit discPolynomials with no multiple root













9















$begingroup$


Let $mathcalP_dcongmathbbA^d$ denote the set of monic degree $d$ polynomials defined over an algebraically closed field of characteristic $0$, where we identify $f(x)$ with its coefficients. The multiplicities of the roots of $f(x)inmathcalP_d$ defines a partition $pi(f)$ of $d$. For example, if $f(x)=(x-alpha)^d$, then $pi(f)=(d)$, and if $f(x)$ has distinct roots, then $pi(f)=(1^d)$.



For any partition $sigma$ of $d$, the set
$$ mathcalP_d(sigma) := bigl finmathcalP_d : pi(f)=sigmabigr $$
is a quasiprojective subvariety of $mathbbA^d$. (This follows from elimination theory.) For example, $mathcalP_d(d)$ is a curve, while $mathcalP_d(1^d-2,2)$ is an open subset of the discriminant locus $biglfinmathcalP_d:operatornameDisc(f)=0bigr$.



  • Do these varieties $mathcalP_d(sigma)$ have a name? My best guess was discriminantal variety, but that term does not seem to be in use.


  • Where have these varieties been studied? Specific references would be appreciated.










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$










  • 1




    $begingroup$
    I may update this later when I'm in front of a computer, but I believe the name you're looking for is coincident root loci. There is quite a bit of literature on these that goes back at least to Cayley's work.
    $endgroup$
    – Gjergji Zaimi
    Sep 29 at 17:12






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    @GjergjiZaimi Thanks. A very logical name that I would not have been able to guess. MathSciNet has 5 articles from the 2000s with "coincident root loci" in the title, and from those I'll be able to locate further material. I'm not surprised they've been studied for a long time. If you want to turn your comment into an answer, I'll be happy to accept it.
    $endgroup$
    – Joe Silverman
    Sep 29 at 18:54






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    The term discriminantral variety has already been used by Gelfand, Kapranov, Zelevinski in their book "Discriminants, resultants and multidimensional determinants"
    $endgroup$
    – James Silipo
    Sep 30 at 5:24
















9















$begingroup$


Let $mathcalP_dcongmathbbA^d$ denote the set of monic degree $d$ polynomials defined over an algebraically closed field of characteristic $0$, where we identify $f(x)$ with its coefficients. The multiplicities of the roots of $f(x)inmathcalP_d$ defines a partition $pi(f)$ of $d$. For example, if $f(x)=(x-alpha)^d$, then $pi(f)=(d)$, and if $f(x)$ has distinct roots, then $pi(f)=(1^d)$.



For any partition $sigma$ of $d$, the set
$$ mathcalP_d(sigma) := bigl finmathcalP_d : pi(f)=sigmabigr $$
is a quasiprojective subvariety of $mathbbA^d$. (This follows from elimination theory.) For example, $mathcalP_d(d)$ is a curve, while $mathcalP_d(1^d-2,2)$ is an open subset of the discriminant locus $biglfinmathcalP_d:operatornameDisc(f)=0bigr$.



  • Do these varieties $mathcalP_d(sigma)$ have a name? My best guess was discriminantal variety, but that term does not seem to be in use.


  • Where have these varieties been studied? Specific references would be appreciated.










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$










  • 1




    $begingroup$
    I may update this later when I'm in front of a computer, but I believe the name you're looking for is coincident root loci. There is quite a bit of literature on these that goes back at least to Cayley's work.
    $endgroup$
    – Gjergji Zaimi
    Sep 29 at 17:12






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    @GjergjiZaimi Thanks. A very logical name that I would not have been able to guess. MathSciNet has 5 articles from the 2000s with "coincident root loci" in the title, and from those I'll be able to locate further material. I'm not surprised they've been studied for a long time. If you want to turn your comment into an answer, I'll be happy to accept it.
    $endgroup$
    – Joe Silverman
    Sep 29 at 18:54






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    The term discriminantral variety has already been used by Gelfand, Kapranov, Zelevinski in their book "Discriminants, resultants and multidimensional determinants"
    $endgroup$
    – James Silipo
    Sep 30 at 5:24














9













9









9


1



$begingroup$


Let $mathcalP_dcongmathbbA^d$ denote the set of monic degree $d$ polynomials defined over an algebraically closed field of characteristic $0$, where we identify $f(x)$ with its coefficients. The multiplicities of the roots of $f(x)inmathcalP_d$ defines a partition $pi(f)$ of $d$. For example, if $f(x)=(x-alpha)^d$, then $pi(f)=(d)$, and if $f(x)$ has distinct roots, then $pi(f)=(1^d)$.



For any partition $sigma$ of $d$, the set
$$ mathcalP_d(sigma) := bigl finmathcalP_d : pi(f)=sigmabigr $$
is a quasiprojective subvariety of $mathbbA^d$. (This follows from elimination theory.) For example, $mathcalP_d(d)$ is a curve, while $mathcalP_d(1^d-2,2)$ is an open subset of the discriminant locus $biglfinmathcalP_d:operatornameDisc(f)=0bigr$.



  • Do these varieties $mathcalP_d(sigma)$ have a name? My best guess was discriminantal variety, but that term does not seem to be in use.


  • Where have these varieties been studied? Specific references would be appreciated.










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$




Let $mathcalP_dcongmathbbA^d$ denote the set of monic degree $d$ polynomials defined over an algebraically closed field of characteristic $0$, where we identify $f(x)$ with its coefficients. The multiplicities of the roots of $f(x)inmathcalP_d$ defines a partition $pi(f)$ of $d$. For example, if $f(x)=(x-alpha)^d$, then $pi(f)=(d)$, and if $f(x)$ has distinct roots, then $pi(f)=(1^d)$.



For any partition $sigma$ of $d$, the set
$$ mathcalP_d(sigma) := bigl finmathcalP_d : pi(f)=sigmabigr $$
is a quasiprojective subvariety of $mathbbA^d$. (This follows from elimination theory.) For example, $mathcalP_d(d)$ is a curve, while $mathcalP_d(1^d-2,2)$ is an open subset of the discriminant locus $biglfinmathcalP_d:operatornameDisc(f)=0bigr$.



  • Do these varieties $mathcalP_d(sigma)$ have a name? My best guess was discriminantal variety, but that term does not seem to be in use.


  • Where have these varieties been studied? Specific references would be appreciated.







ag.algebraic-geometry ac.commutative-algebra polynomials






share|cite|improve this question















share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question








edited Sep 29 at 13:16







Joe Silverman

















asked Sep 29 at 12:51









Joe SilvermanJoe Silverman

34.6k1 gold badge97 silver badges173 bronze badges




34.6k1 gold badge97 silver badges173 bronze badges










  • 1




    $begingroup$
    I may update this later when I'm in front of a computer, but I believe the name you're looking for is coincident root loci. There is quite a bit of literature on these that goes back at least to Cayley's work.
    $endgroup$
    – Gjergji Zaimi
    Sep 29 at 17:12






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    @GjergjiZaimi Thanks. A very logical name that I would not have been able to guess. MathSciNet has 5 articles from the 2000s with "coincident root loci" in the title, and from those I'll be able to locate further material. I'm not surprised they've been studied for a long time. If you want to turn your comment into an answer, I'll be happy to accept it.
    $endgroup$
    – Joe Silverman
    Sep 29 at 18:54






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    The term discriminantral variety has already been used by Gelfand, Kapranov, Zelevinski in their book "Discriminants, resultants and multidimensional determinants"
    $endgroup$
    – James Silipo
    Sep 30 at 5:24













  • 1




    $begingroup$
    I may update this later when I'm in front of a computer, but I believe the name you're looking for is coincident root loci. There is quite a bit of literature on these that goes back at least to Cayley's work.
    $endgroup$
    – Gjergji Zaimi
    Sep 29 at 17:12






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    @GjergjiZaimi Thanks. A very logical name that I would not have been able to guess. MathSciNet has 5 articles from the 2000s with "coincident root loci" in the title, and from those I'll be able to locate further material. I'm not surprised they've been studied for a long time. If you want to turn your comment into an answer, I'll be happy to accept it.
    $endgroup$
    – Joe Silverman
    Sep 29 at 18:54






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    The term discriminantral variety has already been used by Gelfand, Kapranov, Zelevinski in their book "Discriminants, resultants and multidimensional determinants"
    $endgroup$
    – James Silipo
    Sep 30 at 5:24








1




1




$begingroup$
I may update this later when I'm in front of a computer, but I believe the name you're looking for is coincident root loci. There is quite a bit of literature on these that goes back at least to Cayley's work.
$endgroup$
– Gjergji Zaimi
Sep 29 at 17:12




$begingroup$
I may update this later when I'm in front of a computer, but I believe the name you're looking for is coincident root loci. There is quite a bit of literature on these that goes back at least to Cayley's work.
$endgroup$
– Gjergji Zaimi
Sep 29 at 17:12




1




1




$begingroup$
@GjergjiZaimi Thanks. A very logical name that I would not have been able to guess. MathSciNet has 5 articles from the 2000s with "coincident root loci" in the title, and from those I'll be able to locate further material. I'm not surprised they've been studied for a long time. If you want to turn your comment into an answer, I'll be happy to accept it.
$endgroup$
– Joe Silverman
Sep 29 at 18:54




$begingroup$
@GjergjiZaimi Thanks. A very logical name that I would not have been able to guess. MathSciNet has 5 articles from the 2000s with "coincident root loci" in the title, and from those I'll be able to locate further material. I'm not surprised they've been studied for a long time. If you want to turn your comment into an answer, I'll be happy to accept it.
$endgroup$
– Joe Silverman
Sep 29 at 18:54




1




1




$begingroup$
The term discriminantral variety has already been used by Gelfand, Kapranov, Zelevinski in their book "Discriminants, resultants and multidimensional determinants"
$endgroup$
– James Silipo
Sep 30 at 5:24





$begingroup$
The term discriminantral variety has already been used by Gelfand, Kapranov, Zelevinski in their book "Discriminants, resultants and multidimensional determinants"
$endgroup$
– James Silipo
Sep 30 at 5:24











1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes


















6

















$begingroup$

I may be wrong but I think "coincident root loci" mentioned in Gjergjji's comment was coined by my coauthor Jaydeep Chipalkatti. The ideals of such varieties are in general poorly understood.



For a general study see:



  1. J. Chipalkatti, "On equations defining Coincident Root loci", J. Algebra 267 (2003), no. 1, 246-271.

  2. J. Chipalkatti, "Invariant equations defining coincident root loci", Archiv der Math. 83 (2004), no. 5, 422-428.

  3. H. Lee and B. Sturmfels, "Duality of multiple root loci", J. Algebra 446 (2016), 499-526.

For particular cases, the following might be also of interest.



  1. A. Abdesselam and J. Chipalkatti, "Brill–Gordan loci, transvectants and an analogue of the Foulkes conjecture", Adv. Math. 208 (2007), no. 2, 491-520. It has a description of the ideal for a partition with two equal parts.

  2. A. Abdesselam and J. Chipalkatti, "The bipartite Brill-Gordan locus and angular momentum", Transformation Groups 11 (2006),
    no. 3, 341-370. It has a description of the ideal for a partition with two unequal parts.

  3. A. Abdesselam and J. Chipalkatti, "On Hilbert Covariants"
    Canadian J. Math. 66 (2014), no. 1, 3-30. It has several set-theoretic systems of equations for the varieties corresponding to rectangular partitions, and a conjecture about minimal degree of generators for the ideals. This is an $SL_2$ analogue/toy version of the Foulkes-Howe conjecture.

There is also work about these varieties from a topological point of view, e.g.,
F. Napolitano,
"On some topological invariants of algebraic functions associated to the Young stratification of polynomials"
Topology Appl. 134 (2003), no. 3, 189-201.



The relation to Hurwitz stacks is studied in: J. Bertin and M. Romagny,
"Champs de Hurwitz", Mémoires SMF, no. 125-126 (2011), 219 p. See also here for the arXiv version. The relevant result is Theorem 9.16 relating coincident root loci and Hurwitz stacks of cyclic coverings of $mathbbP^1$.



Also, an interesting geometric approach to these varieties is in: G. Katz "How tangents solve algebraic equations, or a remarkable geometry of discriminant varieties", Expositiones Math. 21 (2003),
no. 3, 219-261.



Of course, this is by no means an exhaustive bibliography. There are many references I left out in this short MO post.






share|cite|improve this answer












$endgroup$









  • 2




    $begingroup$
    I phrased my comment poorly. I only meant that people have looked at the varieties for a while, perhaps under different names. Thank you for this list of references!
    $endgroup$
    – Gjergji Zaimi
    Sep 29 at 20:08






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Thanks. I'd already found the articles by Chipalkatti after Gjergji told me the right search term. I like the terminology, but even more, I appreciate the references. For the history, Chipalkatti says in his article "We revisit an old problem in classical invariant theory...This problem is addressed for the first time (to my knowledge) by Arthur Cayley." I'll accept your answer, since you've so kindly provided a great list of entries into the literature, which is what I was seeking. Thanks.
    $endgroup$
    – Joe Silverman
    Sep 29 at 20:54










  • $begingroup$
    Thanks to both of you. BTW regarding 19th century references, indeed Cayley seems to be one of the first to systematically study these varieties. Also, Hilbert computed their degrees (formula and ref are recalled in JC's first paper above).
    $endgroup$
    – Abdelmalek Abdesselam
    Sep 29 at 20:57













Your Answer








StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "504"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);

else
createEditor();

);

function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader:
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/"u003ecc by-sa 4.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
,
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);



);














draft saved

draft discarded
















StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmathoverflow.net%2fquestions%2f342725%2fthe-locus-of-polynomials-with-specified-root-multiplicities%23new-answer', 'question_page');

);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown


























1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes








1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes









6

















$begingroup$

I may be wrong but I think "coincident root loci" mentioned in Gjergjji's comment was coined by my coauthor Jaydeep Chipalkatti. The ideals of such varieties are in general poorly understood.



For a general study see:



  1. J. Chipalkatti, "On equations defining Coincident Root loci", J. Algebra 267 (2003), no. 1, 246-271.

  2. J. Chipalkatti, "Invariant equations defining coincident root loci", Archiv der Math. 83 (2004), no. 5, 422-428.

  3. H. Lee and B. Sturmfels, "Duality of multiple root loci", J. Algebra 446 (2016), 499-526.

For particular cases, the following might be also of interest.



  1. A. Abdesselam and J. Chipalkatti, "Brill–Gordan loci, transvectants and an analogue of the Foulkes conjecture", Adv. Math. 208 (2007), no. 2, 491-520. It has a description of the ideal for a partition with two equal parts.

  2. A. Abdesselam and J. Chipalkatti, "The bipartite Brill-Gordan locus and angular momentum", Transformation Groups 11 (2006),
    no. 3, 341-370. It has a description of the ideal for a partition with two unequal parts.

  3. A. Abdesselam and J. Chipalkatti, "On Hilbert Covariants"
    Canadian J. Math. 66 (2014), no. 1, 3-30. It has several set-theoretic systems of equations for the varieties corresponding to rectangular partitions, and a conjecture about minimal degree of generators for the ideals. This is an $SL_2$ analogue/toy version of the Foulkes-Howe conjecture.

There is also work about these varieties from a topological point of view, e.g.,
F. Napolitano,
"On some topological invariants of algebraic functions associated to the Young stratification of polynomials"
Topology Appl. 134 (2003), no. 3, 189-201.



The relation to Hurwitz stacks is studied in: J. Bertin and M. Romagny,
"Champs de Hurwitz", Mémoires SMF, no. 125-126 (2011), 219 p. See also here for the arXiv version. The relevant result is Theorem 9.16 relating coincident root loci and Hurwitz stacks of cyclic coverings of $mathbbP^1$.



Also, an interesting geometric approach to these varieties is in: G. Katz "How tangents solve algebraic equations, or a remarkable geometry of discriminant varieties", Expositiones Math. 21 (2003),
no. 3, 219-261.



Of course, this is by no means an exhaustive bibliography. There are many references I left out in this short MO post.






share|cite|improve this answer












$endgroup$









  • 2




    $begingroup$
    I phrased my comment poorly. I only meant that people have looked at the varieties for a while, perhaps under different names. Thank you for this list of references!
    $endgroup$
    – Gjergji Zaimi
    Sep 29 at 20:08






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Thanks. I'd already found the articles by Chipalkatti after Gjergji told me the right search term. I like the terminology, but even more, I appreciate the references. For the history, Chipalkatti says in his article "We revisit an old problem in classical invariant theory...This problem is addressed for the first time (to my knowledge) by Arthur Cayley." I'll accept your answer, since you've so kindly provided a great list of entries into the literature, which is what I was seeking. Thanks.
    $endgroup$
    – Joe Silverman
    Sep 29 at 20:54










  • $begingroup$
    Thanks to both of you. BTW regarding 19th century references, indeed Cayley seems to be one of the first to systematically study these varieties. Also, Hilbert computed their degrees (formula and ref are recalled in JC's first paper above).
    $endgroup$
    – Abdelmalek Abdesselam
    Sep 29 at 20:57
















6

















$begingroup$

I may be wrong but I think "coincident root loci" mentioned in Gjergjji's comment was coined by my coauthor Jaydeep Chipalkatti. The ideals of such varieties are in general poorly understood.



For a general study see:



  1. J. Chipalkatti, "On equations defining Coincident Root loci", J. Algebra 267 (2003), no. 1, 246-271.

  2. J. Chipalkatti, "Invariant equations defining coincident root loci", Archiv der Math. 83 (2004), no. 5, 422-428.

  3. H. Lee and B. Sturmfels, "Duality of multiple root loci", J. Algebra 446 (2016), 499-526.

For particular cases, the following might be also of interest.



  1. A. Abdesselam and J. Chipalkatti, "Brill–Gordan loci, transvectants and an analogue of the Foulkes conjecture", Adv. Math. 208 (2007), no. 2, 491-520. It has a description of the ideal for a partition with two equal parts.

  2. A. Abdesselam and J. Chipalkatti, "The bipartite Brill-Gordan locus and angular momentum", Transformation Groups 11 (2006),
    no. 3, 341-370. It has a description of the ideal for a partition with two unequal parts.

  3. A. Abdesselam and J. Chipalkatti, "On Hilbert Covariants"
    Canadian J. Math. 66 (2014), no. 1, 3-30. It has several set-theoretic systems of equations for the varieties corresponding to rectangular partitions, and a conjecture about minimal degree of generators for the ideals. This is an $SL_2$ analogue/toy version of the Foulkes-Howe conjecture.

There is also work about these varieties from a topological point of view, e.g.,
F. Napolitano,
"On some topological invariants of algebraic functions associated to the Young stratification of polynomials"
Topology Appl. 134 (2003), no. 3, 189-201.



The relation to Hurwitz stacks is studied in: J. Bertin and M. Romagny,
"Champs de Hurwitz", Mémoires SMF, no. 125-126 (2011), 219 p. See also here for the arXiv version. The relevant result is Theorem 9.16 relating coincident root loci and Hurwitz stacks of cyclic coverings of $mathbbP^1$.



Also, an interesting geometric approach to these varieties is in: G. Katz "How tangents solve algebraic equations, or a remarkable geometry of discriminant varieties", Expositiones Math. 21 (2003),
no. 3, 219-261.



Of course, this is by no means an exhaustive bibliography. There are many references I left out in this short MO post.






share|cite|improve this answer












$endgroup$









  • 2




    $begingroup$
    I phrased my comment poorly. I only meant that people have looked at the varieties for a while, perhaps under different names. Thank you for this list of references!
    $endgroup$
    – Gjergji Zaimi
    Sep 29 at 20:08






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Thanks. I'd already found the articles by Chipalkatti after Gjergji told me the right search term. I like the terminology, but even more, I appreciate the references. For the history, Chipalkatti says in his article "We revisit an old problem in classical invariant theory...This problem is addressed for the first time (to my knowledge) by Arthur Cayley." I'll accept your answer, since you've so kindly provided a great list of entries into the literature, which is what I was seeking. Thanks.
    $endgroup$
    – Joe Silverman
    Sep 29 at 20:54










  • $begingroup$
    Thanks to both of you. BTW regarding 19th century references, indeed Cayley seems to be one of the first to systematically study these varieties. Also, Hilbert computed their degrees (formula and ref are recalled in JC's first paper above).
    $endgroup$
    – Abdelmalek Abdesselam
    Sep 29 at 20:57














6















6











6







$begingroup$

I may be wrong but I think "coincident root loci" mentioned in Gjergjji's comment was coined by my coauthor Jaydeep Chipalkatti. The ideals of such varieties are in general poorly understood.



For a general study see:



  1. J. Chipalkatti, "On equations defining Coincident Root loci", J. Algebra 267 (2003), no. 1, 246-271.

  2. J. Chipalkatti, "Invariant equations defining coincident root loci", Archiv der Math. 83 (2004), no. 5, 422-428.

  3. H. Lee and B. Sturmfels, "Duality of multiple root loci", J. Algebra 446 (2016), 499-526.

For particular cases, the following might be also of interest.



  1. A. Abdesselam and J. Chipalkatti, "Brill–Gordan loci, transvectants and an analogue of the Foulkes conjecture", Adv. Math. 208 (2007), no. 2, 491-520. It has a description of the ideal for a partition with two equal parts.

  2. A. Abdesselam and J. Chipalkatti, "The bipartite Brill-Gordan locus and angular momentum", Transformation Groups 11 (2006),
    no. 3, 341-370. It has a description of the ideal for a partition with two unequal parts.

  3. A. Abdesselam and J. Chipalkatti, "On Hilbert Covariants"
    Canadian J. Math. 66 (2014), no. 1, 3-30. It has several set-theoretic systems of equations for the varieties corresponding to rectangular partitions, and a conjecture about minimal degree of generators for the ideals. This is an $SL_2$ analogue/toy version of the Foulkes-Howe conjecture.

There is also work about these varieties from a topological point of view, e.g.,
F. Napolitano,
"On some topological invariants of algebraic functions associated to the Young stratification of polynomials"
Topology Appl. 134 (2003), no. 3, 189-201.



The relation to Hurwitz stacks is studied in: J. Bertin and M. Romagny,
"Champs de Hurwitz", Mémoires SMF, no. 125-126 (2011), 219 p. See also here for the arXiv version. The relevant result is Theorem 9.16 relating coincident root loci and Hurwitz stacks of cyclic coverings of $mathbbP^1$.



Also, an interesting geometric approach to these varieties is in: G. Katz "How tangents solve algebraic equations, or a remarkable geometry of discriminant varieties", Expositiones Math. 21 (2003),
no. 3, 219-261.



Of course, this is by no means an exhaustive bibliography. There are many references I left out in this short MO post.






share|cite|improve this answer












$endgroup$



I may be wrong but I think "coincident root loci" mentioned in Gjergjji's comment was coined by my coauthor Jaydeep Chipalkatti. The ideals of such varieties are in general poorly understood.



For a general study see:



  1. J. Chipalkatti, "On equations defining Coincident Root loci", J. Algebra 267 (2003), no. 1, 246-271.

  2. J. Chipalkatti, "Invariant equations defining coincident root loci", Archiv der Math. 83 (2004), no. 5, 422-428.

  3. H. Lee and B. Sturmfels, "Duality of multiple root loci", J. Algebra 446 (2016), 499-526.

For particular cases, the following might be also of interest.



  1. A. Abdesselam and J. Chipalkatti, "Brill–Gordan loci, transvectants and an analogue of the Foulkes conjecture", Adv. Math. 208 (2007), no. 2, 491-520. It has a description of the ideal for a partition with two equal parts.

  2. A. Abdesselam and J. Chipalkatti, "The bipartite Brill-Gordan locus and angular momentum", Transformation Groups 11 (2006),
    no. 3, 341-370. It has a description of the ideal for a partition with two unequal parts.

  3. A. Abdesselam and J. Chipalkatti, "On Hilbert Covariants"
    Canadian J. Math. 66 (2014), no. 1, 3-30. It has several set-theoretic systems of equations for the varieties corresponding to rectangular partitions, and a conjecture about minimal degree of generators for the ideals. This is an $SL_2$ analogue/toy version of the Foulkes-Howe conjecture.

There is also work about these varieties from a topological point of view, e.g.,
F. Napolitano,
"On some topological invariants of algebraic functions associated to the Young stratification of polynomials"
Topology Appl. 134 (2003), no. 3, 189-201.



The relation to Hurwitz stacks is studied in: J. Bertin and M. Romagny,
"Champs de Hurwitz", Mémoires SMF, no. 125-126 (2011), 219 p. See also here for the arXiv version. The relevant result is Theorem 9.16 relating coincident root loci and Hurwitz stacks of cyclic coverings of $mathbbP^1$.



Also, an interesting geometric approach to these varieties is in: G. Katz "How tangents solve algebraic equations, or a remarkable geometry of discriminant varieties", Expositiones Math. 21 (2003),
no. 3, 219-261.



Of course, this is by no means an exhaustive bibliography. There are many references I left out in this short MO post.







share|cite|improve this answer















share|cite|improve this answer




share|cite|improve this answer








edited Oct 1 at 13:34

























answered Sep 29 at 19:50









Abdelmalek AbdesselamAbdelmalek Abdesselam

13.2k1 gold badge30 silver badges81 bronze badges




13.2k1 gold badge30 silver badges81 bronze badges










  • 2




    $begingroup$
    I phrased my comment poorly. I only meant that people have looked at the varieties for a while, perhaps under different names. Thank you for this list of references!
    $endgroup$
    – Gjergji Zaimi
    Sep 29 at 20:08






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Thanks. I'd already found the articles by Chipalkatti after Gjergji told me the right search term. I like the terminology, but even more, I appreciate the references. For the history, Chipalkatti says in his article "We revisit an old problem in classical invariant theory...This problem is addressed for the first time (to my knowledge) by Arthur Cayley." I'll accept your answer, since you've so kindly provided a great list of entries into the literature, which is what I was seeking. Thanks.
    $endgroup$
    – Joe Silverman
    Sep 29 at 20:54










  • $begingroup$
    Thanks to both of you. BTW regarding 19th century references, indeed Cayley seems to be one of the first to systematically study these varieties. Also, Hilbert computed their degrees (formula and ref are recalled in JC's first paper above).
    $endgroup$
    – Abdelmalek Abdesselam
    Sep 29 at 20:57













  • 2




    $begingroup$
    I phrased my comment poorly. I only meant that people have looked at the varieties for a while, perhaps under different names. Thank you for this list of references!
    $endgroup$
    – Gjergji Zaimi
    Sep 29 at 20:08






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Thanks. I'd already found the articles by Chipalkatti after Gjergji told me the right search term. I like the terminology, but even more, I appreciate the references. For the history, Chipalkatti says in his article "We revisit an old problem in classical invariant theory...This problem is addressed for the first time (to my knowledge) by Arthur Cayley." I'll accept your answer, since you've so kindly provided a great list of entries into the literature, which is what I was seeking. Thanks.
    $endgroup$
    – Joe Silverman
    Sep 29 at 20:54










  • $begingroup$
    Thanks to both of you. BTW regarding 19th century references, indeed Cayley seems to be one of the first to systematically study these varieties. Also, Hilbert computed their degrees (formula and ref are recalled in JC's first paper above).
    $endgroup$
    – Abdelmalek Abdesselam
    Sep 29 at 20:57








2




2




$begingroup$
I phrased my comment poorly. I only meant that people have looked at the varieties for a while, perhaps under different names. Thank you for this list of references!
$endgroup$
– Gjergji Zaimi
Sep 29 at 20:08




$begingroup$
I phrased my comment poorly. I only meant that people have looked at the varieties for a while, perhaps under different names. Thank you for this list of references!
$endgroup$
– Gjergji Zaimi
Sep 29 at 20:08




1




1




$begingroup$
Thanks. I'd already found the articles by Chipalkatti after Gjergji told me the right search term. I like the terminology, but even more, I appreciate the references. For the history, Chipalkatti says in his article "We revisit an old problem in classical invariant theory...This problem is addressed for the first time (to my knowledge) by Arthur Cayley." I'll accept your answer, since you've so kindly provided a great list of entries into the literature, which is what I was seeking. Thanks.
$endgroup$
– Joe Silverman
Sep 29 at 20:54




$begingroup$
Thanks. I'd already found the articles by Chipalkatti after Gjergji told me the right search term. I like the terminology, but even more, I appreciate the references. For the history, Chipalkatti says in his article "We revisit an old problem in classical invariant theory...This problem is addressed for the first time (to my knowledge) by Arthur Cayley." I'll accept your answer, since you've so kindly provided a great list of entries into the literature, which is what I was seeking. Thanks.
$endgroup$
– Joe Silverman
Sep 29 at 20:54












$begingroup$
Thanks to both of you. BTW regarding 19th century references, indeed Cayley seems to be one of the first to systematically study these varieties. Also, Hilbert computed their degrees (formula and ref are recalled in JC's first paper above).
$endgroup$
– Abdelmalek Abdesselam
Sep 29 at 20:57





$begingroup$
Thanks to both of you. BTW regarding 19th century references, indeed Cayley seems to be one of the first to systematically study these varieties. Also, Hilbert computed their degrees (formula and ref are recalled in JC's first paper above).
$endgroup$
– Abdelmalek Abdesselam
Sep 29 at 20:57



















draft saved

draft discarded















































Thanks for contributing an answer to MathOverflow!


  • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

But avoid


  • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

  • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




draft saved


draft discarded














StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmathoverflow.net%2fquestions%2f342725%2fthe-locus-of-polynomials-with-specified-root-multiplicities%23new-answer', 'question_page');

);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown





















































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown

































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown









Popular posts from this blog

Tamil (spriik) Luke uk diar | Nawigatjuun

Align equal signs while including text over equalitiesAMS align: left aligned text/math plus multicolumn alignmentMultiple alignmentsAligning equations in multiple placesNumbering and aligning an equation with multiple columnsHow to align one equation with another multline equationUsing \ in environments inside the begintabularxNumber equations and preserving alignment of equal signsHow can I align equations to the left and to the right?Double equation alignment problem within align enviromentAligned within align: Why are they right-aligned?

Where does the image of a data connector as a sharp metal spike originate from?Where does the concept of infected people turning into zombies only after death originate from?Where does the motif of a reanimated human head originate?Where did the notion that Dragons could speak originate?Where does the archetypal image of the 'Grey' alien come from?Where did the suffix '-Man' originate?Where does the notion of being injured or killed by an illusion originate?Where did the term “sophont” originate?Where does the trope of magic spells being driven by advanced technology originate from?Where did the term “the living impaired” originate?